Sporadic deficient mismatch repair in colorectal cancer increases the risk for non-colorectal malignancy: A European multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Disparities between tumors arising via different sporadic carcinogenetic pathways have not been studied systematically. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluated the differences in the risk for non-colorectal malignancy between sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from different DNA mismatch repair status. METHODS: A retrospective European multicenter cohort study including in total of 1706 CRC patients treated between 1996 and 2019 in three different countries. The proficiency (pMMR) or deficiency (dMMR) of mismatch repair was determined by immunohistochemistry. Cases were analyzed for tumor BRAFV600E mutation, and BRAF mutated tumors were further analyzed for hypermethylation status in the promoter region of MLH1 to distinguish between sporadic and hereditary cases. Swedish and Finish patients were matched with their respective National Cancer Registries. For the Czech cohort, thorough scrutiny of medical files was performed to identify any non-colorectal malignancy within 20 years before or after the diagnosis of CRC. Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify the incidence rates of non-colorectal malignancies. For validation purposes, standardized incidence ratios were calculated for the Swedish cases adjusted for age, year, and sex. RESULTS: Of the 1706 CRC patients included in the analysis, 819 were female [48%], median age at surgery was 67 years [interquartile range: 60-75], and sporadic dMMR was found in 188 patients (11%). Patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) for non-colorectal malignancy before and after diagnosis compared to patients with a pMMR tumor, in both uni- (IRR = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89-3.31, p = 0.003) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.67-3.01, p = 0.004). This association applied whether or not the non-colorectal tumor developed before or after the diagnosis of CRC in both uni- (IRR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.28-2.98, p = 0.004), (IRR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.72-3.49, p = 0.004) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 1.67,95% CI = 1.05-2.65, p = 0.029), (IRR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.63-3.42, p = 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective European multicenter cohort study, patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher risk for non-colorectal malignancy than those with pMMR CRC. These findings indicate the need for further studies to establish the need for and design of surveillance strategies for patients with dMMR CRC.

High-tissue FRMD6 expression predicts better outcomes among colorectal cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths. The hippo pathway works as a regulator of organ growth and is often a target for mutations in cancer. Ferm domain containing protein 6 (FRMD6) is an activator of the hippo pathway. This study aimed to explore the role of FRMD6 in CRC and to determine how well it works as a prognostic factor among CRC patients. METHODS: The tumor expression of FRMD6 was evaluated using immunohistochemistry in 538 colorectal patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital. We assessed FRMD6 expression with clinicopathological parameters and the impact of FRMD6 expression on survival. RESULTS: Patients with a high FRMD6 expression exhibited a better prognosis (univariable hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.81), with a 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of 66.3%. By contrast, patients with a low FRMD6 expression had a 5-year DSS of 52.8%. A high FRMD6 expression level served as an independent predictor for better survival in the Cox multivariable survival analysis (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.86). DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that a high FRMD6 expression is an independent marker for a better prognosis in CRC and could help determine the prognosis for CRC patients.

Colorectal cancer is one the most common cancers worldwide affecting millions of individuals annually. To improve patient care, novel biomarkers are needed to individualize patient treatment. We show here that a high FRMD6 expression is an indicator of a favorable prognosis. In the future, FRMD6 might serve as a factor for determining which patients need adjuvant treatment following radical surgery.

Phenotypic subtypes predict outcomes in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. The Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium used the transcriptome-based method to classify CRC according to four molecular subtypes, each showing different genomic alterations and prognoses: CMS1 (microsatellite instable [MSI] immune), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic), and CMS4 (mesenchymal). To expedite the clinical implementation of such methods, easier and preferably tumor phenotype-based methods are needed. In this study, we describe a method to divide patients into four phenotypic subgroups using immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we analyze disease-specific survival (DSS) among different phenotypic subtypes and the associations between the phenotypic subtypes and clinicopathological variables. METHODS: We categorized 480 surgically treated CRC patients into four phenotypic subtypes (immune, canonical, metabolic, and mesenchymal) using the immunohistochemically determined CD3-CD8 tumor-stroma index, proliferation index, and tumor-stroma percentage. We analyzed survival rates for the phenotypic subtypes in different clinical patient subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Associations between phenotypic subtypes and clinicopathological variables were examined using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Patients with immune subtype tumors exhibited the best 5-year DSS, while mesenchymal subtype tumors accompanied the worst prognosis. The prognostic value of the canonical subtype showed wide variation among different clinical subgroups. Immune subtype tumors were associated with being female, stage I disease, and a right-side colon location. Metabolic tumors, however, were associated with pT3 and pT4 tumors, and being male. Finally, a mesenchymal subtype associated with stage IV disease, a mucinous histology, and a rectal tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic subtype predicts patient outcome in CRC. Associations and prognostic values for subtypes resemble the transcriptome-based consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) classification. In our study, the immune subtype stood out with its exceptionally good prognosis. Moreover, the canonical subtype showed wide variability among clinical subgroups. Further studies are needed to investigate the concordance between transcriptome-based classification systems and the phenotypic subtypes.

