Subjective satisfaction and quality of life in patients prior to listing for liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Differences in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) perception between alcohol abusing and non-substance-dependent subjects with liver cirrhosis could depend on differences in personality profile and influence management of patients awaiting liver transplant. METHODS: We compared the perceptions of disease state in 78 male patients of similar disease severity divided into 2 groups based on etiology of cirrhosis: 47% had alcoholic cirrhosis, and 53% had hepatitis C virus(HCV)-related cirrhosis without alcohol abuse. Patients' perception of disease state was determined using the SAT-P questionnaire (a self-administered questionnaire that provides a global assessment of perceived HR-QoL and subjective well-being). The assessment yields 2 scales: an analytic scale based on 32 variables and a synthetic scale based on 5 factors. RESULTS: In patients with alcohol-related disease, ''psychological function'' was found to be more impaired,while ''sleep, diet, and free time'' was less impaired compared with subjects with HCV-related cirrhosis, suggesting dysfunction related to substance abuse with personality disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of disease state is different in alcohol-abusing patients with cirrhosis compared with those with cirrhosis unrelated to alcohol.

Disagreement between acute and chronic haemodynamic effects of nadolol in cirrhosis: a pathophysiological interpretation.

BACKGROUND: The acute effects of beta-blockers may be different from chronic; mechanisms underlying this difference are poorly elucidated. AIM: To assess portal pressure and its pathophysiological determinants after acute and chronic administration of nadolol. METHODS: In 24 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension hepatic venous pressure gradient, portal blood flow and resistance to portal blood flow were measured before, 60-90 min after acute administration of nadolol, and after 1 month. Patients were good-responders if hepatic venous pressure gradient was < or =12 mmHg, or decreased by at least 20%. RESULTS: Eleven and 13 patients were good- and poor-responders to acute administration, respectively. Acute poor-responders showed a lower decrease in portal blood flow (P = 0.04) and a less evident decrease in mean arterial pressure (P < 0.001). Eleven and 13 patients were good- and poor-responders to chronic administration, respectively. Chronic poor-responders showed a larger increase in resistance to portal blood flow compared with good-responders (P = 0.01). Disagreement between acute and chronic effects was seen in 12 patients: six were acute good-responders chronic poor-responders and six were acute poor-responders chronic good-responders. Acute good-responders chronic poor-responders patients had the smallest decreases in portal blood flow and in mean arterial pressure after acute administration, while acute poor-responders chronic good-responders showed the largest (P = 0.05 and 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Disagreement between acute and chronic effects of nadolol on hepatic venous pressure gradient is common. The mechanism responsible is complex, the acute effect being mainly modulated by arterial hypotension and the chronic effect by changes in portal resistance.

Noninvasive grading of the severity of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients by echo-color-Doppler.

The possibility of estimating portal hypertension combining splenic Doppler pulsatility index (PI), which has been shown strictly to be related to portal resistance, and portal blood flow (PBF) was evaluated. Hepatic venous pressure gradient, and splanchnic Doppler parameters were measured in 40 cirrhotic patients. A formula to assess the severity of portal hypertension from Doppler parameters was calculated in a training group of 19 patients, and then this formula was tested to prospectively predict the degree of portal pressure in 21 further patients. In the training group, the regression of portal resistance over splenic PI was calculated and individual values of estimated portal resistance were obtained for every patient of the test group. From them and from observed values of PBF, an estimated value of portal pressure was calculated. The following formula was obtained [(0.066*splenic PI -0.044)*PBF]. In the second group, predicted and observed portal pressure were well correlated (r = 0.71, p = .0003). A good accuracy for the prediction of mild or severe portal hypertension was obtained.

Progression of reflux patterns in saphenous veins of women with chronic venous valvular insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Venous ultrasonography identifies reflux patterns of the great and small saphenous veins (GSV, SSV), allowing evaluation of lower extremities for treatment planning and patient follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To determine progression of saphenous vein reflux patterns in women with primary venous valvular insufficiency. METHODS: Venous ultrasonography was performed in the extremities of 92 women, 43 ± 12 (23-77) years old, CEAP (clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological elements) clinical classes C1-C2. Two examinations were performed 33 ± 19 (8-89) months apart in patients without saphenous vein treatment. GSV and SSV reflux patterns were classified as segmental, multisegmental, distal, proximal, diffuse and normal. Prevalence was determined for each examination, separately for right and left extremities, and jointly. Prevalence was compared using χ2 statistics. RESULTS: Reflux prevalence was higher for the GSV, 89% (164/184) and 88% (n = 162), than for the SSV, 24% (n = 45) and 30% (n = 56), respectively for first and second examinations (P < 0.001). Reflux pattern prevalence was not significantly different in the right and left extremities (1.0 > P > 0.14). Most prevalent patterns were (a) GSV segmental reflux initially, 41% (76/184), decreasing to 28% (52/184) (P = 0.009), and (b) GSV multisegmental reflux at the second examination, increasing from 26% (48/184) to 40% (73/184) (P = 0.006). Prevalence of other GSV or SSV reflux patterns did not change significantly (0.88 > P > 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: We documented early findings and venous reflux progression in a specific population of women with varicose veins, reticular veins and telangiectasias. GSV segmental reflux was most prevalent initially, progressing to GSV multisegmental reflux.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in nonobese patients with diabetes: Prevalence and relationships with hemodynamic alterations detected with Doppler sonography().

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence, severity, and hemodynamic features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in nonobese diabetics. METHODS: We studied 100 consecutive nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 30) patients with type 1 (n = 17) or type 2 (n = 83) diabetes and no known causes of liver disease. Steatosis was diagnosed and graded with ultrasonography. Digital sonographic images of the liver and right kidney were analyzed with dedicated software (HDI-Lab), and the liver/kidney ratio of grey-scale intensity was calculated as an index of the severity of the steatosis. Severity scores ranging from 0 (none) to 5 (severe) were compared with sonographic and Doppler findings (right liver size, portal vein diameter and flow velocity, hepatic and splenic arterial pulsatility indices, hepatic-vein flow profile and A- and S-wave velocities). RESULTS: The prevalence of steatosis was 24% in type I and 80% in type II diabetes (grade 1 in 17%, grade 2 in 34%, grade 3 in 33%, grade 4 in 9%, grade 5 in 7%). In patients with steatosis (especially those with grades 4-5 disease), hepatic volume was increased (p < 0.005). Portal vein diameter was increased in grade 5 steatosis. The hepatic artery pulsatility index was significantly increased, particularly in grades 4 and 5 (p < 0.0001); portal and A-wave velocities were significantly reduced in grades 3-5 (p < 0.001); and the hepatic vein flow profile was altered in 27% (biphasic: 20%, flat: 7%) patients with steatosis, although there was no correlation with severity. CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD is very frequent in nonobese diabetics with type 2 but not type 1 disease, and it is associated with hepatomegaly and liver hemodynamic alterations only when it is severe.

Thrombosis of the portal venous system.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare cause of portal hypertension. Its diagnosis has been facilitated by improvements in imaging techniques, in particular Doppler sonography. The prevalence is about 1% in the general population, but much higher rates are observed in patients with hepatic cirrhosis (7%, range 0.6-17%), particularly those who also have hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (35%). The most common causes of PVT are myeloproliferative disorders, deficiencies of anticoagulant proteins, prothrombotic gene mutations, cirrhosis with portal hypertension, and HCC. Its development often requires the presence of two or more risk factors (local and/or systemic), e.g., a genetically determined thrombophilic state plus an infectious episode or abdominal surgery. It is clinically useful to distinguish between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic forms. Portal vein thrombosis is also traditionally classified as acute or chronic, but this distinction is often difficult. Color Doppler ultrasound is the first-line imaging study for diagnosis of PVT; magnetic resonance angiography and CT angiography are valid alternatives. The main complications are ischemic intestinal necrosis (in acute PVT) and esophageal varices (in chronic cases); the natural history of the latter differs depending on whether or not the thrombosis is associated with cirrhosis. The treatment of choice for PVT has never been adequately investigated. It is currently based on the use of anticoagulants associated, in some cases, with thrombolytics, but experience with the latter agents is too limited to draw any definite conclusions. In chronic thrombosis (even forms associated with cirrhosis), anticoagulant therapy is recommended and possibly, beta-blockers as well. Naturally, treatment of the underlying pathology is essential.

