To Improve Your Surgical Drilling Skills, Make Use of Your Index Fingers.

BACKGROUND: Surgery has greatly benefited from various technologic advancements over the past decades. Surgery remains, however, mostly manual labor performed by well-trained surgeons. Little research has focused on improving osseous drilling techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of different orthopaedic drilling techniques involving the use of both index fingers. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the shooting grip technique and aiming at the contralateral index finger improve accuracy and precision in drilling? (2) Is the effect of drilling technique on accuracy and precision affected by the experience level of the performer? METHODS: This study included 36 participants from two Dutch training hospitals who were subdivided into three groups (N = 12 per group) based on their surgical experience (that is, no experience, residents, and surgeons). The participants had no further experience with drilling outside the hospital nor were there other potential confounding variables that could influence the test outcomes. Participants were instructed to drill toward a target exit point on a synthetic bone model. There were four conditions: (1) clenched grip without aiming; (2) shooting grip without aiming; (3) clenched grip with aiming at the contralateral index finger; and (4) shooting grip aiming at the contralateral index finger. Participants were only used to a clenched grip without aiming in clinical practice. Each participant had to drill five times per technique per test, and the test was repeated after 4 weeks. Accuracy was defined as the systematic error of all measurements and was calculated as the mean of the five distances between the five exit points and the target exit point, whereas precision was defined as the random error of all measurements and calculated as the SD of those five distances. Accuracy and precision were analyzed using mixed-design analyses of variance. RESULTS: Accuracy was highest when using a clenched grip with aiming at the index finger (mean 4.0 mm, SD 1.1) compared with a clenched grip without aiming (mean 5.0 mm, SD 1.2, p = 0.004) and a shooting grip without aiming (mean 4.9 mm, SD 1.4, p = 0.015). The shooting grip with aiming at the index finger (mean 4.1 mm, SD 1.2) was also more accurate than a clenched grip without aiming (p = 0.006) and a shooting grip without aiming (p = 0.014). Shooting grip with aiming at the opposite index finger (median 2.0 mm, interquartile range [IQR] 1.2) showed the best precision and outperformed a clenched grip without aiming (median 2.9 mm, IQR 1.1, p = 0.016), but was not different than the shooting grip without aiming (median 2.2 mm, IQR 1.4) or the clenched grip with aiming (median 2.4 mm, IQR 1.3). The accuracy of surgeons (mean 4.1 mm, SD 1.1) was higher than the inexperienced group (mean 5.0 mm, SD 1.1, p = 0.012). The same applied for precision (median 2.2 mm, IQR 1.0 versus median 2.8 mm, IQR 1.4, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: A shooting grip combined with aiming toward the index finger of the opposite hand had better accuracy and precision compared with a clenched grip alone. Based on this study, experience does matter, because the orthopaedic surgeons outperformed the less experienced participants. Based on our study, we advise surgeons to aim at the index finger of the opposite hand when possible and to align the ipsilateral index finger to the drill bit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.

Fast-track total knee arthroplasty improved clinical and functional outcome in the first 7 days after surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study with 5-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Fast-track protocols (FP) are used more and more to optimize results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Many studies evaluating FP in TKA concentrate on clinical outcome and medium to long-term results. Since discharge from hospital after TKA is achieved increasingly quicker worldwide using FP in an increasingly younger and active patient population, the effects of FP on functional outcome in the first days after TKA become more important. The purpose of the current study was to compare FP with a regular joint care protocol (RP), with an emphasis on the first 7 days after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-blinded randomized controlled clinical pilot study was performed with 25 patients assigned to a FP group and 25 patients assigned to a RP group. Primary outcome was functional outcome, clinical outcome, pain, and complications for each day in the first week after surgery. Patients were followed up to 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: Significantly lower VAS scores for knee pain, faster Timed-Up and Go test times and more mobility on functional tests were seen on several days in the first week in the FP group compared to the RP group. Few other significant differences were found at 2, 6 weeks, and no significant differences were found at 12 weeks and 1, 2 and 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Fast-track protocol for primary TKA showed significantly lower knee pain scores and improved functional outcome in the first 7 days after TKA compared to a regular protocol.

Inter- And Intraobserver Reliability In The Assessment Of Glenoid Fracture Classifications.

Throughout literature a number of glenoid classification systems have been described but lack clear correlation with the fracture patterns found in clinical cases. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interobserver agreement for fracture classifications of the glenoid, using either plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans. The study was retrospective, using images with a variety of fracture types. Six observers classified the fracture patterns. Classifications of Ideberg, OTAAO, Mayo and Euler/Ruedi were used. Agreement was determined using kappa coefficients. Currently used glenoid fracture classification systems have a fair to moderate intraobserver reliability. Combining plain radiographs and CT scans led to a better observer agreement. For interoberserver reliability, the system of Euler scored slightly better than other systems. Although Ideberg's classification is the most widely used system, this study does not support superiority of it. Based on this study there is need for a more reliable glenoid classification system.

The efficacy of continuous-flow cryo and cyclic compression therapy after hip fracture surgery on postoperative pain: design of a prospective, open-label, parallel, multicenter, randomized controlled, clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The number of hip fractures and resulting post-surgical outcome are a major public health concern and the incidence is expected to increase significantly. The acute recovery phase after hip fracture surgery in elder patients is often complicated by severe pain, high morphine consumption, perioperative blood loss with subsequent transfusion and delirium. Postoperative continuous-flow cryocompression therapy is suggested to minimize these complications and to attenuate the inflammatory reaction that the traumatic fracture and subsequent surgical trauma encompass. Based on a pilot study in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, it is anticipated that patients treated with continuous-flow cryocompression therapy will have less pain, less morphine consumption and lower decrease of postoperative hemoglobin levels. These factors are associated with a shorter hospital stay and better long-term (functional) outcome. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred and sixty patients with an intra or extracapsular hip fracture scheduled for internal fixation (intramedullary hip nail, dynamic hip screw or cannulated screws) or prosthesis surgery (total hip or hemiarthroplasty) will be included in this prospective, open-label, parallel, multicenter, randomized controlled, clinical superiority trial. Patients will be allocated to two treatment arms: group 'A' will be treated with continuous-flow cryocompression therapy and compared to group 'B' that will receive standard care. Routine use of drains and/or compressive bandages is allowed in both groups. The primary objective of this study is to compare acute pain the first 72 h postoperative, measured with numeric rating scale for pain. Secondary objectives are: (non-) morphine analgesic use; adjusted postoperative hemoglobin level; transfusion incidence; incidence, duration and severity of delirium and use of psychotropic medication; length of stay; location and duration of rehabilitation; functional outcome; short-term patient-reported health outcome; general and cryotherapy related complications and feasibility. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial that will assess the analgesic efficiacy of continuous-flow cryocompression therapy in the acute recovery phase after hip fracture surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.trialregister.nl, NTR4152 (23(rd) of August 2013).

Reproducibility of a knee and hip proprioception test in healthy older adults.

BACKGROUND: Proprioception can be assessed by measuring joint position sense (JPS). Most studies have focused on JPS of the knee joint while literature for other joints especially for hip JPS is scarce. Although some studies have evaluated proprioception of the knee joint, the reproducibility of methods has rarely been investigated. AIMS: To estimate intrasession reliability and agreement of an active-active JPS test for hip flexion/abduction and knee flexion in healthy older adults. METHODS: Nineteen healthy older adults participated in this study. The proprioception of the hip (flexion and abduction) and knee (flexion) were assessed in both legs using the "active-active" reproduction technique. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and limits of agreement (LOA) were estimated for relative angular error (RE), absolute angular error (AE), and variable angular error (VE). RESULTS: Reliability of our JPS test was substantial to almost perfect for the RE for both joints and legs (ICC values ranging from 0.75 to 0.93). We also found that the ICC values for AE were substantial for knee flexion and hip abduction of the left and right leg. The ICC results of VE showed poor reliability for hip and knee joints. SEM and LOA values for hip abduction were generally lower than for hip and knee flexion, indicating lower measurement error or more precise scores for the proprioception test of hip abduction. CONCLUSION(S): Proprioceptive acuity of the knee and hip joints in healthy older adults can be reliably assessed with an active-active procedure in a standing position with respect to relative and absolute error.

Does Insert Type Affect Clinical and Functional Outcome in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial With 5-Year Follow-Up.

New insert types have been developed to improve clinical and functional outcome in mobile bearing (MB-TKA) and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty (FB-TKA). A prospective single blinded randomised controlled clinical trial was performed to evaluate 2 types of MB-TKA inserts and 2 types of FB-TKA inserts of the Genesis II prosthesis (Smith & Nephew) in 146 patients with 5-years follow-up. A significant difference (P=.042) between the MB-TKA inserts was found in KSS function scores, but clinical significance is expected to be limited. Goniometry, temporal gait parameters and QoL were similar in all groups. Survival was significantly better (P=.047) for FB-TKA. The comparable outcome and higher revision rate in MB-TKA indicate that FB-TKA may be preferential for the Genesis II implant system.

Missed low-grade infection in suspected aseptic loosening has no consequences for the survival of total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aseptic loosening and infection are 2 of the most common causes of revision of hip implants. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces not only the rate of revision due to infection but also the rate of revision due to aseptic loosening. This suggests under-diagnosis of infections in patients with presumed aseptic loosening and indicates that current diagnostic tools are suboptimal. In a previous multicenter study on 176 patients undergoing revision of a total hip arthroplasty due to presumed aseptic loosening, optimized diagnostics revealed that 4-13% of the patients had a low-grade infection. These infections were not treated as such, and in the current follow-up study the effect on mid- to long-term implant survival was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were sent a 2-part questionnaire. Part A requested information about possible re-revisions of their total hip arthroplasty. Part B consisted of 3 patient-related outcome measure questionnaires (EQ5D, Oxford hip score, and visual analog scale for pain). Additional information was retrieved from the medical records. The group of patients found to have a low-grade infection was compared to those with aseptic loosening. RESULTS: 173 of 176 patients from the original study were included. In the follow-up time between the revision surgery and the current study (mean 7.5 years), 31 patients had died. No statistically significant difference in the number of re-revisions was found between the infection group (2 out of 21) and the aseptic loosening group (13 out of 152); nor was there any significant difference in the time to re-revision. Quality of life, function, and pain were similar between the groups, but only 99 (57%) of the patients returned part B. INTERPRETATION: Under-diagnosis of low-grade infection in conjunction with presumed aseptic revision of total hip arthroplasty may not affect implant survival.

Comparison between open and arthroscopic procedures for lateral clavicle resection.

PURPOSE: Arthroscopic lateral clavicle resection (LCR) is increasingly used, compared to an open approach, but literature does not clearly indicate which approach is preferable. The goal of this study was to compare function and pain between patients who underwent lateral clavicle resection using an open approach and patients treated using an arthroscopic approach. METHODS: Patients who underwent LCR between January 2008 and December 2011 were reviewed. After exclusion, 149 shoulders (143 patients) were eligible for analysis: 41 open and 108 arthroscopic. Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were used to assess shoulder function and pain. Complications, operative time, length of hospitalization and resection distance were compared. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of three years, patients in the open group had significantly less pain by VAS (mm) (Mdn 10, IQR 23) compared with arthroscopic patients (Mdn 20, IQR 50) (p = 0.036). Operative time (minutes) was significantly less for the open approach (Mdn 24.0, IQR 12) compared with arthroscopic (Mdn 38.0, IQR 15) (p < 0.001). Resection distance (mm) was larger for the open approach (Mdn 7.1, IQR 7.0) compared with the arthroscopic approach (Mdn 3.2, IQR 3.1) (p = 0.006), but was not associated with outcome. No significant differences were found for DASH score, complication rate or length of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Both arthroscopic and open approaches for LCR provide excellent outcome in patients with acromioclavicular pain. Less residual pain was found for the open approach, which has shorter operating time and is likely more cost effective.

Glenoid fractures: a review of pathology, classification, treatment and results.

Glenoid fractures are rare, and relatively little is known about their mechanism, fracture pattern and optimal treatment strategies. The avulsions and rim fractures are strongly associated with anterior shoulder dislocations. Fossa fractures are mostly seen in high energy trauma patients as direct impact of the humeral head against the glenoid fossa. CT-scanning can be very useful in diagnosing the extend of injury and relation of humeral head with the main fragment of the glenoid. Fracture classification systems, have been designed mainly based on trauma mechanism, location and severity of fracture pattern. Treatment depends on instability, the degree of displacement and the articular surface fragment size, but is conservative in most cases. Due to the increase of arthroscopic fixation possibilities, operative treatment may increase. In this review, we have tried to summarize the available evidence into a treatment algorithm for different types of glenoid fractures. With regard to best functional outcome, an anatomical and concentric joint restoration should be the goal of treatment. Outcome is generally good in conservative and operative treatment, but exact data is difficult to appreciate, due to heterogeneity and comorbidities in different studies.

Operative resection is a viable treatment of macrodactyly of the foot caused by lipofibromatous hamartoma: a case study with 5 year follow-up.

UNLABELLED: Lipofibromatous hamartoma (LFH) is a benign tumour of nervous tissue that most commonly involves the median nerve. Only a few cases of LFH in the foot have been described. In these cases growth of bone and other tissue causing macrodactyly, a condition known as macrodystrophia lipomatosa, is often observed. Conservative treatment of LFH is usually preferred because of the potential loss of neurological function after surgery. Here we present a rare case of a 44-year old patient with LFH causing macrodactyly of the second ray of the left foot whose symptoms did not improve after conservative treatment. We describe the diagnostic process and the operative resection that was performed and show the follow-up results 5 years after surgery. All the symptoms experienced by our patient had disappeared. This case demonstrates that operative treatment of LFH in the foot is a viable option in patients with persistent symptoms following conservative treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Treatment of decentered developmental dysplasia of the hip under the age of 1 year: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline - Part 2.

Background and purpose: Diagnostics and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are highly variable in clinical practice. To obtain more uniform and evidence-based treatment pathways, we developed the 'Dutch guideline for DDH in children < 1 year'. This study describes recommendations for unstable and decentered hips. Materials and methods: The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation criteria (AGREE II) were applied. A systematic literature review was performed for six predefined guideline questions. Recommendations were developed, based on literature findings, as well as harms/benefits, patient/parent preferences, and costs (GRADE). Results: The systematic literature search resulted in 843 articles and 11 were included. Final guideline recommendations are (i) Pavlik harness is the preferred first step in the treatment of (sub) luxated hips; (ii) follow-up with ultrasound at 3-4 and 6-8 weeks; (iii) if no centered and stable hip after 6-8 weeks is present, closed reduction is indicated; (iv) if reduction is restricted by limited hip abduction, adductor tenotomy is indicated; (v) in case of open reduction, the anterior, anterolateral, or medial approach is advised, with the choice based on surgical preference and experience; (vi) after reduction (closed/open), a spica cast is advised for 12 weeks, followed by an abduction device in case of residual dysplasia. Interpretation: This study presents recommendations on the treatment of decentered DDH, based on the available literature and expert consensus, as Part 2 of the first official and national evidence-based 'Guideline for DDH in children < 1 year'. Part 1 describes the guideline sections on centered DDH in a separate article.

Treatment of centered developmental dysplasia of the hip under the age of 1 year: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline - Part 1.

Despite the high incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), treatment is very diverse. Therefore, the Dutch Orthopedic Society developed a clinical practice guideline with recommendations for optimal and uniform treatment of DDH. This article summarizes the guideline on centered DDH (i.e. Graf types 2A-C). The guideline development followed the criteria of Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II. A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies including children <1 year with centered DDH. Articles were included that compared (1) treatment with observation, (2) different abduction devices, (3) follow-up frequencies, and (4) discontinuation methods. Recommendations were based on Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, which included the literature, clinical experience and consensus, patient and parent comfort, and costs. Out of 430 potentially relevant articles, 5 comparative studies were included. Final guideline recommendations were (1) initially observe 3-month-old patients with centered DDH, start abduction treatment if the hip does not normalize after 6-12 weeks; (2) prescribe a Pavlik harness to children <6 months with persisting DDH on repeated ultrasonography, consider alternative abduction devices for children >6 months; (3) assess patients every 6 weeks; and (4) discontinue the abduction device when the hip has normalized or when the child is 12 months. This paper presents a summary of part 1 of the first evidence-based guideline for treatment of centered DDH in children <1 year. Part 2 presents the guideline on decentered DDH in a separate article.

Kinematic and clinical evaluation of shoulder function after primary and revision reverse shoulder prostheses.

HYPOTHESIS: Results of the reverse shoulder prosthesis on pain are generally satisfying; however, active range of motion (ROM) is often not optimal, especially after revision. A kinematic and clinical analysis of the reverse prosthesis was performed to provide more precise information on its glenohumeral motion pattern. We hypothesized that the difference in the primary and revision cases is due to differences in the motion in the glenohumeral joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The motion pattern of 31 patients with a reverse prosthesis (35 shoulders, 19 primary and 16 revisions) was measured during 3 active ROM tasks-forward flexion, abduction, and axial rotation. Average age was 71 ± 8 years (range, 58-85 years). Average follow-up was 23 ± 14 months (range, 4-63 months). Kinematic measurements were performed with a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device. Clinical evaluation was performed by obtaining Constant score, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Acromial-prosthetic distance was measured on anteroposterior radiographs. RESULTS: Primary placed prostheses showed significantly better active glenohumeral motion than revisions for forward flexion (71° ± 18° vs 53° ± 26°, P < .05), abduction (64° ± 15° vs 46° ± 24°, P < .05), and active external rotation (31° ± 25° vs 13° ± 16°, P < .05). Constant score improved for the whole group from 24 (range, 5-47) to 50 (range, 8-87; P < .001), for the primary group from 28 (range, 13-47) to 60 (range, 8-87; P < .001) and for revisions from 20 (range, 5-47) to 38 (range, 11-73; P < .001). Acromial-prosthetic distance showed no significant correlation for active glenohumeral motion. Five shoulders with a deficient teres minor muscle showed no significant decrease of external rotation. CONCLUSION: Active ROM is better in primary placed prosthesis, and this difference takes place mainly in the glenohumeral joint. In all our patients, Constant scores improved significantly postoperatively. However, we could not find any clinical correlating parameters to explain this difference.

