Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (Caelyx) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine as second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite chemotherapy and radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), most patients die within 2 years. Response rates for second-line chemotherapy are 15-25%, with a median survival of 5 months. Caelyx, a pegylated liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, may be better tolerated and has activity in SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in a phase II study of intravenous Caelyx (35 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) and vincristine (1.2 mg/m2) every 21 days as second-line therapy in SCLC for up to six cycles. RESULTS: Thirty patients were evaluable for response, with a response rate of 10%. Another two had an unconfirmed response. Stable disease (SD) for >or=2 cycles was seen in an additional 53%. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was seen in 17 (55%) patients (26 [22%] cycles) and included fatigue, mucositis, plantar-palmar erythrodysesthesia, rash and neuropathy. Twelve patients required transfusions. All patients on study have now expired, with a median survival of 28 weeks (7 months). For patients with SD or partial response, median time to progression was 15 weeks. CONCLUSION: The combination of Caelyx, cyclophosphamide and vincristine, despite cyclophosphamide and Caelyx dose reductions, has modest activity in relapsed SCLC with acceptable toxicity.

Agents targeting ras signaling pathway.

Ras genes encode proteins that activate in an intracellular signaling network controlling differentiation, proliferation and cell survival. Mutated Ras oncogenes encoding proteins that are constitutively active can induce malignancies in a variety of laboratory models. In human malignancies, Ras mutations are common, having been identified in approximately 30% of cancers. Given the importance of Ras and downstream targets Raf and MEK in the development of malignancies and their frequent expression in human cancers, it is not surprising that a variety of agents disrupting signaling through Ras and downstream proteins are under development. These agents can be broadly classified structurally as small molecules and anti-sense oligonucleotides. They can be characterized functionally as those inhibiting Ras protein expression such as the oligodeoxynucleotide ISIS 2503, those inhibiting Ras processing, in particular the farnesyl transferase inhibitors R115777, SCH 66336 and BMS 214662, and those inhibiting downstream effectors Raf, such as ISIS 5132 and MEK, which is inhibited by CI-1040. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advances in the development of these agents.

Treatment of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic 90Y-microspheres.

UNLABELLED: Treatment for nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is palliative. The relatively greater arteriolar density of hepatic tumors compared with normal liver suggests that intrahepatic arterial administration of 90Y-microspheres can be selectively deposited in tumor nodules and results in significantly greater radiation exposure to the tumor than external irradiation. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion (frequency) and duration of response, survival, and toxicity after intrahepatic arterial injection of 90Y-microspheres in patients with HCC. METHODS: Patients with documented HCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-3, adequate bone marrow, and hepatic and pulmonary function were eligible for study. Patients who had significant shunting of blood to the lungs or gastrointestinal (GI) tract or who could not undergo cannulation of the hepatic artery were excluded. Patients received a planned dose of 100 Gy through a catheter placed into the hepatic artery. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were treated with 90Y-microspheres; 20 of the treated patients (median age, 62.5 y) were evaluated for treatment efficacy. Nine patients were Okuda stage I, and 11 were Okuda stage II. The median dose delivered was 104 Gy (range, 46-145 Gy). All 22 treated patients experienced at least 1 adverse event. Of the 31 (15%) serious adverse events, the most common were elevations in liver enzymes and bilirubin and upper GI ulceration. The response rate was 20%. The median duration of response was 127 wk; the median survival was 54 wk. Multivariable analysis suggested that a dose >104 Gy (P = 0.06), tumor-to-liver activity uptake ratio >2 (P = 0.06), and Okuda stage I (P = 0.07) were associated with longer survival. CONCLUSION: Significantly higher doses of radiation can be delivered to a HCC tumor by intrahepatic arterial administration of 90Y-microspheres than by external beam radiation. This treatment appears to be beneficial in nonresectable HCC with acceptable toxicity.

Validation of novel imaging methodologies for use as cancer clinical trial end-points.