Tumor-associated CD3- and CD8-positive immune cells in colorectal cancer: The additional prognostic value of CD8+-to-CD3+ ratio remains debatable.

BACKGROUND: A large number of infiltrating CD3- and CD8-positive inflammatory cells indicates an improved survival in colorectal cancer (CRC), similar to many other cancers. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prognostic value of different combinations of CD3- and CD8-positive immune cells in CRC patients. METHODS: The densities of CD3- and CD8-positive cells in intratumoral and stromal tissues were evaluated from 539 patients, for which we calculated a CD3 tumor-stroma index, a CD8 tumor-stroma index, and a CD3-CD8 tumor-stroma index. RESULTS: High CD3 and CD8 tumor-stroma indices associated with stage I to II disease (p <  0.001 for both). The CD3 tumor-stroma index associated with a colonic tumor location (p = 0.006), while the CD8 tumor-stroma index associated with right-sided tumors (p <  0.001) and histological grade 3 tumors (p = 0.032). High intratumoral and stromal densities for CD3- and CD8-positive immune cells, the CD3 tumor-stroma index, the CD8 tumor-stroma index, and the CD3-CD8 tumor-stroma index all indicated a better DSS. CONCLUSIONS: The CD3 tumor-stroma index carries a strong prognostic value in CRC, and none of the CD3 and CD8 combinations we analyzed proved superior.

TATI, TAT-2, and CRP as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, with an obvious need for more accurate prognostics. Previous studies identified C-reactive protein (CRP) as a prognostic serum biomarker for colorectal cancer, whereas the biomarkers tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) and tumor-associated trypsin-2 (TAT-2) are less well-known prognostic factors. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the prognostic role of these biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 219 women and 274 men who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at Helsinki University Central Hospital from 1998 through 2005. Serum and plasma samples were collected before surgery, aliquoted, stored at -80°C, and then analyzed using high-sensitivity methods with commercially available time-resolved immunofluorometric assay kits. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, CRP (HR 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-2.23; p = 0.001), TATI (HR 1.87; 95% CI: 1.13-3.08; p = 0.014), and TAT-2 (HR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.13-2.06; p = 0.006) were significant prognostic biomarkers across the entire cohort. In subgroup analyses, TATI and TAT-2 represented significant negative prognostic factors among patients older than 66, while patients with left-sided disease, a high serum TAT-2, or a high plasma CRP experienced worse prognosis. None of the biomarkers emerged as important in the disease stage subgroup analysis nor did they serve as independent factors in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: TATI and TAT-2 as well as CRP significantly, but not independently, served as prognostic factors in our cohort of colorectal cancer patients. Further research is needed to fully understand their clinical role in colorectal cancer.

Long-term survival among colorectal cancer patients in Finland, 1991-2015: a nationwide population-based registry study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in Finland has risen steadily. Given development in cancer treatments in recent decades, disease-specific data on the long-term prognosis of patients may be obsolete. Thus, this study aimed to report 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and relative survival based on tumour spread and site among CRC patients diagnosed between 1991 and 2015 in Finland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based registry study among 59 465 CRC patients identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. RESULTS: The 5-year DSS for all CRC patients was 56.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 56.3-57.1%] for 1991 through 2015. Tumour site-specific survival has improved for the period 2006-2015 versus 1991-2005 for right-sided colon cancer from 54.8% (95% CI 53.8-55.8%) to 59.9% (95% CI 58.7-61.1%), for left-sided colon cancer from 54.1% (95% CI 52.9-55.3%) to 61.0% (95% CI 59.8-62.2%) and for rectal cancer from 53.6% (95% CI 52.2-55.0%) to 62.3% (95% CI 61.3-63.3%). The 5-year relative survival for the period 2006 through 2015 was 93.6% for localised disease (stage I); 84.2% for locally advanced tumour invading adjacent structures (stage II); 68.2% for regional disease with regional lymph node metastases (stage III); and 14.0% for metastatic disease (stage IV). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that survival for CRC has improved in recent decades in Finland, mirroring observations from other Western countries. However, the classification of tumour spread within the Finnish Cancer Registry differs slightly from the TNM classification, thereby limiting the generalisability of these results.

