RESUMO
Background: Recognizing preoperative first-ray hypermobility is important to planning hallux valgus (HV) surgery. A recent study showed the minimally invasive chevron Akin (MICA) osteotomy increased varus displacement of the proximal fragment of the first metatarsal osteotomy. The present study aims to evaluate the ability of the radiographic first-ray squeeze test to predict the varus displacement of the proximal fragment of the first metatarsal osteotomy when performing the MICA procedure. Methods: A prospective case series of patients with moderate to severe HV who underwent MICA was performed. The HV deformity correction was analyzed by comparing the preoperative and 12-week postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) and the intermetatarsal angle between the first and second rays (1-2 IMA). The ability of the radiographic first-ray squeeze test to predict the varus displacement of the first metatarsal was done by comparing the preoperative 1-2 IMA measured in the AP radiographic first-ray squeeze test (IMA-ST) with the intermetatarsal angle between the second metatarsal and the axis of the first metatarsal osteotomy proximal fragment (IAPF) taken 12 weeks postoperatively. Results: Between July 2022 and May 2023, a total of 39 feet in 28 patients underwent MICA. The mean IMA improved from 13.8 (SD = 2.2) to 3.8 degrees (SD = 1.5) (P < .001), and the mean HVA improved from 27.8 (SD = 6.1) to 4.9 degrees (SD = 2.5) (P < .001). A linear regression analysis revealed that IMA-ST is highly associated with the 12 week assessed IAPF (P < .001). Conclusion: The preoperative radiographic first-ray squeeze test appears to predict with high fidelity the varus displacement of the proximal fragment of the first metatarsal that can occur after the MICA procedure.Level of Evidence: Level III, prospective cohort study.
RESUMO
Background: The aim was to analyze changes in normal functional parameters of gait analysis by aging, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Methods: A cross-sectional study with a consecutive sample of asymptomatic subjects was performed between 2014 and 2020. Primary outcomes were time and force parameters (contact time and center of force [CoF] time), in the heel, midfoot, and metatarsal areas, measured using an in-office force platform. Results: A total of 156 subjects (312 feet) were included, including 67% of women with a mean age of 47 years. The mean of total contact time was similar in males and females (P = .695) and across BMI (P = .413). Contact time did not show differences by region (P = .648 heel, P = .286 midfoot, and P = .690 metatarsal). CoF time in the heel and metatarsal areas did not change between males and females (P = .288 and P = .879, respectively); meanwhile, it was different in midfoot (P = .002). Maximum force showed a reduction between sexes in the heel (P = .039) but did not in the midfoot and metatarsal areas. By age, differences were detected in the heel and metatarsal areas in females (P = .002 and P = .001) and the metatarsal area in males (P = .001). According to the age groups, total contact time increased in females (P = .001) but not in males (P = .018), and no differences were detected between foot areas. In females, CoF time did not change either foot areas or age groups. In males, CoF time values increased in the midfoot area in the older group (P = .001). Conclusion: Time variables did not change by foot region, independent of age, sex, and BMI. Heel maximum force decreased in females, probably linked to adaptive phenomena by aging. The midfoot remains stable, and acts as an undamaged "bridge." These parameters could be interpreted as normal in asymptomatic subjects. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic and prognostic.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment for severe hallux valgus deformity presents a challenge with high risk of complications. Third generation MIS techniques have increased their publications in recent years. The aim was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes in moderate and severe cases and report minor and major complications. METHODS: Retrospective series of cases with prospective data collection of 156 consecutive feet that underwent percutaneous double first metatarsal osteotomy (PEDO) and first phalanx osteotomy between 2008 and 2019 for moderate (hallux valgus angle [HVA] between ≥20 and <40 degrees and/or intermetatarsal angle [IMA] <16 degrees) and severe (HVA ≥40 degrees and/or IMA ≥16 degrees) hallux valgus deformities. Primary outcomes included radiographic and clinical parameters. Secondary outcomes included minor and major complications. RESULTS: A total of 156 procedures were performed in 128 patients. Mean age