GH secretion in a cohort of children with pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia.

Pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia (PHP-Ia) is characterized by Albright's hereditary osteodistrophy (AHO) and resistance to hormones that act via the alpha subunit of the Gs protein (Gsalpha) protein, ie PTH, TSH, FSH/LH, and, as recently described in limited series, GHRH. However, the current lack of data on GHRH secretion, obesity and short stature included in the AHO phenotype hampers interpretation of GH secretory status and its effects on these subjects. We evaluated GH secretion after GHRH plus arginine (Arg) stimulus, IGF-I levels and anthropometric features in an exclusively pediatric population of 10 PHP-Ia subjects. Of our PHP-Ia children, 5 out of 10 (50%) showed impaired GH responsiveness to the provocative test, with a lower prevalence than the 75-100% previously reported. A negative correlation (p=0.024) was found between GH secretion and body mass index (BMI), whereas no correlation emerged between GH and IGF-I values (p=0.948). Height and growth velocity did not significantly differ between GH-deficient and GH-sufficient subjects. In the 5 GH-deficient patients, GHRH resistance could arguably be responsible for hormonal impairment; however, 3 of them were obese, showing normal stature and IGF-I levels: the increased BMI in these subjects could influence GH secretion and its effects. In conclusion, GH deficiency is frequent among PHP-Ia children and its prevalence is variable, two factors indicating that GH secretory testing should be part of the routine management of this patient group. It could be argued that GHRH resistance is the pathogenetic mechanism in most patients, but further studies on GHRH secretion are needed to define which values can be considered as raised. Lastly, because BMI has been indicated as a major determinant of evoked adult GH response to provocative testing, GH levels related to increased BMI also in childhood could be helpful in defining GH assessment in obese or overweight PHP-Ia children.

Intranasal administration of neostigmine potentiates both intravenous and intranasal growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-induced GH release in short children.

Administration of cholinergic agonists increases both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion, probably acting via inhibition of endogenous somatostatin release. The aim of our study was to verify in two groups of children with idiopathic short stature the effect of intranasal administration of neostigmine (inNS; 3 mg), a cholinesterase inhibitor, on basal GH levels as well as on the somatotroph response to GHRH when the peptide was administered either iv (ivGHRH; 1 microgram/kg) or intranasally (inGHRH; 10 micrograms/kg). In group A (n = 6; age, 10.6-16.0 yr) inNS induced a significant GH increase [inNS vs. saline, area under the curve (AUC; mean +/- SEM), 263.7 +/- 60.2 vs. 73.8 +/- 3.1 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03] and potentiated the somatotroph response to ivGHRH (inNS with ivGHRH vs. ivGHRH, 1316 +/- 183.0 vs. 644.9 +/- 154.5 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03). In group B (n = 6; age, 11.5-15.9 yr) ivGHRH induced a GH rise clearly higher than that induced by inGHRH (604.2 +/- 154.3 vs. 137.1 +/- 28.2 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03). Administration of inNS induced a GH rise similar to that occurring after inGHRH (AUC, 239.2 +/- 69.5 micrograms/L.h) and markedly increased the inGHRH-induced GH response (482.4 +/- 103.6 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.05 and 0.03 vs. inNS and inGHRH, respectively), so that it overlapped with that induced by ivGHRH alone. In conclusion, cholinergic agonists such as neostigmine are able to increase both basal and GHRH-induced GH secretion in short children even when given intranasally. Combined intranasal administration of neostigmine and GHRH (10 micrograms/kg) is able to induce a GH rise similar to that induced by ivGHRH alone (1 microgram/kg), suggesting the potential usefulness of this combination cocktail and route of administration for the treatment of short stature.

Growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin, a new synthetic hexapeptide, before and during puberty.