CA125: A superior prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer compared to CEA, CA19-9 or CA242.

OBJECTIVES: The tumor stage represents the single most important prognostic factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), although more accurate prognostics remain much needed. Previously, we identified CA125 as an independent significant prognostic factor, which we have further validated along with CEA, CA19-9, and CA242 in a large cohort of CRC patients. METHODS: Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, we analyzed preoperative serum samples in 322 CRC patients operated on between 1998 and 2003. RESULTS: Using the Spearman's rho model, we calculated the correlation between our previous findings on MUC16 and CA125, for which the correlation coefficient was 0.808 (p < 0.001). The Cox regression analysis of the linear and logarithmic values of CEA, CA125, CA242, and CA19-9 identified only CA125 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-1.04; p < 0.001) as significant when using the linear values. Survival among CRC patients with a high CA125 level was poor compared with CRC patients with a low CA125 level (HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.68-3.65; p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, patients with high CA125 levels and aged ≤67 or >67, with stage I-II or III-IV, and both colon and rectal cancer exhibited poor prognoses. In the multivariate analysis, we used clinical pathological variables in the model, where age, gender, and stage served as the background characteristics. We dichotomized CA125 using the Youden maximal cutoff point, and the median values for CEA, CA19-9, and CA242. CA125 emerged as the only marker remaining significant and independent together with stage, location, and age (HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.24-2.95; p 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: CA125 represents a significant and independent prognostic factor in CRC patients, superior to CEA. Furthermore, CA242 served as a better prognostic marker than both CEA and CA19-9. We recommend including both CA125 and CA242 in prognostic clinical trials among CRC patients.

High Tissue TLR5 Expression Predicts Better Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most common cancer globally, caused 881,000 cancer deaths in 2018. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), the primary sensors of pathogen-associated molecular patterns and damage-associated molecular patterns, activate innate and adaptive immune systems and participate in the development of an inflammatory tumor microenvironment. We aimed to explore the prognostic value of TLR3, TLR5, TLR7, and TLR9 tissue expressions in CRC patients. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, we analyzed tissue microarray samples from 825 CRC patients who underwent surgery between 1982 and 2002 at the Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. After analyzing a pilot series of 205 tissue samples, we included only TLR5 and TLR7 in the remainder of the patient series. We evaluated the associations between TLR5 and TLR7 tissue expressions, clinicopathologic variables, and survival. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we generated survival curves, determining significance using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses relied on the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-specific survival was 55.9% among TLR5-negative (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.6-61.2%) and 61.9% (95% CI 56.6-67.2%; p = 0.011, log-rank test) among TLR5-positive patients. In the Cox multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age, sex, stage, location, and grade, positive TLR5 immunoexpression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% CI 0.59-0.92; p = 0.007) served as an independent positive prognostic factor. TLR7 immunoexpression exhibited no prognostic value in the survival analysis across the entire cohort (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78-1.20; p = 0.754) nor in subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We show for the first time that a high TLR5 tumor tissue expression associates with a better prognosis in CRC patients.

TKTL1 as a Prognostic Marker in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Its Correlation with FDG-PET-CT.

INTRODUCTION: Glucose metabolism in cancer cells differs from noncancerous cells. The expression of transketolase-like protein 1 (TKTL1), a key enzyme in the glucose metabolism of cancer cells, predicts poor prognosis in several cancer types. We studied TKTL1 as a prognostic tool and whether TKTL1 expression correlates with 18F-FDG-PET-CT among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This retrospective study examined two PDAC patient cohorts: 168 patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital between 2001 and 2011, and 20 patients with FDG-PET-CT results available from the Auria Biobank. We used immunohistochemistry for TKTL1 expression, combining results with clinicopathological data. RESULTS: Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was slightly but not significantly better in patients with a high versus low TKTL1 expression, with DSS of 28.0 versus 17.3%, respectively (p = 0.123). TKTL1 served as a marker of a better prognosis in patients over 65 years old (p = 0.012) and among those with TNM class M1 (p = 0.018), stage IV disease (p = 0.027), or perivascular invasion (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that TKTL1 cannot be used as a prognostic factor in PDAC with the exception of elderly patients and those with advanced disease. The correlation of TKTL1 with 18F-FDG-PET-CT requires further study in a larger patient cohort.