Paraumbilical vein patency in cirrhosis: effects on hepatic hemodynamics evaluated by Doppler sonography.

Doppler sonographic portal vein parameters are used for the noninvasive evaluation of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. The patency of a paraumbilical vein is a rather frequent finding in cirrhosis, which may affect hepatic hemodynamics and function. We evaluated portal and hepatic arterial parameters in 184 cirrhotic patients with and without a patent paraumbilical vein and the relationships with paraumbilical blood flow. A patent paraumbilical vein was found in 33.7% of patients. The prevalence was higher (56.8%) in Child C patients. Portal blood flow velocity (PBV) (10.8 +/- 2.2 vs. 9.8 +/- 2.4 cm/sec; P < .01) and volume (PBF) (995.0 +/- 383.8 vs. 811.6 +/- 318.7 mL/min; P < .001) was significantly higher, and effective portal liver perfusion (PLP) (portal blood flow--paraumbilical blood flow) (621.3 +/- 420.8 vs. 811.6 +/- 318.7 mL/min; P < .001) was significantly lower in patients with a patent paraumbilical vein than in those without. These differences were more evident in Child C patients (10.7 +/- 2.0 vs. 8.3 +/- 2.3 cm/sec; 935.7 +/- 378.3 vs. 680.6 +/- 239.4 mL/min; 369.0 +/- 282.0 vs. 680.6 +/- 239.4 mL/min). Portal vein diameter, the congestion index (CI) of the portal vein, hepatic arterial resistance indexes, and the severity of esophageal varices did not differ between the two groups. In patients with a patent paraumbilical vein, the Child-Pugh score and the prevalence of ascites were significantly higher than in those without. In conclusion, the evaluation of PBV and PBF in cirrhotic patients can provide misleading results if a paraumbilical vein is patent, underestimating the degree of portal hypertension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The hemodynamic response to medical treatment of portal hypertension as a predictor of clinical effectiveness in the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.

In the prevention of variceal rebleeding, it is already established that hemodynamic response to drug treatment (decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] to 12 mm Hg or by >20%) is predictive of clinical effectiveness. In primary prophylaxis very few clinical data are available. We assessed the role of the hemodynamic response to beta-blockers or beta-blockers plus nitrates in predicting clinical efficacy of prophylaxis. A total of 49 cirrhotic patients with varices at risk of bleeding, without prior variceal bleeding, were investigated by hepatic vein catheterization before and after 1 to 3 months of chronic treatment with nadolol or nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate, and were followed during treatment for up to 5 years. A total of 30 patients (61%) were good hemodynamic responders, and among them in 12 (24%) HVPG was

Effects of chronic therapy with nadolol on portal hemodynamics and on splanchnic impedance indices using Doppler sonography: comparison between acute and chronic effects.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Beta-blockers are currently used for chronic therapy of portal hypertension. Duplex Doppler ultrasonography has been proposed for non-invasive evaluation of splanchnic pharmacodynamics, but the chronic effects of beta-blockers on portal hemodynamics and on splanchnic arterial impedance indices have not been analyzed with this method. This was the aim of the study. METHODS: The effects of acute (80 mg p.o.) and chronic (2 months at a dosage sufficient to reduce heart rate by at least 25% in respect of basal values) nadolol administration on portal blood flow velocity and volume, and on splanchnic and renal arterial impedance indices [pulsatility index = (peak systolic velocity-minimum velocity)/mean velocity] were evaluated in patients with cirrhosis. Twenty-eight patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension were investigated. Nineteen patients received nadolol, and nine received placebo. RESULTS: Placebo caused no significant hemodynamic change. Portal blood flow mean velocity decreased after chronic therapy (11.7 +/- 2.9 cm/s to 9.1 +/- 2.3, p < 0.001). In the 16 patients with acute and chronic evaluation, portal blood flow mean velocity decreased after acute therapy (11.8 +/- 3.0 cm/s to 10.4 +/- 3.0, p < 0.01), and even more so after chronic therapy (to 9.2 +/- 2.4, p < 0.01). No parallel was found between acute and chronic effects. Hepatic, mesenteric and splenic pulsatility indices increased after chronic therapy (1.26 +/- 0.33 to 1.39 +/- 0.28, p < 0.02; 2.04 +/- 0.41 to 2.50 +/- 0.61, p < 0.01; 0.92 +/- 0.22 to 1.18 +/- 0.27, p < 0.001 respectively); renal pulsatility index increased (1.12 +/- 0.20 to 1.40 +/- 0.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic therapy with nadolol decreased portal blood flow velocity and volume, and increased splanchnic and renal impedance indices. Chronic effects of nadolol on portal inflow cannot be predicted from its acute effects. Evaluation of the effect of nadolol on portal blood velocity and volume should be performed after chronic therapy. Duplex Doppler ultrasonography allows venous and arterial splanchnic pharmacodynamics to be studied separately.

