Statin Intolerance in Clinical Practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In our pilot study, we aimed to determine how many patients with the statin intolerance history referred to the specialized center for the diagnostics and treatment of lipoprotein metabolism disorders really suffer from a complete statin intolerance. The purpose of the study was to prove that complete statin intolerance is overestimated and overdiagnosed, and with the detailed knowledge of the issue and patient approach, it is possible to find an appropriate statin treatment for the most of patients. RECENT FINDINGS: With the increasing number of statin users worldwide, the issue of statin intolerance has been a frequently discussed topic in recent years. There are many factors that play a role in the manifestation of statin intolerance (predisposing factors as age, sex, and some diseases), genetic factors leading to a different metabolism, drug-drug interactions, psychological reasons, and the negative influence of the mass media. However, it is estimated that true complete statin intolerance, defined by an intolerance of at least three statins at their usual lowest daily doses, occurs in approximately 3-6% of all statin users. In our pilot study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 300 patients who were referred to the Center of Preventive Cardiology with a history of statin intolerance. During the follow-up treatment, 222 patients (74%) were able to use some statin (rosu-, atorva-, simva-, fluvastatin), and in 21% of the cases (63 patient), the target values according their CV risk level were even achieved. Only 78 patients (26%) were confirmed as being complete statin intolerant following a thorough therapeutic effort. The most tolerated statin was rosuvastatin.

Strong Association between APOA5 Gene Polymorphisms and Hypertriglyceridaemic Episodes.

Plasma triglyceride (TG) levels represent a significant risk factor of cardiovascular and total mortality. Concentrations of TG in the plasma depend, to a large extent, on the genetic background, and the apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5) gene seems to be one of the most powerful players in the plasma TG metabolism regulation. In total, we analysed three tagging APOA5 (rs964184 rs662799, rs3135506) SNPs in 209 patients with plasma TG levels over 10 mmol/l (HTG) on at least one occasion and in 379 treatment-naïve controls (NTG) with plasma TG values within the normal range. Minor alleles of all three analysed APOA5 polymorphisms significantly (all P < 0.0001) increased the risk of hypertriglyceridaemia. The most significant association (P < 0.0000001) was observed for the rs964184 polymorphism, where the minor GG homozygotes had the odds ratio (OR, 95% CI) for hypertriglyceridaemia development 21.30 (8.09-56.07, P < 0.000001) in comparison with the major CC allele homozygotes. Carriers of at least one minor allele at rs3135506 had OR (95% CI) 4.19 (2.75-6.40); (P < 0.000005) for HTG development and similarly, carriers of a minor allele at rs662799 had OR (95% CI) 3.07 (2.00-4.72) (P < 0.0001). The cumulative presence of risk alleles (unweighted gene score) significantly differed between patients with episodes of high TG and controls at P < 0.0000001. There were 73 % of subjects without any of the risk alleles among the controls and 46 % in the patients. In contrast, the controls just included 3 % of subjects with score 3 and more in comparison with 18 % in HTG patients. We conclude that common APOA5 variants are very important genetic determinants of episodic hypertriglyceridaemia in the Czech population with a high potential to be applied in personalized medicine.

[An anaesthesiologist's perspective on requirements for pre-surgery examinations]. / Pozadavky na predoperacní vysetrení z pohledu anesteziologa.

A preoperative check-up remains still an issue. The preoperative check-up should thoroughly evaluate an actual state of patients health, an anticipated perioperative course should be taken into account. An internist should closely collaborate not only with a surgeon, but with an anaesthesiologist as well. As guidelines cover this topic only sparsely, different approach might result either in excess or in insufficient examinations. Therefore an anaesthesia department should have its own guidelines available that would cover required preoperative check-ups considering expected operation. These guidelines should be then sent to the internist. Preoperative check-up should be done with an adequate margin before the operation, the internist should deliver a complete report including executed laboratory check-ups and consultations with specialists.

[Dyslipidemia and obesity 2011. Similarities and differences]. / Dyslipidemie a obezita 2011. Jak spolu souvisejí a v cem se lisí.