The objective of this study was to verify the GH-releasing activity of a synthetic hexapeptide, hexarelin (HEX), before and during puberty. Ninety-six children (54 boys and 42 girls, aged 4.1-17.4 yr) were studied. Fifty-two of the children were prepubertal, and the other 44 were in pubertal stage II-IV. The GH response to 2 micrograms/kg HEX, iv (n = 56), was higher (P < 0.001) than that induced by 1 microgram/kg GHRH, iv (n = 33). The iv dose of 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX induced a greater GH increase (P < 0.02) than the 1.0 microgram/kg dose. The GH-releasing effect of 10 mg HEX, orally, was greater (P < 0.03) than that of 1.0 microgram/kg GHRH, iv (n = 7). The iv dose of 2 micrograms/kg HEX elicited an increase in GH levels that was higher in pubertal children than in prepubertal children (77.5 +/- 8.5 vs. 39.4 +/- 4.4 micrograms/L; P < 0.001). Before puberty, there was no sex-dependent difference in the GH response to HEX. It increased during puberty (P < 0.05 and P < 0.002 for boys and girls, respectively), when it was higher (P < 0.05) in girls than in boys. In contrast, GH responses to GHRH were not related to sex differences and/or puberty. In conclusion, HEX is a potent and reproducible stimulus of GH secretion in children. The effect of HEX increases in puberty, with girls showing a more marked GH response.

Reliability of provocative tests to assess growth hormone secretory status. Study in 472 normally growing children.

The reliability of provocative stimuli of GH secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency is still controversial. Until now, normative values of GH response to various stimuli have not been established properly. In 472 children and adolescents with normal stature (n = 295, height SDS range -1.5 to 1.2) or normal short stature (n = 177, height SDS range -3.7 to -1.8), we studied the GH response to physical exercise, insulin-induced hypoglycemia, arginine (ARG), clonidine, levodopa, glucagon, pyridostigmine (PD), GHRH, PD + GHRH, and ARG + GHRH. The peak GH responses (range) to various stimuli were: 1) physical exercise: 3.0-28.3 micrograms/L; 2) insulin-induced hypoglycemia: 2.7-46.4 micrograms/L; 3) ARG: 0.5-48.4 micrograms/L; 4) clonidine: 3.8-86.0 micrograms/L; 5) levodopa: 1.9-40.0 micrograms/L; 6) glucagon: 1.9-49.5 micrograms/L; 7) PD: 2.5-35.0 micrograms/L; 8) GHRH: 2.7-102.7 micrograms/L; 9)PD + GHRH: 19.6-106.0 micrograms/L; and 10) ARG + GHRH: 19.4-120.0 micrograms/L. Our results show that all conventional stimuli of GH secretion frequently failed to increase GH levels, showing values lower than that arbitrarily assumed, so far, as minimum normal GH peak, i.e. 7 or 10 micrograms/L. When combined with PD or ARG (substances inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin release), GHRH becomes the most powerful test to explore the secretory capacity of somatotrope cells (the GH response being always higher than 19 micrograms/L). Therefore, only GHRH combined with PD or ARG may be able to clearly differentiate normal children from patients with GH deficiency, though a normal GH response to these tests cannot rule out the existence of GH hyposecretory state because of hypothalamic dysfunction.

Acute clonidine administration potentiates spontaneous diurnal, but not nocturnal, growth hormone secretion in normal short children.

It has been shown that alpha 2-adrenoreceptor activation induced by clonidine (CLON) increases plasma GH levels in both adults and children. In this study the effects of CLON (150 micrograms/m2, orally) on GH secretion were studied both in the morning (from 0800-1100 h) and at night (from 2300-0200 h) in nine short children previously shown to have normal spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion. In the morning, CLON induced a GH increase higher than placebo [peak (mean +/- SEM), 23.8 +/- 4.3 vs. 3.4 +/- 1.4 micrograms/L; P = 0.0001; area under curve (AUC), 624.4 +/- 62.7 vs. 135.6 +/- 33.3 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.00001]. In the night, no difference was observed between GH secretion after CLON (peak, 15.4 +/- 3.2 micrograms/L; AUC, 562.2 +/- 57.5 micrograms/L.h) and placebo (peak, 13.1 +/- 4.7 micrograms/L; AUC, 497.2 +/- 83.5 micrograms/L.h). Spontaneous GH secretion was higher during the night than in the morning (P = 0.0001), whereas nocturnal GH secretion overlapped with that in the morning after CLON. The data presented show that alpha 2-adrenoreceptor activation is probably mediated by increased endogenous GHRH release; our results suggest that the endogenous GHRH secretion is maximally stimulated at night.

The growth hormone response to hexarelin in children: reproducibility and effect of sex steroids.

