The parasite intraerythrocytic cycle and human circadian cycle are coupled during malaria infection.

During infections with the malaria parasites Plasmodium vivax, patients exhibit rhythmic fevers every 48 h. These fever cycles correspond with the time the parasites take to traverse the intraerythrocytic cycle (IEC). In other Plasmodium species that infect either humans or mice, the IEC is likely guided by a parasite-intrinsic clock [Rijo-Ferreiraet al., Science 368, 746-753 (2020); Smith et al., Science 368, 754-759 (2020)], suggesting that intrinsic clock mechanisms may be a fundamental feature of malaria parasites. Moreover, because Plasmodium cycle times are multiples of 24 h, the IECs may be coordinated with the host circadian clock(s). Such coordination could explain the synchronization of the parasite population in the host and enable alignment of IEC and circadian cycle phases. We utilized an ex vivo culture of whole blood from patients infected with P. vivax to examine the dynamics of the host circadian transcriptome and the parasite IEC transcriptome. Transcriptome dynamics revealed that the phases of the host circadian cycle and the parasite IEC are correlated across multiple patients, showing that the cycles are phase coupled. In mouse model systems, host-parasite cycle coupling appears to provide a selective advantage for the parasite. Thus, understanding how host and parasite cycles are coupled in humans could enable antimalarial therapies that disrupt this coupling.

Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons.

Investigating the cell cycle often depends on synchronizing cell populations to measure various parameters in a time series as the cells traverse the cell cycle. However, even under similar conditions, replicate experiments display differences in the time required to recover from synchrony and to traverse the cell cycle, thus preventing direct comparisons at each time point. The problem of comparing dynamic measurements across experiments is exacerbated in mutant populations or in alternative growth conditions that affect the synchrony recovery time and/or the cell-cycle period. We have previously published a parametric mathematical model named Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony (CLOCCS) that monitors how synchronous populations of cells release from synchrony and progress through the cell cycle. The learned parameters from the model can then be used to convert experimental time points from synchronized time-series experiments into a normalized time scale (lifeline points). Rather than representing the elapsed time in minutes from the start of the experiment, the lifeline scale represents the progression from synchrony to cell-cycle entry and then through the phases of the cell cycle. Since lifeline points correspond to the phase of the average cell within the synchronized population, this normalized time scale allows for direct comparisons between experiments, including those with varying periods and recovery times. Furthermore, the model has been used to align cell-cycle experiments between different species (e.g., Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe), thus enabling direct comparison of cell-cycle measurements, which may reveal evolutionary similarities and differences.