RESUMO
Epidemiological studies report the association of diverse cardiovascular conditions with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the causality has remained to be established. Specific genetic factors and the extent to which they can explain variation in susceptibility or severity are largely elusive. The present study aimed to evaluate the link between 32 cardio-metabolic traits and COVID-19. A total of 60 participants were enrolled, who were categorized into the following 4 groups: A control group with no COVID-19 or any other underlying pathologies, a group of patients with a certain form of dyslipidemia and predisposition to atherosclerotic disease, a COVID-19 group with mild or no symptoms and a COVID-19 group with severe symptomatology hospitalized at the Intensive Care Unit of Sotiria Hospital (Athens, Greece). Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were recorded and genetic material was isolated, followed by simultaneous analysis of the genes related to dyslipidemia using a custom-made next-generation sequencing panel. In the COVID-19 group with mild or absent symptoms, the variant c.112C>T:p.P38S was detected in the sodium channel epithelial 1 subunit α (SCNN1A) gene, with a major allele frequency (Maf) of <0.01. In the COVID-19 group with severe symptoms, the variant c.786G>A:p.T262T was detected in the SCNN1B gene, which encodes for the ß-subunit of the epithelial sodium channel ENaC, with a Maf <0.01. None of the two rare variants were detected in the control or dyslipidemia groups. In conclusion, the current study suggests that ENaC variants are likely associated with genetic susceptibility to COVID-19, supporting the rationale for the risk and protective genetic factors for the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a pandemic since 2020, and depending on the SARS-CoV-2 mutation, different pandemic waves have been observed. The aim of this study was to compare the baseline characteristics of patients in two phases of the pandemic and evaluate possible predictors of mortality. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter observational study that included patients with COVID-19 in 4 different centers in Greece. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the period during which they were infected during the Delta and Omicron variant predominance. RESULTS: A total of 979 patients (433 Delta, 546 Omicron) were included in the study (median age 67 years (54, 81); 452 [46.2%] female). Compared to the Omicron period, the patients during the Delta period were younger (median age [IQR] 65 [51, 77] vs. 70 [55, 83] years, p < 0.001) and required a longer duration of hospitalization (8 [6, 13] vs. 7 [5, 12] days, p = 0.001), had higher procalcitonin levels (ng/mL): 0.08 [0.05, 0.17] vs. 0.06 [0.02, 0.16], p = 0.005, ferritin levels (ng/mL): 301 [159, 644] vs. 239 [128, 473], p = 0.002, C- reactive protein levels (mg/L): 40.4 [16.7, 98.5] vs. 31.8 [11.9, 81.7], p = 0.003, and lactate dehydrogenase levels (U/L): 277 [221, 375] vs. 255 [205, 329], p < 0.001. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was lower (3 [0, 5] vs. 4 [1, 6], p < 0.001), and the extent of disease on computed tomography (CT) was greater during the Delta wave (p < 0.001). No evidence of a difference in risk of death or admission to the intensive care unit was found between the two groups. Age, cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury during hospitalization, extent of disease on chest CT, D-dimer, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio values were identified as independent predictors of mortality for patients in the Delta period. Cardiovascular events and acute liver injury during hospitalization and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission were identified as independent predictors of mortality for patients in the Omicron period. CONCLUSIONS: In the Omicron wave, patients were older with a higher number of comorbidities, but patients with the Delta variant had more severe disease and a longer duration of hospitalization.