We shall open our overview of issues related to obesity and hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) or dyslipidemia with a notoriously known truth (that some are still reluctant to accept): HLP/DLP is not obesity. It is certainly not possible to put an equal sign between subcutaneous fat and the level of plasma lipids and lipoproteins. On the other hand, it is obvious that there is a number of connecting links between HLP/DLP and obesity. These associations on one side and differences on the other are the focus of this review paper. (1) HLP/DLP as well as obesity represent a group of high incidence metabolic diseases (gradually evolving from epidemic to pandemic) that affect several tens of percent of inhabitants. (2) Both HLP/DLP and obesity often occur concurrently, often as a result of unhealthy lifestyle. However, genetic factors are also been studies and it is possible that mutual predispositions for the development of both diseases will be identified. At present, it is only possible to conclude that obesity worsens lipid metabolism in genetically-determined HLP. (3) Both these metabolic diseases represent a risk factor for other pathologies, cardiovascular diseases are the most important common complication of both conditions (central type of obesity only). Concurrent presence of HDL/DLP and obesity is often linked to other diagnoses, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2T), hypertension, pro-coagulation or pro-inflammatory states; all as part of so called metabolic syndrome. (4) Patients with metabolic syndrome and, mainly, central obesity usually have typical dyslipidemia with reduced HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and sometimes hypertriglyceridaemia. Current treatment of HDL/DLP aims to first impact on the primary aim, i.e. LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and than influence HDL-C. (5) It seems that the therapeutic efforts in HLP/DLP and obesity will go in the same direction. I will skip the trivial (and difficult to accept by patients) dietary changes. Pharmacotherapy, however, (very scarce with respect to obesity) may bring positive effects on lipids and BMI. Metformin used to be considered as a drug that could improve lipid profile and lead to body weight reduction. Even though larger studies did not provide an unambiguous evidence for this, metformin keeps its position as a first line oral antidiabetic (not only) in patients with T2DM, HLP and obesity. Positive effect on lipids, mainly HDL-C is reported with pioglitazone. This drug, unlike other glitazones, does not bring body weight reduction but at least does not have a negative effect. Other antidiabetics with a positive effect on lipids and body weight include incretins, liraglutid in particular. Liraglutid importantly decreases triglyceride levels and has anorectic effect. Furthermore, metabolic effects of bariatric surgery should not be overlooked. Bariatric surgery brings weight reduction as well as it improves lipid profile and compensation of diabetes mellitus (DM). It should be mentioned here that bariatric surgery has been used for the treatment of HLP as early as 1980s. The results of the 25-year follow up within the POSCH study (ideal bypass indicated for HLP), presented in 2010, confirm a decrease in overall as well as cardiovascular mortality in an operated group, even though patients who did not undergo surgery were significantly more frequently treated with statins.

Efficacy and safety of extended-release niacin/laropiprant plus statin vs. doubling the dose of statin in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia.

BACKGROUND: Co-administration of niacin with statin offers the potential for additional lipid management and cardiovascular risk reduction. However, niacin is underutilised because of the side effects of flushing, mediated primarily by prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)). A combination tablet containing extended-release niacin and laropiprant (ERN/LRPT), a PGD(2) receptor (DP1) antagonist, offers improved tolerability. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ERN/LRPT added to statin vs. doubling the dose of statin in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia who were not at their National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal based on their coronary heart disease risk category (high, moderate or low). METHODS: After a 2- to 6-week run-in statin (simvastatin 10 or 20 mg or atorvastatin 10 mg) period, 1216 patients were randomised equally to one of two treatment groups in a double-blind fashion: group 1 received ERN/LRPT (1 g) plus the run-in statin dose and advanced to ERN/LRPT (2 g) after 4 weeks for an additional 8 weeks, with no adjustments to the run-in statin dose; group 2 received simvastatin or atorvastatin at twice their run-in statin dose and remained on this stable dose for 12 weeks. RESULTS: ERN/LRPT added to statin (pooled across statin and statin dose) significantly improved key lipid parameters vs. the doubled statin dose (pooled): the between-treatment group difference in least squares mean per cent change [95% confidence interval (CI)] from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C (primary end-point) was -4.5% (-7.7, -1.3) and in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was 15.6% (13.4, 17.9) and in median per cent change for triglyceride (TG) was -15.4% (-19.2, -11.7). Treatment-related adverse experiences (AEs) related to flushing, pruritis, rash, gastrointestinal upset and elevations in liver transaminases and fasting serum glucose occurred more frequently with ERN/LRPT added to statin vs. statin dose doubled. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ERN/LRPT to ongoing statin treatment produced significantly improved lipid-modifying benefits on LDL-C, HDL-C and TG and all other lipid parameters compared with doubling the statin dose in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. The types of AEs that occurred at a greater frequency in the ERN/LRPT group were those typically associated with niacin.