Arterioportal fistulas in patients with liver cirrhosis: usefulness of color Doppler US for screening.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of routine ultrasonographic (US) evaluation of the hepatic arterial resistive and pulsatility indexes and of the direction of portal venous blood flow for the diagnosis of intrahepatic arterioportal fistulas (APFs) in patients with liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all patients with cirrhosis examined at one center over 4 years, the resistive (RI) and the pulsatility (PI) indexes in the right and left branches of the hepatic artery were evaluated with Doppler US. An APF was suspected when an RI decrease of at least 20% and a PI decrease of at least 30% were present in one hepatic lobe relative to values in the other lobe and portal blood flow in the lobe with the decreased values was reversed. The RI and PI in patients with an APF were compared with those in 75 patients with cirrhosis and without APFs at angiography. RESULTS: Seven patients with an APF were identified. APFs suspected at Doppler US were always confirmed with angiography. The percent differences +/- SD in the RI and the PI between the two intrahepatic branches of the hepatic artery in patients with versus in patients without an APF were as follows: RI, 35% +/- 6 (range, 27%-42%) versus 5% +/- 4 (range, 0%-15%) (P: <.001); PI, 50% +/- 5 (range, 41%-58%) versus 11% +/- 7 (range, 0%-26%) (P: <.001). CONCLUSION: The intrahepatic arterial resistive and pulsatility indexes and the direction of portal blood flow should be evaluated in routine screening for APFs in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Doppler sonography and hepatic vein catheterization in portal hypertension: assessment of agreement in evaluating severity and response to treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The study was designed to assess to what extent portal hemodynamic parameters obtained by duplex Doppler ultrasonography may be substituted for the measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient in evaluating the severity of portal hypertension and the response to medical treatment with beta-blockers or beta-blockers plus nitrates in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. METHODS: In 39 of these patients hepatic venous pressure gradient was determined by hepatic vein catheterization, and portal blood flow velocity and the congestion index of the portal vein were measured by duplex Doppler ultrasonography. In 19 of these patients the changes in hepatic venous pressure gradient and in Doppler parameters were also assessed after chronic administration of nadolol. In 11 of the 19 patients the changes after chronic administration of nadolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate were also measured. RESULTS: In the whole series, no significant correlation was found between hepatic venous pressure gradient and duplex Doppler parameters, but, when the 12 patients with a patent para-umbilical vein were excluded, significant linear correlations were found between hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal blood velocity (r=-0.39; p=0.05) or congestion index (r=0.37; p=0.05). Considering together the changes induced by nadolol and nadolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate, no correlation was apparent between changes in duplex Doppler parameters and in hepatic venous pressure gradient. Agreement between hepatic venous pressure gradient and duplex Doppler parameters in defining good and poor responders was insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that portal blood velocity and the congestion index of the portal vein are related to portal hypertension in patients without a patent para-umbilical vein, but are of limited value in discriminating good responders from poor responders to medical treatment for portal hypertension.

Hemodynamic evaluation of the addition of isosorbide-5-mononitrate to nadolol in cirrhotic patients with insufficient response to the beta-blocker alone.

