RESUMO
Aplastic anemia (AA) is a rare bone marrow failure disorder that is treated with either allogeneic stem cell transplant or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) consisting of antithymocyte globulin (ATG), cyclosporine (CSA), and eltrombopag. While outcomes are favorable in younger patients, older patients (>60) have significantly worse long-term survival. The dose of ATG is often reduced in older patients and those with multiple comorbidities given concerns for tolerability. The efficacy and safety of dose-attenuated IST in this population is largely undescribed. We performed a retrospective review of patients with AA treated with IST. Our analysis was confounded by changes in practice patterns and the introduction of eltrombopag. We identified 53 patients >60 years old, of which, 20 received dose-attenuated IST, with no statistically significant difference in overall survival between full and attenuated dose cohorts. Overall response rates in both cohorts were similar at 6 months at 71% and 68%. There were more documented infectious complications in the full dose cohort (13 vs. 3). This supports the consideration of dose-attenuated IST in older patients with concerns about tolerance of IST. Lastly, our data confirmed favorable outcomes of younger patients receiving IST, especially in combination with eltrombopag.
Assuntos
Anemia Aplástica , Benzoatos , Hidrazinas , Imunossupressores , Pirazóis , Humanos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Anemia Aplástica/diagnóstico , Anemia Aplástica/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Soro Antilinfocitário/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Patient education in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has become increasingly complex with the introduction of new treatments and chemotherapy regimens. Video education presents an opportunity to supplement traditional patient education and address some of the gaps associated with standard methods. This single-center study sought to assess the potential impact of supplemental video education on patients receiving induction chemotherapy for AML. Participants were consented to be randomized to receive their education with or without a supplemental video designed for their treatment regimen. We then provided a survey to each participant to assess knowledge retention, anxiety, and overall satisfaction with their care. Patients that received video education were found to have significantly improved knowledge retention compared to those that did not. There were no differences detected in anxiety or patient satisfaction. Video education appears to be an effective supplemental method for patient education in AML. Limitations include the single-center nature of the study at an urban academic medical center with a relatively well-educated, primarily Caucasian, younger population. Future research is warranted to assess the video in a diverse set of languages and to explore its broader benefits.
RESUMO
In recent years, an explosion of novel agents has shifted the treatment paradigm for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The optimal place in therapy for many of these novel agents remains unknown due to limited guidance from national guidelines and the way these agents were studied prior to entering the market. A critical evaluation of the literature and incorporation of oncology stewardship principles can be helpful in determining an optimal place for these agents while being mindful of the overall cost that is associated with therapies. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety data for five controversial agents and provide examples of the use of stewardship practices in determining their place in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.
Assuntos
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Oncologia , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation (FLT3+ AML) have historically had poor outcomes. While the addition of the FLT3 inhibitors to induction therapy has been shown to improve survival outcomes in FLT3+ AML, interactions and overlapping toxicities between FLT3 inhibitors and standard of care medications used during induction therapy (e.g. azole antifungals, anthracyclines) and logistical barriers have complicated their use. To avoid these concerns, our institution has opted to defer initiation of midostaurin until after completion of induction therapy. However, to our knowledge no study confirming the effectiveness of this strategy for real world FLT3 inhibitor use has been published. METHODS: We performed a single center, propensity-score matched, retrospective cohort study characterizing efficacy and safety of our strategy for use of FLT3 inhibitors in the treatment of FLT3+ AML. The primary outcome was median event-free survival (EFS), while secondary endpoints included median overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), 30-day mortality, duration of neutropenia, duration of thrombocytopenia, consolidation cycle delays, documented infections, and all-cause hospital readmission. RESULTS: A total of 83 FLT3+ AML patients treated with intensive induction therapy were included in the study, of whom 48 were propensity-score matched and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the patients who received a FLT3 inhibitor after induction therapy and the historical control arm. Median EFS was not significantly different but compared favorably between the FLT3 inhibitor cohort and historical controls (not reached vs 8 months, p = 0.343) with 18-month EFS of 54% and 43% for the two cohorts, respectively. Similarly, no significant differences were noted with regard to median OS (not reached vs 28.7 months, p = 0.752), ORR (79.2% vs 79.2%), or safety outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to historical controls, addition of a FLT3 inhibitor to intensive chemotherapy post-induction may improve EFS or OS in a real world patient cohort with longer follow-up and a larger sample size. The omission of midostaurin in induction allowed for the use of an azole antifungal and the intensification of anthracycline dose may have contributed to high remission rates in both groups.