The success or failure of a clinical trial, of any phase, depends critically on the choice of an appropriate primary end-point. In the setting of phases II and III cancer clinical trials, imaging end-points have historically, and continue presently to play a major role in determining therapeutic efficacy. The primary goal of this paper is to discuss the validation of imaging-based markers as end-points for phase II clinical trials of cancer therapy. Specifically, we outline the issues that must be considered, and the criteria that would need to be satisfied, for an imaging end-point to supplement or potentially replace RECIST- defined tumour status as a phase II clinical trial end-point. The key criteria proposed to judge the utility of a new end-point primarily relate to its ability to accurately and reproducibly predict the eventual phase III end-point for treatment effect, which is usually assessed by a difference between two arms on progression free or overall survival, both at the patient and more importantly at the trial level. As will be demonstrated, the level of evidence required to formally and fully validate a new imaging marker as an appropriate end-point for phase II trials is substantial. In many cases, this level of evidence will only become available by conducting a series of coordinated prospectively designed multicentre clinical trials culminating in a formal meta-analysis. We also include a discussion of situations where flexibility may be required, relative to the ideal rigorous evaluation, to accommodate inevitable real-world feasibility constraints.

Recommendations for the assessment of progression in randomised cancer treatment trials.

Progression-free survival (PFS) is an increasingly important end-point in cancer drug development. However, several concerns exist regarding the use of PFS as a basis to compare treatments. Unlike survival, the exact time of progression is unknown, so progression times might be over-estimated (or under-estimated) and, consequently, bias may be introduced when comparing treatments. In addition, the assessment of progression is subject to measurement variability which may introduce error or bias. Ideally trials with PFS as the primary end-point should be randomised and, when feasible, double-blinded. All patients eligible for study should be evaluable for the primary end-point and thus, in general, have measurable disease at baseline. Appropriate definitions should be provided in the protocol and data collected on the case-report forms, if patients with only non-measurable disease are eligible and/or clinical, or symptomatic progression are to be considered progression events for analysis. Protocol defined assessments of disease burden should be obtained at intervals that are symmetrical between arms. Independent review of imaging may be of value in randomised phase II trials and phase III trials as an auditing tool to detect possible bias.

Phase I trial of UCN-01 in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced solid cancers: a Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium study.

BACKGROUND: 7-Hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) inhibits serine-threonine kinases including the Ca2+ and phospholipid-dependent protein kinase C (PKC), CDKs 2, 4, 6, Chk-1 and PDK1. UCN-01 mediates distinct effects in vitro/in vivo: cell cycle arrest in G1, abrogation of G2 arrest by inhibiting chk1, induction of apoptosis and potentiation of cytotoxicity of S-phase-active chemotherapeutics including the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor topotecan (T). This phase I study was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RPTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of T and UCN-01 in patients with refractory solid tumors. DESIGN: Both agents were administered every 21 days intravenously through central venous access in escalating doses to eligible patients. On day 1, following antiemetic prophylaxis with dexamethasone and a serotonin type 3(A) receptor (5HT3) inhibitor, UCN-01 was infused over 3 h, followed by T infused over 30 min. On days 2-5, patients received T only. UCN-01 doses were reduced by 50% in cycles 2 and beyond because of its prolonged half-life. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were entered in three cohorts: Dose Level (DL) 1 (UCN-01 70 mg/m2, T 0.75 mg/m2), three patients; DL 2 (UCN-01 70 mg/m2, T 1.0 mg/m2), 24 patients; DL 3 (UCN-01 90 mg/m2, T 1.0 mg/m2), six patients. All but three patients were PS 0 or 1, median age was 54 years (range, 29-72), 91% were female. Primary tumor types: ovary/peritoneal (23 patients), colon (three patients), salivary gland (two patients), others (five patients). All patients were eligible for adverse event (AE) analysis and 22 patients were eligible for survival and tumor response analysis. Two of six patients had dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at DL 3 (grade 3 N/V; grade 4 neutropenia with infection). One DLT was seen in one patient at DL 2, consisting of grade 4 leukopenia. This cohort was expanded and no further DLTs were observed. Most common drug-related AEs were mild (grade 1-2). Non-hematological grade 3-4 AEs consisted of transient hyperglycemia (4), infection (3), coagulation, fatigue, hypotension, nausea (2), hypomagnesemia, vomiting, headache (1). Hematologic toxicities occurred in 100% of patients. Grade 3-4 hematologic abnormalities included neutropenia (16, including three with infection), leukopenia (11), lymphopenia (7), thrombocytopenia (5). Best response for 22 evaluable patients was PD (8), SD for at least six cycles (12), PR (1: carcinoma of ovary, dose level 2) and one not assessable. Pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed the prolonged half-life of UCN-01 of approximately 15 days. CONCLUSIONS: DLT was observed at DL 3 and RPTD was determined to be DL 2. To date, this combination has been relatively well tolerated with some preliminary evidence of efficacy. A phase II study of this combination in patients with ovarian cancer is underway.