The association beta-blockers plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (I5M) has been proposed for the treatment of portal hypertension in patients with insufficient response to beta-blockers alone, according to hemodynamic criteria. The mechanism of action in these patients is not clearly defined. Fifteen patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices were evaluated by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement and duplex-Doppler ultrasonography before and after 1 month of treatment with nadolol. Nine patients who did not exhibit a decrease in HVPG to 12 mm Hg or a percent decrease greater than 20% were classified as poor responders, and were studied again with the same methodology after 3 months of chronic administration of nadolol + I5M 20 mg twice per day. In poor responders, mean HVPG decrease after nadolol was 8.9% +/- 2.8%, and after the combination, it was 25.7% +/- 1.7% (P = .004). All patients except one became good responders to the association. Portal blood flow (PBF) decreased significantly after nadolol (P = .004), and remained unchanged after the addition of nitrates. Resistance to portal blood flow (RPBF) increased after nadolol (P = .02) and returned to baseline values during combined treatment (P = .03). In good responders, an adequate decrease in HVPG was associated with a decrease in PBF (P = .06) but no change in RPBF. A wide spectrum of combined changes in PBF and in RPBF after nadolol was observed in poor responders, ranging from no change in either parameter to a marked decrease in PBF counterbalanced by a marked increase in RPBF. The addition of I5M was followed in most cases by larger effects on resistance than on flow. Doppler parameters were not significantly correlated with the HVPG response to nadolol alone or associated with I5M. It is concluded that good hemodynamic responders to nadolol differ from poor responders in the lack of increase in RPBF after the drug. The addition of nitrates to nadolol is effective in decreasing portal pressure in most poor responders to nadolol alone. A decrease in outflow resistance is the main mechanism involved.

Q-T interval prolongation in liver cirrhosis. Reversibility after orthotopic liver transplantation.

The aim of this work was to study the prevalence of Q-T prolongation in patients with liver cirrhosis and the modifications of the Q-T interval after liver transplantation. Q-T interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) and dispersion of Q-T interval were evaluated in 75 cirrhotic patients and in 24 controls by means of a 12-lead electrocardiogram. In addition, 15 patients were evaluated before and after liver transplantation. Forty-five patients (60%) had a prolonged Q-Tc. Compared with controls, both patients with alcoholic and non alcoholic cirrhosis had increased Q-Tc (414 +/- 28 msec1/2, 463 +/- 31 and 444 +/- 32 respectively; p < 0.001 and < 0.001); Q-Tc was significantly higher in alcoholic than in non-alcoholic cirrhosis (p < 0.02). Q-T dispersion was normal in cirrhotics. No correlation was found between Q-Tc interval and severity of the cirrhosis, haemodynamic variables (stroke volume, cardiac output) and s-calcium and potassium concentrations. After transplantation, Q-Tc decreased significantly (415 +/- 26 msec1/2 vs 449 +/- 31; p < 0.0001) returning to the values of the normal subjects, but no modification of the Q-T dispersion was observed. These data show that 1) prolongation of Q-T interval is frequent in cirrhosis, being higher in alcoholic than in non-alcoholic cirrhosis, 2) is not related to the severity of the disease, and 3) is reversible after transplantation.

Splenic impedance indices: a useful method to monitor patients after liver transplantation?

Splenic Doppler impedance indices are influenced, in portal hypertensive patients, by the resistance of the portal system. The aim of the study was to verify the usefulness of these indices in evaluating the presence of a pathological increase in portal resistance in patients with complications after liver transplantation. Splenic impedance indices have been evaluated in 46 patients before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), and 2 days, 1, 4, 8, and 12 to 18 months after transplantation. The results showed that spleen size slowly decreased after liver transplantation. From a baseline longitudinal diameter value of 18.0+/-3.6 cm (M+/-SD), the decrease was by 0%+/-3%, 8%+/-8%, 13%+/-9%, 15%+/-11%, and 14%+/-11% at 2 days and 1, 4, 8, and 12 to 18 months after liver transplantation. Splenic impedance indices-resistance index = (peak systolic - end diastolic) / peak systolic velocity; pulsatility index = (peak systolic - end diastolic) / mean velocity-which were increased before liver transplantation, showed a rapid decrease to normal values: resistance index: from 0.62+/-0.08 to 0.55+/-0.08 after 2 days, and to 0.49+/-0.09, 0.51+/-0.10, 0.54+/-0.10, 0.55+/-0.11 after 1, 4, 8, 12-18 months; pulsatility index: from 0.96+/-0.21 to 0.82+/-0.17 after 2 days, and to 0.69+/-0.19,0.72+/-0.21, 0.81+/-0.26, 0.84+/-0.26 after 1, 4, 8, and 12 to 18 months. Patients who had a good outcome, without any major complications, showed a clear and steady decrease in splenic impedance indices. On the contrary, patients who had complications affecting portal resistance (e.g., acute rejection, relapse of chronic hepatitis C virus-related hepatitis or cirrhosis, stenosis of portal anasthomosis, portal thrombosis), showed a lack of decrease, or, after an initial decrease, a subsequent re-increase in splenic impedance indices to pathological values. Splenic impedance indices measured in patients with complications were higher than those of patients without complications (P < .0004). Specificity and sensitivity of splenic impedance indices in the evaluation of the presence of complications increasing portal resistance were good. In conclusion, after OLT, splenic impedance indices could be useful aspecific parameters for identifying patients with complications that are able to affect or increase portal resistance.

Splenic Doppler impedance indices: influence of different portal hemodynamic conditions.

The spleen plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and maintenance of portal hypertension. Few data exist about splenic hemodynamics evaluated by duplex sonography in this condition. Twenty-six normal subjects, 207 patients with portal hypertension of various causes, and in different splenoportal hemodynamic conditions, and 31 patients with liver transplantation were evaluated. In each patient the splenic resistive index (RI = peak systolic--end diastolic velocity/peak systolic velocity) and pulsatility index (PI = peak systolic--end diastolic velocity/mean velocity) were measured. In 17 cirrhotic patients, splenic indices were compared with portal hemodynamics as invasively evaluated by hepatic vein catheterization. In the various groups, RI and PI were respectively: normal subjects, 0.51 +/- 0.05 and 0.72 +/- 0.11; cirrhotic patients with hepatopetal portal blood flow (n = 167), 0.64 +/- 0.08 and 1.03 +/- 0.24; cirrhotic patients with hepatofugal portal flow (n = 3), 0.74 +/- 0.08 and 1.27 +/- 0.08; cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (n = 9), 0.74 +/- 0.08 and 1.36 +/- 0.34; patients with noncirrhotic obstruction of the portal system (n = 7), 0.69 +/- 0.11 and 1.16 +/- 0.28; cirrhotic patients with surgical decompression of splenic vein system (n = 21), 0.54 +/- 0.07 and 0.76 +/- 0.15; patients with liver transplantation (n = 31), 0.50 +/- 0.08 and 0.70 +/- 0.15. Both RI and PI were significantly higher in cirrhotic patients with hepatopetal portal flow compared with controls (P < .0001), and even higher in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (P < .004 and P < .001 in comparison with RI and PI values of cirrhotic patients). In patients with noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, splenic impedance indices were higher than those in controls (RI and PI P < .0001). Cirrhotic patients who underwent surgery for the therapy of portal hypertension showed splenic impedance indices significantly decreased compared with other cirrhotic patients (RI and PI P < .0001). In patients who underwent liver transplantation, splenic impedance indices were the same as those in controls. In 23 of the 52 patients surgically treated (surgical shunt or liver transplantation), impedance indices were evaluated both before and after surgical treatment. All these patients showed a decrease in splenic impedance indices (RI and PI, P < .0001) after surgical treatment. RI and PI values were higher in patients with large esophageal varices as compared with patients without or with small varices (P < .02 and P < .01). RI and PI values were not related to age, mean arterial pressure, sex, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, presence of ascites, or cause. A significant correlation was found between splenic impedance indices and portal resistance as evaluated by hepatic vein catheterization (r = .80, P < .001 for RI values; r = .87, P < .001 for PI values). In conclusion, this study shows that splenic impedance indices are increased in cirrhotic patients, and seems to demonstrate that in patients with cirrhosis these indices reflect portal vein blood flow resistance.