Radiation Oncologist Shortage Creates Opportunity for NPs.

A 50% estimated increase in new cancer cases over the next few decades will significantly challenge health care systems already strained by a shortage of oncology providers. Radiation oncology (RO), 1 of 3 three primary pillars of oncology care, treats half of all new cancer cases. Workforce shortages, reimbursement changes, delays in patient treatment, and the lack of follow-up care all continue to increase pressure on RO centers to boost efficiency, improve patient and staff retention, and strive for service satisfaction. Nurse practitioners (NPs) can bring greater capacity, expertise, and profitability to RO, especially in light of the fact that demand is predicted to outstrip supply by as much as 10 times. It is critical, however, that NPs receive specialized training in RO's clinical, technological, and operational processes before assuming patient-facing roles.

Image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gallbladder carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Clinical and technical parameter analysis of patients treated with ultrasound-based image-guided tomotherapeutic IMRT for gallbladder cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 8/2001 and 5/2005, 10 patients with primary tumors of the gallbladder were treated by image-guided IMRT to median doses of 59 Gy. To analyze normal tissue radiation exposure reduction using this novel approach, a virtual plan comparison between actually delivered IMRT plans and re-computed plans with identical inverse planning parameters but more conventional PTV safety margins was conducted. RESULTS: Average CTV was 379 cm(3), with a mean initial PTV of 834 cm(3). In 9/10 patients, a boost was delivered to a mean CTV(boost) of 171 cm(3) and average PTV(boost) of 241 cm(3). One patient reported RTOG grade 3 acute toxicity. All other patients exhibited Grade 2 or lower acute toxicity. Preliminary median overall survival was 16.7 months (range 3.2-34.9 months), with 5/10 patients alive at analysis. Virtual plan comparison revealed significant organ-at-risk sparing by the enabled PTV margin reduction. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-based image-guided IMRT is a feasible mechanism of delivering conformal radiation doses to tumors of the gallbladder with acceptable toxicity. Early outcome data with this novel radiation planning and delivery technique are encouraging and comparable to previously reported literature.

Significant rectal and bladder dose reduction via utilization of Foley balloon catheters in high-dose-rate tandem and ovoid intracavitary brachytherapy of the uterine cervix.

PURPOSE: To ascertain the potential for dose reduction to bladder and rectal points by using intravaginal Foley balloon catheters as a mechanism for structural displacement during tandem and ovoid high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy of the uterine cervix. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 22 patients, two Foley balloons were placed intravaginally, with one balloon placed anterior to the tandem and one posterior, as close to the flange as patient geometry allowed. A series of 57 consecutive digitized treatment plans was assessed with and without liquid contrast inflation of Foley catheter balloons. Planning X-rays were acquired and digitized. Software calculated dose was then defined for two bladder and two rectal points, both with and without Foley balloon inflation. Results were then assessed using parametric statistical analysis. RESULTS: Collectively and between equivalent points, a statistically significant (p < or = 0.01) diminution in calculated dose was observed with inflation of intracavitary balloon catheters, with a mean reduction in calculated dose of 16% and 17.6% for bladder and rectal points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The potential advantages available from dose reduction using intracavitary balloon catheters include decreased high-dose-rate-induced organ toxicity, case-by-case customizability, and low cost of implementation. As such, further exploration of this technique is warranted.

Daily ultrasound-based image-guided targeting for radiotherapy of upper abdominal malignancies.

PURPOSE: Development and implementation of a strategy to use a stereotactic ultrasound (US)-based image-guided targeting device (BAT) to align intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) target volumes accurately in the upper abdomen. Because the outlines of such targets may be poorly visualized by US, we present a method that uses adjacent vascular guidance structures as surrogates for the target position. We assessed the potential for improvement of daily repositioning and the feasibility of daily application. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 62 patients were treated by sequential tomotherapeutic IMRT between October 2000 and June 2003 for cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma (n = 10), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 10), liver metastases (n = 11), pancreatic carcinoma (n = 20), neuroblastoma (n = 3), and other abdominal and retroperitoneal tumors (n = 8). The target volumes (TVs) and organs at risk were delineated in contrast-enhanced CT data sets. Additionally, vascular guidance structures in close anatomic relation to the TV, or within the TV, were delineated. Throughout the course of IMRT, US BAT images were acquired during daily treatment positioning. In addition to the anatomic structures typically used for US targeting (e.g., the TV and dose-limiting organs at risk), CT contours of guidance structures were superimposed onto the real-time acquired axial and sagittal US images, and target position adjustments, as indicated by the system, were performed accordingly. We report the BAT-derived distribution of shifts in the three principal room axes compared with a skin-mark-based setup, as well as the time required to perform BAT alignment. The capability of the presented method to improve target alignment was assessed in 15 patients by comparing the organ and fiducial position between the respective treatment simulation CT with a control CT study after US targeting in the CT suite. RESULTS: A total of 1,337 BAT alignments were attempted. US images were not useful in 56 setups (4.2%), mainly because of limited visibility due to daily variations in colonic and gastric air. US imaging was facilitated in intrahepatic tumors and asthenic patients. The mean +/- SD shift from the skin mark position was 4.9 +/- 4.35, 6.0 +/- 5.31, and 6.0 +/- 6.7 mm in the x, y, and z direction, respectively. The mean magnitude vector of three-dimensional alignment correction was 11.4 +/- 7.6 mm. The proportion of daily alignments corrected by a magnitude of >10, >15, and >20 mm was 48.9%, 25.1%, and 12.7%, respectively. The magnitude of shifts in the principal directions, as well as the three-dimensional vector of displacement, was statistically significant (test against the zero hypothesis) at p <0.0001. The guidance structures that were the most valuable for identification of the TV position were the branches of the portal vein, hepatic artery, and dilated bile ducts in intrahepatic lesions and the aorta, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and extrahepatic aspects of the portal vein system in retroperitoneal and extrahepatic lesions. The mean total setup time was 4.6 min. The correlation of BAT targeting with target setup error assessment in the control CT scans in 15 patients revealed setup error reduction in 14 of 15 alignments. The average setup error reduction, assessed as a reduction in the length of setup error three-dimensional magnitude vector, was 54.4% +/- 26.9%, with an observed mean magnitude of residual setup error of 4.6 +/- 3.4 mm. The sole worsening of an initial setup was by a magnitude of <2 mm. US targeting resulted in statistically significant improvements in patient setup (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Daily US-guided BAT targeting for patients with upper abdominal tumors was feasible in the vast majority of attempted setups. This method of US-based image-guided tumor targeting has been successfully implemented in clinical routine. The observed improved daily repositioning accuracy might allow for individualized reduction of safety margins and optional dose escalation. Compared with the established application of the BAT device for prostate radiotherapy, in which the target can be directly visualized, the TV in the present study was predominantly positioned relative to guidance vascular structures in close anatomic relation. We perceived an enormous potential in improved and individualized patient positioning for fractionated radiotherapy and also for stereotactic extracranial radiotherapy and radiosurgery, especially for tumors of the liver and pancreas.

Repositioning accuracy of a commercially available double-vacuum whole body immobilization system for stereotactic body radiation therapy.

We evaluated the repositioning accuracy of a commercially available stereotactic whole body immobilization system (BodyFIX, Medical Intelligence, Schwabmuenchen, Germany) in 36 patients treated by hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy. CT data were acquired for positional control of patient and tumor before each fraction of the treatment course. Those control CT datasets were compared with the original treatment planning CT simulation and analyzed with respect to positional misalignment of bony patient anatomy, and the respective position of the treated small lung or liver lesions. We assessed the stereotactic coordinates of distinct bony anatomical landmarks in the original CT and each control dataset. In addition, the target isocenter was recorded in the planning CT simulation dataset. An iterative optimization algorithm was implemented, utilizing a root mean square scoring function to determine the best-fit orientation of subsequent sets of anatomical landmark measurements relative to the original treatment planning CT data set. This allowed for the calculation of the x, y and z-components of translation of the patient's body and the target's center-of-mass for each control CT study, as well as rotation about the principal room axes in the respective CT data sets. In addition to absolute patient/target translation, the total magnitude vector of patient and target misalignment was calculated. A clinical assessment determined whether or not the assigned planning target volume safety margins would have provided the desired target coverage. To this end, each control CT study was co-registered with the original treatment planning study using immobilization system related fiducial markers, and the computed isodose calculation was superimposed. In 109 control setup CT scans available for comparison with their respective treatment planning CT simulation study (2-5 per patient, median 3), anatomical landmark analysis revealed a mean bony landmark translation of -0.4 +/- 3.9 (mean +/- SD), -0.1 +/- 1.6 and 0.3 +/- 3.6 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. Bony landmark setup deviations along one or more principal axis larger than 5 mm were observed in 32 control CT studies (29.4%). Body rotations about the x-, y- and z-axis were 0.9 +/- 0.7, 0.8 +/- 0.7 and 1.8 +/- 1.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming a rigid body relationship of target and bony anatomy, the mean computed absolute target translation was 2.9 +/- 3.3, 2.3 +/- 2.5 and 3.2 +/- 2.7 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. The median and mean magnitude vector of target isocenter displacement was computed to be 4.9 mm, and 5.7 +/- 3.7 mm. Clinical assessment of PTV/target volume coverage revealed 72 (66.1%), 23 (21.1%), and 14 (12.8%), of excellent (100% isodose coverage), good (>90% isodose coverage), and poor GTV/isodose alignment quality (less than 90% isodose coverage to some aspect of the GTV), respectively. Loss of target volume dose coverage was correlated with translations >5 mm along one or more axes (p<0.0001), rotations >3 degrees about the z-axis (p=0.0007) and body mass index >30 (p<0.0001). The analyzed BodyFIX whole body immobilization system performed favorably compared with other stereotactic body immobilization systems for which peer-reviewed repositioning data exist. While the measured variability in patient and target setup provided clinically acceptable setup accuracy in the vast majority of cases, larger setup deviations were occasional observed. Such deviations constitute a potential for partial target underdosing warranting, in our opinion, a pre-delivery positional assessment procedure (e.g., pre-treatment control CT scan).

Daily stereotactic ultrasound prostate targeting: inter-user variability.

We analyzed the inter-user variability of patient setup for prostate radiotherapy using a stereotactic ultrasound-targeting device. Setup variations in 20 prostate cancer patients were analyzed. Users were a radiation oncologist, a medical physicist, four radiation technologists (RTT) and a radiologist. The radiation oncologist, radiologist, physicist and two RTTs were experienced users of the system (>18 months of experience); two RTTs were users new to the system. Gold standard for this analysis was a control CT acquired immediately following ultrasound targeting. For inter-user variability assessments, the radiation oncologist provided a set of axial and sagittal freeze-frames (standard freeze-frames) for virtual targeting by all users. Additionally each user acquired individual freeze-frames for target alignments. We analyzed the range of virtual setups in each patient along the principal room axes based on standard and individual freeze-frames. The magnitude of residual setup error and percentage of setup change for each user was assessed by control CT/planning CT comparison with individual virtual shifts. A total of 184 alignments were analyzed. The range of virtual shifts between users was 2.7+/-1.4, 3.6+/-1.1, and 4.4+/-1.4 mm (mean+/-SD) in x, y and z-direction for setups based on standard freeze-frames and 3.9+/-2.6, 6.0+/-4.7, and 5.4+/-2.7 mm for setups based on individual freeze-frames. When only virtual shifts of experienced users were analyzed, the mean ranges were reduced by up to 2.4 mm. Average magnitude of initial setup error before ultrasound targeting was 14.3 mm. Average improvement of prostate setup was 63.1+/-23.4% in experienced and 35.14+/-37.7% in inexperienced users, respectively (p<0.0001). Only 5 of 184 (2.7%) virtual alignments would have introduced new larger setup errors (mean 3.2 mm, range 0.2 to 9.5 mm) than the magnitude of the initial setup error. We conclude that ultrasound guided treatment setup for patients treated for prostate cancer can be performed with high inter-user consistency and does lead to improved treatment setup in more than 97% of attempted setups. Experienced use is correlated with a reduced range of setups between users and higher degree of setup improvement when compared with users new to the system

In vivo dose perturbation effects of metallic dental alloys during head and neck irradiation with intensity modulated radiation therapy.

