More tumor-affected lymph nodes because of the sentinel lymph node procedure but no stage migration, because the 2002 TNM classifies small tumor deposits as pathologic N0 breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intensified examination of the sentinel lymph node (SN) may result in increased detection of tumor-affected lymph nodes. The authors of this report hypothesized that the introduction of the SN procedure has led to stage migration because of the intensified workup of SNs by pathologists. METHODS: After the introduction of the SN procedure, 360 patients with operable breast cancer were included prospectively from 2 large hospitals (Hospital A and Hospital B). The prospectively included patients (the "SN era" group) were compared with 88 historic controls from the year 1994 who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer before introduction of the SN procedure. RESULTS: After correcting for classic clinical and pathologic prognostic factors in a multiple logistic regression analysis, the detection frequency of lymph node involvement was significantly higher in the SN era group compared with historic controls (P = .04). However, when using the 2002 TNM classification, in which isolated tumor cells (

Risk factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer. The outcome of a multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: In this multi-institutional prospective study, we evaluated whether we could identify risk factors predictive for non-sentinel lymph node (non-SN) metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SN). METHODS: In this multi-institutional study, 541 eligible breast cancer patients were included prospectively. RESULTS: The occurrence of non-SN metastases was related to the size of the SN metastasis (P = .02), primary tumor size (P = .001), and lymphovascular invasion (P = .07). The adjusted odds ratio was 3.1 for SN micro-metastasis compared with SN isolated tumor cells, 4.0 for SN macro-metastasis versus SN isolated tumor cells, 3.1 for tumor size (>3.0 cm compared with 3.0 cm, and with vessel invasion. CONCLUSION: We identified three predictive factors for non-SN metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive SN: size of the SN metastasis; primary tumor size; and vessel invasion. We were not able to identify a specific group of patients with a positive SN in whom the risk for non-SN metastases was less than 5%.

Differences in sentinel lymph node pathology protocols lead to differences in surgical strategy in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Internationally, there is no consensus on the pathology protocol to be used to examine the sentinel lymph node (SN). At present, therefore, various hospitals use different SN pathology protocols of which the effect has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that differences between hospitals in SN pathology protocols affect subsequent surgical treatment strategies. METHODS: Patients from four hospitals (A-D) were prospectively registered when they underwent an SN biopsy. In hospitals A, B, and C, three levels of the SN were examined pathologically, whereas in hospital D, at least seven additional levels were examined. In the absence of apparent metastases with hematoxylin and eosin examination, immunohistochemical examination was performed in all four hospitals. RESULTS: In total, 541 eligible patients were included. In hospital D, more patients were diagnosed with a positive SN (P < .001) as compared with hospitals A, B, and C, mainly because of increased detection of isolated tumor cells. This led to more completion axillary lymph node dissections in hospital D (66.3% of patients (P < .0001), compared with 29.0% in hospitals A, B, and C combined). Positive non-SNs were detected in 13.9% of patients in hospital D, compared with 9.7% in hospitals A, B, and C (P = .70). That is, in 52.4% of patients in hospital D, a negative completion axillary lymph node dissection was performed, compared with 19.3% of patients in hospitals A, B, and C combined. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in SN pathology protocols between hospitals do have a substantial effect on SN findings and subsequent surgical treatment strategies. Whether ultrastaging and, thus, additional surgery can offer better survival remains to be determined.