A case series of live attenuated vaccine administration in dupilumab-treated children with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Current regulatory labeling recommends avoiding live vaccine use in dupilumab-treated patients. Clinical data are not available to support more specific guidance for live or live attenuated vaccines administration in dupilumab-treated patients. METHODS: Children (6 months-5 years old) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) enrolled in a phase 2/3 clinical trial of dupilumab (LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL Part A/B; NCT03346434) and subsequently participated in the LIBERTY AD PED-OLE (NCT02612454). During these studies, protocol deviations occurred in nine children who received measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine with or without varicella vaccine; five with a ≤12-week gap between dupilumab administration and vaccination and four with a >12-week gap after discontinuing dupilumab. RESULTS: Nine children (1 female; 8 male) had severe AD at baseline (8-56 months old). Of the nine children, five had a ≤12-week gap ranged 1-7 weeks between dupilumab administration and vaccination who received MMR vaccine (n = 2) or MMR and varicella vaccines (n = 3); among these, one resumed dupilumab treatment as early as 2 days and four resumed treatment 18-43 days after vaccination. No treatment-emergent adverse events, including serious adverse events and infections, were reported within the 4-week post-vaccination period in any children. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series of dupilumab-treated children with severe AD who received MMR vaccine with or without varicella vaccine, no adverse effects (including vaccine-related infection) were reported within 4 weeks after vaccination. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immune response to live attenuated vaccines in dupilumab-treated patients.

Infections in children and adolescents treated with dupilumab in pediatric clinical trials for atopic dermatitis-A pooled analysis of trial data.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have increased risk of cutaneous and extracutaneous infections. Dupilumab has previously been associated with reduced risk of serious/severe infections and non-herpetic skin infections in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. This analysis assessed infection rates with dupilumab versus placebo in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe and severe AD participating in clinical trials. METHODS: This is a pooled analysis from two 16-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials of dupilumab: monotherapy in adolescents aged 12-17 years with moderate-to-severe AD (LIBERTY AD ADOL, NCT03054428) and with concomitant topical corticosteroids in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD (LIBERTY AD PEDS, NCT03345914). Data were pooled according to treatment received: placebo/approved dupilumab doses/other studied dupilumab doses/all dupilumab doses. Exposure-adjusted rates (patients with ≥1 event per 100 patient-years [nP/100 PY]) were used to compare treatment groups. RESULTS: Overall, 612 patients were included: 205 received placebo and 407 received dupilumab (261 received approved dupilumab doses and 146 received other studied dupilumab doses). Overall infection rates were numerically lower with dupilumab versus placebo (nP/100 PY: placebo, 227; approved dupilumab, 173; other dupilumab, 206; all dupilumab, 184). Total skin infections were numerically less frequent in all dupilumab-treated groups versus placebo (nP/100 PY: placebo, 67; approved dupilumab, 30; other dupilumab, 46; all dupilumab, 36). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that dupilumab treatment in children and adolescents with AD does not increase infection risk overall and is associated with lower rates of skin infections compared with placebo.

Infections in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years Treated with Dupilumab in a Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), particularly infants and young children, are at greater risk of developing skin infections. In this study, we assessed infection rates in AD patients aged 6 months to 5 years treated with dupilumab. METHODS: In LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial, children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo, with concomitant low-potency topical corticosteroids, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Exposure-adjusted infection rates were used to compare treatment groups. RESULTS: The analysis included 162 patients, of whom 83 received dupilumab and 79 received placebo. Total infection rates were not significantly different between the dupilumab and placebo groups (rate ratio [RR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.48-1.19; p = 0.223). Non-herpetic adjudicated skin infections and bacterial infections were significantly less frequent with dupilumab versus placebo (non-herpetic skin infections: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.99; p = 0.047; bacterial infections: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.67; p = 0.019), and the number of patients using systemic anti-infective medication was significantly lower in the dupilumab group (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.89; p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in the number of herpetic infections between the dupilumab and placebo groups (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.31-4.35; p = 0.817). The number of patients with two or more infection events was significantly higher in the placebo group (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.68; p = 0.004), and no severe or serious infections (including eczema herpeticum) were observed among patients receiving dupilumab. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that dupilumab treatment in infants and children younger than 6 years with AD does not increase overall risk of infections and is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial and non-herpetic skin infections compared with placebo, resulting in a reduced need for anti-infective medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT03346434 on November 17, 2017. INFOGRAPHIC.

Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic disease of the skin, are at greater risk of developing skin infections, particularly infants and young children. Several medications for AD may weaken the patient's immune system, further increasing the risk of infections. Dupilumab is a recently developed drug for AD that should not interfere with the patient's immune defenses against bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. In this study, we evaluated the effect of dupilumab on infections in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients received 200 or 300 mg of dupilumab (depending on the child's weight) or placebo, together with ointments containing mild steroids, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. At the end of treatment, total infections were not significantly different between patients receiving dupilumab and placebo. Furthermore, patients receiving dupilumab experienced significantly less bacterial and non-herpetic skin infections and used significantly less anti-infective medication compared with patients receiving placebo. Herpetic infections were also not significantly different between dupilumab- and placebo-treated patients. Finally, significantly more patients in the placebo group experienced two or more infections. This study demonstrates that dupilumab does not increase the risk of infections in infants and young children with AD and can decrease the use of anti-infective medication.

No Increased Risk of Overall Infection in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated for up to 4 Years with Dupilumab.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have an increased risk for infections. This open-label extension study, LIBERTY AD OLE, reports the incidence of infections in adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab for up to 4 years. METHODS: We evaluated infections in adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab 300 mg weekly (qw) or every 2 weeks (q2w; approved regimen) for up to 4 years. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) and calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) were permitted. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (number of patients with at least one event per 100 patient-years [nP/100 PY]) are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 2677 patients were enrolled and treated with dupilumab: 352 (13.1%) completed up to week 204; 226 patients (8.4%) switched from qw to q2w during the trial. Rates of overall infections (71.27 nP/100 PY), serious and/or severe infections (1.39 nP/100 PY), and infections leading to discontinuation (0.34 nP/100 PY) were consistent with a previous 3-year analysis of this study and low compared with 1-year results in adults with AD treated with placebo + TCS. The cumulative number of patients with treatment-emergent serious or severe infections, non-herpetic or herpetic infections, and total skin infections decreased year-over-year. Limitations included open-label study design with no placebo arm; decreasing sample size at later time points due to sponsor decision to close sites following regulatory approval; qw dosing differs from approved q2w dosing; and patients could use TCS/TCI throughout the study, which may have impacted infection rates. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous long-term dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe AD is not associated with an increased risk of overall systemic or cutaneous infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01949311. Video Abstract INFOGRAPHIC.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic disease that causes dry skin, skin inflammation, and itching. Patients with atopic dermatitis have an increased risk of bacterial or viral skin infections, which can cause further serious infections in the entire body. This study investigated the rates of infections in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis after 204 weeks (almost 4 years) of dupilumab treatment. The patients received 300 mg of dupilumab every week, and a subset of patients switched to the approved dose of 300 mg of dupilumab every 2 weeks. Patients were allowed the use of topical corticosteroids. Among the patients receiving dupilumab for up to 4 years, rates of total infections, serious and severe infections, and infections leading to treatment discontinuation were consistent with a previously published 3-year evaluation. The infection rates in the 4-year study were lower than those in a previous 1-year study in adults with atopic dermatitis treated with placebo and topical corticosteroids. Importantly, our results showed that the cumulative number of patients with total skin infections decreased over 4 years of dupilumab treatment. The number of patients with severe infections appearing after the start of treatment, herpes viral infections, and infections not involving herpes virus also decreased yearly during the 4-year study. The safety data presented here show that long-term dupilumab treatment does not increase the overall risk of skin infections, and provides important evidence related to continuous use of dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Dupilumab Provides Clinically Meaningful Responses in Children Aged 6-11 Years with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Post Hoc Analysis Results from a Phase III Trial.

BACKGROUND: Children with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have a multidimensional disease burden. OBJECTIVE: Here we assess the clinically meaningful improvements in AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD treated with dupilumab compared with placebo. METHODS: R668-AD-1652 LIBERTY AD PEDS was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III clinical trial of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD. This post hoc analysis focuses on 304 patients receiving either dupilumab or placebo with TCS and assessed the percentage of patients considered responsive to dupilumab treatment at week 16. RESULTS: At week 16, almost all patients receiving dupilumab + TCS (95%) demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in AD signs, symptoms, or QoL compared with placebo + TCS (61%, p < 0.0001). Significant improvements were seen as early as week 2 and sustained through the end of the study in the full analysis set (FAS) and the subgroup of patients with an Investigator's Global Assessment score greater than 1 at week 16. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the post hoc nature of the analysis and that some outcomes were not prespecified; the small number of patients in some subgroups potentially limits generalizability of findings. CONCLUSION: Treatment with dupilumab provides significant and sustained improvements within 2 weeks in AD signs, symptoms, and QoL in almost all children with severe AD, including those who did not achieve clear or almost clear skin by week 16. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03345914. Video Abstract: Does dupilumab provide clinically meaningful responses in children 6 to 11 years old with severe atopic dermatitis? (MP4 99484 kb).

Current and Emerging Strategies to Inhibit Type 2 Inflammation in Atopic Dermatitis.

Type 2 immunity evolved to combat helminth infections by orchestrating a combined protective response of innate and adaptive immune cells and promotion of parasitic worm destruction or expulsion, wound repair, and barrier function. Aberrant type 2 immune responses are associated with allergic conditions characterized by chronic tissue inflammation, including atopic dermatitis (AD) and asthma. Signature cytokines of type 2 immunity include interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13, and IL-31, mainly secreted from immune cells, as well as IL-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin, mainly secreted from tissue cells, particularly epithelial cells. IL-4 and IL-13 are key players mediating the prototypical type 2 response; IL-4 initiates and promotes differentiation and proliferation of naïve T-helper (Th) cells toward a Th2 cell phenotype, whereas IL-13 has a pleiotropic effect on type 2 inflammation, including, together with IL-4, decreased barrier function. Both cytokines are implicated in B-cell isotype class switching to generate immunoglobulin E, tissue fibrosis, and pruritus. IL-5, a key regulator of eosinophils, is responsible for eosinophil growth, differentiation, survival, and mobilization. In AD, IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 are associated with sensory nerve sensitization and itch, leading to scratching that further exacerbates inflammation and barrier dysfunction. Various strategies have emerged to suppress type 2 inflammation, including biologics targeting cytokines or their receptors, and Janus kinase inhibitors that block intracellular cytokine signaling pathways. Here we review type 2 inflammation, its role in inflammatory diseases, and current and future therapies targeting type 2 pathways, with a focus on AD. INFOGRAPHIC.

Dupilumab in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Prior Use of Systemic Non-Steroidal Immunosuppressants: Analysis of Four Phase 3 Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Dupilumab is approved as first-line systemic treatment for adults/adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in Europe and elsewhere owing to its favourable benefit-risk profile. However, systemic non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS) are often used as first-line therapy in clinical practice. Impact of prior therapy with NSISS on dupilumab's treatment effect vs. control has not been described previously. This study assessed dupilumab's efficacy vs. control in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, comparing treatment effect in patients with/without prior systemic NSISS therapy, in four phase 3 trials. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included 1553 patients randomized to placebo or dupilumab (300 mg q2w) as monotherapy for 16 weeks, or with concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) for 16/52 weeks, from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Patients were stratified by prior use of systemic NSISS and dupilumab-treated patients were analysed against control groups (treated with placebo or placebo + TCS). RESULTS: Dupilumab-treated patients, regardless of prior treatment with NSISS, achieved a significantly higher percentage reduction from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Dermatology life Quality Index (DLQI), and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) vs. control; significantly more achieved EASI score ≤ 7, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale ≤ 4, POEM ≤ 7, and DLQI ≤ 5 by week 4. These rapid, significant improvements were seen with or without concomitant TCS and sustained through end-of-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab treatment (monotherapy or + TCS) provides rapid, significant, sustained improvements in signs, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe AD compared with control, regardless of prior systemic NSISS use. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: LIBERTY AD SOLO 1: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02277743, EudraCT 2014-001198-15. LIBERTY AD SOLO 2: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02277769, EudraCT 2014-002619-40. LIBERTY AD CHRONOS: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02260986, EudraCT 2013-003254-24. LIBERTY AD CAFÉ: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02755649, EudraCT 2015-002653-35.

Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as eczema, is characterized by red, oozy, and dry skin that can become cracked and infected. Dupilumab is a drug that blocks key molecules that cause allergic conditions, such as AD. It has been shown to be effective in treating moderate-to-severe AD. Other drugs commonly used to treat AD include certain anti-inflammatory drugs, known as non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS), such as cyclosporin. It is not known if patients treated in the past with NSISS get the same results from AD treatment with dupilumab. This analysis used data from four large studies that included patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The objective was to see if prior NSISS use impacted how dupilumab worked to control AD. The researchers looked at a range of measurements­including ones that were assessed by a patient's doctor such as measurements of AD skin lesions. Itching and how patients felt about their overall life quality were also analysed (which included items such as sleep, pain, ability to work or do normal leisure activities, etc.). The researchers found that if a patient had taken an NSISS for AD before taking dupilumab, it had no impact on the efficacy of dupilumab. All of the measurements evaluated improved significantly more in patients treated with dupilumab than in patients taking a placebo (dummy) medication. The benefits of treatment occurred within a few weeks of starting dupilumab treatment and remained until the end of the longest study included in this analysis, 1 year.

Murine host responses to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) following intranasal administration of a Protollin-adjuvanted, epitope-enhanced recombinant G protein vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Immunization of mice with the G protein of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) characteristically induces an immune response that is partially protective, but which can prime for pulmonary eosinophilia. We have shown previously that the N191A mutation in a recombinant RSV G protein fragment is associated with reduced pulmonary eosinophilic infiltration when administered with alum subcutaneously in BALB/c mice followed by RSV challenge. We hypothesize that the performance of this "epitope enhanced" recombinant G protein fragment may be further improved by combining with the newly developed adjuvant, Protollin, coupled with intranasal delivery. OBJECTIVES: To investigate efficacy of an intranasally delivered, Protollin-adjuvanted, epitope-enhanced recombinant G protein vaccine in BALB/c mice. STUDY DESIGN: Recombinant protein, designated Trx-G128-229, consisted of a bacterially expressed central fragment (amino acids 128-229) of the RSV Long strain G protein fused to a fragment of thioredoxin (Trx). BALB/c mice were chosen to evaluate the effectiveness of wild type and epitope-enhanced Trx-G128-229 as a nasal vaccine with the adjuvant Protollin. RESULTS: The intranasal administration of Trx-G128-229 with Protollin conferred similar protection against RSV challenge as subcutaneously administered Trx-G128-229 with alum, but with markedly reduced eosinophilia and the Th2 cytokine IL-13. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the concept of an RSV vaccine optimized by combined strategies, including epitope enhancement and judicious selection of adjuvants.

TLR4 and MyD88 control protection and pulmonary granulocytic recruitment in a murine intranasal RSV immunization and challenge model.

An intranasal vaccine composed of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) ligand Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane proteins and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) ligand Shigella flexneri lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Protollin) and enriched respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) proteins (eRSV) has been demonstrated to promote balanced Th1/Th2 responses without eosinophil recruitment and to protect against challenge in mouse models. We used TLR2, TLR4 and myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) knock-out (-/-) mice to investigate the roles of these signalling pathways on immunogenicity, protection and pulmonary infiltrates following RSV immunization and challenge. Antigen-specific systemic and mucosal antibody production was significantly impaired only in TLR4-/- mice following Protollin-eRSV immunization. In contrast, an intact MyD88 pathway was crucial to elicit a balanced type 1:type 2 immune response, characterized by increased splenocyte production of antigen-induced IFNgamma and IL-10 with concomitant reduction of IL5, IgG2a isotype switching and abrogation of pulmonary eosinophil recruitment following challenge. MyD88-dependent signalling also contributed to neutrophil recruitment to the lungs following immunization with eRSV antigen, in the presence or absence of Protollin, compared to a mock antigen or vaccine. Both TLR4 and MyD88-signalling were required for optimal protection against challenge. The upregulation of early signalling molecules IFN-beta, TNFalpha, CD40 and CD86 were studied in splenocytes isolated from naïve TLR2, TLR4 and MyD88-/- mice following stimulation with vaccine components. Splenocytes from TLR4-/- mice displayed reduced IFN-beta while those of MyD88-/- mice elicited less TNFalpha and lower expression of CD40 and CD86 on CD11c+ cells. Together, our results suggest that optimal immunogenicity and protection against RSV without risk of enhanced pulmonary inflammation requires intact TLR4/MyD88-dependent signalling.