The Relationship between the Tissue Expression of TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR7 and Systemic Inflammatory Responses in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy globally. CRC patients with elevated plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels exhibit compromised prognoses. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), activating the innate and adaptive immune systems, may contribute to pro- and antitumorigenic inflammatory responses. We aimed to identify a possible link between local and systemic inflammatory responses in CRC patients by investigating the association between tissue TLRs and plasma CRP. METHODS: Tissue expressions of TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR7 were assessed using immunohistochemistry of tissue microarray slides from 549 CRC patients surgically treated between 1998 and 2005. Blood samples were drawn preoperatively, centrifuged, aliquoted, and stored at -80°C until analysis. Plasma CRP was determined through high-sensitivity time-resolved immunofluorometric assay. We investigated the association of TLRs to clinicopathologic variables, plasma CRP, and survival. RESULTS: High TLR2 expression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.85; p = 0.005), high TLR5 expression (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45-0.83; p = 0.002), positive TLR7 expression (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.33-0.72; p < 0.001), and low CRP (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.08-2.11; p = 0.017) were associated with a better prognosis. A high TLR2 immunoexpression was associated with a better prognosis among low-CRP patients (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.80; p = 0.002), high TLR4 expression among high-CRP patients (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.04-4.00; p = 0.038), high TLR5 expression among low-CRP patients (HR 0.059; 95% CI 0.37-0.92; p = 0.021), and positive TLR7 expression among low-CRP patients (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.28-1.00; p = 0.049). In multivariate analyses, no biomarkers emerged as significant independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: High tissue TLR2, TLR5, and TLR7 levels were associated with a better prognosis. Among low-CRP patients, those with high TLR2, TLR5, and TLR7 immunoexpressions exhibited a better prognosis. Among high CRP patients, a high TLR4 immunoexpression was associated with a better prognosis.

Association between local immune cell infiltration, mismatch repair status and systemic inflammatory response in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory response in colorectal cancer (CRC) has been established as a prognostic factor for impaired cancer-specific survival, predominantly in patients with right-sided tumors. On the other hand, defective mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors, primarily located in the right colon, are known to have favorable survival and dense local immune infiltration. The aim of this study was to see if there is any form of relationship between these seemingly diverse entities. METHODS: Complete clinical and long-term survival data were retrieved for 316 CRC patients operated at Helsinki University Hospital between the years 1998 and 2003. Tissue microarrays were prepared from surgical specimens and further processed and analyzed for local immune cell infiltration using multispectral imaging with a Vectra quantitative pathology imaging system and Inform software. Multiplex immunohistochemistry was applied using antibodies against CD66b, CD8, CD20, FoxP3, CD68 and pan-Cytokeratin. After exclusions, data on immune infiltration were available for 275 patients. Mismatch repair status was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: CRP was seen to be an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival but not overall survival in uni- and multivariable (HR 1.01 (1.00-1.02); p = 0.028) analyses of non-irradiated patients. There was no significant difference in CRP according to mismatch repair status, but all cases (n = 10) with CRP ≥ 75 mg/l had proficient mismatch repair (pMMR). There was a significant negative correlation between intratumor stromal infiltration by T-regulatory FOXP3+ cells and CRP (p = 0.006). There was significantly lower intratumor stromal infiltration by FOXP3+ cells (p = 0.043) in the right colon compared to the rectum, but no significant difference in CRP (p = 0.44). CRP was not a predictor of overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.01) nor cancer-specific survival in irradiated patients (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.94-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant negative relationship between SIR, defined as an elevated CRP, and intratumor stromal infiltration by T-regulatory FOXP3+ cells. This and the fact that all cases with a CRP > 75 mg/l had pMMR suggests that SIR and dMMR are independent entities in CRC. Indeed, the general lack of difference in CRP between cases with dMMR and pMMR may be evidence of overlap in cases with a less pronounced SIR.

Transketolase-Like Protein 1 and Glucose Transporter 1 in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The glucose metabolism of cancer cells differs from that of noncancerous cells. Transketolase-like protein 1 (TKTL1) and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) both play a role in this process. These biochemical tumor markers are overexpressed in several types of human cancer. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if TKTL1 and/or GLUT1 expression predicts prognosis in gastric cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we selected 284 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at the Helsinki University Hospital. We used immunohistochemistry to assess the expression of TKTL1 and GLUT1, combined with clinicopathological data. RESULTS: Positive expression of TKTL1 was associated with positive expression of GLUT1, age over 65 years, male gender, advanced stage (II-IV), and advanced tumors (T2-T4). Patients with a positive expression of TKTL1 had a poorer prognosis than those with no expression (p = 0.042, Breslow test). GLUT1 positivity was associated with higher age and with the intestinal type of gastric cancer but did not carry any prognostic value. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study showed that positive expression of TKTL1 correlates with a poor prognosis in gastric cancer.

Tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) and tumor-associated trypsin-2 (TAT-2) predict outcomes in gastric cancer.

Introduction: Tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) limits serine proteases, promotes carcinogenesis in several cancers and functions as an acute-phase reactant. Tumor-associated trypsin-2 (TAT-2), a proteolytic target enzyme for TATI, can enhance invasion by promoting extracellular matrix degradation. Here, we aimed to study serum TATI and TAT-2 levels, including the TAT-2/TATI ratio, as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers in gastric cancer. We compared the results with the plasma level of C-reactive protein (CRP).Material and Methods: We selected 240 individuals operated on for gastric adenocarcinoma at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between 2000 and 2009. We determined the preoperative serum TAT-2, TATI and plasma CRP levels using time-resolved immunofluorometric assays using monoclonal antibodies.Results: The medium serum TAT-2 level was higher among gastric cancer patients [8.68 ng/ml; interquartile range (IQR) 5.93-13.2] than among benign controls (median 5.41 ng/ml; IQR 4.12-11.8; p = .005). Five-year survival among patients with a high serum TAT-2 was 22.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.7-34.1], compared to 52.2% (95% CI 44.6-59.8; p < .001) among those with a low level. The five-year survival among patients with a high serum TATI was 30.6% (95% CI 20.4-40.8), compared to 52.9% (95% CI 44.7-61.1; p < .001) among those with a low level. The serum TATI level remained significant in the multivariable survival analysis (hazard ratio 2.01; 95% CI 1.32-3.07). An elevated plasma CRP level associated with a high serum TATI level (p = .037).Conclusions: This study shows for the first time that a high serum TAT-2 may function as a prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer and that TAT-2 levels may be elevated compared to controls. Additionally, we show that the prognosis is worse among gastric cancer patients with a high serum TATI. These biomarkers serve as prognostic factors particularly among patients with a metastatic or a locally advanced disease.

Mucin 16 and kallikrein 13 as potential prognostic factors in colon cancer: Results of an oncological 92-multiplex immunoassay.

Colon cancer represents one of the most common cancers in the world. Despite improved treatment, mortality remains high. In order to improve the assessment of prognosis for colon cancer patients, identifying new prognostic markers remains necessary. We analyzed preoperative serum samples from 148 colon cancer patients surgically treated at Helsinki University Hospital from 1998 through 2002 using a multiplex proximity extension assay (Oncology II panel, Olink Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden), a panel constituting 92 immunological and oncological markers. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses on these patients and calculated the disease-specific survival among patients using the log-rank test for Kaplan-Meier estimates. In the univariate survival analysis of 92 biomarkers, 26 resulted in p < 0.1. Among these, eight biomarkers emerged as statistically significant (p < 0.05). Patients with low levels of kallikrein 13 had a poor prognosis. Moreover, patients with high levels of amphiregulin, carcinoembryonic antigen-related adhesion molecule 5, interleukin 6, mucin 16, syndecan 1, transforming growth factor alpha, and vimentin also had a poor prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, kallikrein 13 and mucin 16 emerged as independent prognostic markers. The role of kallikrein 13, a member of the serine protease kallikrein biomarker family, in tumorigenesis remains unclear. Mucin 16 is also known as carbohydrate antigen 125, a well-known ovarian cancer biomarker. Patients with low levels of kallikrein 13 (hazard ratio: 0.36; 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.92; p = 0.033) and high levels of mucin 16 (hazard ratio: 3.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.68-5.93; p < 0.005) had a poor prognosis. Mucin 16 and kallikrein 13 represent independent prognostic markers for colon cancer. Furthermore, the clinical utility of mucin 16 and kallikrein 13 serum tests warrants additional investigation.

