Current state of benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in spinal surgeries: A systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Recent years have been characterized by a great technological and clinical development in spine surgery. In particular, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs, started to gain interest also in this surgical field. Here we tried to analyse the current state of art of ERAS technique in spine surgery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A systematic review of the literature has been performed in order to find all the possible inclusions. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a search of the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, Medline databases was conducted to identify all full-text articles in the English-language literature describing the use of ERAS programs or techniques for spine surgery in adult patients. RESULTS: Out of the 827 studies found, only 21 met the inclusion criteria has been retained to be included in the present study. The most frequently benefits of ERAS protocols were shorter hospitalisations (n=15), and decreased complication rates (n=8) lower postoperative pain scores (n=4). These benefits were seen in the 3 main categories considered: lumbar spine surgeries, surgeries for correction of scoliosis or deformity, and surgeries of the cervical spine. CONCLUSION: There are an arising amount of data showing that the use of ERAS programs could be helpful in reducing the days of hospitalizations and the number of complications for certain spinal procedures and in a highly selected group of patients. Despite the large interest on the topic; there is an important lack of high level of scientific evidences. Because of that, there is the need to encourage the design and creation of new randomized clinical trials that will validate the present findings.

Subthalamic oscillatory activities at beta or higher frequency do not change after high-frequency DBS in Parkinson's disease.

This study aimed to assess whether changes in the patterns of local field potential (LFP) oscillations of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) underlie to the clinical improvement within 60 s after turning off subthalamic DBS. We studied by spectral analysis the STN LFPs recorded in 13 nuclei from 7 patients with Parkinson's disease before and immediately after unilateral high-frequency (130 Hz) stimulation of the same nucleus, when the clinical benefit of DBS was unchanged. The results were compared with LFP data previously reported [A. Priori, G. Foffani, A. Pesenti, F. Tamma, A.M. Bianchi, M. Pellegrini et al., Rhythm-specific pharmacological modulation of subthalamic activity in Parkinson's disease. Exp. Neurol. 189 (2004) 369-379]--namely 13 STN from 9 parkinsonian patients recorded before and after levodopa administration--which were used as a control. Before DBS, in the 'off' clinical state after overnight withdrawal of dopaminergic therapy, the STN spectrum did not significantly differ from the control nuclei, showing prominent activity at beta frequencies (13-20 and 20-35 Hz). After DBS (10-15 min) of the STN, the recorded nuclei significantly differed from the control, failing to show significant changes either in the beta bands or at higher frequencies (60-90 and 250-350 Hz). The patterns of subthalamic LFP oscillations after DBS therefore differ from those after dopaminergic medication. These results suggest (1) that subthalamic LFP modulations are not the epiphenomenon of peripheral motor improvement and (2) that the transitory clinical efficacy maintained after discontinuation of subthalamic DBS is not associated with local modulation of LFP activity at beta or higher frequencies within the STN.

Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain.

Although cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) decreases cortical excitability, the mechanisms underlying DC-induced changes remain largely unclear. In this study we investigated the effect of cathodal DC stimulation on spontaneous neural activity and on motor responses evoked by stimulation of the central and peripheral nervous system. We studied 17 healthy volunteers. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) of the motor area were used to study the effects of cathodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 10 min) on resting motor threshold and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI). The electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in response to cathodal tDCS was analysed by power spectral density (PSD). Motor axonal excitability changes in response to transcutaneous DC stimulation of the ulnar nerve (0.3 mA, 10 min) were assessed by testing changes in the size of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) elicited by submaximal nerve stimulation. Cathodal tDCS over the motor area for 10 min increased the motor threshold and decreased the size of MEPs evoked by TMS for at least 60 min after current offset (t(0) 71.7 +/- 5%, t(20) 50.8 +/- 11%, t(40) 47.7 +/- 7.7%, and t(60) 39.7 +/- 6.4%, P < 0.01). The tDCS also significantly decreased the size of MEPs elicited by TES (t(0) 64 +/- 16.4%, P = 0.09; t(20) 67.6 +/- 10.8%, P = 0.06; and t(40) 58.3 +/- 9.9%, P < 0.05). At the same time in the EEG the power of delta (2-4 Hz) and theta (4-7 Hz) rhythms increased (delta 181.1 +/- 40.2, P < 0.05; and theta 138.7 +/- 27.6, P = 0.07). At the peripheral level cathodal DC stimulation increased the size of the ulnar nerve CMAP (175 +/- 34.3%, P < 0.05). Our findings demonstrate that the after-effects of tDCS have a non-synaptic mechanism of action based upon changes in neural membrane function. These changes apart from reflecting local changes in ionic concentrations, could arise from alterations in transmembrane proteins and from electrolysis-related changes in [H(+)] induced by exposure to constant electric field.

[Syndrome 49,XXXXY,9qh+. Case report]. / La sindrome 49,XXXXY,9 qh +. Descrizione di un caso.

The case of a patient with 49, XXXXY, 9qh + syndrome is described. Father's karyotype is 46,XY,9qh+,9(qh +,inv(pllh12)).