was 54.3 years (SD 14.3) (range, 19-82 years), median follow-up was 22.6 months (range, 12-96 months). Radiographic changes pre- to postoperation were as follows: HVA changed from 38.2 (SD 10.1) degrees to 11.2 (SD 8.3) degrees (P < .001), IMA from 14.7 (SD 3.2) degrees to 7.9 (SD 3.7) degrees (P < .001), and distal articular metatarsal angle from 19.7 (SD 6.3) degrees to 8.8 (SD 5.7) degrees (P < .001) after PEDO technique. Clinical changes pre- to postoperation were as follows: American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale scores improved from 47.3 (SD 16.5) to 87 (SD 11.6) (P < .001) and visual analog scale scores from 5 (2.7) to 0.9 (1.3) (P < .001). The satisfaction rate was 97% in the total sample. Recurrence rate (HVA ≥20 degrees) was 7.7%. Hallux varus (HVA <0 degrees) occurred in 5.8%, acute osteomyelitis in 1.3%, partial avascular necrosis in 0.6%, screw removal in 0.6%, and reoperation in 1.9%. No nonunion was observed. CONCLUSION: Clinical and radiographic parameters improved significantly, with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up in moderate and severe hallux valgus. Long experience in percutaneous surgery and specific instruments are needed for this technique. Recurrence was linked to preoperative HVA ≥40 degrees and postoperative tibial sesamoid position; Hallux varus was linked to lateral soft tissue release. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
Assuntos
Joanete , Hallux Valgus , Hallux Varus , Ossos do Metatarso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ossos do Metatarso/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossos do Metatarso/cirurgia , Hallux Valgus/diagnóstico por imagem , Hallux Valgus/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Radiografia , Resultado do Tratamento , Osteotomia/métodosRESUMO
Age expectancy has significantly increased over the last 50 years, as well as some age-related health conditions such as hip fractures. The development of hip fracture registries has shown enhanced patient outcomes through quality improvement strategies. The development of the Argentinian Hip Fracture Registry is going in the same direction. INTRODUCTION: Age expectancy has increased worldwide in the last 50 years, with the population over 64 growing from 4.9 to 9.1%. As fractures are an important problem in this age group, specific approaches such as hip fracture registries (HFR) are needed. Our aim is to communicate the Argentinian HFR (AHFR) development resulting from an alliance between Fundación Trauma, Fundación Navarro Viola, and the Argentinian Network of Hip Fracture in the elderly. METHODS: Between October 2020 and May 2021, an iterative consensus process involving 5 specialty-focused meetings and 8 general meetings with more than 20 specialists was conducted. This process comprised inclusion criteria definitions, dataset proposals, website deployment with data protection and user validation, the definition of hospital-adjusted registry levels, implementation planning, and sustainability strategies. RESULTS: By June 2021, we were able to (1) outline data fields, including epidemiological, clinical, and functional dimensions for the pre-admission, hospitalization, discharge, and follow-up stages; (2) define three levels: basic (53 fields), intermediate (85), and advanced (99); (3) identify 21 benchmarking indicators; and (4) make a correlation scheme among fracture classifications. Simultaneously, we launched a fundraising campaign to implement the AHFR in 30 centers, having completed 18. CONCLUSION: AHFR development was based on four pillars: (1) representativeness and support, (2) solid definitions from onset, (3) committed teams, and (4) stable funding. This tool may contribute to the design of evidence-based health policies to improve patient outcomes, and we hope this experience will help other LMICs to develop their own tailored-to-their-needs registries.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Idoso , Benchmarking , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
