Leaving Against Medical Advice: Current Problems and Plausible Solutions.

Leave against medical advice (LAMA) is defined as 'a decision to leave the hospital before the treating physician recommends discharge', and is associated with higher rates of readmission, longer subsequent hospitalization, and worse health outcomes. In addition to this, they also contribute to poor healthcare resource utilization. We conducted a single-center audit to establish patient demographics and contributing factors of patients leaving against medical advice from our emergency department (ED). We benchmarked our data against locally available clinical policy guidelines. We interrogated our electronic health record system (known as Salamtak®), which is a Cerner-based platform (Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, MO 64138) for patients who signed LAMA from ED from 2018 to 2023. We selected a convenience pilot sample of 120 subjects. Based on a literature review, we identified patient demographics (age, gender, nationality, socioeconomic status, marital status, religion), possible contributing factors (time of attendance, insurance status, length of ED stay), and patient outcomes (reattendances within 1 week and mortality) to evaluate. Based on locally available guidance, we formulated six criteria to audit with a standard set at 100% for each. A team of emergency medicine residents collected data that was anonymized on an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Corporation. (2018). Basic descriptive statistics were used to collate results. About 93 patients (77.5%) were 16 years and above, and 27 patients (22.5%) were below 16 years. There was a slight preponderance of males (64 patients, 53.3%) than females (56 patients, 46.6%). The majority of LAMA cases presented in the evening and night (97 patients, 80.8%). About 57 (47.5%) patients had an ED length of stay of 3 hours or more. The average ED length of stay for these patients was 3.4 hours. About 73 patients (60.3%) were insured. Out of 120 patients, only 12 (10%) had a mental capacity assessment documented. The commonest reason for signing LAMA was a social reason in 45 (37.5%) cases. In the remaining cases, the causes were a combination of family, financial, waiting, or other/undocumented reasons). When faced with a decision to LAMA, the involvement of a Public Relationship Officer (PRO) was only documented to be consulted in seven (5.8%) cases. About 14 cases were re-attended within 1 week (11.6%) and no mortalities were reported in any of the reattendances. LAMA is a not-so-rare phenomenon often occurring in EDs, and often a cause of trepidation for healthcare workers. Treating this as an aberrant behavior on the part of the patient, or laying the responsibility for this action on the healthcare provider is primitive, counter-productive, and not patient-centric. Familiarity with local guidelines around this contentious area is essential. Revised nomenclature like 'premature discharge' may be less stigmatizing for the patient. Where possible, a harm reduction approach should be used and frontline healthcare workers must be prepared with an escalation plan. In the United Arab Emirates, familiarity with Wadeema's Law as a child protection measure is essential.

Procedural Sedation in a UAE Emergency Department: Encouraging Informed Decision-Making Through a Patient Information Leaflet.

Introduction Procedural sedation is a common procedure conducted in emergency departments (ED) across the world, which requires patients to receive anesthesia/sedation medication in a controlled environment in order to alleviate pain, anxiety, and suffering, thereby allowing multiple procedures to be completed in a safe and timely manner. We deploy this technique for joint reductions, burns dressings, wound repairs, etc. in our ED. As a large tertiary referral hospital ED, we aimed to benchmark our practice for this high-acuity procedure against international standards. The main objective of our audit was to benchmark our current practice of procedural sedation against international standards from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), United Kingdom, and American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) guidelines. As a secondary objective, we aimed to design and implement a multi-lingual procedural sedation leaflet for our patients and their carers. Methods A retrospective electronic healthcare records review was conducted from January 2019 to August 2022 following which a convenience sample of 100 patients was selected. Records audited were obtained from the Hospital Quality and Pharmacy departments. We selected patients from the data provided by selecting sedation medication used (ketamine, midazolam, propofol) and frequency documented as 'pre-procedure' (Pre-Proc). We included patients of all age groups who received procedural sedation in the emergency department and excluded inpatient encounters. After reviewing RCEM and ACEP guidance, we studied 14 criteria and standards. A team comprising physicians and hospital interpreters was set up to draft a procedural sedation leaflet. After hospital marketing team approval, these were published in Arabic, English, Urdu, Hindi, Bengali, and Malayalam. Results Compliance percentages of the 14 criteria were calculated. A "traffic light" color scheme was used to inform the reader of areas of good practice and areas for improvement. Percentages of 90-100% (green) were considered compliant, 80-89% (amber) were partially compliant, and 79% or less (red) were non-compliant. Of the 14 criteria, 10 were fully compliant. One criterion was partially compliant and three criteria were non-compliant. Conclusion Overall, we performed well in in this audit with 100% compliance rates in many areas. We identified that we had no written discharge information leaflet for our patients and carers. We drafted a multi-lingual procedural sedation leaflet and stocked this in the department. Through face-to-face education, we re-trained physicians on the importance of documentation when adhering to safe practices around procedural sedation.

Establishment of a course for Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is not widely practiced by Trauma Surgeons in the Middle East despite its international acceptance. A FAST course was established by the Trauma Group at the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at United Arab Emirates (UAE) University aiming to introduce doctors who have limited experience of ultrasound to the basics of FAST. This article summarizes the content of the course; the evaluation of the participants and their recommendations. METHODS: An 8 hour FAST course was offered to 18 participants in May 2004 in the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, UAE. Lectures with syllabus material were used to cover the following topics: basic ultrasound physics, knobology and sonographic orientation, the FAST scan, chest and cardiac trauma sonographic evaluation, training and credentialing issues. Each participant received 3 hours of hands-on ultrasound instruction. On completion of the course participants responded anonymously to an evaluation questionnaire. RESULTS: All participants responded to the questionnaire (100% response rate). Delegates found the course well organized, relevant, met their needs and encourages them to use FAST in their own practice. The course objectives were met. Participants suggested that including actual patients and the use of animal models improve the practical sessions. CONCLUSION: Organizing a FAST course is an important step towards recognizing and implementing it in practice. Nevertheless, there is a need for appropriate quality assurance and credentialing guidelines before commencing.

Delayed recognition of esophageal intubation.

It is important for clinicians to be aware of the sensitivity and limitations of commonly used methods to confirm endotracheal tube placement. Overreliance on insensitive indicators can lead to delayed recognition of esophageal intubation. The case presented highlights this concern.