L1TD1 - a prognostic marker for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic markers specific to a particular cancer type can assist in the evaluation of survival probability of patients and help clinicians to assess the available treatment modalities. METHODS: Gene expression data was analyzed from three independent colon cancer microarray gene expression data sets (N = 1052). Survival analysis was performed for the three data sets, stratified by the expression level of the LINE-1 type transposase domain containing 1 (L1TD1). Correlation analysis was performed to investigate the role of the interactome of L1TD1 in colon cancer patients. RESULTS: We found L1TD1 as a novel positive prognostic marker for colon cancer. Increased expression of L1TD1 associated with longer disease-free survival in all the three data sets. Our results were in contrast to a previous study on medulloblastoma, where high expression of L1TD1 was linked with poor prognosis. Notably, in medulloblastoma L1TD1 was co-expressed with its interaction partners, whereas our analysis revealed lack of co-expression of L1TD1 with its interaction partners in colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identify increased expression of L1TD1 as a prognostic marker predicting longer disease-free survival in colon cancer patients.

Toll-like receptor 2 and Toll-like receptor 4 predict favorable prognosis in local pancreatic cancer.

Toll-like receptors play an essential role in our innate immune system and are a focus of interest in contemporary cancer research. Thus far, Toll-like receptors have shown promising prognostic value in carcinomas of the oral cavity, colon, and ovaries, but the prognostic role of Toll-like receptors in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has not been established. We set out to investigate whether Toll-like receptor expression could serve in prognostic evaluation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, as well. Our study comprised 154 consecutive stage I-III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients surgically treated at Helsinki University Hospital between 2002 and 2011. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry allowed assessment of the expression of Toll-like receptor 2 and Toll-like receptor 4 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tissue, and we matched staining results against clinicopathological parameters using Fisher's test. For survival analysis, we used the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test, and the Cox regression proportional hazard model for univariate and multivariate analyses. The hazard ratios were calculated for disease-specific overall survival. Strong Toll-like receptor 2 expression was observable in 51 (34%) patients and strong Toll-like receptor 4 in 50 (33%) patients. Overall, neither marker showed any direct coeffect on survival. However, strong Toll-like receptor 2 expression predicted better survival when tumor size was less than 30 mm (hazard ratio = 0.30; 95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.69; p = 0.005), and strong Toll-like receptor 4 expression predicted better survival in patients with lymph-node-negative disease (hazard ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval = 0.07-0.65; p = 0.006). In conclusion, we found strong Toll-like receptor 2 and Toll-like receptor 4 expressions to be independent factors of better prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with stage I-II disease.

Serum MMP-8 and TIMP-1 as prognostic biomarkers in gastric cancer.