Assuntos
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Azóis/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Mutação , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tirosina Quinase 3 Semelhante a fms/genéticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea are common cancer and cancer therapy adverse effects. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned to optimize patient symptom control and minimize excess use of hospital resources, such as emergency department visits. METHODS: Michigan Medicine oncology clinical pharmacists have been independently providing patient symptom management through a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) program which established guidelines for management of gastrointestinal toxicities (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and/or constipation) secondary to a patient's cancer diagnosis or treatment of the cancer. Patients were referred to the pharmacist by the treating oncologist or hematologist. RESULTS: From June 2019 to May 2020, there were a total of 62 patient referrals. Ten of the 62 referrals did not meet the CDTM inclusion criteria, resulting in 52 patients who were managed by the pharmacists. The total number of individual pharmacist visits was 136, with a median of 2.2 (range, 0-11) visits per patient referred. A total of 169 categorized pharmacist interventions were captured. Most interventions (100/169, 59.2%) were related to nausea/vomiting. Diarrhea-related and constipation-related interventions accounted for 10 (5.9%) and 13 (7.7%) of the total interventions, respectively. Most patients (36/52, 69.2%) had a reduction in the severity of their referral diagnosis symptom(s) based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading. CONCLUSION: The Michigan Medicine Pharmacist CDTM program allowed pharmacists to independently manage gastrointestinal toxicities of patients with cancer and improved patient symptom severity. The CDTM program has the opportunity to improve quality of care.
Assuntos
Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Farmacêuticos , Humanos , Oncologia , Cuidados Paliativos , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Secondary AML is associated with a disproportionately poor prognosis, consistently shown to exhibit inferior response rates, event-free survival, and overall survival in comparison with de novo AML. Secondary AML may arise from the evolution of an antecedent hematologic disorder, or it may arise as a complication of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the case of therapy-related AML. Because of the high frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics and high-risk molecular features, such as alterations in TP53, leukemic clones are often inherently chemoresistant. Standard of care induction had long remained conventional 7 + 3 until its reformulation as CPX-351, recently FDA approved specifically for secondary AML. However, recent data also suggests relatively favorable outcomes with regimens based on high-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents. With several investigational agents being studied, the therapeutic landscape becomes even more complex, and the treatment approach involves patient-specific, disease-specific, and therapy-specific considerations.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Citarabina/uso terapêutico , Daunorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/metabolismo , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patologia , Mutação , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/genética , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismoRESUMO
Clofarabine containing chemotherapeutic regimens have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of relapsed refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Nonetheless, there are limited data on the use of clofarabine in patients with renal failure. The present report describes the use of clofarabine in a patient with renal failure undergoing intermittent dialysis. We describe our rationale for dosing, clofarabine plasma levels obtained, and discuss our findings in the context of other available literature. Consistent with previous findings, intermittent hemodialysis was not found to be a reliable method of removing clofarabine in patients with renal insufficiency.
