[Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia by endoscopic techniques using electricity and open prostatectomy: A review of the literature by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. / Traitement de l'hyperplasie bénigne de prostate par techniques endoscopiques électriques et adénomectomie voie haute : revue de littérature du CTMH de l'AFU.

PURPOSE: To perform an update on the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by endoscopic electric resection and vaporization, and by open prostatectomy. METHOD: A systematic review of recent literature was performed. The level of evidence of each report was evaluated, and only recent publications of high level of evidence were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Both monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy remain the gold standards. Endoscopic electric alternatives are monopolar and bipolar prostate vaporisation as well as bipolar resection. These techniques seem to show similar functional results than TURP and open prostatectomy, as well as an advantage in terms of bleeding.

[Surgical management of BPH by laser therapies: A review of the literature by the LUTS committee of the French urological association]. / Traitement chirurgical de l'hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate par laser : revue de littérature du CTMH de l'AFU.

PURPOSE: To perform an update on the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by laser. METHOD: A systematic review of recent literature was performed. The level of evidence of each report was evaluated, and only recent publications of high level of evidence were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy remain the gold standards. Alternative endoscopic options are laser photoselective vaporisation, holmium enucleation and thulium resection. These techniques seem to show functional results similar to those obtained after TURP and open prostatectomy, as well as an advantage in terms of bleeding.

[Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia by thermotherapy and other emerging techniques: A review of the literature by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. / Traitement chirurgical de l'hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate par thermothérapie et autres techniques émergentes : revue de littérature du CTMH de l'AFU.

PURPOSE: To perform an update on mini-invasive surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by thermotherapy and other emerging techniques. METHOD: A systematic review of literature was performed in Pubmed database for the period running from 1980 to 2011. The level of evidence of each report was evaluated, and only recent publications of high level of evidence were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy remain the gold standards. Thermotherapy using transurethral microwaves or needle ablation is an alternative to medical management. Urethral stents should only be proposed in exceptional cases of surgical contra-indication, because of their related complications. Botulinium toxin and ethanol intra-prostatic injections are currently under evaluation.

[Initial assessment, follow-up and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: guidelines of the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. / Bilan initial, suivi et traitement des troubles mictionnels en rapport avec hyperplasie bénigne de prostate : recommandations du CTMH de l'AFU.

AIM: To elaborate guidelines for the diagnosis, the follow-up, and the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to select more relevant publications. The level of evidence was evaluated. Graded recommendations were written by a working group, and then reviewed by a reviewer group according to the formalized consensus technique. RESULTS: Terminology of the International Continence Society was used. Initial assessment has several aims: making sure that lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are related to BPH, assessing bother related to LUTS and checking for a possible complicated bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Initial assessment should include: medical history, LUTS assessment using a symptomatic score, physical examination including digital rectal examination, urinalysis, flow rate recording, and residual urine volume. Frequency volume chart is recommended when storage symptoms are predominant. Serum PSA should be done when the diagnosis of prostate cancer can modify the management. When a surgical treatment is discussed, serum PSA, serum creatinine and ultrasonography of the urinary tract are recommended. BPH patients should be informed of the benign and possibly progressive patterns of the disease. When LUTS cause no bother, annual follow-up should be planned. Medical treatment includes some phytotherapy agents, alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. The last two can be associated. The association of antimuscarinics and alpha-blockers can be offered to patients with residual storage symptoms when already under alpha-blockers therapy, after checking for the absence of severe BOO (residual volume more than 200mL or max urinary flow less than 10mL/s). Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors could be used in patients complaining for both LUTS and erectile dysfunction. In case of complication, or when medical treatment is inefficient or not tolerated, then a surgical treatment should be discussed. Treatment decision should be done according to type of LUTS and related bother, prostate anatomy, level of obstruction and its consequences on urinary tract, patient co-morbidities, experience of practitioner, and choice of patient. Surgical treatments with the higher level of evidence of efficacy include monopolar or bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate, open prostatectomy, transurethral incision of the prostate, photoselective vaporization of the prostate, and Holmium laser enuclation of the prostate. CONCLUSION: Here are the first guidelines of the French Urological Association for the initial assessment, the follow-up and the treatment of urinary disorders related to BPH.

[Initial assessment and follow-up of benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review of the literature by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. / Bilan initial et suivi de l'hyperplasie bénigne de prostate: revue de littérature du CTMH de l'AFU.