Introducción: Los estudios dinámicos de la función del pie habitualmente se realizan en laboratorios de marcha de gran complejidad. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar parámetros funcionales utilizando una plataforma de fuerza en una serie de pacientes asintomáticos evaluados en consultorios externos. materiales y métodos: Estudio de corte transversal que incluyó una serie consecutiva de pacientes asintomáticos voluntarios a quienes se les realizó una medición con una plataforma de fuerza (TekScan MatScan®, Boston, MA, EE.UU.) entre 2014 y 2020, en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Resultados: Se incluyeron 316 registros de 158 pacientes con mediciones bilaterales. La mayoría eran mujeres (66,5%) y el promedio de la edad era de 47 años (DE 16.1). Se evaluaron 14 variables, correspondientes a parámetros de fuerza, trayectoria y tiempo de contacto de la fuerza. El tiempo de contacto total fue de 0,79 segundos (DE 0,09), el CoF time según la región del pie fue del 20% en el talón, 26% en el mediopié y 46% en el antepié. El CPEI (center of pressure excursion index) fue del 16,55% (DE 7,14). Conclusiones: Se comunican los parámetros funcionales del pie en pacientes asintomáticos. Se midieron el tiempo de contacto del pie en el suelo, la fuerza (en talón, mediopié y antepié) y la trayectoria de la fuerza con una platafor-ma de fuerza. No se utilizaron radiaciones ionizantes. Estos hallazgos podrían ser utilizados como valores de referencia para detectar marchas patológicas. Nivel de Evidencia: II
Introduction: Dynamic studies of foot function are usually carried out in highly complex gait analysis laboratories. The objective of this study was to analyze functional parameters using a force platform in a series of asymptomatic patients evaluated in an outpatient clinic. materials and methods: Cross-sectional study, which included a consecutive series of volunteer asymptomatic patients who underwent a force platform measurement (TekScanMatScan®, Boston, MA, USA) between 2014 and 2020, in the City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Results: 316 records were included, corresponding to 158 individuals with bilateral measurements. Most were women (66.5%), with a mean age of 47 years (SD 16.1). Fourteen variables were evaluated, corresponding to parameters of force, trajectory, and contact time. The total contact time was 0.79 seconds (SD 0.09), and the COF time according to the region of the foot was 20% in the heel, 26% in the midfoot, and 46% in the forefoot. The CPEI (Center of Pressure Excursion Index) value was 16.55% (SD 7.14). Conclusion:Foot functional parameters in asymptomatic patients are presented. The contact time of the foot on the ground, the force in the heel, midfoot, and forefoot, and the force trajectory were measured. No ionizing radiation was used. These findings could be used as reference values to detect pathological gaits. Level of Evidence: II
Assuntos
Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Pé , Análise da MarchaRESUMO
La presentación de trabajos científicos a través de un informe requiere de un armado que podemos llamar "anatomía de un informe" y una dinámica en su interior a la que consideramos "la fisiología del informe" para que tenga validez y credibilidad, pero ¿cómo se evalúan los trabajos científicos presentados en nuestros congresos? ¿Cuáles son los criterios para determinar que un trabajo sea aceptado o no? El Comité de Investigación de la AAOT elaboró las grillas de evaluación. El objetivo de publicar las grillas es poder contar con una herramienta objetiva de valoración cualitativa y cuantitativa de todos los trabajos presentados en sus diferentes géneros, que podrá ser utilizada por los evaluadores de trabajos como elemento de feedback y como elemento de evaluación objetiva, y por los autores como guía para el armado del informe de su trabajo de investigación.
For validity and credibility purposes, the presentation of scientific publications in a report form requires a certain layout that we could call the "anatomy of the report", as well as the dynamics of it, considered the "physiology of the report". But how are conference scientific publications evaluated? What are the criteria used determine whether a report is accepted or not? The Research Committee at the AAOT developed evaluation with the aim of publishing them to have an objective tool for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of all types of publications submitted. These grids could be used by evaluators to present their feedback, as well as an objective evaluation tool. Authors could used them as a guide to prepare the report of their research work.
Assuntos
Ortopedia , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Congressos como Assunto , Publicações Científicas e Técnicas , Estudos de Avaliação como AssuntoRESUMO
La cirugía ortopédica ha avanzado mucho en estos años y, con ello, el uso de la intensificación de imágenes en el quirófano. El objetivo de este informe es revisar los principios biológicos de la radiación, el marco legal actual y hacer una breve reseña sobre la situación actual en la Argentina.
Orthopedic surgery has significantly advanced in the past years along with image intensifier fluoroscopy in the operating room. The purpose of this report is to review biological principles of radiation, as well as the current legal framework and to outline the present situation in Argentina.