C57Bl/6 mice are protected from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) challenge and IL-5 associated pulmonary eosinophilic infiltrates following intranasal immunization with Protollin-eRSV vaccine.

The protective efficacy of an intranasal (IN) Protollin-eRSV vaccine has recently been demonstrated in the RSV-susceptible BALB/c mouse model. Here, we report the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of Protollin-eRSV vaccine in the relatively resistant C57Bl/6 mouse model. C57Bl/6 mice immunized IN with either two or three doses of Protollin-eRSV produced significant systemic and mucosal RSV-specific antibodies. Mice immunized with the Protollin vaccine displayed polarized Th1 responses with augmented IFNgamma/IL-5 ratios in RSV-restimulated lung and spleen cell preparations compared with animals that received antigen alone. The Protollin-eRSV immunized C57Bl/6 mice were fully protected against challenge without eosinophilic pulmonary pathology observed in the animals immunized with the formalin-inactivated RSV vaccine. This new model will permit us to dissect the respective roles of the TLR2 and TLR4 ligands contained in the vaccine using TLR knock-out animals established on the C57Bl/6 background.

Intranasal proteosome-based respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines protect BALB/c mice against challenge without eosinophilia or enhanced pathology.

A safe and effective vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is still unavailable. Proteosome-based adjuvants are derived from the outer membrane proteins (OMP) of Neisseria species and are potent inducers of both mucosal and systemic immunity in humans and animals. Candidate RSV subunit vaccines comprising enriched RSV proteins (eRSV) formulated with proteosomes alone or with LPS (Protollin) were produced. Administered intranasally in BALB/c mice, both vaccines elicited long-lasting systemic and mucosal RSV-specific antibodies and fully protected against challenge. In vitro restimulation of lymphocytes from the Protollin-eRSV immunized mice with F (MHC-I) and G (MHC-II) peptides elicited F peptide-specific CD8(+) T cells and supernatant IFNgamma, TNFalpha, IL-2 and IL-10 while the formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV) vaccine elicited predominantly IL-5. Pulmonary eosinophilia did not develop following immunization with either proteosome-based vaccine following challenge compared to mice immunized with FI-RSV. Proteosome-based eRSV vaccines can therefore protect against RSV challenge in mice without increasing the risk of pulmonary immunopathologic responses.

Intranasal Protollin/F1-V vaccine elicits respiratory and serum antibody responses and protects mice against lethal aerosolized plague infection.

F1-V is a recombinant plague antigen comprising the capsular (F1) and virulence-associated (V) proteins. Given intramuscularly with Alhydrogel, it protects mice against challenge, but is less effective in non-human primates against high-dose aerosolized Yersinia pestis challenge, perhaps because it fails to induce respiratory immunity. Intranasal immunization of mice with F1-V formulated with a Proteosome-based adjuvant (Protollin), elicited high titers of specific IgA in lungs whereas intranasal F1-V alone or intramuscular Alhydrogel-adsorbed F1-V did not. The Protollin-adjuvanted F1-V vaccine also induced high serum titers of specific IgG, comparable to those induced by intramuscular Alhydrogel-adsorbed F1-V. Mice immunized intranasally with Protollin-F1-V were 100% protected against aerosol challenge with 170 LD50 of Y. pestis and 80% against 255 LD50.

A nasal Proteosome influenza vaccine containing baculovirus-derived hemagglutinin induces protective mucosal and systemic immunity.

The potential for enhancing the immunogenicity of recombinant (baculovirus-derived) influenza hemagglutinin (rHA) was investigated by comparing the immune responses elicited in mice by an intranasal (i.n.) rHA formulated with Proteosomes, with those induced by intramuscular (i.m.) or i.n. rHA alone. The Proteosome-rHA vaccine induced mucosal responses in the respiratory tract, as well as high serum IgG and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers. In contrast, rHA alone given i.m. induced serum IgG without mucosal responses and was ineffective at inducing either mucosal or systemic responses when given i.n. Only mice immunized with the Proteosome-rHA vaccine were completely protected from both death and acute morbidity following live virus challenge, indicating that the i.n. Proteosome-rHA vaccine induced more complete protective immunity than the same doses of unformulated rHA given i.n. or i.m.