PURPOSE: To perform an update on the initial evaluation and follow-up of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHOD: A systematic review of recent literature was performed. Level of evidence of publications was evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Objectives of the initial evaluation are to assess the link between low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and BPH, to evaluate the bother associated to LUTS, assess a complicated bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), diagnose an adenocarcinoma of the prostate if it modifies the therapeutic strategy, and establish an evolutive profile of the disease. Clinical assessment with digital rectal examination, evaluation of symptoms by a dedicated questionnaire and urine analysis are the first steps of BPH evaluation. Bladder diary is useful to objective storage symptoms. Uroflowmetry and post-void residual volume assessment are useful if BOO is suspected. Measure of serum creatinine and ultrasound exam of the urinary tract are second line explorations. Urine cytology, neurological evaluation, urethrocystoscopy, urodynamics with pressure-flow studies are useful if the link between LUTS and BPH is unclear. PSA dosage is used for prostate cancer screening or as a prognostic marker of BPH evolution.

[Benign prostatic hyperplasia medical treatment: systematic review of the literature by the CTMH/AFU]. / Traitement médical de l'hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate: revue de littérature par le CTMH/AFU.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS-BPH) has dramatically evolved within the last years: new drugs have been commercialized and others that used to be contra-indicated may now be prescribed. Our objective was to provide with an updated review of the scientific literature on the medical treatment of LUTS-BPH. PATIENT AND METHOD: A systematic review of the most recent scientific literature was performed. The query was addressed to the PubMed database using the following keywords: "benign prostatic hyperplasia" and "medical treatment". A very large amount of publications, from year 1990 until 2011, were reviewed to select the publications with level of evidence 1 and 2. These publications were analysed and the 30 most relevant were selected to serve as references for this article. RESULTS: There are many randomized clinical trials in the field of LUTS-BPH medical treatment. Recently, anti-muscarinic agents have been assessed and have proven their efficacy and tolerance as long as the storage symptoms are predominant over the voiding symptoms. Combination therapies using alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase (5-ARI) inhibitors, but also anti-muscarinic agents and PDEF-5 inhibitors may also be prescribed depending on the patient' complaint. CONCLUSION: The publication of recent randomized clinical trials allows the urologists to use new drugs and new combination therapies in the medical treatment of LUTS-BPH. In 2011, the medical treatment decision-making may better integrate the patient' complaint and medical history.

[Sporadic upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas: identification of interaction between toxic carcinogens and individuals genetic susceptibility]. / Tumeurs des voies excrétrices urinaires supérieures sporadiques: identification de l'interaction entre l'exposition aux carcinogènes environnementaux et la susceptibilité génétique des individus.

Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas (UUT UCC) are rare sporadic tumors. Recent epidemiologic and molecular data have shown a singular susceptibility of UUT UCCs for specific risk factors. The main exogenic factors involved in UUT UCCs carcinogenesis remain tobacco and occupational exposure (aromatic amines, polycyclic hydrocarbures and chlored solvents). Enzymatic variants of detoxification system may be responsible of carcinogenesis with these toxics. Tumors induced by phenacetine consumption are decreasing since it was banned in the 1970s. Also, acid aristolochic exposure (Balkan nephropathy, Chinese Herb nephropathy) has been demonstrated to specifically induce UUT UCCs. Familial genic polymorphism of detoxification system would explain geographic distribution in endemic areas. In Taiwan, chronic arsenic exposition would constitute the main risk factor of UUT UCC. However, theses mechanisms of carcinogenesis remain unclear. The knowledge of UUT UCC development mechanisms implying toxic detoxification systems is still incomplete. To date, there is a growing body of evidence supporting that the interaction between individual genetic susceptibilities and environmental toxic exposure is a key to explain carcinogenesis in the majority of sporadic UUT UCC occurrence.

[Oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: French validation of the D'Amico risk group classification]. / Résultats carcinologiques après prostatectomie totale pour cancer: validation française de la classification de D'Amico.

PURPOSE: To validate the D'Amico risk group classification in French consecutive series and to analyse recurrence risk factor after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. MATERIAL: We retrospectively analyzed data collected from 10/2000 to 05/2009 for 730 consecutive patients who underwent RP for clinically localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (cT1-cT3) in our institution. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of greater than 0.1 ng/ml, with rising PSA at two consecutive dosages. Postoperative survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method after D'Amico's group stratification. The accuracy of the model was evaluated using the Harrell's concordance index. The impact on outcomes of preoperative PSA and pathological features was evaluated using a monovariate and multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 30 months [interquartile range: 13-51]. The overall 3-year and 5-year probability of freedom from BCR was 85% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 81-88%) and 78% (95% CI, 74-83%), respectively. For low, intermediate, and high-risk group, the 5-year freedom from BCR was 92% (95% CI, 88-97%), 73% (95% CI, 65-81%) and 44% (95% CI, 28-59%), respectively (p<0.001). Harrell's concordance index was 0.71. Surgical margins were positive in 31% of all cases. In a multivariate analysis, preoperative PSA, pathological tumor stage, Gleason score and surgical margins status predicted BCR after RP. CONCLUSIONS: We externally validated the ability of the D'Amico's risk group stratification to predict disease progression following RP in European patients. Preoperative PSA, pathological stage, Gleason score and surgical margins status predicted BCR after RP in our series through a multivariate analysis.