[Comprehensive management of cardiovascular risk. Focusing on telmisartan]. / Komplexní lécba kardiovaskulárního rizika. Zamereno na telmisartan.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent a significant health problem in all countries world-wide and in the developed world, including the Czech Republic, in particular. The underlying cause in the majority of CVD patients is atherosclerosis and its complications, respectively. The present paper focuses on prevention and timely treatment of atherosclerosis. Management should be comprehensive and should target the risk factors (RF). Hypertension, hyperlipoproteinaemia and dyslipidemia (HLP and DLP), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), visceral fat obesity and cigarette smoking are the dominating RFs. Even though all RFs have to be managed simultaneously and it is not possible to focus on just one of them, for the sake of clarity, this paper discusses hypertension and the use of telmisartan, a representative of one the most up-to-date group of antihypertensives. There is a growing evidence that it is not always just a reduction of a specific risk that is important but also the mode of treatment. For example, to reduce a CV risk in a patient with hypertension but also, for example, with metabolic syndrome, it is more beneficial to treat the patient with rennin-angiotensin system (RAS) blocking agents, possibly in a combination with calcium channels antagonists, than to use "traditional" (older) treatment approach with a combination of a beta/blocker and diuretic. Among the RAS-modifying agents, ACE inhibitors and sartans are the most widely used. Among sartans, telmisartan is very well-tolerated and has evidence from a large interventional study for its effect on reducing the CV risk.

[Hyperlipoproteinaemia and dyslipoproteinaemia I. Classification, diagnostics, cardiovascular, cardiometabolic and residual risk]. / Hyperlipoproteinemie a dyslipoproteinemie I. Klasifikace, diagnostika, kardiovaskulární, kardiometabolické a reziduální riziko.

Cardiovascular diseases remain the most important cause of death worldwide. The situation in the Czech Republic is one of the best when compared to the other countries of the former socialist block; on the other hand, we significantly lack behind when the comparison is made to south and southwest European countries. The concept of risk factors (RF) and multifactorial character of atherosclerosis as the main cause of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is fully accepted at present. Hyperlipoproteinaemia (HLP) and dyslipidemia (DLP) are a group of high incidence metabolic diseases characterised by increased levels of lipids and lipoproteins in plasma or, in case of DLP, by unsuitable, atherogenic composition of lipids and lipoproteins in plasma. HLP and DLP are among the most important RF for the development of CVD. Mainly LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) is perceived as a very important risk factor; successful reduction of LDL-C is linked to a reduction in cardiovascular risk. Even when LDL-C is decreased and the so-called "target values" achieved, patients are still at risk ofa CV event. This remnant risk is the so called "residual risk". The most important "rival" to LDL-cholesterol among the risk factors is the metabolic syndrome, or rather the DLP associated with the metabolic syndrome, characterised from the perspective of DLP by low levels of HDL-cholesterol and increased triglycerides with concurrent occurrence of "small dense LDL". The issue of heterogeneity and atherogenicity oflipoprotein particles in general then becomes topical. Lipoprotein (a)--Lp(a) is another important lipid risk factor that is getting a significant attention.

[Hyperlipoproteinaemia and dyslipoproteinaemia II. Therapy: non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches]. / Hyperlipoproteinemie a dyslipoproteinemie II. Terapie: Nefarmakologická a farmakologická lécba.

