Scaling up ocean conservation through recognition of key biodiversity areas in the Southern Ocean from multispecies tracking data.

Biodiversity is critical for maintaining ecosystem function but is threatened by increasing anthropogenic pressures. In the Southern Ocean, a highly biologically productive region containing many endemic species, proactive management is urgently needed to mitigate increasing pressures from fishing, climate change, and tourism. Site-based conservation is one important tool for managing the negative impacts of human activities on ecosystems. The Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) Standard is a standardized framework used to define sites vital for the persistence of global biodiversity based on criteria and quantitative thresholds. We used tracking data from 14 species of Antarctic and subantarctic seabirds and pinnipeds from the publicly available Retrospective Analysis of Antarctic Tracking Data (RAATD) data set to define KBAs for a diverse suite of marine predators. We used track2kba, an R package that supports identification of KBAs from telemetry data through identification of highly used habitat areas and estimates of local abundance within sites. We compared abundance estimates at each site with thresholds for KBA criteria A1, B1, and D1 (related to globally threatened species, individual geographically restricted species, and demographic aggregations, respectively). We identified 30 potential KBAs for 13 species distributed throughout the Southern Ocean that were vital for each individual species, population, and life-history stage for which they were determined. These areas were identified as highly used by these populations based on observational data and complement the ongoing habitat modeling and bioregionalization work that has been used to prioritize conservation areas in this region. Although further work is needed to identify potential KBAs based on additional current and future data sets, we highlight the benefits of utilizing KBAs as part of a holistic approach to marine conservation, given their significant value as a global conservation tool.

Ampliación de la conservación oceánica por medio del reconocimiento de áreas importantes de biodiversidad en el Océano Antártico a partir de datos de rastreo de varias especies Resumen La biodiversidad es fundamental para mantener la función de los ecosistemas, pero está amenazada por las crecientes presiones antropogénicas. En el Océano Antártico, una región con mucha producción biológica que contiene numerosas especies endémicas, se necesita urgentemente una gestión proactiva para mitigar las crecientes presiones de la pesca, el cambio climático y el turismo. La conservación basada en el sitio es una herramienta importante para gestionar los efectos negativos de las actividades humanas en los ecosistemas. El Estándar de Áreas Clave para la Biodiversidad (ACB) es un marco estandarizado que se utiliza para definir lugares vitales para la persistencia de la biodiversidad mundial con base en criterios y umbrales cuantitativos. Usamos datos del seguimiento de 14 especies de aves marinas y pinnípedos antárticos y sub­antárticos del conjunto de datos públicos Retrospective Analysis of Antarctic Tracking Data (RAATD) para definir las ACB de un conjunto diverso de depredadores marinos. Utilizamos track2kba, un paquete de R que permite la identificación de ACB a partir de datos telemétricos mediante la identificación de áreas de hábitat altamente utilizadas y estimaciones de abundancia local dentro de los sitios. Comparamos las estimaciones de abundancia en cada lugar con los umbrales de los criterios A1, B1 y D1 de las ACB (relacionados con especies amenazadas a nivel mundial, especies individuales restringidas geográficamente y agregaciones demográficas, respectivamente). Identificamos 30 ACB potenciales para 13 especies distribuidas por todo el Océano Antártico que eran vitales para cada especie individual, población y etapa del ciclo biológico para las que se determinaron. Estas áreas fueron identificadas como muy utilizadas por estas poblaciones con base a datos observacionales y complementan el trabajo en curso de modelos del hábitat y biorregionalización que se ha utilizado para priorizar las áreas de conservación en esta región. Aunque es necesario seguir trabajando para identificar posibles ACB basadas en conjuntos de datos adicionales actuales y futuros, destacamos los beneficios de utilizar las ACB como parte de un enfoque holístico de la conservación marina, dado su importante valor como herramienta de conservación global.

The importance of migratory connectivity for global ocean policy.

The distributions of migratory species in the ocean span local, national and international jurisdictions. Across these ecologically interconnected regions, migratory marine species interact with anthropogenic stressors throughout their lives. Migratory connectivity, the geographical linking of individuals and populations throughout their migratory cycles, influences how spatial and temporal dynamics of stressors affect migratory animals and scale up to influence population abundance, distribution and species persistence. Population declines of many migratory marine species have led to calls for connectivity knowledge, especially insights from animal tracking studies, to be more systematically and synthetically incorporated into decision-making. Inclusion of migratory connectivity in the design of conservation and management measures is critical to ensure they are appropriate for the level of risk associated with various degrees of connectivity. Three mechanisms exist to incorporate migratory connectivity into international marine policy which guides conservation implementation: site-selection criteria, network design criteria and policy recommendations. Here, we review the concept of migratory connectivity and its use in international policy, and describe the Migratory Connectivity in the Ocean system, a migratory connectivity evidence-base for the ocean. We propose that without such collaboration focused on migratory connectivity, efforts to effectively conserve these critical species across jurisdictions will have limited effect.

Seabird and reef conservation must include coral islands.

Tropical seabirds exert key roles in reef ecosystems but face growing threats from climate change, especially on coral reef islands (CRIs). Therefore, we advocate for a more comprehensive, global data exchange on CRIs and CRI-dependent seabirds and outline steps for improving their study and conservation.

A realist evaluation of a "single point of contact" end-of-life care service.

PURPOSE: Following the development of a service that consisted of a "single point of contact" to coordinate end-of-life care (EoLC), including EoLC facilitators and an urgent response team, we aimed to explore whether the provision of coordinated EoLC would support patients being cared or dying in their preferred place and avoid unwanted hospital admissions. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using a realist evaluation approach, the authors examined "what worked for whom, how, in what circumstances and why". Multiple data were collected, including activity/performance indicators, observations of management meetings, documents, satisfaction survey and 30 interviews with service providers and users. FINDINGS: Advance care planning (ACP) increased through the first three years of the service (from 45% to 83%) and on average 74% of patients achieved preferred place of death. More than 70% of patients avoided an emergency or unplanned hospital admission in their last month of life. The mechanisms and context identified as driving forces of the service included: 7/7 single point of contact; coordinating services across providers; recruiting and developing the workforce; understanding and clarifying new roles; and managing expectations. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This was a service evaluation and the outcomes are related to the specific context and mechanisms. However, findings can be transferable to similar settings. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: "Single point of contact" services that offer coordinated EoLC can contribute in supporting people to be cared and die in their preferred place. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This paper provides an evaluation of a novel approach to EoLC and creates a set of hypotheses that could be further tested in similar services in the future.

Assessing trade-offs in large marine protected areas.

Large marine protected areas (LMPAs) are increasingly being established and have a high profile in marine conservation. LMPAs are expected to achieve multiple objectives, and because of their size are postulated to avoid trade-offs that are common in smaller MPAs. However, evaluations across multiple outcomes are lacking. We used a systematic approach to code several social and ecological outcomes of 12 LMPAs. We found evidence of three types of trade-offs: trade-offs between different ecological resources (supply trade-offs); trade-offs between ecological resource conditions and the well-being of resource users (supply-demand trade-offs); and trade-offs between the well-being outcomes of different resource users (demand trade-offs). We also found several divergent outcomes that were attributed to influences beyond the scope of the LMPA. We suggest that despite their size, trade-offs can develop in LMPAs and should be considered in planning and design. LMPAs may improve their performance across multiple social and ecological objectives if integrated with larger-scale conservation efforts.