The dynamic sagittal balance: Definition of dynamic spino-pelvic parameters using a method based on gait analysis.

Introduction: Evaluation of sagittal balance parameters is a standard assessment before spine surgery. However, these parameters can change during walking. We aimed to describe the behavior of spino-pelvic parameters during walking in healthy subjects. Material and methods: Analyses were performed in 60 healthy subjects. Static spinal sagittal balance parameters were assessed. We performed gait analysis and we used SMART-DX 500® to analyze parameters aimed at defining dynamic sagittal balance, including pelvic tilt angle (PTA), sagittal trunk shift (STS), and trunk angle (TA). We considered rotational and obliquity movements of the pelvis, flexo-extension movements of the hip, trunk, and knees. Analyses were performed in a standing posture and during walking. Results: PTA-cycle, PTA-stance, PTA-swing, STS-cycle, STS-stance, and STS-swing showed good-to-excellent internal reliability (ICC = 0.867; ICC = 0.700; ICC = 0.817, respectively). The parameters with the lowest variability were radiographic PI (CV = 16.53%), PTA-stance (CV = 9.55%), and PTA-swing (CV = 17.22%). PT was directly related to PTA-cycle (r = 0.534, p = .027). PI was inversely correlated with trunk flexo-extension range of motion (r = -0.654, p = .004) and dynamic PT (r = -0.489, p = .047). LL and SS were directly related to knee flexo-extension (r = 0.505, p = .039; r = 0.493, p = .045, respectively). SVA was correlated with the trunk obliquity in dynamics (r = 0.529, p = .029). PTA-cycle was directly related to trunk obliquity (r = 0.538, p = .049). STS and TA in the three phases of step were related to the kinematic parameters of the pelvis. TA was related to flexo-extension of the hip and knee. Conclusions: Variations of dynamic spino-pelvic parameters occur during walking and modify sagittal balance from a static to a dynamic condition.

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Barthel Index in an Italian ischemic stroke population in the acute phase: a cross-sectional study.

The objective of this study was to assess and validate the psychometric properties of the Italian culturally adapted Barthel Index (IcaBI) in a cohort of people with ischemic stroke. The validation process was conducted in an Italian cohort of 99 stroke inpatients to whom the IcaBI was administered in order to test its structural validity, and inter-and intrarater reliability. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.901. Factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure. The interclass correlation coefficient 3,1 (ICC) for intra-rater reliability was estimated at 0.987 (95% CI: 0.975-0.993), while the ICC for inter-rater reliability was 0.909 (95% CI: 0.852-0.948). This study demonstrates the psychometric properties of the IcaBI in an Italian stroke population, and therefore shows that the scale can be considered a valid and reliable assessment tool for measuring functional disability in Italian acute ischemic stroke survivors.

The culturally adapted Italian version of the Barthel Index (IcaBI): assessment of structural validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness to clinically relevant improvements in patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation centers.

The Barthel Index (BI) is widely used to determine eligibility criteria for inpatient rehabilitation and to monitor patients' recovery, irrespective of the illnesses that affect them. The culturally adapted Italian version of the Barthel Index (IcaBI) was recently validated. This paper reports the structural validity and inter-rater reliability of the IcaBI and its responsiveness to the results of inpatient rehabilitation. The IcaBI was administered to a cohort of 264 patients hospitalized in two rehabilitation centers in Rome, Italy. Factor analysis using principal component analysis revealed a monofactorial structure for neurological patients and, after removal of item 1 "feeding", also for orthopedic patients. Substantial to optimal inter-rater reliability was found (0.74 > intraclass correlation coefficient < 0.96). The IcaBI was found to be accurate (area under the curve= 0.72) with a minimal clinically important change score of 35 points. This work confirms that IcaBI is a useful tool for measuring disability in health and social care settings along the continuum of care. Further studies are needed to assess its criterion validity, interpretability and responsiveness in other specific disease conditions.