Characteristics of State Policies Impact Health Care Delivery: An Analysis of Mammographic Dense Breast Notification and Insurance Legislation.

BACKGROUND: Increased breast tissue density may mask cancer and thus decrease the diagnostic sensitivity of mammography. A patient group advocacy led to the implementation of laws to increase the awareness of breast tissue density and to improve access to supplemental imaging in many states. Given limited evidence about best practices, variation exists in several characteristics of adopted policies. OBJECTIVE: To identify which characteristics of state-level policies with regard to dense breast tissue were associated with increased use of downstream breast ultrasound. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a retrospective series of monthly cross-sections of screening mammography procedures before and after implementation of laws. SUBJECTS: A sample of 13,481,554 screening mammography procedures extracted from the MarketScan Research database performed between 2007 and 2014 on privately insured women aged 40-64 years that resided in a state that had implemented relevant legislation during that period. MEASURES: The outcome was an indicator of whether breast ultrasound imaging followed a screening mammography procedure within 30 days. The main independent variables were policy characteristics indicators. RESULTS: Notification of patients about issues surrounding increased breast density was associated with increased follow-up by ultrasound by 1.02 percentage points (P=0.016). Some policy characteristics such as the explicit suggestion of supplemental imaging or mandated coverage of supplemental imaging by health insurance augmented that effect. Other policy characteristics moderated the effect. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneous effect of state legislation with regard to dense breast tissue on screening mammography follow-up by ultrasound may be explained by specific and unique characteristics of the approaches taken by a variety of states.

The Many Roads toward Achieving Health Equity.

This special issue of the Journal is devoted to understanding the many roads that lead toward achieving health equity. The eleven articles in the issue portray an America that is struggling with the clash between its historical ideal of pursuing equality for all and its ambivalence toward achieving equity in all social domains, especially health. Organized in five sections, the issue contains articles that examine and analyze: the role of civil rights law and the courts in shaping health equity; the political discourse that has framed our understanding of health equity; health policies that affect health equity, such as the Medicaid program, as well as related strategies that might help to improve equity, such as the use of mobile technologies to empower individuals; immigration policies and practices that impact health equity in marginalized populations; and commentaries in the final section that explore how the Affordable Care Act has addressed health equity, how repeal of the law would jeopardize equity gains, and how the political discourse and culture of the Trump administration could adversely affect health equity.

Use of quality improvement interventions and the link to performance on percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous calls for hospitals to employ quality improvement (QI) interventions to improve emergency department (ED) performance, their impact has not been explored in multi-site investigations. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between use of QI interventions (patient flow strategies, ED electronic dashboards, and five-level triage systems) and hospital performance on receipt of percutaneous intervention (PCI) within 90 min for acute myocardial infarction patients, a publicly available quality measure. METHODS: This was an exploratory, cross-sectional analysis of secondary data from 292 hospitals. Data were drawn from the Quality Improvement Activities Survey, the American Hospital Association's Annual Survey, and Hospital Compare. Linear regression models were used to detect differences in PCI performance scores based on whether hospitals employed one or more QI interventions. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of hospitals reported widespread use of patient flow strategies, 62% reported using a dashboard, and 74% reported using a five-level triage system. Time to PCI performance scores were 3.5 percentage points higher (i.e., better) for hospitals that used patient flow strategies and 6.2 percentage points higher for hospitals that used a five-level triage system. Scores were 10.4 percentage points higher at hospitals that employed two quality improvement interventions and 12.8 percentage points higher at hospitals that employed three. CONCLUSION: Employing QI interventions was associated with better PCI scores. More research is needed to explore the direction of this relationship, but results suggest that hospitals should consider adopting patient flow strategies, electronic dashboards, and five-level triage systems to improve PCI scores.