At present, literally no one disputes hyperlipoproteinaemia and dyslipidemia (HLP and DLP) treatment as a rational therapeutic approach in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). This approach is in line with the current principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and is sufficiently evidenced particularly by the results of large intervention studies. Nevertheless! When the results of the recent studies are critically appraised, these by no means are (mostly, there, obviously, are exceptions) as conclusive as the studies conducted in 1980s and 1990s. Consequently, positive results are being sought in subanalyses, subgroup evaluations and multiple-study metaanalyses. This paper is not intended as a critique of new drugs. These certainly are developed to be safe, effective and well-tolerated. However, the newer studies suffer from a range of issues: the populations studied are already very well managed, it is not possible to compare against placebo and sometimes, let us be honest, the trial design itself is problematic (often it is an uncritical effort to treat as wide as possible range of patients as well as new groups of patients who might not be suitable for the given treatment). Certainly, we should not start disputing the well-evidenced hypotheses and seek alternatives to the long-established arguments and approaches as a consequence to some less convincing studies. We must not overlook the most robust results of statin studies as well as 'positive' studies with other hypolipidemics. There is no doubt that the effect ofstatins on LDL-cholesterol represents a significant move towards cardiovascular disease prevention. Despite this, we currently recognise with increased intensity that this very effective and well-evidenced treatment has its limits and that a high proportion of patients dies or are faced with cardiovascular diseases even though they are treated with a correct dose ofa statin and a target LDL-C level is achieved. This remaining risk (represents more than 50% ofevents) has been termed 'RESIDUAL RISK'. The issue of residual risk is crucial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2T) or in all patients with HDL-C-low DLP. As was repeatedly emphasised, a statin will be a cornerstone of pharmacological treatment of a DLP. However, a question arises what to combine it with. The most convincing data exist for niacin (combination of niacin with laropiprant minimising the incidence of unwanted flushes). We surely should not marginalize other hypolipidemics used mainly in combinations: resin and ezetimibe to treat LDL-C, niacin, fibrates and possibly omega-3-fatty acids to manage the residual risk (HDL and TG). Last but not least we should not forget non-pharmacological treatment as the pivotal treatment approach in all patients.

Lower wall shear rate of the common carotid artery in treated type 2 diabetes mellitus with metabolic syndrome.

Arterial sites with low wall shear stress (WSS) are more prone to the development of atherosclerotic plaques, as was observed in carotid arteries in subjects with atherosclerosis risk factors. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, hyperlipidemia and other components of the metabolic syndrome, are associated with high risk for symptomatic cerebrovascular disease. It was shown by others that untreated type 2 DM is associated with lower WSS in common carotid arteries. However, the cardiovascular risk of type 2 DM could be modified by therapy. The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that treated type 2 DM subjects with metabolic syndrome still have lower WSS in common carotid arteries than healthy controls. We enrolled 26 compensated DM subjects with metabolic syndrome, treated by metformin, statins and ACEI for more than 6 months, and 22 aged-comparable healthy controls. Wall shear rate (WSR) was used as a measure of WSS. A linear 3-11 MHz probe was used to measure blood velocity and internal diameter in the common carotid arteries. We compared observed values of WSR adjusted for age by ANCOVA. Wall shear rate was significantly lower in DM group than in control subjects: peak (systolic) values of wall shear rate were 410+/-130 s(-1) vs. 487+/-111 s(-1) (p<0.005). DM subjects had significantly lower WSR, because of both thinner lumen and slower blood flow velocities. Lower WSR was accompanied by higher IMT (0.73+/-0.12 mm vs. 0.64+/-0.11 mm, p<0.001). Treated subjects with compensated type 2 DM with metabolic syndrome still have atherogenic hemodynamic profile. These findings might help to understand faster progression of atherosclerosis in diabetic subjects with metabolic syndrome despite up-to-date medication.

The effect of rosiglitazone on the expression of thrombogenic markers on leukocytes in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes mellitus is associated with a number of prothrombotic abnormalities, and correction of these abnormalities might translate into the reduction of cardiovascular risk. Glitazones improve endothelial function and reduce inflammation, but much less is known about their effect on thrombogenic factors. We have therefore studied the effect of rosiglitazone on leukocyte and soluble thrombogenic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thirty-three subjects with type 2 diabetes and 32 normal controls were included; patients were examined at baseline and after 5 months of rosiglitazone treatment (4 mg/day). We measured leukocyte-platelet aggregates and leukocyte expression of either P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) or receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) using flow cytometry, as well as several circulating soluble thrombogenic markers by ELISA method. Leukocyte expression of uPAR and PSGL-1 was significantly higher in patients than in controls. Leukocyte-platelet aggregates and leukocyte expression of uPAR and PSGL-1 significantly decreased after rosiglitazone. There was also significant decrease in CRP and fibrinogen levels, but there was no effect of diabetes and/or rosiglitazone on other circulating molecules. In conclusions, we observed a substantial improvement in the expression of thrombogenic markers on leukocytes after rosiglitazone treatment, suggesting the novel antithrombotic effects of rosiglitazone.

Leukocyte and endothelial adhesion molecules in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the effect of atorvastatin treatment.

Atherogenesis involves the migration of leukocytes into vascular subendothelial space, a process mediated by endothelial and leukocyte cell adhesion molecules. Endothelial molecules are assessed indirectly via serum levels, but leukocyte molecules can be assessed directly. We have therefore hypothesized that leukocyte adhesion molecules are altered to a greater degree in hypercholesterolemia than serum endothelial adhesion molecules. We examined 29 subjects with hypercholesterolemia and 27 controls at baseline and after 12 weeks of atorvastatin treatment (20 mg/day). Expression of leukocyte integrins CD11a, CD11b, CD18, and CD49d and of L-selectin was measured by flow cytometry. Serum ICAM-1, E-selectin and von Willebrand factor were measured by ELISA. Expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules was significantly higher in patients at baseline than in the controls, except for CD11a. Expression significantly decreased after atorvastatin in most adhesion molecules except for CD11b. In contrast, there was no effect of hypercholesterolemia and/or atorvastatin on the serum endothelial molecules. Leukocyte but not endothelial adhesion molecules were influenced by hypercholesterolemia and by lipid lowering treatment. Leukocyte molecules may therefore be a more sensitive marker of atherogenesis than endothelial molecules. Our results support the role of increased leukocyte adhesiveness in atherogenesis.

Hyperlipidemia is associated with altered levels of insulin-like growth factor-I.

Previous studies revealed altered levels of the circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and of its binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in subjects with coronary atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome and premature atherosclerosis. Hyperlipidemia is a powerful risk factor of atherosclerosis. We expected IGF-I and IGFBP-3 alterations in subjects with moderate/severe hyperlipidemia but without any clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis. Total IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were assessed in 56 patients with mixed hyperlipidemia (MHL; cholesterol >6.0 mmol/l, triglycerides >2.0 mmol/l), in 33 patients with isolated hypercholesterolemia (IHC; cholesterol >6.0 mmol/l, triglycerides <2.0 mmol/l), and in 29 healthy controls (cholesterol<6.0 mmol/l, triglycerides<2.0 mmol/l). The molar ratio of IGF-I/IGFBP-3 was used as a measure of free IGF-I. IHC subjects differed from controls by lower total IGF-I (164+/-60 vs. 209+/-73 ng/ml, p=0.01) and IGF-I /IGFBP-3 ratio (0.14+/-0.05 vs. 0.17+/-0.04, p=0.04). Compared to controls, MHL subjects had lower total IGF-I (153+/-54 ng/ml, p=0.0002) and IGFBP-3 (2.8+/-0.6 mg/ml, p<0.0001), but higher IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio (0.25+/-0.06, p<0.0001). Differences remained significant after the adjustment for clinical and biochemical covariates, except for triglycerides. Patients with both IHC and MHL have lower total IGF-I compared to controls. The mechanism is presumably different in IHC and MHL. Because of prominent reduction of IGFBP-3 in patients with MHL, they have reduced total IGF-I despite the actual elevation IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio as a surrogate of free IGF-I.

