Tumor Necrosis Factor: Function, Release and Clearance.

Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) is a multifunctional cytokine. It plays an important role in the pathophysiology of several diseases. Recently, it has been discovered that TNF is circulating in two different forms, a bioactive form and an immunologically detectable form. These two forms of TNF show different clearance kinetics. The immunological form is supposed to be an inactivated TNF protein. For this inactivation, proteolytic degradation or TNF binding by inactivating proteins is necessary. In this review we have focused on TNF inactivation by TNF binding proteins. Recent data show that there are soluble TNF receptors circulating which can bind and inactivate TNF. These receptors are membrane-bound TNF receptors which have been proteolytically cleaved from the cell membrane. Two TNF receptors are circulating, the soluble TNF receptor of 55 kDa (P55) and the receptor of 75 kDa (P75). The receptors are held responsible not only for inactivation of the TNF, but also for the clearance of TNF. Recent data show that the kidney is the most important organ for TNF clearance, followed by the liver. All other organs are of less importance. In this review, function, release, and clearance of TNF are discussed.

Effects of postoperative morbidity on long-term outcome following surgery for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcomes after surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains controversial. During the last decade, advances in surgical as well as non-surgical treatment have increased resectability and altered outcomes. We sought to determine the influence of postoperative morbidity on disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: All patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM for the first time between 2000 and 2011 were retrospectively identified from a prospective database. Postoperative morbidity was classified according to Dindo-Clavien grade. A Dindo-Clavien grade ≥ 3a was considered a major complication. Primary outcomes were DFS and OS depending on the presence or absence of postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Of the 266 included patients, 97 patients (37 %) developed postoperative complications, of whom 61 (23 %) had major complications. Median DFS and OS (5-year) were 17 and 53 months (42 %). The occurrence of postoperative morbidity did not significantly shorten OS (p = 0.130) and DFS (p = 0.101). However, major morbidity reduced DFS significantly (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the present study, the occurrence of major postoperative complications was associated with diminished DFS. However, the effect of (major) complications on OS did not reach statistical significance.

Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated recovery from surgery has been achieved when patients are managed within a multimodal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. This study evaluated the benefit of an ERAS programme for patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS: The ERAS protocol of epidural analgesia, early oral intake and early mobilization was studied prospectively in a consecutive series of 61 patients. Outcomes were compared with those in a consecutive series of 100 patients who underwent liver resection before the start of the study. Endpoints were postoperative length of hospital stay, postoperative resumption of oral intake, readmissions, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (92 per cent) in the ERAS group tolerated fluids within 4 h of surgery and a normal diet on day 1 after surgery. Median hospital stay, including readmissions, was 6.0 days compared with 8.0 days in the control group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of readmission (13 and 10.0 per cent respectively), morbidity (41 and 31.0 per cent) and mortality (0 and 2.0 per cent) between ERAS and control groups. CONCLUSION: The ERAS fast-track protocol is safe and effective for patients undergoing liver resection. It allows early oral intake, promotes faster postoperative recovery and reduces hospital stay.

The introduction of a laparoscopic liver surgery programme: a cost analysis of initial experience in a university hospital.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the era of expanding costs of healthcare, this study was conducted to perform a cost analysis of introducing a laparoscopic liver surgery programme for left sided liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients treated by laparoscopic liver resections of left lateral segments were included. Controls were a group of 14 patients undergoing open resection for similar pathology. Primary outcomes were costs. Secondary outcomes were complications, conversions, blood loss, length of operation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The laparoscopic approach for hepatic left lateral resection (bisegmentectomy 2 and 3) was performed in fourteen patients (group I, median age 54 [range 26-82] years). In the open group, fourteen patients from a prospectively collected database with the same type of resection were selected (group II, median age 64 [range 29-76] years). Costs of theatre usage in the laparoscopic group were significantly lower (p=0.031). No significant differences in costs of disposable instruments, ward stay and total costs were observed between the two groups. There were three complications in the laparoscopic group compared with two complications in the open group. In the laparoscopic group there were 2 conversions (14%). Median blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (50 mls [range 0-750], (p=0.001) versus the open group (500 mls [range 150-750]). Furthermore, operation time was also significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (116 [range 85-261] minutes) versus the open group (165 [range 96-217] minutes, p=0.016). Median length of stay was 6 [range 4-11] days in group I versus 6 [range 5-13] days in group II (p=0.508). CONCLUSION: Costs of laparoscopic liver resections proved to be equivalent to open surgery. Furthermore, implementation of a laparoscopic liver resection programme seems feasible and safe with reduced blood loss and operation time and comparable morbidity and length of stay.