Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 18(1): 383, 2017 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28865425

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hip and knee replacements in patients with bone defects after infection correlates with high rates of reinfection. In this vulnerable patient population, the prevention of reinfection is to be considered superordinate to the functionality and defect bridging. The use of silver coating of aseptic implants as an infection prophylaxis is already proven; however, the significance of these coatings in septic reimplantation of large implants is still not sufficiently investigated. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, 34 patients who have been treated with a modular mega-endoprosthesis after a cured bone infection of the lower limb (femur or tibia) have been evaluated. One group with 14 patients (NSCG: non silver- coated group) was supplied with the non silver- coated implants: MML München- Lübeck™ modular endoprosthesis system (AQ Implants, Ahrensburg, Germany) or MUTARS® Modular Universal Tumor And Revision System (Implantcast GmbH, Buxtehude, Germany). The other group with 20 patients (SCG: silver- coated group) was supplied with the silver- coated system of MUTARS®. In addition to the clinical findings and the patients' histories, specifically the reinfection rates, the patients' mobility was assessed using the New Mobility Score (NMS, by Parker and Palmer). RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 72 months, ranging from 6 to 267 months. The dropout rate was 5.8%. The reinfection rate after healed reinfection in SCG was 40% (8/20), in NSCG 57% (8/14), p = 0.34; α =0.05. The time for reinfection was, on average, 14 months (1-72 months) in SCG and 8 months (1-48 months) in the NSCG (p = 0.61; α =0.05). The two groups showed no differences in the NMS. CONCLUSION: With this retrospective analysis, it can be determined that the rate of reinfection of modular mega-endoprostheses on the hip and knee joint after healed periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be reduced by the use of silver coated implants. The time until reinfection can also be delayed by utilizing silver coated implants. Due to the low number of cases of this highly specific patient population, no statistical significance could be determined. A positive effect, however, can be assumed through the use of silver coatings in mega-endoprostheses after an infectious situation.


Assuntos
Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico por imagem , Reoperação/métodos , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Prata/administração & dosagem , Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/tendências , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/tendências , Feminino , Fêmur/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Reoperação/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação/tendências , Tíbia/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA