Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJOG ; 113(9): 1060-6, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16956337

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with important (> or =50%) variation in awareness and practice of evidence-based obstetric interventions in an African setting where we have previously reported poor awareness and use of evidence-based reproductive interventions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from our Reproductive Health Interventions Study. SETTING: North-west province, Cameroon, Africa. POPULATION: Health workers including obstetricians, other physicians, midwives, nurses and other staff providing reproductive care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence ratios (PR) of uniform awareness and practice of four key evidence-based obstetric interventions from the World Health Organization Reproductive Health Library (WHO RHL): antiretrovirals to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV/AIDS, antenatal corticosteroids for prematurity, uterotonics to prevent postpartum haemorrhage and magnesium sulphate for seizure prophylaxis. METHODS: Comparisons of descriptive covariates, applying logistic regression to estimate independent relationships with awareness and use of evidence-based interventions. RESULTS: A total of 15.5% (50/322) of health workers were aware of all the four interventions while only 3.8% (12/312) reported optimal practice. Evidence-based awareness was strongly associated with practice (PR = 15.4; 96% CI: 4.3-55.0). Factors significantly associated with awareness were: attending continuing education, access to the WHO RHL, employment as an obstetrician/gynaecologist and working in autonomous military or National Insurance Fund facilities. Controlling for potential confounding, working as an obstetrician was associated with increased awareness (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR] = 8.3; 95% CI: 1.3-53.8) as was median work experience of 5-15 years (aPOR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.0-3.8). Internet access was associated with increased practice (aPOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.0-11.8). Other potentially important variations were observed, although they did not attain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors including obstetric training and continuous education positively influence evidence-based awareness and practice of key obstetric interventions. Confirmation and application of this information may enhance the effectiveness of programmes to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Cuidado Pré-Natal/normas , Prática Profissional/normas , Medicina Reprodutiva/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Conscientização , Camarões , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA