[Tenotoxic potential of fluoroquinolones in the choice of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in ophthalmology]. / Prise en compte du potentiel ténotoxique des fluoroquinolones dans le choix d'une antibioprophylaxie chirurgicale en ophtalmologie.

PURPOSE: Fluoroquinolones are mainly used in ophthalmic antibiotic prophylaxis because of their broad spectrum activity and good ocular diffusion. But a single oral dose of fluoroquinolones can result in a serious source of tendinopathy and tendon rupture, especially in patients 60 years and older. It seems very important to investigate tendon toxicity of fluoroquinolones to improve the risk-benefit ratio in ophthalmologic antibiotic prophylaxis. MATERIAL: and methods: The intrinsic tenotoxic potential of four fluoroquinolones (pefloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin) was directly evaluated on living adherent tendon cells in microplates. Cell viability and reactive oxygen species production was evaluated using neutral red, alamar blue, and dichlorofluorescin diacetate tests. RESULTS: Results showed a loss of viability associated with free radical production depending on fluoroquinolone molecules. Pefloxacin appeared more tenotoxic but no study has confirmed its efficacy in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and its use in the patient who is 60 years and older could be disputed. Ciprofloxacin is highly toxic with a low ocular diffusion and seems to be inappropriate for antibiotic prophylaxis. Ofloxacin and levofloxacin are less cytotoxic, associated with good ocular diffusion and a broad antibacterial spectrum. CONCLUSION: Ofloxacin and levofloxacin seem to be good alternatives for improving the risk-benefit ratio in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients 60 years and older.

[Contribution of intravitreal infracyanine green to macular hole and epimacular membrane surgery: preliminary study]. / Apport du vert d'infracyanine intravitréen dans la chirurgie des trous maculaires et des membranes épirétiniennes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the contribution of intravitreal infracyanine green to macular hole and epimacular membrane surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients were operated on for macular hole (seven cases) or epiretinal membrane (18 cases) using intravitreal infracyanine. In most cases, 25mg of infracyanine powder was diluted in 5ml of solvent, then in 5ml of BSS and used within 1 hour. The solution was injected at the end of the vitrectomy and aspirated after 1-2 minutes. The internal limiting membrane was removed in both diseases. All specimens were studied using confocal microscopy or an immunocytochemical preparation. RESULTS: In cases of macular hole, the internal limiting membrane was bright green colored. Opening and peeling were greatly facilitated. In cases of epiretinal membrane, staining was variable: the most frequent aspect was an uncolored central area similar to a geographic map surrounded by a green stained zone. Sometimes the coloration appeared as sparse spots on the posterior pole. Occasionally the staining was homogeneous as in the macular hole cases. After the removal of the membrane, a second injection made it possible to check for the persistence of the internal limiting membrane and proceed to its ablation when necessary. A good correlation was found between surgical and histopathological aspects. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal infracyanine green is very helpful for the removal of internal limiting membrane in macular holes and epiretinal membrane surgery.

[Clinical evaluation of the ocular safety of Amukine 0.06% solution for local application versus povidone iodine (Bétadine) 5% solution for ocular irrigation) in preoperative antisepsis]. / Evaluation clinique de la tolérance oculaire d'Amukine 0,06% solution pour application locale versus povidone iodée (Bétadine 5% solution pour irrigation oculaire) en antisepsie pré-opératoire.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this monocentric, randomized, comparative, open study was to evaluate the safety of Amukine 0.06% solution (an isotonic hypochloride sodium solution) versus a 5% povidone iodine solution (Bétadine 5% solution for ocular irrigation) in antisepsis before cataract surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patients, aged between 49 and 90 years, were included and split, after randomization, into two groups: one testing Amukine 0.06%, the other testing a 5% povidone iodine solution. For each group, after local anesthesia, the antiseptic procedure consisted of an antisepsis of periocular teguments followed by an eye antisepsis through the instillation of two drops of the tested product in the conjunctival fornices. The safety evaluation was performed by grading superficial punctate keratitis 24 hours after surgery (slit lamp examination after fluorescein instillation). Conjunctival hyperemia scores by examination of the bulbar conjunctiva before the first instillation, immediately before surgery, and 24 hours after surgery were also compared. RESULTS: One hundred and seven reports were analyzed. Concerning the presence of corneal superficial punctate keratitis 24 hours after surgery, mean scores were not different (0.27 for the Amukine 0.06% group and 0.38 for the povidone iodine group; p=0.27 Mann Whitney test). The observations did not show a different progression of conjunctival hyperemia depending on the treatment group (p=0.65 (immediately after application) and p=0.52 (after 24 hours); Mann Whitney test). CONCLUSION: In this study, the ocular safety of Amukine 0.06% solution was not different from a 5% povidone iodine solution. Therefore, Amukine 0.06% is a new interesting approach to surgical antisepsis in ophthalmology and an alternative in case of iodine allergy.

[A relevant choice for corticoid eye drops: solution or suspension?]. / Quel choix pour un collyre de corticoïdes : solution ou suspension ?

INTRODUCTION: The various forms of ophthalmic pharmaceutical presentation of steroids is proliferating on the market: solutions, gels, and suspensions. Suspensions are characterized by particles in solution and require agitation before instillation. This trial studied the impact of agitation on the corticoid concentration of eye drop solutions, gels, and suspensions. METHODS: Corticosteroid levels in a drop of a dexamethasone solution or suspension or betamethasone suspension or gel were compared using liquid chromatography. These levels were measured after shaking for 5, 10, 30s, and 1 min using a vortex or without shaking. RESULTS: The results of this study show that, whatever shaking time was used, the suspension form seems less suited to instillation of corticosteroids. The suspension did not deliver consistent levels of corticosteroids (mean between 23 and 99%) compared to solutions and gels, which released about 100% of the corticosteroid content in each drop. CONCLUSION: Physicians, ophthalmologists, and pharmacists should remind the patient of the proper use of these suspensions before instillation. In cases of treatment failure, it is necessary to check the instillation method before questioning patient compliance.

[Cytotoxicity evaluation of different eyes drops with cyclosporine oral solution (Sandimmun)]. / Etude de la cytotoxicité de différents collyres à base de ciclosporine A buvable (Sandimmun).

INTRODUCTION: Cyclosporine is a molecule used in ophthalmology for the prevention of corneal graft rejection. The systemic use of this product can lead to serious adverse side effects that can be avoided using the topical formulation of cyclosporine. However, cyclosporine application can induce ocular irritation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cytotoxicity of four formulations of 2% cyclosporine eye drops: Sandimmum intravenous solution diluted with NaCl 0.9%, Sandimmun oral solution diluted in castor oil or corn oil after ethanol evaporation, and Sandimmun oral solution diluted in castor oil without previous ethanol evaporation. Two tests--the Draize test and the evaluation of cytotoxicity of adherent alive cells with cold light cytofluorimetry on microplates--were used in this study. RESULTS: These tests demonstrated that the aqueous solution shows more toxicity than the other formulations, and the type of oil and ethanol concentration influence cell viability. CONCLUSION: These results helped the Pharmacy unit choose the vehicles for a safe cyclosporine eye drop formulation and thus decrease the side effects of cyclosporine eye drop instillation with a decrease in ethanol concentration compared to published formulations.