Adverse events among people on delamanid for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in a high HIV prevalence setting.

SETTING: Patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) in the township of Khayelitsha, South Africa, were offered delamanid (DLM) within a decentralised RR-TB treatment programme.OBJECTIVE: To describe adverse events (AEs) among HIV-positive and negative people receiving DLM for RR-TB in a programmatic setting.DESIGN: Patients were followed up monthly for blood, electrocardiography and clinical monitoring and AEs were assessed for severity grade, seriousness and relationship to DLM.RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (55% male; median age 35 years, interquartile range [IQR] 28-42) started DLM; 46 (79%) were HIV-positive, median CD4 count 173 cells/mm³ (IQR 70-294). Fifty (86%) patients experienced ≥1 new or worsening AE after starting DLM, most commonly vomiting, QTcB >450 ms and/or myalgia. Serious and/or severe AEs were experienced by 22 (38%) patients; three HIV-positive patients died (not related to DLM). HIV status was not significantly associated with number (P = 0.089) or severity/seriousness (P = 0.11) of AEs during exposure to DLM. Two (3%) patients had DLM withdrawn due to AEs.CONCLUSION: AEs during RR-TB treatment, both before and during DLM exposure, were common, with relatively few serious/severe AEs considered related to DLM and no significant association with HIV status. Clinical and electrocardiography monitoring should be prioritised in the first two months after starting DLM.

Missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis despite access to Xpert® MTB/RIF.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) patients with potential earlier RR-TB diagnoses in Khayelitsha, South Africa. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis among RR-TB patients diagnosed from 2012 to 2014. Patients were considered to have missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis if 1) they were incorrectly screened according to the Western Cape diagnostic algorithm; 2) the first specimen was not tested using Xpert® MTB/RIF; 3) no specimen was ever tested; or 4) the initial Xpert test showed a negative result, but no subsequent specimen was sent for follow-up testing in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. RESULTS: Among 543 patients, 386 (71%) were diagnosed with Xpert and 112 (21%) had had at least one presentation at a health care facility within the 6 months before the presentation at which RR-TB was diagnosed. Overall, 95/543 (18%) patients were screened incorrectly at some point: 48 at diagnostic presentation only, 38 at previous presentation only, and 9 at both previous and diagnostic presentations. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that a significant proportion of RR-TB patients might have been diagnosed earlier, and suggest that case detection could be improved if diagnostic algorithms were followed more closely. Further training and monitoring is required to ensure the greatest benefit from universal Xpert implementation.