Enlarged perivascular spaces are associated with brain microangiopathy and aging in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence links brain-MRI enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) and multiple sclerosis (MS), but their role remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the cross-sectional associations of EPVS with several neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative features in a large multicentric-MS cohort. METHODS: In total, 207 patients underwent 3T axial-T2-weighted brain-MRI for EPVS assessment (EPVS dichotomized into high/low according to ⩾ 2/< 2 rating categories). MRI biomarkers included brain-predicted age and brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD), central vein sign (CVS)-positive lesion percentage (CVS%), paramagnetic rim and cortical lesions, T2-lesion load, and brain volumetry. The variable relative importance for EPVS-category prediction was explored using a classification random forest approach. RESULTS: High EPVS patients were older (49 vs 44 years, p = 0.003), had ⩾ 1 vascular risk factors (VRFs; p = 0.005), lower CVS% (67% vs 78%, p < 0.001), reduced brain volumes (whole brain: 0.63 vs 0.73, p = 0.01; gray matter: 0.36 vs 0.40; p = 0.002), and older brain-predicted age (58 vs 50 years, p < 0.001). No differences were found for neuroinflammatory markers. After adjusting for age and VFRs (multivariate analyses), the high EPVS category correlated with lower CVS% (odds ratio (OR) = 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-0.99; p = 0.02), lower whole brain (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.0003-0.5; p = 0.02), gray matter (OR = 0.0004, 95% CI = 0.0000004-0.4; p = 0.03) volumes, and higher brain-PAD (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09; p = 0.02). Random forest identified brain-PAD as the most important predictor of high EPVS. CONCLUSION: EPVS in MS likely reflect microangiopathic disease rather than neuroinflammation, potentially contributing to accelerated neurodegeneration.

Central Vein Sign, Cortical Lesions, and Paramagnetic Rim Lesions for the Diagnostic and Prognostic Workup of Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) can be challenging in clinical practice because MS presentation can be atypical and mimicked by other diseases. We evaluated the diagnostic performance, alone or in combination, of the central vein sign (CVS), paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL), and cortical lesion (CL), as well as their association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this multicenter observational study, we first conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the CVS (proportion of CVS-positive lesions or simplified determination of CVS in 3/6 lesions-Select3*/Select6*), PRL, and CL in MS and non-MS cases on 3T-MRI brain images, including 3D T2-FLAIR, T2*-echo-planar imaging magnitude and phase, double inversion recovery, and magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo image sequences. Then, we longitudinally analyzed the progression independent of relapse and MRI activity (PIRA) in MS cases over the 2 years after study entry. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to test diagnostic performance and regression models to predict diagnosis and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The presence of ≥41% CVS-positive lesions/≥1 CL/≥1 PRL (optimal cutoffs) had 96%/90%/93% specificity, 97%/84%/60% sensitivity, and 0.99/0.90/0.77 area under the curve (AUC), respectively, to distinguish MS (n = 185) from non-MS (n = 100) cases. The Select3*/Select6* algorithms showed 93%/95% specificity, 97%/89% sensitivity, and 0.95/0.92 AUC. The combination of CVS, CL, and PRL improved the diagnostic performance, especially when Select3*/Select6* were used (93%/94% specificity, 98%/96% sensitivity, 0.99/0.98 AUC; p = 0.002/p < 0.001). In MS cases (n = 185), both CL and PRL were associated with higher MS disability and severity. Longitudinal analysis (n = 61) showed that MS cases with >4 PRL at baseline were more likely to experience PIRA at 2-year follow-up (odds ratio 17.0, 95% confidence interval: 2.1-138.5; p = 0.008), whereas no association was observed between other baseline MRI measures and PIRA, including the number of CL. DISCUSSION: The combination of CVS, CL, and PRL can improve MS differential diagnosis. CL and PRL also correlated with clinical measures of poor prognosis, with PRL being a predictor of disability accrual independent of clinical/MRI activity.