[Radiotherapy for high-risk patients after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: immediate postoperative or salvage?]. / Radiothérapie chez les patients à haut risque après prostatectomie radicale: postopératoire ou de rattrapage?

The use of immediate postoperative and salvage radiotherapy in high-risk patients after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer remains controversial. Immediate postoperative radiotherapy improves biochemical and clinical progression-free survival in randomised trials. Metastasis-free survival and overall survival were seen to be improved in a recently updated randomised trial. On the basis of retrospective data only, salvage radiotherapy is effective against biochemical relapse after prostatectomy. The adjunction of androgen deprivation therapy to immediate postoperative or salvage radiotherapy is only supported by retrospective data. The results of the ongoing, prospective, randomized trials will hopefully enable accurate comparison of immediate postoperative radiotherapy with salvage radiotherapy and assessment of the value of androgen deprivation therapy.

[Benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery and anticoagulant therapy: review of the literature by the French Association of Urology]. / Chirurgie de l'hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate et traitements anticoagulants: état des lieux par le Comité des troubles mictionnels de l'homme de l'Association française d'urologie (CTMH-AFU).

INTRODUCTION: The prescription of a long-term oral anticoagulant may pose several problems for the endoscopic surgery of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Questions regarding the length of its interruption, what it can be replaced by and the date oral treatment can be resumed must be asked at preoperative stage to avoid haemorrhaging or cardiovascular accidents. While the number of patients concerned by this type of prescription continues to grow, surgical hemostasis techniques continue to progress and recommendations for good practice are evolving. It is therefore interesting to bring up to date the knowledge and recommendations for surgery of BHP while being treated with anticoagulants. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A systematic revue of publications and of recommendations by knowledgeable bodies in cardiology and anesthesia were carried out. RESULTS: The transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is an intervention which carries an intermediate risk of haemorrhaging. Whenever possible, it is recommended to briefly interrupt the anticoagulant treatment in the perioperative period. For antivitamins K, heparinotherapy takes over, which, thanks to a short half-life, allows for a quicker management of the anticoagulation. For antiplatelets, the tendency is towards proposing an interruption for 4 to 5 days before the intervention. In all cases, the anticoagulant must be reintroduced as quickly as possible because cardiovascular risks are in proportion to the length of time of interruption. CONCLUSION: The strategy for treatment of patients taking oral anticoagulants is complex. It must be defined in consultation with the anesthetist, the cardiologist or hemostatis specialist. Nevertheless, the urologist remains at the center of the decision for treatment because he/she is the only one who can weigh up the risk of haemorrhaging, the cardiovascular risks and the necessity of an operation and technique used.

[Review of literature concerning the use of laser treatment for symptomatic BPH]. / Revue de la littérature sur l'utilisation des lasers pour le traitement de l'HBP symptomatique.

Even if transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) today remains the referential surgery in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the last decade has seen the emergence of considerable improvements in light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (LASER) technology. Better understanding of the interaction between the different wavelengths of these lasers and tissue has enabled the development of new and promising types of treatment. This article, through a review of published literature, attempts first of all to retrace the history of this technique in the treatment of symptomatic BPH and then goes on to give an update on results and new aspects of the different types of laser used.

[Management of male urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (CTMH AFU 2006 - 4/5): place of intraurethral macroplastique injection, artificial urinary sphincter and cell therapy]. / Prise en charge d'une incontinence urinaire masculine après prostatectomie radicale (CTMH AFU 2006 - 4/5): place de l'injection intra-urétrale de macroplastique, du sphincter urinaire artificiel et des thérapies cellulaires.

The management of moderate urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy may require the use of an artificial sphincter, which remains the reference technique although it requires implantation of material, sometimes involving redo operations. Submucosal macroplastique injections have been proposed, but the results do not appear to be maintained over time. Cell therapy, consisting of the injection of stem cells into or close to the sphincter, probably represents the approach of the future, but in 2006, studies were still only at the evaluation phase.