Lipoprotein(a) and its position among other risk factors of atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] comprises of an LDL particle and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] and its elevated levels are considered a risk factor for atherosclerosis. The aim of our study was to find out whether elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis in patients with multiple other risk factors. We further tested the association of three polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene promoter with Lp(a) levels. No significant correlation was detected between Lp(a) levels and lipid and clinical parameters tested. The study demonstrated a significantly (p=0.0219) elevated Lp(a) level (mean 28+/-35 mg/dl, median 0.14) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). In a group with premature CHD the correlation was not significant anymore. There was a significant correlation between polymorphic loci of the promoter region of apo(a) gene and Lp(a) levels (+93C T, p=0.0166, STR, p<0.0001). Our study suggests that elevated Lp(a) level is an independent risk factor of CHD in carriers of other important CHD risk factors. Observed association of sequence variants of the promoter of apo(a) gene with Lp(a) levels is caused in part due to linkage to a restricted range of apo(a) gene length isoforms.

[Diabetes, dyslipidaemia and kidney diseases]. / Diabetes, dyslipidemie a onemocnení ledvin.

Dyslipidemia (DLP) is the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Similarly, the relevance of diabetes mellitus (DM) as a CVD risk indicator is so high that it is attributed the same significance as the secondary prevention ofCVD in different systems of global cardiovascular risk assessment. Most recently, also kidney disorders have been increasingly referred to as a risk factor for the manifestation of CVD. According to some guidelines, patients with kidney disorders are at the same risk as the patients with manifest IHD (or another manifestation of atherosclerosis), and patients with DM. This paper does not pretend to resolve the complex relationship between DLP, DM and nephropathy. Its sole objective is to bring attention to the fact that it is a relevant and significant issue which is gradually becoming a central point of attention. The first part of the article deals primarily with diabetic DLP and the different options for its management. The second part deals with the role of DLP in kidney disorders, the risk it represents and the options for its management, as well as with the results of the first intervention studies. The studies focused on the effect of hypolipidemic therapy on CV risk of patients on the one hand and, on the other hand, on the way hypolipidemic drugs contribute to the improvement or sustaining of renal functions, or on their influence on renal disease markers.

[The Atractiv project: improvement of cardiovascular preventive in primary care in the Czech Republic]. / Projekt Atractiv: zlepseni kardiovaskulárni prevence v podmínkách primárni péce v Ceské republice.

INTRODUCTION: The Atractiv project assessing the efficacy ofa complex approach to cardiovascular risk reduction in primary care was conducted by 464 physicians in the entire Czech Republic between 2006 and 2007. AIM: The primary goals of the Atractiv project were description of prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in high-risk patients and attempt to maximize the risk reduction by optimalization of treatment. Within five visits the patients were carefully followed and their risk factors were intervened using lifestyle and pharmacological measures. METHODS: The main focus of the project was management of dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension. Basic anthropometric and laboratory data were collected including serum lipids, glycemia, kidney liver function tests, CVD risk was assessed using SCORE charts. 4,427 patients were included in the project (2,372 men), average age 62.9 +/- 10 years. RESULTS: Optimalization of treatment of dyslipidemia resulted in a significant decrease of both total and LDL-cholesterol levels by 23 and 28%, respectively, HDL-cholesterol concentrations increased by 4.5% and levels of triglycerides declined by 22%. Improved management of arterial hypertension was accompanied by a decrease of average blood pressure from 152.5/90.5mm Hg to 132.5/80.2mm Hg. Average fasting glycemia was lowered by 0.4 mmol/l while body mass index and waist circumference decreased by 0.6 kg/m2 and 2.5 cm, respectively. All differences between baseline and the last visit were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Pharmacotherapy indicated during the project was well tolerated and occurrence of side effects was minimal. CONCLUSION: The Atractiv project documents the complex approach to patients at high-risk of CVD including lifestyle intervention with effective combination of lipid-lowering drugs and antihypertensive drugs brings additional significant lowering of CVD risk. Application of modern, evidence-based approaches to treatment of dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension in everyday practice is possible, effective and feasible.