Reverse or Hemi Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Single-Blinded Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes between hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as a treatment for dislocated 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Three Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: This study included 31 patients of which 14 were randomized into the HA group and 17 into the RSA group. INTERVENTION: Patients randomized to the HA group were treated with a cemented-stem Aequalis-fracture HA and patients randomized to the RSA group with a cemented-stem Aequalis-fracture RSA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes consisted of range of motion and constant score. Secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale for pain, DASH score, SF-12 scores, and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: After 6 and 12 months of follow-up, RSA showed a significant higher anterior elevation (105 degrees vs. 80 degrees, P = 0.002 and 110 degrees vs. 90 degrees, P = 0.02, respectively) and constant score (60 vs. 41, P = 0.01 and 51 vs. 32, P = 0.05, respectively) compared with HA. There were no significant differences in external and internal rotation. Also, visual analog scale pain, DASH scores, SF-12 scores, and radiological healing of the tuberosities and heterotopic ossification did not show any significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: RSA showed significant superior functional outcomes for anterior elevation and constant score compared with HA for dislocated 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures after short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Use of serotonergic antidepressants and bleeding risk in orthopedic patients.

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been associated with an increased bleeding tendency. Information on the impact of a possible impaired hemostasis associated with the perioperative use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is limited. This study aimed to determine the association between the perioperative use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the amount of blood loss during surgery and perioperative transfusion requirements. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients who underwent elective primary total hip arthroplasty in two hospitals from the period of July 1, 2004 until July 1, 2008. The index group included all users of both serotonergic and nonserotonergic antidepressants. The reference group included a random sample (ratio 1:3) of nonusers. The primary outcome was the amount of intraoperative blood loss. The requirement for blood transfusion was a secondary outcome. The outcomes were adjusted for confounding factors (comorbidity and comedication) using regression techniques. RESULTS: The index group included 66 users of serotonergic and 29 users of nonserotonergic antidepressants, and the reference group included 285 patients. After adjustment for confounding factors, mean blood loss during surgery was significantly higher in the users of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors when compared with the reference group: 95 ml (95% CI 9-181). Mean blood loss in the users of nonserotonergic antidepressants did not differ from the reference group. Users of antidepressants did not have a higher risk for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty who continue the use of serotonergic antidepressants show a significantly higher, but clinically unimportant, intraoperative blood loss, without an increase in perioperative transfusion requirements.

Prognosis of limitations in activities in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a 3-year cohort study.