[Management of male urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (CTMH AFU 2006 - 5/5). Prevention of incontinence and CTMH guidelines]. / Prise en charge d'une incontinence urinaire masculine après prostatectomie radicale (CTMH AFU 2006 - 5/5) Prévention de l'incontinence et recommandations du CTMH.

Preservation of continence essentially depends on the operator and the quality of the operative procedure. The number of publications on this subject reflects the desire of urologists to provide their patients not only with control of the cancer but also preservation of their sexual and urinary functions. Ideally, surgery should preserve the striated sphincter and levator muscles, the neurovascular pedicles when oncologically acceptable, and the bladder neck and a leak-proof anastomosis must be ensured. The surgeon must satisfy two imperatives to achieve these objectives: a good knowledge of anatomy and meticulous preservation of this anatomy from the beginning to the end of the operation by highly selective dissection in selected patients. Finally, the Comité des Troubles Mictionnels de l'Homme (Male Voiding Disorders Committee) proposes guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

[Management of male urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (CTMH AFU 2006-1/5): incidence and role of urodynamic assessment and electromyography]. / Prise en charge d'une incontinence urinaire masculine après prostatectomie radicale (CTMH AFU 2006-1/5): incidence et rôle du bilan urodynamique et de l'électromyogramme.

The incidence of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence varies according to the technique used, over time and according to the type of management, with an incidence at one year ranging from just a few percent to more than 60%. Assessment is required in the case of persistent disabling urinary incontinence despite well conducted perineal rehabilitation one year after surgery or earlier in the case of severe incontinence. Urodynamic assessment is the essential examination to quantify urethral closure pressure. A review of the literature of urodynamic assessment and electromyography is presented.

[Management of male urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (CTMH AFU 2006-2/5): place of perineal rehabilitation and medical treatment]. / Prise en charge d'une incontinence urinaire masculine après prostatectomie radicale (CTMH AFU 2006-2/5): place de la rééducation périnéale et du traitement médical.

The treatment of incontinence is changing, but perineal rehabilitation still plays an essential role and is usually able to rapidly and effectively improve urinary incontinence. Medical treatment modalities are fairly limited: anticholinergic drugs have a limited efficacy except in the case of unstable bladder demonstrated by urodynamic assessment and, despite encouraging preliminary results, duloxetine has not obtained scientific recognition or marketing authorization.

[Management of male urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (CTMH AFU 2006-3/5): place of periurethral balloon and suburethral tape]. / Prise en charge d'une incontinence urinaire masculine après prostatectomie radicale (CTMH AFU 2006-3/5): place des ballons périurétraux et des bandelettes sous uréthrales.

The treatment of incontinence is changing. Perineal rehabilitation still plays an essential role, but new modalities are now available with promising results, particularly periurethral balloon and suburethral tape, which may be indicated after failure of well-conducted perineal rehabilitation and before artificial sphincter. Periurethral balloons consist of two silicone balloons filled with a mixture of saline and radiopaque agent inserted transperineally on either side of the urethra as close as possible to the bladder neck. Titanium ports connected to each balloon allow adjustment of the volume contained in the balloon at any time after surgery. This technique appears to be promising but further studies are required to clearly define many unresolved issues, including results based on longer follow-up and patient selection according to the severity of incontinence or their treatment history (radiotherapy). Suburethral tape is used to exert permanent static compression of the urethra and was still under development in 2006. Fairly heterogeneous materials are used and no consensus on this issue has yet been reached. Follow-up is still relatively short and few studies have addressed the problem of patient selection. Some authors consider that the best indication is mild-to-moderate incontinence, which has not yet been clearly defined.

Minimal focus of adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy: clinicopathological correlations.

AIMS: To establish the clinicopathological features of minimal volume prostate adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy. METHODS: Twenty four cases of minimal adenocarcinoma diagnosed on prostate biopsy and treated by radical prostatectomy were reviewed. RESULTS: The major microscopic criteria were nuclear enlargement (22 of 24), infiltrative pattern (19 of 24), prominent nucleoli (19 of 24), intraluminal eosinophilic secretions (15 of 24), and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia associated (11 of 24). Sixteen of 24 cases were assigned a Gleason score 6 on biopsy. When the whole gland was assessed, 22 of these tumours were localised to the prostate (stage pT2), and only two cases were stage pT3. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal focus of adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy is not an uncommon finding. It is usually an intermediate grade and localised stage neoplasm.