A patient with base of tongue squamous sell carcinoma, with significant CT artifact-inducing metallic alloy, non-removable dental restorations in both the mandible and maxilla was identified. Simultaneous with IMRT treatment, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed in the oral cavity. After a series of three treatments, the data from the TLDs and software calculations were analyzed. Analysis of mean in vivo TLD dosimetry reveals differentials from software predicted dose calculation that fall within acceptable dose variation limits. IMRT dose calculation software is a relatively accurate predictor of dose attenuation and augmentation due to dental alloys within the treatment volume, as measured by intra-oral thermoluminescent dosimetry. IMRT represents a safe and effective methodology to treat patients with non-removable metallic dental work who have head and neck cancer.

Treatment of merkel cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 85 cases of Merkel cell carcinoma. There were 68 males and 17 females. The majority of cases involved head and neck sites (48%), followed by the extremities (38%) and trunk (14%). Sixty-seven percent of the patients had stage I disease that was localized to the skin of origin at presentation. Twenty-five percent and 8% were stage II (nodal metastasis) and stage III (distant metastasis), respectively. Surgical intervention included local or wide local excision +/- nodal dissection (68%), radical resection +/- nodal dissection (22%), and amputation (4%). Five patients (6%) underwent biopsy only because of metastatic disease or unresectability at presentation. Fifty-one percent received adjuvant therapy consisting of external beam radiation therapy and/or combination chemotherapy. RESULTS: With an average follow-up time of 39.5 months, 12% had persistent disease and 40% had recurrent disease. The median time to recurrence was 8 months with a mean of 10.6 months. Although the addition of adjuvant therapy did not affect survival, the recurrence rate was 32.5% for surgery +/- adjuvant radiation therapy +/- chemotherapy as compared with 52.7% for surgery-only patients. Although the 40.7% recurrence rate for patients receiving surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy was approximately the same as for patients receiving surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (40%), the effect of systemic chemotherapy on recurrence is less clear as a result of the small number of patients who received such therapy. Although tumor size and site of presentation were not observed to be statistically significant in overall survival, significant differences were observed based on sex and tumor stage. For females, the median survival time was 96 months (mean, 94.5 months) compared with 63 months (mean, 76.8 months) for males. This difference was significant (P < 0.01). Patients presenting with low-stage (stage I) disease had a significant (P < 0.01) survival benefit when compared with high-stage individuals (stages II and III). The 5-year actuarial survival rates were 68% and 42%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, surgery remains the primary modality for Merkel cell carcinoma, and adjuvant radiation therapy +/- systemic chemotherapy reduces local recurrence. Female patients and those who present with early-stage disease appear to have a better prognosis.

Early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics following prostate carcinoma radiotherapy: prognostic value of a time-and-PSA threshold model.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the current study was to analyze the prognostic value of early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, with PSA assessed as reaching or failing to reach discrete threshold values at fixed time points during follow-up after external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate carcinoma. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of PSA follow-up for 839 patients treated between May 1987 and December 2000 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (Cleveland, OH). They also assessed the impact on bRFS of PSA levels lower than defined threshold values at given time points during follow-up. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 24-189 months), 540 patients (64.4%) maintained bRFS, whereas 299 patients (35.6%) did not maintain bRFS. The median nadir among patients with sustained bRFS was 0.4 ng/mL, with a median time to nadir of 28.9 months. Patients who did not maintain bRFS reached a median nadir of 1.3 ng/mL at a median of 15 months (P < 0.0001 for both nadir level and time to nadir). Reaching PSA thresholds of 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.2 ng/mL at any time during follow-up was correlated with improved bRFS (P < 0.0001, each threshold). Patients whose PSA levels crossed the appropriate thresholds within 3 and 6 months of follow-up, irrespective of the time or level of eventual nadir, exhibited significantly improved bRFS when compared with patients whose PSA levels reached those thresholds at any time during follow-up and patients whose PSA levels never reached those thresholds (all thresholds: P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite previous conclusions that early PSA assessment may lack prognostic value, the data obtained in the current study suggest that the kinetics of early PSA decline is predictive of long-term bRFS when assessed using a time-and-PSA threshold model. After EBRT for prostate carcinoma, PSA levels below various discrete PSA thresholds were indicative of statistically meaningful long-term outcome differences between experimental arms as early as 90 days after radiotherapy. If the time-and-PSA threshold model is shown to be predictive of prostate carcinoma mortality as well, then it may allow the scientific community to evaluate promising treatment concepts and technologies at a highly accelerated pace.