UNLABELLED: van Dijk GM, Veenhof C, Spreeuwenberg P, Coene N, Burger BJ, van Schaardenburg D, van den Ende CH, Lankhorst GJ, Dekker J, on behalf of the CARPA Study Group. Prognosis of limitations in activities in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a 3-year cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To describe the course of limitations in activities in elderly patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee over a follow-up period of 3 years, and to identify prognostic factors of the course of limitations in activities, focusing on body functions, comorbidity, and cognitive functioning. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study with 3 years of follow-up. Measurements were conducted annually. Statistical analyses included t tests, univariate regression analyses, and multivariate regression analyses. SETTING: Rehabilitation centers and hospitals (Departments of Orthopedics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation) in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=237) with hip or knee OA. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-perceived change, self-reported limitations in activities measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and observed limitations in activities (timed walking test). Prognostic factors: demographic data, clinical data, body function (pain, muscle strength, range of motion [ROM]), comorbidity, and cognitive functioning (cognitive decline, memory, attention). RESULTS: Self-reported limitations in activities measured by the WOMAC improved slightly after 3-year follow-up. In knee OA, reduced ROM at 1-year follow-up (beta=.120), increased pain at 1-year follow-up (beta=-.177), and higher morbidity count (beta=-.180) predicted worsening of self-reported limitations in activities. In hip OA, reduced ROM at 1-year follow-up (beta=.201 for hip external rotation and beta=.144 for knee extension), increased pain at 1-year follow-up (beta=-.134), higher morbidity count (beta=-.220), or the presence of moderate to severe cardiac disease (beta=-.214) and poorer cognitive functioning (beta=.181) predicted worsening of self-reported limitations in activities. Performance-based limitations in activities measured by the timed walking test did not change after 3 years of follow-up. In knee OA, decreased muscle strength at 1-year follow-up (beta=-.272) and higher morbidity count (beta=.199) predicted worsening of performance-based limitations in activities. In hip OA, better ROM (beta=.182), higher morbidity count (beta=.232), or the presence of moderate to severe cardiac and eye-ear-nose-throat disease (beta=.210 and beta=.188, respectively) and older age (beta=.355) predicted worsening of performance-based limitations in activities. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, at the group level, limitations in activities of patients with OA of the hip or knee recruited from hospitals and rehabilitation centers seem fairly stable during the first 3 years of follow-up. However, at the level of individual patients, considerable variation occurs. Prognostic factors for worsening of limitations in activities include increased pain, reduced ROM, and decreased muscle strength at 1-year follow-up; higher morbidity count; and to a lesser extent poor cognitive functioning.

Malunion after midshaft clavicle fractures in adults.

This is an overview of the current literature on malunion after midshaft clavicle fracture. Anatomy, trauma mechanism, classification, incidence, symptoms, prevention, and treatment options are all discussed. The conclusion is that clavicle malunion is a distinct clinical entity that can be treated successfully.

Incidence of low-grade infection in aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: We investigated the hypothesis that many total hip arthroplasty revisions that are classified as aseptic are in fact low-grade infections missed with routine diagnostics. METHODS: In 7 Dutch hospitals, 176 consecutive patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening of their total hip arthroplasty were enrolled. During surgery, between 14 and 20 tissue samples were obtained for culture, pathology, and broad-range 16S rRNA PCR with reverse line blot hybridization. Patients were classified as either not being infected, suspected of having infection, or infected according to strict, predefined criteria. Each patient had a follow-up visit after 1 year. RESULTS: 7 patients were classified as infected, 4 of whom were not identified by routine culture. 15 additional patients were suspected of having infection. 20 of these 22 patients received a cemented prosthesis, fixated with antibiotic-loaded bone cement. All 22 patients received prophylactic systemic antibiotics. 7 of them reported complaints one year after surgery, but only one showed signs of early loosening. However, additional surgery was not performed in any of the patients. INTERPRETATION: Although the proportions were not as high as previously reported in the literature, between 4% and 13% of patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening were infected. However, as thorough debridement was performed during surgery and prophylactic antibiotics were used, the diagnosis of infection did not have any obvious clinical consequences, as most patients performed well at the 1-year follow-up. Whether this observation has implications for long-term implant survival remains to be seen.

Long-term follow-up of conservatively treated midshaft clavicular fractures on functional outcome.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the long-term effect of shortening after a midshaft clavicular fracture on strength deficiency in the shoulder. METHOD: This study included 18 participants (14 males, 4 females) with a conservatively treated midshaft clavicular fracture. Mean age was 52.2 ±â€¯13.8 years, range 32-76 years). The mean follow-up time was 13.5 ±â€¯0.4 years. Participants filled in a QUICKDASH questionnaire and both clavicle lengths were measured using a caliper. The isometric strengths in internal rotation, external rotation and abduction of both arms were measured with a handheld dynamometer. RESULTS: Average shortening of the clavicle in this group was 1.09 cm (SD 0.53). Nearly all strength measurements showed no significant difference between the shortened and the unaffected side. Multiple regression revealed a small (3N per mm length difference) but statistically significant relationship on external rotation between the relative extent of shortening of the clavicle, dominant side of the fracture and the isometric force difference between the unaffected and affected arm, F(2,15) = 5.746, p < .05, adj. R2 = .358. Over 14 years there was a reduction in mean DASH-score of 4.4 (8.8 ±â€¯12.3; current DASH = 4.4 ±â€¯7.7)In this group, long term effects of clavicular shortening were small. Based on these results we conclude that on the long term clavicular shortening will not result in significant strength loss.