Assuntos
Nucleotídeos de Adenina/administração & dosagem , Arabinonucleosídeos/administração & dosagem , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Nucleotídeos de Adenina/sangue , Nucleotídeos de Adenina/farmacocinética , Adulto , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos , Arabinonucleosídeos/sangue , Arabinonucleosídeos/farmacocinética , Clofarabina , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Masculino , Diálise Renal , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is an important treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. However, there is limited data on the safety of venetoclax without a dose ramp-up in patients with AML. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with AML treated with HMA/venetoclax (HMA/Ven) with or without a dose ramp-up, or HMA alone from 6/30/2014-8/22/2022 was conducted. The primary endpoint was the incidence of laboratory and/or clinical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) by day 10. Of 225 patients, 111 patients received HMA alone or HMA/Ven with a dose ramp-up and 114 received HMA/Ven with no dose ramp-up. The incidence of TLS was similar between the control and no dose ramp-up groups, with rates of 5.4% and 5.3% respectively (p = 0.962). TLS incidence was comparable in patients with and without a dose ramp-up, suggesting that a dose ramp-up may not be mandatory in patients with AML.
Assuntos
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Sulfonamidas , Síndrome de Lise Tumoral , Humanos , Síndrome de Lise Tumoral/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos com Pontes/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
This retrospective study was conducted to determine whether the number of peripherally inserted central-catheter lumens affected the rate of central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in adult patients with acute leukemia. The results show that CLABSI rates were not significantly different between patients with triple-lumen or double-lumen PICCs (22.1% vs 23.4%; P = .827).
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Sepse , Tromboembolia Venosa , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicaçõesRESUMO
Eltrombopag has been shown to improve response rates when added to standard therapy in adults with severe aplastic anemia in controlled trial settings. However, outcomes in real-world populations have mostly been examined in small retrospective studies. This robust, multicenter, retrospective cohort study across six academic health systems compared outcomes in patients who received immunosuppressive therapy with or without eltrombopag. The study included 82 patients who received front-line therapy from January 2014 to August 2021. Overall response rates at 6 months did not differ significantly for patients receiving eltrombopag versus immunosuppressive therapy alone (58% v. 65%, p = 0.56). However, complete response rates at 6 and 12 months were over two times higher in the eltrombopag arm (29% v. 12%, p = 0.06 and 48% v. 18%, p = 0.005). Rates of hepatotoxicity were similar across both arms. Eltrombopag addition did not impact overall survival (median not reached in either arm at 2 years, p = 0.86) or disease-free survival (median not reached v. 13.3 months at 2 years, p = 0.20). Eltrombopag may not produce as large of a benefit in real-world settings compared to controlled trial settings but may offer patients deeper responses with similar rates of toxicity to immunosuppressive therapy alone.
Assuntos
Anemia Aplástica , Humanos , Adulto , Anemia Aplástica/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Benzoatos/efeitos adversos , Hidrazinas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represent a heterogeneous population and therefore there is no standard of care first salvage regimen. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis to compare chemotherapy (e.g. HyperCVAD, MOAD, Larson/CALGB-9511, etc.) to novel agents (blinatumomab or inotuzumab) in first salvage. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not significantly different among treatment arms, with a median OS of 10.6 months with chemotherapy and 10.1 months with novel therapy (p = .799). Similarly, there was no difference in the CR/CRi rate, with a CR/CRi in 18 patients (41.9%) versus 16 patients (47.1%) treated with salvage chemotherapy and novel therapy, respectively (p = .817). Age significantly impacted the probability of achieving CR/CRi with novel therapy versus chemotherapy. This analysis suggests the use of chemotherapy in first salvage still represents an appropriate treatment option, particularly for young fit patients, as the median OS was roughly 10 months regardless of whether patients received novel therapy or chemotherapy in first salvage. For the reported outcomes, 100% of patients in the novel therapy arm received a novel therapy (per design), whereas only 60.5% of patients in the chemotherapy arm required a novel therapy. Thus, 40% of patients did not require a novel therapy for similar OS. This analysis demonstrates that first-line chemotherapy can achieve similar results to novel therapies, especially now that novel therapies are available for subsequent relapses. However, this study has several limitations including younger age, increased CNS involvement, and higher blast percentage in the chemotherapy arm and potential confounders, including selection of treatment sequence as 43 patients (55.8%) ultimately received both chemotherapy and novel therapy. Therefore, a larger, prospective, randomized study with adequate chemotherapy comparators and availability of novel agents upon relapse is warranted to confirm these results.