We studied the variability of the GH response to the synthetic hexapeptide hexarelin (Hex) and the effect of sex steroids on the GH-releasing effect of Hex in a group of prepubertal short normal children. Twenty-five children were tested on two occasions 3-7 days apart with 2 micrograms/kg, i.v., Hex. The GH response to Hex was reevaluated after testosterone (T) administration in 10 boys, after ethinyl estradiol (EE) administration in 15 children (5 boys and 10 girls), and after oxandrolone (Ox) administration in 8 boys. In the 25 children tested twice, the mean GH peak and mean area under the curve after the first and second tests were similar. The mean (+/- SD) coefficients of variation of the GH peak and area under the curve responses to Hex was 22.7 +/- 21.0% and 24.0 +/- 20.7%, respectively. Priming with T and EE resulted in an increased GH response to Hex [41.8 +/- 21.0 before vs. 71.1 +/- 28.3 after T (P < 0.001); 43.0 +/- 14.5 before vs. 60.0 +/- 20.0 after EE (P < 0.005)], whereas Ox administration had no effect on the Hex-induced GH release. These data confirm that Hex is a potent stimulus for GH secretion in children with a limited intraindividual variability. In addition, we have shown that both T and EE, but not Ox, significantly augment the GH-releasing effect of Hex. Our data suggest that the sex steroid-induced increase in the GH response to Hex is mediated by estrogens.

Growth hormone-releasing effect of oral growth hormone-releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6) administration in children with short stature.

Growth hormone-releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6) is a synthetic hexapeptide with a potent GH-releasing activity after intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal and oral administration in man. Previous data showed its activity also in some patients with GH deficiency. The aim of our study was to verify the GH-releasing activity of oral GHRP-6 administration on GH secretion in children with normal short stature. The effect of oral GHRP-6 (300 micrograms/kg) was compared with that of the maximally effective dose of intravenous GH-releasing hormone (GHRH-29, 1 microgram/kg). As the GHRH-induced GH rise in children is potentiated by arginine (ARG), even when administered by oral route at low dose (4 g), we studied also the interaction of oral GHRP-6 and ARG administration. We studied 13 children (nine boys and four girls aged 6.2-10.5 years, pubertal stage I) with normal short stature (height less than -2 SD score; height velocity more than -2 SD score; normal bone age; insulin-like growth factor I > 70 micrograms/l). In a first group of children (N = 7), oral GHRP-6 administration induced a GH response (mean +/- SEM; peak at 60 min vs baseline: 18.8 +/- 3.0 vs 1.1 +/- 0.3 micrograms/l, p < 0.0006; area under curve: 1527.3 +/- 263.9 micrograms l-1 h-1) which was similar to that elicited by GHRH (peak at 45 min vs baseline: 20.8 +/- 4.5 vs 2.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/l, p < 0.007; area under curve: 1429.4 +/- 248.2 micrograms l-1 h-1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Enhanced adrenocorticotrophic hormone and cortisol responses to corticotrophin-releasing hormone in central idiopathic diabetes insipidus.

It is well known that arginine vasopressin (AVP) exerts a stimulatory effect on adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) secretion. Moreover, there is consistent evidence that the hypothalamic AVP-secreting neurons are involved in the neuroregulation of ACTH secretion. With the aim to throw further light on the interaction between AVP and corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the neuroregulation of ACTH secretion, in this study we compared the ACTH and cortisol responses to human CRH (100 micrograms iv as a bolus) in 18 normal subjects (15 females and three males, age 22-35 years) and seven patients with central isolated diabetes insipidus (six females and one male, age 16-40 years). Two patients were newly diagnosed and five had discontinued substitution therapy with desamino-D-AVP 24 h before testing. All had free access to water before and during the test period. The ACTH and cortisol responses to CRH were higher in subjects with diabetes insipidus than in controls, either when evaluated as peak values (ACTH, mean +/- SEM: 17.0 +/- 1.2 vs 7.7 +/- 0.7 pmol/l, p = 0.0003; cortisol: 611.3 +/- 59.4 vs 450.7 +/- 21.2 nmol/l, p = 0.01) or area under curve values (ACTH: 672.5 +/- 75.7 vs 364.0 +/- 33.6 pmol.l-1 x h-1, p = 0.002; cortisol: 29158.0 +/- 2937.0 vs 23236.7 +/- 1052.1 nmol.l-1 x h-1, p = 0.03). These results show that patients with diabetes insipidus have an exaggerated pituitary-adrenal response to CRH. This may be due to the fact that in diabetes insipidus AVP secretion from parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular nucleus in the hypophysial portal system is not impaired.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

New approach to the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults.

