Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 19(3): 135-44, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25384359

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the only curative treatment in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and the prognostic factors of tumour-free resection margin (R0) and overall survival (OS) in LRRC. METHODS: Consecutive LRRC patients observed between 1987 and 2005 in three Italian university hospitals were evaluated. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. In order to identify factors associated with both R0 resection and OS, a logistic regression analysis was performed in patients who underwent surgery with curative intent. RESULTS: Out of 150 patients with LRRC, 107 underwent surgery, but since 7 were found to have unresectable disease only 100 underwent surgical resection. Of them, 51 underwent radical and 49 extended resection. Sixty of the 107 patients underwent multimodality treatment. In 61 patients, R0 resection was achieved. Median OS after surgery was 43.4 months. In patients, who had surgery with curative intent, independent variables associated with R0 resection were: surgery for the primary tumour performed in other hospitals (p = 0.042) extended resection (p = 0.025) and use of positron emission tomography (PET) as a staging modality (p = 0.03). Independent variables associated with OS were: post-operative radiotherapy (p = 0.004), stage of the primary tumour (p = 0.004), R0 resection (p = 0.00001), and use of PET (0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Resection for LRRC results in improved survival. Other than the well-known prognostic factors R0 resection and OS, PET scan has an independent impact both on OS and R0 resection. It should therefore be included in routine clinical practice when staging LRRC.


Assuntos
Colectomia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 14(8): e506-7, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22360678

RESUMO

AIM: Reconstruction of a stenotic anal canal and repair of a stenotic perineal colostomy using a free graft foreskin. METHOD: The use of free graft foreskin anoplasty was described by Freeman for the treatment of mucosal prolapse in pediatric patients. The original surgical technique was modified and employed in two adult patients for the reconstruction of the anal region. RESULTS: The graft, in both cases, took well with a satisfactory functional and morphological recovery of the anal canal. CONCLUSION: Free graft foreskin anoplasty, has proved to be an effective solution to stenosis in the anal canal following major local surgery.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Prepúcio do Pênis/transplante , Hidradenite Supurativa/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA