Unexpected positive cultures of humeral head detected with Dithiothreitol in primary shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) are frequently observed in primary shoulder arthroplasty and its clinical significance has not yet been well defined. The aim is to evaluate the UPCs in humeral head in primary shoulder replacement and to understand if UPCs increase in patients with risk factors for contamination (previous surgery or infiltrations). METHODS: Patients undergoing total shoulder replacement were enrolled in this prospective observational study. To reduce the risk of humeral head contamination, all known procedures to reduce C. acnes burden of the skin were implemented. Patients were divided into 2 groups, namely patients who had undergone previous rotator cuff repair or infiltration and patients with no risk factors for contamination. All the humeral heads harvested were treated with Dithiothreitol, in a specific device (MicroDTTect), to increase the sensitivity of the cultures for bacterial identification. The cultures were analyzed for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria for up to 14 days. RESULTS: The UPCs positivity rate of the 80 patients in the study was 19 % (15 patients). The positivity rates for UPCs in the group with and without risk factors were 30 % (12 patients) and 7.5% (3 patients), respectively. The rate of positive culture was higher in men (87%) than in women (13%). The observed positivity was due to Cutibacterium acnes and peptoniphilus asaccarolyticus, both slow-growing anaerobes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with previous surgery or infiltrations had a 4-fold higher rate of positivity for UPCs compared with patients without previous risk factors. The higher percentage of positivity in patients with risk factors could be related to changes in the joint microenvironment after shoulder procedures. We do not know whether the presence of UPCs could be associated with the development of periprosthetic infections at longer follow-up.

Return to sport after arthroscopic xenograft bone block associated with Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation in competitive contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Open Bankart repair and Latarjet stabilization are two of surgical procedures used in the treatment of shoulder instability in contact athletes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of bone block arthroscopic procedure, performed with xenograft, in combination with Bankart repair and selective subscapularis augmentation (ASA) for contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed contact athletes who underwent arthroscopic bone block with xenograft and Bankart repair with selective augmentation of subscapularis for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between January 2017 and December 2021. Shoulders with posterior instability or multidirectional instability were excluded. Recurrence, complications, return to sport, and functional scores (Rowe score, WOSI score, ASES score) were assessed. A CT scan at 2-year follow-up was performed to assess the status of Bone block integration, its displacement and restoration of glenoid surface. RESULTS: 16 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 24. None of the patients treated with arthroscopic bone block and ASA presented new dislocation episodes. An increase in preoperative scores was observed at the last follow-up, in particular the ASES, Rowe, and WOSI scores increased from 69±7, 31±9 , 1235±46 respectively to 96.1±3.2, 94±6, 119±51. All athletes returned to sporting activity at or near the same level as pre-surgery. The glenoid bone surface increase from 83% to 116% at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Bone block treatment with Xenograft combined with Bankart repair and ASA procedures has been shown to be effective in treating instability in contact athletes with significant glenoid deficit. All athletes returned to athletic activity at a level similar to the pre-intervention period.

TikTok content as a source of health education regarding epicondylitis: a content analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the validity and informational value of TikTok content about epicondylitis. The hypothesis tested herein was that TikTok video content would not provide adequate and valid information. METHODS: The term "epicondylitis" was used as a keyword to comprehensively search for TikTok videos, and the first 100 videos that were retrieved were subsequently included for analysis. The duration, number of likes, number of shares and number of views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, the videos were categorized on the basis of their source (medical doctor, physiotherapist, or private user), type of information (physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, etiopathogenesis, patient experience, treatment, or other), video content (rehabilitation, education, or patient experience/testimony), and the presence of music or voice. Assessments of video content quality and reliability were conducted using the DISCERN tool, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS). RESULTS: A total of 100 videos were included in the analysis: 78 (78.0%) were published by physiotherapists, 18 were published by medical doctors (18.0%), and 4 were published by private users (4.0%). Most of the information pertained to physical therapy (75; 75.0%) and most of the content was about rehabilitation (75; 75.0%). The mean length of the videos was 42.51 ± 24.75 seconds; the mean number of views was 193,207.78 ± 1,300,853.86; and the mean number of comments, likes, and shares were 22.43 ± 62.54, 1578.52 ± 8333.11, and 149.87 ± 577.73, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 18.12 ± 5.73, 0.80 ± 0.53, and 1.30 ± 0.52, respectively. Videos posted by medical doctors/private users had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos posted by physiotherapists. Videos that focused on education or patient experience had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos based on rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: TikTok can be an unreliable source of information regarding epicondylitis treatment. It is common to find nonphysicians who share medical advice on the platform, with medical treatments demonstrating the weakest level of supporting evidence. Elbow surgeons should advise their patients that treatment recommendations from TikTok may not align with established guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Cross-sectional study.