Assuntos
Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Inotuzumab Ozogamicina , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação/métodosRESUMO
High dose cytarabine (HIDAC) consolidation has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The increasing prevalence of obesity and the toxicity risk with this therapy renders important the quantification of potential risks with weight-based dosing in this patient population. The American Society of Clinical Oncology published recommendations on chemotherapy dosing in obese patients, but patients with leukemia were excluded from analysis. This was a retrospective comparison of safety and efficacy outcomes in obese and non-obese patients with AML who received HIDAC consolidation. Thirty-nine (41.9 %) patients received dose adjusted HIDAC in cycle 1. Nine of the 40 patients in the obese group received HIDAC dose-adjusted for obesity. The combined incidence of cycle delays, febrile neutropenia, or documented infection was 41.5 % in non-obese patients compared to 57.5 % in obese patients (p = 0.127). The median overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were not reached in both cohorts. The estimated 36-month overall survival was 76.4 % (95 % CI 0.623-0.905) in non-obese patients, compared to 66.1 % (95 % CI 0.472-0.85) in obese patients. There were no significant differences in safety or efficacy outcomes for obese versus non-obese patients who received HIDAC consolidation. For class III obesity, baseline dose-adjustments were more common.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia de Consolidação/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia de Consolidação/métodos , Citarabina/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Novel treatment strategies have shifted the treatment landscape for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, particularly for those with relapsed/refractory disease. However, uncertainty remains regarding the therapeutic value of these novel agents compared to existing salvage chemotherapy regimens. In addition, the high cost associated with these agents puts both patients and health systems at risk of financial toxicity, further complicating their use. The development of clinical pathways incorporating oncology stewardship principles are necessary in order to maximize value-based care. This comprehensive review assesses the efficacy and safety data available for novel treatment options in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and applies stewardship principles to evaluate their optimal place in therapy, with the aim of optimizing safe, effective, and financially responsible patient care.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confers a poor prognosis, and there is no single standard of care first-line salvage regimen. FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) is a common salvage regimen with a favorable toxicity and efficacy profile in poor-risk AML. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of first relapse/primary refractory patients with AML that received salvage chemotherapy from January 2009 to July 2019. We propensity-score matched patients 1:1 (based on age at diagnosis, cytogenetic risk group, Charlson comorbidity index, de novo vs. secondary AML, and whether or not they received an allogeneic stem cell transplant in first complete remission) into 2 groups, FLAG (Group 1) or non-FLAG (Group 2) as first-line salvage regimen, with 66 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (complete response and complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery). RESULTS: The median patient age was 59 years (range, 19-80 years). Patients treated with FLAG had a higher overall response rate (complete response/complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery) (71.2% vs. 50.0%; odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-5.08; P = .013), longer event-free survival (8.9 vs. 2.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .005), and longer overall survival (14.2 vs. 5.9 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93; P = .019). Patients who received FLAG had a shorter median duration of neutropenia (22 vs. 34 days; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29-0.64; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This analysis supports the FLAG regimen as an effective and well-tolerated salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory AML.