Despite gastric cancer being rare nowadays in Western countries, it remains one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. The course of the disease varies, so the individual gastric cancer patient's prognosis is difficult to determine. The need for new biomarkers is crucial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of serum matrix metalloproteinase-8, serum tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, and tissue matrix metalloproteinase-8 in patients with gastric cancer. Preoperative serum samples from 233 patients with gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase-8 were analyzed with immunofluorometric assay, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We also determined the tissue expression of matrix metalloproteinase-8 in 276 gastric cancer samples by immunohistochemistry. Survival data and death causes came from patient records, the Population Register Center of Finland, and Statistics Finland. Patients with a low (<31 ng/mL) or high (>131 ng/mL) serum matrix metalloproteinase-8 level had a considerably unfavorable prognosis (p = 0.002). Those patients with a high (≥170 ng/mL) serum tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 level also had a poor prognosis (p < 0.001), and the latter remained significant in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio = 1.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.26-2.72; p = 0.002). The molar ratio of serum matrix metalloproteinase-8 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 levels with low (<0.07) or high (>0.30) molar ratios predicted a worse prognosis (p = 0.020). Tissue matrix metalloproteinase-8 did not influence prognosis. These results suggest that serum matrix metalloproteinase-8, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, and the ratio of matrix metalloproteinase-8/ tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 may prove useful biomarkers for prediction of prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Serum MMP-8 and TIMP-1 predict prognosis in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Almost all of the extracellular matrix (ECM) components can be degraded by the endoproteinases matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Important regulators of MMPs, and thereby of the extracellular environment, are tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), and especially TIMP-1. Early tumor development, as well as distant metastasis, may be results of an MMP/TIMP ratio imbalance altering the ECM. MMPs are elevated in several inflammatory conditions. Our aim is to investigate the prognostic role of MMP-8, - 9, and TIMP-1 in colorectal cancer (CRC) and their relationship to inflammation. METHODS: We included 337 colorectal cancer patients and 47 controls undergoing surgery at Helsinki University Hospital in Finland, 1998-2011. Serum levels of MMP-8 and plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined with a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (IFMA), and MMP-9 and TIMP-1 with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Association and correlation analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman rank correlation tests. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Among patients with advanced disease, serum levels of MMP-8 and TIMP-1 were elevated. CRC patients with high MMP-8 (HR (hazard ratio) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.52, P = 0.005) and those with high TIMP-1 (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.64, P = 0.002) had worse prognoses. MMP-9 level failed to serve as a prognostic factor. In multivariable survival analysis, Dukes stage, and low MMP-9/TIMP-1 molar ratio (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.98, P = 0.042) were independently predicted prognosis. A weak correlation between CRP and MMP-8 (rS = 0.229, P < 0.001), and TIMP-1 (rS = 0.280, P < 0.001) was noted. Among patients showing no systemic inflammatory response, MMP-8 (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.10-2.53, P = 0.017) and TIMP-1 (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-2.42, P = 0.029) were prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: MMP-8 and TIMP-1 in serum, but not MMP-9, identified CRC patients with bad prognosis. Among patients showing no systemic inflammatory response, MMP-8 and TIMP-1 may associate with poor prognosis.

Impact of sphincter lesions and delayed sphincter repair on sacral neuromodulation treatment outcomes for faecal incontinence: results from a Finnish national cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicentre study was to analyse the effects of patent sphincter lesions and previous sphincter repair on the results of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) treatment on patients with faecal incontinence (FI). METHODS: Patients examined by endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) with FI as the indication for SNM treatment were included in the study. Data was collected from all the centres providing SNM treatment in Finland and analysed for differences in treatment outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients treated for incontinence with SNM had been examined by EAUS. Of these patients, 33 had a history of previous delayed sphincter repair. A patent sphincter lesion was detected by EAUS in 128 patients. The EAUS finding did not influence the SNM test phase outcome (p = 0.129) or the final treatment outcome (p = 0.233). Patient's history of prior sphincter repair did not have a significant effect on the SNM test (p = 0.425) or final treatment outcome (p = 0.442). CONCLUSIONS: Results of our study indicate that a sphincter lesion or previous sphincter repair has no significant effect on the outcome of SNM treatment. Our data suggests that delayed sphincter repair prior to SNM treatment initiation for FI is not necessary.

Factors predicting a failed primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

INTRODUCTION: The success of the primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is paramount in maintaining adequate fecal continence after childbirth. The factors determining the success or failure of primary repair are unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate modifiable factors determining the success or failure of the primary sphincter repair after OASI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty women with OASI were investigated by endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, and with the Wexner incontinence questionnaire. Based on the findings, the women were divided in two groups; successful primary repair group (n = 41) and failed primary repair group (n = 19). RESULTS: The primary repair failed in 31.7% of the tears. These included more tears repaired by less experienced personnel (p < 0.001) and more repairs performed during on-call hours (p = 0.039) than in the successful primary repair group. Significantly more pain medication was used in the failed group (p = 0.003), and the use of antibiotics and laxatives after the repair was more common in the successful group (p < 0.001). Sphincter injuries were repaired using the overlapping suture technique in 95.1% of the repairs in the successful group compared with 47.4% in the failed group (p = 0.03). The mean (SD) Wexner score was significantly higher in the failed group [5.92 (4.1) vs. 1.88 (4.2), p < 0.001], in agreement with the findings on endoanal ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum perineal tears should be evaluated by personnel familiar with the diagnosis and repair of OASI. Delaying the primary repair until next morning is recommended if experienced personnel are unavailable during on-call hours.