[Statin pharmacokinetics]. / Farmakogenetika lécby statiny.

Reducing high levels of plasmatic lipoids (LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides) is one of the most important steps in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. In the majority of cases, treatment based on lifestyle changes (changes in dietary habits, more physical activity) is not sufficient and pharmacotherapy becomes necessary. Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, are a well tolerated first-choice drug in patients with dyslipidemia. However, great variability of statin effects has been observed in different patients on the same therapy, and the cause clearly resides in different genetic characteristics of each individual, influencing the effect of therapy. The influence of different genetic variants has been described, but the control of response to hypolipidemic therapy is most likely subject to polygenic control. The analysis of multiple gene combinations may help detect the "hyper-" and "hypo-" responders, i.e. individuals with a good response to treatment (allowing for starting with a lower dose of the drug), and those with an insufficient response to treatment (in whom statin shall not be the drug of first choice), or it may help detect the patients who are more likely to develop severe adverse events. Studies with different designs describe that for instance genes (and their variants) for cytochromes, apolipoprotein E and A1 and cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase may be important genetic determinants of the effect of pharmacological treatment of dyslipidemia and play a role in the individualisation of treatment.

Age and residual cholesterol efflux affect HDL cholesterol levels and coronary artery disease in ABCA1 heterozygotes.

We and others have recently identified mutations in the ABCA1 gene as the underlying cause of Tangier disease (TD) and of a dominantly inherited form of familial hypoalphalipoproteinemia (FHA) associated with reduced cholesterol efflux. We have now identified 13 ABCA1 mutations in 11 families (five TD, six FHA) and have examined the phenotypes of 77 individuals heterozygous for mutations in the ABCA1 gene. ABCA1 heterozygotes have decreased HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and increased triglycerides. Age is an important modifier of the phenotype in heterozygotes, with a higher proportion of heterozygotes aged 30-70 years having HDL-C greater than the fifth percentile for age and sex compared with carriers less than 30 years of age. Levels of cholesterol efflux are highly correlated with HDL-C levels, accounting for 82% of its variation. Each 8% change in ABCA1-mediated efflux is predicted to be associated with a 0.1 mmol/l change in HDL-C. ABCA1 heterozygotes display a greater than threefold increase in the frequency of coronary artery disease (CAD), with earlier onset than unaffected family members. CAD is more frequent in those heterozygotes with lower cholesterol efflux values. These data provide direct evidence that impairment of cholesterol efflux and consequently reverse cholesterol transport is associated with reduced plasma HDL-C levels and increased risk of CAD.

Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism in the Mongolian population.

Apolipoprotein E plays a key role in the regulation of lipid metabolism. ApoE function is determined by the presence of three common alleles (epsilon2, epsilon3, epsilon4). The apo epsilon3 allele is the most prevalent, apo epsilon2 is associated with dysbetalipoproteinaemia, and apo epsilon4 is frequently associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular and Alzheimer's diseases. Mongolian population has a high rate of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and there might be genetic susceptibility of the population to cardiovascular disease. The aim of our study was to establish the frequency of apoE genotypes in 744 Mongolian subjects and to compare the results with findings from other Asian populations. The apo E sequence was amplified using polymerase chain reaction and apo E genotyping was performed by restriction enzyme cleavage with CfoI. The relative apoE allele frequencies were epsilon2 = 3.7%, epsilon3 = 80.8%, and epsilon4 = 15.5%, the genotype frequencies were epsilon2/epsilon2 = 0% (N = 0), epsilon2/epsilon3 = 5.7% (N = 42), epsilon2/epsilon4 = 1.7% (N = 13), epsilon3/epsilon3 = 65.3% (N = 486), epsilon3/epsilon4 = 25.4% (N = 189), epsilon4/epsilon4 = 1.9% (N = 14); the occurrence of the risk epsilon4 allele in Mongolia is among the highest in Asia. The high frequency of the apo epsilon4 allele may increase the susceptibility of Mongolian population to cardiovascular diseases.