Pyridostigmine (PD), a muscarinic cholinergic agonist, and arginine (ARG) clearly increase the growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in man. The current study was undertaken to investigate the value and safety of PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH tests as well as the measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in diagnosing GH deficiency in adults. Fifty-four patients considered GH deficient from extensive organic or idiopathic pituitary disease and 326 healthy adults were studied. The IGF-I concentrations were lower than the 3rd percentile of normal values in only 31 of the 54 (57.4%) patients with hypopituitarism. However, the IGF-I levels in hypopituitary patients and in normal subjects overlapped more frequently between 41 and 60 years (50%) and between 61 and 80 years (92.3%) as opposed to between 20 and 40 years (8.6%). In contrast to the IGF-I measurement, the ranges of peak GH responses to PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH tests were clearly differentiated between the hypopituitary (0.2-6.8 and 0.1-9.5 microg/l, respectively) and normal (17.7-114 and 16.1-119 microg/l, respectively). However, the PD + GHRH test was reliable only in subjects of 20-40 years of age. In conclusion, IGF-I measurement had no value in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults aged over 40 years, but is reliable enough when young adults of 20-40 years of age are considered. Both PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH testing should be considered more reliable biochemical measurements of GH deficiency. In contrast to the PD + GHRH test, the ARG + GHRH test is reliable throughout the adult lifespan and appears to be the most appropriate for patient compliance and safety.

Acute administration of recombinant human growth hormone inhibits the somatotrope responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone in childhood.

In adulthood the growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is inhibited by previous acute administration of either GH or GHRH and it is restored by substances that inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin release. Because in children the GH response to GHRH is not affected by previous neurohormone administration, it has been suggested that in childhood a GH increase is not able to trigger the somatostatin-mediated negative GH autofeedback mechanism. To verify this hypothesis, in 25 children (8 girls and 17 boys; 15 prepubertal and 10 in pubertal stages II-IV) with familial short stature (normal height velocity and insulin-like growth factor I levels) we studied the effect of acute i.v. administration of different recombinant human GH doses (group 1, N = 5, 0.06 U/kg; group 2, N = 6, 0.01 U/kg; group 3, N = 7, 0.005 U/kg at - 150 min) or saline on the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 min). In another group (N = 7), we studied the effect of 0.005 U/kg iv recombinant human GH or saline on the GH response to GHRH combined with arginine (0.5 g/kg i.v. over 30 min), which likely inhibits hypothalamic somatostatin release. Serum GH increases after recombinant human GH were dose-dependent (GH peak, mean +/- SEM, 171.7 +/- 24.4, 33.3 +/- 3.9 and 21.8 +/- 5.1 micrograms/l, respectively). The administration of recombinant human GH strongly inhibited the GHRH-induced GH rise in all groups (group 1, 7.1 +/- 1.7 vs 23.1 +/- 7.6 micrograms/l, p < 0.05; group 2, 9.5 +/- 2.8 vs 26.9 +/- 8.5 micrograms/l, p < 0.05; group 3, 9.1 +/- 2.7 vs 34.8 +/- 7.2 micrograms/l, p < 0.02). The GH response to arginine + GHRH (56.9 +/- 13.3 micrograms/l) was higher than that to GHRH alone recorded in group 1 (p < 0.005), group 2 (p < 0.01) and group 3 (p < 0.01), while exogenous recombinant human GH failed to inhibit it (45.0 +/- 9.4 micrograms/l). Our results demonstrate that in childhood, as well as in adulthood, recombinant human GH administration inhibits the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH. This inhibitory effect is likely to be mediated by hypothalamic somatostatin release.

The GH, prolactin, ACTH and cortisol responses to Hexarelin, a synthetic hexapeptide, undergo different age-related variations.

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP) which acts on specific receptors at both the pituitary and the hypothalamic level to stimulate GH release in an age-dependent manner. Like other GHRPs, HEX possesses also prolactin (PRL) and ACTH/cortisol-releasing activity. similar to that of human corticotropin-releasing hormone (hCRH). The mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effect of GHRPs on lactotrope and corticotrope secretion are even less clear and the influence of age on these endocrine activities of GHRPs is unknown. To clarify this point we studied the GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol responses to the maximal effective dose of HEX (2.0 micrograms/kg i.v.) in: 12 prepubertal children (Pre-C, 8 male, 4 female, age 5.8-12.1 years); 12 pubertal normal short children (Pub-C, 5 male, 7 female, age 9.7-15.5 years, pubertal stage II-IV); 20 normal young adults (Young, 6 males, 14 females, age 23-32 years); and in 16 normal elderly people (Elderly, 5 male, 11 female, age 66-81 years). The GH response to HEX was clear in Pre-C (0-120 min area under curve, mean +/- S.E.M. 769.5 +/- 122.2 micrograms*min/l) but strikingly increased (P < 0.001) in Pub-C (1960.2 +/- 283.5 micrograms*min/l). The HEX-induced GH rise in Young (1829.7 +/- 243.1 micrograms*min/l) persisted similar to that in Pub-C, but decreased in Elderly (951.1 +/- 232.9 micrograms*min/I, P < 0.005); the latter was, in turn, similar to that in Pre-C. HEX induced a significant PRL increase which, however, showed no age-related variations, being similar in Pre-C (512.1 +/- 88.0 micrograms*min/l), Pub-C (584.0 +/- 106.0 micrograms*min/l), Young (554.9 +/- 56.0 micrograms*min/l) and Elderly (523.9 +/- 59.6 micrograms*min/l). The ACTH-releasing activity of HEX was present in Pre-C (1356.6 +/- 204.9 pg*min/ml) and was clearly enhanced (P < 0.02) in Pub-C (2253.5 +/- 242.8 pg*min/ml). The ACTH rise after HEX in Young (1258.1 +/- 141.2pg*min/ml) was lower (P < 0.02) than that in Pub-C and similar to that in Pre-C, while the ACTH response to HEX in Elderly (1786.5 +/- 340.1 pg*min/ml) showed a further trend toward increase, being similar to that in Pub-C. On the other hand, the cortisol response to HEX showed no significant age-related variations, being not different in Pre-C (7747.2 +/- 1031.6 micrograms*min/l), Pub-C (6106.0 +/- 862.9 micrograms*min/l), Young (6827.5 +/- 509.6 micrograms*min/I) and Elderly (7950.6 +/- 658.3 micrograms*min/l). In conclusion, our present data demonstrate that in humans the GH- and ACTH-releasing activities of HEX undergo different age-related variations, while its PRL-releasing activity is not dependent on age. These finding suggest that actions at different levels and/or on different receptor subtypes mediate the different age-related hormonal effects of GHRPs.

Reproducibility of the growth hormone response to stimulation with growth hormone-releasing hormone plus arginine during lifespan.

The reliability and reproducibility of provocative stimuli of growth hormone (GH) secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency are still controversial both in childhood and in adulthood. The combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and arginine (ARG), which likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, is one of the most potent stimuli known so far and has been proposed recently as the best test to explore the maximal somatotrope capacity of somatotrope cells. However, it is well known that, usually, provocative stimuli of GH secretion suffer from poor reproducibility and that of the GHRH + ARG test has still to be verified. We aimed to verify the between- and within-subject variability of the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test in normal subjects during their lifespan as well as in hypopituitaric patients with GH deficiency (GHD). In 10 normal children (C: six male and four female, age 12.3 +/- 0.9 years, body mass index (BMI) = 16.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m2, pubertal stages I-III), 18 normal young adults (Y: ten male and eight female, age 31.1 +/- 1.3 years, BMI = 21.4 +/- 0.4 kg/m2), 12 normal elderly subjects (E: two male and ten female, age 74.4 +/- 1.8 years, BMI= 22.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) and 15 panhypopituitaric GH-deficient patients (GHD: nine male and six female, age 40.9 +/- 4.1 years, BMI= 22.7 +/- 1.0 kg/m2), we studied the inter- and intra-individual variability of the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + ARG (0.5 g/kg i.v.) in two different sessions at least 3 days apart. The GH responses to GHRH + ARG in C (1st vs 2nd session: 61.6 +/- 8.1 vs 66.5 +/- 9.4 microg/l), Y (70.4 +/- 10.1 vs 76.2 10.7 microg/l) and E (57.9 14.8 vs 52.1 +/- 8.0 microg/l) were similar and reproducible in all groups. The somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH + ARG also showed a limited within-subject variability (r = 0.71, 0.90 and 0.89 and p < 0.02, 0.0005 and 0.0005 for C, Y and E, respectively). Similarly in GHD, the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test showed a good inter- (1st vs 2nd session: 2.3 +/- 0.5 vs 2.2 +/- 0.6 microg/l) and intra-individual reproducibility (r = 0.70, p < 0.005). The GHRH + ARG-induced GH responses in GHD were markedly lower (p < 0.0005) than those in age-matched controls and no overlap was found between GH peak responses in GHD and normal subjects. In normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH + ARG is very marked, independent of age and shows limited inter- and intra-individual variability. The GH response to the GHRH + ARG test is strikingly reduced in panhypopituitaric patients with GHD, in whom the low somatotrope responsiveness is reproducible. Thus, these findings strengthen the hypothesis that GHRH + ARG should be considered the most reliable test to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotrope cells and to distinguish normal subjects from GHD patients in adulthood.

