Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Palliat Med ; 24(3): 438-442, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33513069

RESUMO

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer worldwide. Almost all are related to human papillomavirus exposure. Cervical cancer treatment is associated with significant morbidity that is likely to require support from palliative care teams. In these pearls on cervical cancer, we hope to inform providers about the common treatments and issues for cervical cancer patients. Treatment modalities include surgery for early-stage disease, radiation therapy for locally advanced disease, and pelvic exenteration, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for recurrent disease. Cervical cancer causes pain and bleeding. Radiation can affect ovarian, urinary, and bowel function. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy are associated with fatigue and nausea. Fistulas between the vagina and bowel or bladder can occur due to cancer or to cancer treatments. Physical and emotional supportive care is important for women with cervical cancer.


Assuntos
Enfermagem de Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Dor , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia
2.
Transl Oncol ; 13(12): 100860, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32862103

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Disease recurrence and progression of ovarian cancer is common with the development of platinum-resistant or refractory disease. This is due in large part to the presence of chemo-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance. We developed a CSCs drug cytotoxicity assay (ChemoID) to identify the most effective chemotherapy treatment from a panel of FDA approved chemotherapies. METHODS: Ascites and pleural fluid samples were collected under physician order from 45 consecutive patients affected by 3rd-5th relapsed ovarian cancer. Test results from the assay were used to treat patients with the highest cell kill drugs, taking into consideration their health status and using dose reductions, as needed. A retrospective chart review of CT and PET scans was used to determine patients' outcomes for tumor response, time to recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We observed that recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with high-cell kill chemotherapy agents guided by the CSCs drug response assay had an improvement in the median PFS corresponding to 5.4 months (3rd relapse), 3.6 months (4th relapse), and 3.9 months (5th relapse) when compared to historical data. Additionally, we observed that ovarian cancer patients identified as non-responders by the CSC drug response assay had 30 times the hazard of death compared to those women that were identified as responders with respective median survivals of 6 months vs. 13 months. We also found that ChemoID treated patients on average had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between -$18,421 and $7,241 per life-year saved (LYS). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated improved PFS and OS for recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with assay-guided chemotherapies while decreasing the cost of treatment.

3.
J Palliat Med ; 18(8): 722-8, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26218581

RESUMO

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) frequently defines the trajectory of end-stage ovarian cancer and results in severe physical and psychological distress in patients and their caregivers. Venting gastrostomy (VG) is an alternative to both prolonged medical therapy with nasogastric intubation and intestinal bypass/diversion for refractory MBO. Limited published data from large academic research centers support use of VG in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and MBO. In this case series, we describe supportive care outcomes in ovarian cancer patients with MBO receiving the effects of VG in a community setting. Six cases of advanced ovarian cancer involving MBO were evaluated for VG from July 2009 through February 2012. Five of six patients were managed with VG. Our experience suggests that VG may be beneficial in controlling nausea and vomiting in ovarian cancer patients with MBO and that VG placement with concurrent evacuation of large-volume ascites was associated with minimal complications. Future prospective studies to evaluate the benefits of VG are warranted.


Assuntos
Gastrostomia/métodos , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/terapia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/complicações , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA