[Pregnant woman anaesthetic management in gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery at the maternity hospital of Clermont-Ferrand]. / Prise en charge anesthésique de la femme enceinte pour coeliochirurgie gynécologique non obstétricale à la maternité de Clermont-Ferrand.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anaesthetic management intended for pregnant women in the field of non obstetric and gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective and monocentric investigation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of the anaesthetic and obstetric files from 27 pregnant women operated on in the establishment, between January 2001 and July 2004. RESULTS: 27 female patients involved in the study. The mean pregnancy term was 15 weeks when laparoscopic surgery was performed, though a single patient was at 30 weeks. The average duration of the surgery was 61 minutes, of which 28 minutes were dedicated to pneumoperitoneum. Twenty-four patients underwent general anaesthesia, the three others underwent locoregional anaesthesia. During the perioperative period no surgical, anaesthetic or obstetric complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy requires double skilled management, both in anaesthesiology and obstetrics. On haemodynamics and breathing, pneumoperitoneum does not induce any additional effects when compared to operations without pregnancy. Except with delivery cases, anaesthetic support in laparoscopic surgery intended for pregnant women eventually does not generate any specific problems, but requires the same rigorous management as the one usually following surgery for pregnant patients.

[Use of the intraosseous access in adult patients in France in 2012]. / Utilisation de la voie intraosseuse chez l'adulte en France en 2012.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate theoretical and practical knowledges of intraosseous (IO) access in adults patients in France in 2012. STUDY DESIGN: National observational descriptive transversal study as survey of opinion and practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An email, with an URL to online computerized quiz, was sent to residents and medical doctors who were working, in France, in anesthesiologist units, intensive care units or emergency units. Several questions were asked about theoretical and practical knowledges concerning IO access. RESULTS: After 1359 responses, 396 (29%) practitioners have used an IO kit mainly in case of cardiopulmonary arrest in adults (68%). The insurance of operators in this technique and the rate of physicians who has even put an IO catheter increased with the years of experience of physicians. The reasons given for not using an IO access were no trouble placing a peripheral vein (77%) and unfamiliarity with the equipment and technology (32%). Most of practitioners (753 [55%]) have been trained and 90% (n=265) of untrained doctors believe that training was necessary. The powered system was the most used (71%). CONCLUSION: Only 29% of practitioners have ever used an IO kit. With the new IO kits, a theoretical and practical training is needed to ensure IO kit used.

[Use of neuromuscular blocking agents in prehospital medicine: practice survey in Emergency Mobile Services of the South-East of France]. / Utilisation des curares en médecine préhospitalière : enquête de pratique dans les Smur de la région Sud-Est.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) in the French adult Prehospital Emergency Medical Services (PEMS). STUDY DESIGN: Telephone survey of practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted from April to July 2009 in every PEMS of the South-East of France. A PEMS physician by center was interviewed using a standardized quiz including demographic data, methods of anesthetic induction, use of NMBA and succinylcholine. RESULTS: All 86 EMS were interviewed. Succinylcholine was used in 98% of cases for rapid sequence induction. Nondepolarizing NMBA were never used by 38%. They were not available in 21% of PEMS. Among the practitioners using them, 79% prescribed them rarely (less than 25% of intubated patients). Nondepolarizing NMBA were prescribed in more than half of cases of patient ventilator asynchrony by 27% of physicians, of ventilator high pressure (23%), of acute status asthmaticus (23%), of suspicion of intracranial hypertension (22%), of refractory hypoxemia (16%), therapeutic hypothermia (10%). Limitations of prescription were essentially little guidance and lack of training. Atracurium and cisatracurium were the most used. The exact dosages were known by only 18% of practitioners. None of the practitioners were performing a monitoring of NMBA. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights the very frequent use of succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction and low use of nondepolarizing NMBA for selected indications. A training endeavor could be undertaken to improve the use of these anesthetic drugs by prehospital physicians.

[Survey on anaesthetic practices for electroconvulsivotherapy in French university hospitals]. / Anesthésie pour électroconvulsivothérapie: résultats d'une enquête dans les CHU.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the anaesthetic management of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in French university hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: National survey in university hospitals by mail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An email was sent to heads of department of anaesthesiology in French university hospitals to identify a referent practitioner, which we then sent a computerized quiz. The questions were about the volume and organization of the activity, pre-, per- and post-anaesthetic management of patients undergoing ECT. RESULTS: Of the 33 sites performing ECT, 28 (85%) responded. The anaesthesia consultation was systematic at least 48 hours before the start of treatment but the preanaesthetic visit was performed in 32% of the centers. A routine electrocardiogram was performed in 89% of patients. In four centers (25%), neuromuscular blockade was not systematic. Propofol was the agent most widely used (82%) and etomidate and thiopental in 11% and 7% respectively. In two centers, practitioners did not report using oral protection. The psychiatrist was present in 71% of cases. The electroencephalogram was continuously recorded in 45% of the centers. CONCLUSION: The recommendations remain valid while old and may be updated. They are not always followed by the teams. Continuing medical education should be promoted to a better understanding of the factors interfering between anesthesia and ECT.

[French national survey on evaluation by residents in anesthesiology and critical care of choice's motivations of the specialty and their practical and theoretical training]. / Evaluation des motivations de choix et de leur cursus d'apprentissage par les internes d'anesthésie-réanimation: enquête nationale.

INTRODUCTION: The duration of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (AIC) residency increased from four to five years in 2002 in France. AIC is a specialty increasingly chosen in relation to medical and surgical specialties. We conducted a national survey by questionnaire on the evaluation of their theoretical and practical training by the French residents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire (demographics, motivations for the choice, training) was sent to 1422 residents, enrolled since 2002, in each province. RESULTS: In total, 562 questionnaires (40 %) were returned. The mean age of residents is 28+/-2 years, 46 % are women, on average in 6th semester [1-10th]. The obtained specialty was their first choice for 90 % and of the obtained city home for 73 %. Residents declare that the place of their definitive installation will be chosen depending on the quality of life mainly. So, 97 % referred the same choice of specialty. Training in locoregional anaesthesia (LRA) was evaluated correct or good by 53 % of residents and in the management of difficult intubation correct or good by 62 %. Theoretical training was assessed correct by 31 % of responders and good by 53 % and practical training correct by 25 % and good by 61 %. DISCUSSION: The AIC is now a specialty of positive choice by students. This choice is reinforced by teaching and practice during the residency. The global training is as good as a whole. Residents wish to deepen in some areas (ultrasound, LRA, critical reading, medical redaction) and an evaluation of their practical training with simulations. CONCLUSION: French AIC residents seem satisfied with almost all their training and referred the same choice of specialty.