Effects of alpha- and Beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists on growth hormone secretion in man.

UNLABELLED: Abstract It is well known that the adrenergic system has both stimulatory and inhibitory influences on growth hormone (GH) secretion probably by modulating GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and/or somatostatin release. To better understand the mechanisms by which these influences take place, we investigated the effects of alpha- and beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists on both basal and GHRH-induced GH release in 23 male adult volunteers. The GH-releasing effect of clonidine (0.15 mg infused iv over 10 min), an alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist, was significantly blunted by yohimbine (30 mg orally at -50 min), a relatively specific alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist area under the response curve, mean+/-SEM: 672.6 +/- 143.0 versus 219.6 +/- 16.7 mug/l/h; P<0.05). On the other hand, the GHRH (1 mug/kg iv as a bolus)-induced GH increase was unaffected by yohimbine (339.3 +/- 19.1 versus 518.1+/-172.8 mug/I/h). Concomitant blockade of alpha(1)-/alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors by phentolamine (0.5 mg/ml/min infused iv from -60 to +30 min) abolished the GHRH-induced GH rise (645.5+/- 106.0 versus 189.0+/-58.8 mug/l/h; P<0.01). Finally, the GHRH-stimulated release was blunted by beta(2)-adrenergic stimulation with salbutamol (10 mug/min infused iv from -5 to +15 min) (324.3 +/- 99.7 versus 112.7 +/- 48.8 mug/l/h; P<0.02). IN CONCLUSION: 1) The evidence that yohimbine is able to blunt the clonidine-induced GH release but fails to inhibit the GHRH-induced GH rise indicates that, as in animals, in man too the GH-releasing effect of clonidine is specifically mediated by alpha(2)-receptor activation, and may occur via endogenous GHRH release; 2) the inhibitory effect on GH release of beta, namely beta(2), receptor activation is probably mediated by the somatostatinergic system; 3) an unopposed beta-adrenergic activation would account for the inhibitory effect on GHRH-induced GH release of concomitant alpha(1)-/alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor blockade by phentolamine.

Effect of cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine on growth hormone secretion in obese adults and children.

In obesity the reduced growth hormone (GH) responses to several provocative stimuli including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) indicate a diminished somatotroph responsiveness but do not distinguish between primary pituitary and hypothalamic pathogenesis. However, it has been shown that the cholinergic system positively influences Gh secretion likely by modulating somatostatin release in a negative way. Thus, the effect of cholinergic activity enhancement by pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, on both basal and GHRH-induced GH secretion was studied in 14 obese subjects (eight adults and six children). Eighteen nonobese subjects (seven adults and 11 children) were studied as controls. In obese subjects the GHRH-induced GH increase was lower than in controls (peak, mean +/- SEM, adults, 9.2 +/- 2.7 v 16.8 +/- 5.7 ng/mL; children, 8.0 +/- 0.8 v 20.3 +/- 4.6 ng/mL) attaining statistical significance only in children group (P less than .02). The PD-induced GH response in the two obese groups was similar to that observed in relative controls (adults, 5.3 +/- 1.0 v 7.4 +/- 1.7 ng/mL; children, 9.6 +/- 1.6 v 13.3 +/- 1.4 ng/mL). PD clearly potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese subjects, both adults (P less than .05 v GHRH alone) and children (P less than .0005 v GHRH alone). However, the GH responses to PD + GHRH was significantly reduced in obese subjects compared with controls (adults, 18.1 +/- 2.2 v 42.7 +/- 10.7 ng/mL, P less than .05; children, 28.3 +/- 4.5 v 58.2 +/- 7.7 ng/mL, P less than .01). In conclusion, PD is able to potentiate the blunted GH responses to GHRH in obese adults and children, inducing a GH increase similar to that observed after GHRH alone in normal subjects. This finding suggests that an alteration of somatostatinergic tone could be involved in the reduced GH secretion in obesity.

Diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults.

Within an appropriate clinical context, growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults must be demonstrated biochemically. The assays of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) per se do not establish the diagnosis of adult GHD. Similarly, the evaluation of spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion over 24 h has no diagnostic value in adulthood even when an ultra-sensitive GH assay is used. The diagnosis of adult GHD is established by provocative testing of GH secretion, and insulin-induced hypoglycaemia using the insulin tolerance test (ITT) is indicated as the test of choice. Alternative provocative tests of GH secretion have been proposed and have to be used with appropriate cut-off limits. Testing with GH releasing hormone (GHRH) alone has no diagnostic value, but when GHRH is given in combination with arginine or pyridostigmine it becomes the most potent and reproducible provocative test to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotrope cells. The potentiating effect of arginine on the GHRH-induced GH response is fully preserved while the stimulatory effect of GHRH + pyridostigmine is reduced in ageing. The GHRH + arginine test is well tolerated and reproducibly distinguishes between normal and GHD adult and elderly subjects. Thus, the GHRH + arginine test is the most promising alternative to the ITT provided that cut-off limits appropriate to its potent stimulatory effect are considered.

Effects of direct and indirect acetylcholine receptor agonists on growth hormone secretion in humans.

Cholinergic pathways in the central nervous system positively influence growth hormone (GH) secretion. In fact pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, enhances both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion while, conversely, pirenzepine, an antagonist of muscarinic M1 receptors, inhibits the GH response to GHRH and to other physiological and pharmacological stimuli. The effect of the cholinergic system on GH secretion probably takes place via inhibition of the release of endogenous somatostatin. In this study in 36 normal adults (26 males and 10 females, age 22-35 years) we compared the effects of three cholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine, 120 mg p.o., n = 19; neostigmine, 10 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 6; physostigmine, 12.5 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 6) and bethanechol, a direct muscarinic receptor agonist that is mainly active on muscarinic M3 receptors (25 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 5), on both basal and GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.)-stimulated GH secretion. Pyridostigmine, neostigmine and physostigmine induced a significant GH increase (peak vs. basal levels, mean +/- S.E.: 10.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l, P = 0.0001; 13.3 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.5 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.004; and 14.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.7 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.025;, respectively). These drugs also induced a similar potentiation of the GH response to GHRH (peak: 48.3 +/- 5.6 vs. 16.2 +/- 2.2 micrograms/l, P = 0.0001; 49.2 +/- 2.2 vs. 19.9 +/- 5.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.006; and 76.9 +/- 12.4 vs. 18.1 +/- 5.3 micrograms/l, P = 0.001, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of the potentiating effect of pyridostigmine, arginine and propranolol on the GHRH-induced GH release in short children.

The effect of pyridostigmine (60 mg orally), arginine (0.5 g/kg iv) and propranolol (PROP, 40 mg orally) on GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv)-induced GH release was studied in seven short children. Pyridostigmine and arginine induced a similar potentiating effect on GHRH-induced GH rise (Peak, mean +/- SEM: 56.9 +/- 12.8 and 48.6 +/- 8.5 micrograms/L, respectively vs 12.3 +/- 1.6 micrograms/L; p < 0.05). Combination of GHRH with propranolol induced an increase of GH that was significant only with regard to peak (28.9 +/- 8.4 micrograms/L) but not to AUC. However, GH rises observed after GHRH combined with PD or ARG did not significantly differ from that recorded after coadministration of GHRH and PROP both for peak and AUC. Our results confirm that pyridostigmine and arginine have a striking potentiating effect on the GHRH-induced GH rise in children and show that the tests with GHRH + PD and GH + H + ARG are ore reliable than that with GHRH + PROP to explore the secretory capacity of somatotroph cells.

The GH-releasing effect of Hexarelin, a synthetic hexapeptide, in newborns is lower than in young adults.

The aim of the present study was to verify the GH-releasing effect of Hexarelin, a synthetic hexapeptide, in newborns who are known to have GH hypersecretion likely due to hyperactivity of GHRH-secreting neurons while somatostatinergic activity seems not fully operative. We studied in 6 newborns (NB, 2.5 +/- 2.1 days), 12 prepubertal children (PC, 9.8 +/- 0.45 yr) and 12 young adults (YA, 28.2 +/- 0.2 yr) the GH response to Hexarelin (HEX, 2 micrograms/kg i.v.) compared to that observed after GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) in 6 NB (4.2 +/- 0.4 days), 12 PC (9.9 +/- 0.6 yr) and 12 YA (31.0 +/- 1.3 yr). GH levels were assayed basally and 30 and 60 min after drug administration. In NB, mean (+/- SEM) basal GH levels were higher while IGF-I levels were lower than those recorded in PC and YA (GH: 34.8 +/- 1.9 vs 2.8 +/- 0.4 vs 1.4 +/- 0.4 micrograms/l, p < 0.0006; IGF-I: 36.3 +/- 1.9 vs 152.0 +/- 11.5 vs 175.8 +/- 15.3 micrograms/l, p < 0.0007); in the last two groups GH and IGF-I levels were similar. The mean delta GH peak after HEX in NB (32.8 +/- 4.7 micrograms/l) was similar to that in PC (34.6 +/- 4.3 micrograms/l) and lower (p < 0.01) than that in YA (56.2 +/- 7.4 micrograms/l). Delta GH peak after GHRH in NB (60.1 +/- 1.5) was higher than those in PC and YA (20.8 +/- 4.8 and 22.8 +/- 3.4 micrograms/l) (p < 0.005 and < 0.002, respectively). In NB, the GH response to HEX was lower (p < 0.005) than to GHRH while in PC and YA the somatotrope response to HEX was higher (p < 0.03 and 0.0004, respectively) than to GHRH. These data demonstrate that the GH-releasing effect of Hexarelin undergoes age-dependent variation being lower in newborns than in young adults, opposite to that observed after GHRH administration. The evidence that Hexarelin releases less GH than GHRH in newborns but not in prepubertal children and in young adults makes unlikely the hypothesis that the GH-releasing effect of this hexapeptide is mediated via endogenous GHRH release.

Effects of phenylalanine, histidine, and leucine on basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion and on PRL, insulin, and glucose levels in short children. Comparison with the effects of arginine.

Of the amino acids arginine is the most potent GH secretagogue in man. It potentiates the GH response to GHRH, exerts a weaker PRL-releasing effect, stimulates insulin and glucagon and induces a biphasic glucose variation. The potency and effects of other amino acids on pituitary and pancreatic hormones need to be clarified. In 43 children with normal short stature (5.3-14.0 yr; 30 M and 13 F) the effects of the infusion of phenylalanine (Phe, 0.08 g/kg), histidine (His, 0.1 g/kg), and leucine (Leu, 0.08 g/kg) on basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion and on PRL, insulin and glucose levels were studied and compared with those of arginine at high (hArg, 0.5 g/kg) or low dose (lArg, 0.2 g/kg). Phe increased basal (p < 0.05) but not GHRH-stimulated GH levels, induced PRL and insulin rises (p < 0.03 and p < 0.03), and did not change glycemia. Though a trend toward an increase in basal GH levels was found after His, His and Leu did not significantly modify either basal or GHRH-induced GH secretion nor basal PRL, insulin and glucose levels. Both hArg and lArg increased basal (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively) and GHRH-stimulated GH levels (p < 0.006 and p < 0.006). hArg increased both PRL (p < 0.002) and insulin levels (p < 0.005) more (p < 0.0005 and p < 0.004) than lArg (p < 0.005 and p < 0.005), while glucose levels showed a similar increase followed by a similar decrease. We conclude that in childhood: a) Phe significantly increases GH secretion but, differently from Arg, does not potentiate the response to GHRH, suggesting different mechanisms of action of these amino acids; b) differently from His and Leu, Phe is a PRL and insulin secretagogue but is less potent than Arg; c) Arg has the highest stimulatory effect on pituitary and pancreatic hormones.