Causes, symptoms, and treatments of nerve entrapments around the elbow: Current concepts.

The elbow is a joint extremely susceptible to stiffness, even after a trivial trauma. As for other joints, several factors can generate stiffness such as immobilisation, joint incongruity, heterotopic ossification, adhesions, or pain. Prolonged joint immobilisation, pursued to assure bony and ligamentous healing, represents the most acknowledged risk factor for joint stiffness. The elbow is a common site of nerve entrapment syndromes. The reasons are multifactorial, but peculiar elbow anatomy and biomechanics play a role. Passing from the arm into the forearm, the ulnar, median, and radial nerves run at the elbow in close rapport with the joint, fibrous arches and through narrow fibro-osseous tunnel. The elbow joint, in fact, has a large range of flexion which exposes nerves lying posterior to the axis of rotation to traction and those anterior to compression.

The internal joint stabilizer for elbow instability: current concepts.

The management of residual elbow instability is challenging in both acute and chronic injuries. Among the available devices, the hinged external fixator provides an additional joint stabilization while allowing an early motion, but it is clumsy and associated to high rate of pin track complications. To address these issues, an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) has been recently developed. An easier recreation of the axis of rotation coupled to the reduced lever arm of the hinge is the root of the consistent and satisfactory results thus far observed. In addition, the device is more comfortable for the patients being an internal stabilizer. Nonetheless, a second surgery for the device removal is necessary, of which the timing is still not standardized. This current concepts paper describes literature regarding outcomes of the IJS focusing on the rate of maintained radiographic joint reduction, the resultant range of motion, and the associated complication profile.

Nonunion of distal humeral fractures: Current concepts.

The incidence of complex articular fractures of the distal humeral in adults has increased and will be growing in the future due to the greater incidence of high energy trauma and to the higher percentage of elderly population. Successful treatment is challenging for the needed balance between a stability of often comminuted fracture and early motion. Nonunion is a common complication after distal humerus fractures that is influenced by a variety of factors such as biology, in particular the blood supply of the metaphysis, the non-anatomical reduction of the fracture, the methods of fixation, and mechanical failure. These can involve the intra-articular or extra-articular areas. Clinical presentation may be mainly with a flail elbow in extra-articular nonunion or mainly with disfunction and stiffness for an intra-articular nonunion. However, the symptoms will depend on the degree of articular surfaces damage and the main localization of nonunion in the intra- and extra-articular region. The surgical treatment is usually required, being the non-operative treatment with a brace a reasonable option just for low-demand patients and with a high risk of complications. Despite a limited range of motion regained, the union rate achieved with internal fixation and bone grafting is substantially high.

Malunion of distal humeral fractures: Current concepts.

The incidence of complex articular fractures of the distal humeral in adults has increased and will be growing in the future due to the greater incidence of high-energy trauma and to the higher percentage of the elderly population. Successful treatment is challenging for the needed balance between the stability of often comminuted fractures and early motion. Malunion is a common complication after distal humerus fractures that is influenced by a variety of factors, such as biology, particularly the blood supply of the metaphysis, the nonanatomical reduction of the fracture, the methods of fixation, and mechanical failure. These can involve the intra-articular or extra-articular areas. The clinical presentation may be mainly with pain and instability as for the cubitus varus, or with disfunction and stiffness as for an intra-articular malunion. However, the symptoms will depend on the degree of articular surfaces damage and the degree of deformities in specific planes. The surgical treatment can be challenging, varying from supracondylar osteotomies and re-contouring arthroplasty for extra-articular deformities to interposition arthroplasty, and elbow replacement for intra-articular deformities.