Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 11(7): 442-52, 1989.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2673664

RESUMO

Clinical studies have been carried out world-wide on cefetamet pivoxil, a new orally active cephalosporin. This paper reports on the first 1000 patients treated with the antibiotic; another 505 patients received standard antibiotics, mainly cefadroxil and cefaclor, for comparison. The results show that single doses of 1500 and 1200 mg cefetamet pivoxil were fully effective in gonorrhoea. Comparative trials in uncomplicated urinary tract infection indicate a significant superiority of a single dose of 2 g cefetamet pivoxil (n = 158; 90.0% cure) versus 2 g cefadrox (n = 162; 77.0% cure). In complicated urinary tract infections, a comparable outcome was achieved with a single daily dose of 2 g cefetamet pivoxil for 10 days (n = 99; 90% cure) and 1 g cefadroxil twice daily for 10 days (n = 98; 76.5% cure). The clinical response rate in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis was 89.4% in the group receiving cefetamet pivoxil (136 patients) and 83% in the cefaclor-treated group (n = 122). Treatment with 1000 or 2000 mg cefetamet pivoxil achieved a (bacteriological) success rate of 96% compared to 95% with cefaclor in acute ear, nose and throat-infections (n = 91). Overall, based on 894 isolated pathogens prior to therapy, the bacteriological response rate was 90% and it would appear that in vivo the spectrum of this cephalosporin covers a wide range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens, including urinary pathogens, but excluding Enterococci and Pseudomonas. Cefetamet pivoxil proved to be well tolerated. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported in 7.1% of patients but only 2 of the 1000 patients treated with cefetamet pivoxil were withdrawn because of diarrhoea, which subsided rapidly. There were no clinically relevant deviations in laboratory parameters.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Ceftizoxima/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Bronquite/complicações , Ceftizoxima/efeitos adversos , Ceftizoxima/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Otorrinolaringopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Uretrite/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico
4.
J Urol ; 149(1): 77-82; discussion 83, 1993 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7678043

RESUMO

The efficacy and tolerance of the nonsteroidal antiandrogen nilutamide in the treatment of prostatic cancer were studied in a large double-blind clinical trial initiated in 1986. Patients with metastatic prostatic cancer without prior endocrine manipulation underwent orchiectomy and were randomized to 1 of 2 groups receiving nilutamide (225 patients) or placebo (232). Nilutamide and placebo were evaluated for efficacy in 207 and 216 patients, respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nilutamide group (median time to progression 20.8 months on nilutamide and 14.9 months on placebo, p = 0.005). Median time to death from prostatic cancer was 30.0 months in the placebo group and 37 months in the nilutamide group. Objective regressions were higher in the nilutamide group (41%) than in the placebo group (24%). Significant differences in favor of the nilutamide group were found at several intervals for bone pain, prostatic acid phosphatase, prostate specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase and bone scan isotope uptake. Nilutamide and orchiectomy constitute a more effective treatment for metastatic prostatic cancer than orchiectomy alone, and the adverse effects of nilutamide, usually minor, are outweighed by the significant improvements in most disease measures and progression-free survival.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Imidazolidinas , Orquiectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Fosfatase Ácida/sangue , Análise Atuarial , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Terapia Combinada , Método Duplo-Cego , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imidazóis/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Orquiectomia/efeitos adversos , Próstata , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida
5.
Chemotherapy ; 27 Suppl 1: 75-9, 1981.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7018853

RESUMO

Ceftriaxone (CFX), a parenteral cephalosporin which belongs to a new generation of analogues, was studied by means of three experimental designs in patients suffering from flare-up episodes of chronic urinary tract infections. Results obtained in 2 randomized parallel trials showed a cure rate of 75% with CFX in comparison with 33.3% of gentamicin (p less than 0.05). In a third single open study of 18 patients with infections due to gentamicin-resistant strains, 61.1% became persistently negative during all follow-up controls. Drug-related side effects were mild and did not warrant discontinuation of therapy.


Assuntos
Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Ceftriaxona , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Gentamicinas/administração & dosagem , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Distribuição Aleatória , Recidiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA