Correlation of symptoms to ECG diagnosis following atrial fibrillation ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, definition of success following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is commonly based on the lack of symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between symptoms and the underlying rhythm after AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients (pts) were treated for paroxysmal episodes of AF by segmental ostial ablation of all pulmonary veins and right atrial isthmus ablation. For 6 months pts transmitted transtelephonic (T-) ECG recordings in combination with comments daily or in the event of symptoms. Eligible comments were classified as: (1) asymptomatic, (2) symptomatic. Analysis was performed at 1-month intervals, defining an acute (first month) and chronic period (second to sixth month) after ablation. Overall 6,835 T-ECGs were analyzed. Of these 5,437 (79.5%) showed sinus rhythm (SR) and 1,398 (20.5%) showed AF. Pts in SR reported symptoms for 593 (10.9%) episodes, whereas 4,844 (89.1%) episodes were asymptomatic. During AF, 646 (46.2%) episodes were associated with symptoms, and 752 (53.8%) episodes remained asymptomatic. Exclusively asymptomatic were 7 (8.8%) pts. In 30 (52.6%) of 57 pts with AF, arrhythmic events were confined to the acute phase. Of the remaining 27 pts 14 (52%) reported an improvement, 12 (44%) the same, and 1 (4%) worsened symptoms after 3 months. A significant change (P < 0.01) toward more asymptomatic episodes from the acute (43.5%) to the chronic (57.5 +/- 4.5%) period was evident. CONCLUSION: Assessment of success after AF ablation cannot be based on the absence of symptoms due to a high prevalence of asymptomatic episodes.

Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison.

AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of additional substrate modification (SM) by left atrial (LA) linear lesions as compared with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in a prospective randomized study. Percutaneous PVI has evolved as an accepted treatment for paroxysmal AF but seemed to be less effective in patients with persistent AF. The benefit of PVI alone and additional linear lesions has not been validated in a randomized study so far. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with persistent AF (median duration 7, range 1-18 months) were randomly assigned to either PVI alone (n = 30) or additional SM (n =32) consisting of a roof line connecting both left superior and right superior PV and LA isthmus ablation between left inferior PV and mitral annulus. Procedures including SM were performed using a three-dimensional mapping system (EnSite NavX, St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA). Anti-arrhythmic drugs were discontinued within 8 weeks after ablation in both groups. Follow-up included daily trans-telephonic ECG transmitted irrespective of the patient's symptoms. PVI was successful in 98% of all targeted veins in both groups. Additional SM did not increase fluoroscopy time (72.1+/-18.7 vs. 72.9+/-17.3 min, P=0.92) because of the use of three-dimensional navigation in the PVI+SM group. AF recurrences within the first 4 weeks following ablation were more common after PVI alone (77%) than additional SM (44%, P=0.002). After a follow-up time of 487 (429-570) days, only 20% of patients undergoing stand alone PVI remained in sinus rhythm when compared with 69% following PVI combined with SM (P=0.0001). Two patients assigned to PVI+SM experienced procedure-related complications (cardiac tamponade and minor stroke) which resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSION: PVI alone is insufficient in the treatment of persistent AF. However, additional left linear lesions increase the success rate significantly. Early AF-relapses are associated with a negative outcome after PVI alone but not following additional SM.