Does surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV cirrhotic patients improve treatment outcome mainly due to better clinical status at diagnosis?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C virus infection are a group at higher risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Conventional screening programs detect only few early hepatocellular carcinomas that are eligible for radical treatment. Our aim was to compare characteristics of patients, modality of treatment, and outcome in anti-HCV positive cirrhotics with hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed during follow-up, or incidentally. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-one hepatocellular carcinomas were consecutively diagnosed in cirrhotic anti-HCV patients from 1993-1998 among which 34 during biannual ultrasonographic-biochemical follow-up and the others incidentally. Child-Pugh's score, alpha-fetoprotein levels, uni- or multifocality of the tumor, and treatment and survival of the patients were then analyzed on the basis of modality of diagnosis. RESULTS: Surgical treatment was feasible only in a minority of patients. Radical and palliative treatment was more frequent among patients with HCC diagnosed during follow-up. Child-Pugh's score was lower in these patients, moreover their survival rate was better. Analysis of survival of patients treated with the same procedure and grouped by modality of diagnosis did not demonstrate any differences. Regression analysis showed that patients with a lower Child-Pugh's score, one nodule, with a tumor diagnosed during follow-up and who were treated had a better survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: In our population surveillance did not detect a higher percentage of curable HCC. Nevertheless the results of palliative treatment and of curative treatment overlapped. Overall better outcome was observed in patients with preserved liver function whatever the treatment. Surveillance allowed us to diagnose HCC in patients with these characteristics thus leading to an improved survival rate.

Lidocaine elimination and monoethylglycinexylidide formation in patients with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between plasma elimination of lidocaine and monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) formation, which is considered to be a quantitative liver function test. METHODOLOGY: The study included ten healthy subjects and 54 patients: 27 with chronic hepatitis and 27 with cirrhosis. Lidocaine and MEGX were measured at 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30 min and then every 30 min for 180 min using the TDX system. RESULTS: In cirrhotic patients, the lidocaine half-life of the slow decline phase of the plasma disappearance curve (beta-HL) and the lidocaine half-life of hepatic elimination from the second compartment (K20-HL) proved to be significantly abnormal, as did all parameters of MEGX formation. In chronic hepatitis, both the lidocaine kinetics and the MEGX formation parameters were within the normal range. In chronic hepatitis patients, MEGX formation (AUC 0-180) was significantly correlated to K20-HL (rs = -0.633, p < 0.001) and to the rapid decline phase of the plasma disappearance curve (alpha-HL, rs = -0.483, p < 0.05). In cirrhotic patients, MEGX was significantly correlated to K20-HL (rs = -0.423, p < 0.05) and to beta-HL (rs = -0.500, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that in chronic active hepatitis, MEGX formation from lidocaine is maintained as a metabolic process, whereas it is altered in cirrhotic patients. The interrelationship between lidocaine elimination and MEGX formation were somewhat different in the two liver diseases.

Monoethylglycinexylidide formation measurement as a hepatic function test to assess severity of chronic liver disease.

OBJECTIVES: Monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) is the main lidocaine metabolite and its formation depends on liver microsomal activity. MEGX formation was studied in comparison with the histological score of chronic hepatitis and with the clinical score (Child-Pugh) of cirrhosis. Furthermore, we evaluated its ability to distinguish between the two liver diseases. METHODS: We studied 284 patients: 130 with chronic hepatitis (on the basis of the histological activity index, 45 had mild chronic hepatitis, 54 had moderate chronic hepatitis, and 31 had chronic hepatitis with cirrhosis) and 154 with cirrhosis (49 Child-Pugh's class A, 78 class B, and 27 class C). MEGX formation was evaluated 15, 30, and 60 min after lidocaine administration. RESULTS: MEGX formation showed a stepwise decline corresponding to worsened liver disease. MEGX values were related both to the histological score in chronic hepatitis and to the clinical score in cirrhosis. Significantly lower values were found in females < 50 yr of age than in males of the same age. The MEGX test showed great efficacy in discriminating between chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis compared with standard liver tests. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of MEGX formation proved to be a safe test, allowing us to show that functional subgroups can be identified both in chronic hepatitis and in cirrhosis. Thus, this test could integrate both the histological grading of chronic hepatitis and the clinical staging of cirrhosis.