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Pontuação de Propensão , Recidiva , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute leukemia with mixed-phenotype blasts is associated with poor outcomes. There are no standard treatment regimens. Due to disease heterogeneity, controversy exists over whether an AML-based, ALL-based, or a combined (hybrid) AML/ALL-based regimen is most appropriate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective case series review of patients with acute leukemia with mixed phenotype blasts as described by the European Group for Immunological Characterization of Leukemia (EGIL) or the 2008 WHO classification. Patients were treated from November 2014 and December 2019 with the combination chemotherapy regimen FLAG-idarubicin-vincristine-prednisone with or without rituximab. Outcomes included induction response, time to transplant, time to relapse, overall survival, time to neutrophil or platelet recovery, infection, and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: The median age was 68 years (range 21-77). Six patients (87.5 %) had unfavorable/complex cytogenetics. All patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). Estimated 1-year overall survival was 85.7 %. There were no deaths during induction, with a 22 day median duration of hospitalization for induction. CONCLUSION: The combination of FLAG, idarubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (FLAG-VIPR) demonstrated favorable induction responses in a disease state with historically poor outcomes and should be studied in a prospective clinical trial.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vincristina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Idarubicina/administração & dosagem , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Vidarabina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351) gained FDA approval for secondary AML after demonstrating improved outcomes over daunorubicin and cytarabine (7 + 3). A number of study limitations prompted a comparison of safety/efficacy of CPX-351 against regimens containing a purine analogue and high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC). This retrospective study compared complete response rates with/without count recovery (CR/CRi) between HIDAC-based regimens and CPX-351 in 169 patients with newly diagnosed sAML. The CR/CRi rate was 62.7% in the HIDAC-based therapy arm vs. 47.9% in the CPX-351 arm (p = 0.002 [one-sided for non-inferiority]). Median time to absolute neutrophil and platelet count recovery was shorter after HIDAC-based therapy (18 and 23 days, respectively) compared to CPX-351 (36 and 38 days; p < 0.001). Median overall survival was 9.8 months in the HIDAC-based group and 9.14 months in the CPX-351 group. 30-day mortality was greater with CPX-351 (8.5%) compared to HIDAC-based (1.3%; p = 0.039). These results reveal comparable efficacy and favorable safety with HIDAC-based regimens.
Assuntos
Citarabina , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Citarabina/uso terapêutico , Daunorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Azole antifungals are first-line options in the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections. They are often used for prolonged (weeks to months) periods of time, particularly in patients with hematologic malignancies, or in those who have received a solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Long-term use of azoles is associated with hepatotoxicity and hormone-related effects, including gynecomastia, alopecia, decreased libido, oligospermia, azoospermia, impotence, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and (rarely) adrenal insufficiency. Voriconazole and posaconazole have been associated with peripheral neuropathies, and itraconazole and voriconazole with pancreatitis. In addition, voriconazole has been associated with periostitis, phototoxic reactions, and squamous cell carcinoma. Since many at-risk patients are commonly receiving multiple medications, it can be difficult for care providers to identify antifungal agent causality or contribution to patient symptoms. Knowledge and recognition of adverse events caused by azoles, leading to dose reduction or discontinuation, can generally reverse these adverse events.
Assuntos
Antifúngicos/efeitos adversos , Azóis/efeitos adversos , Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Azóis/administração & dosagem , Azóis/uso terapêutico , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/prevenção & controle , Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Asparaginase is commonly de-emphasized/omitted in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia regimens due to poor tolerability, including hepatotoxicity (HTX). Adult patients (n = 100) given induction therapy containing pegylated asparaginase (PEG) from January 2008 to February 2016 were evaluated for HTX. Sixteen patients met criteria for HTX (direct bilirubin >3 g/dL). A multivariable model identified body surface area >2m2 (OR 7.40; 95% CI: 1.73-31.61, p = .007), albumin <3 mg/dL (OR 4.62; 95% CI: 1.09-19.68, p = .038), and platelet count <50 K/mm3 (OR 9.36; 95% CI: 2.13-41.17, p = .003) as risk factors for HTX. More patients with HTX missed ≥1 dose of intended chemotherapy (75% vs. 8%, p < .001). In patients with HTX, complete response and 30-day mortality rates were 40% and 9% versus 73% and 1% in patients without HTX (p = .02 and p < .001). A risk scoring tool was created to predict risk of toxicity, which should be validated through a prospective evaluation.