Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative to mobilise these patients early. This study aims to identify whether NMES performed within the first 72 hours of septic shock diagnosis or later is safe from a metabolic perspective. METHODS: This is the analysis of two randomised controlled crossover studies. Patients with acute septic shock (within the first 72 hours of diagnosis) and sepsis and septic shock in the late phase (after 72 hours of diagnosis) were eligible. Patients were submitted in a random order to the intervention protocol (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised and NMES) and control (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised without NMES). The patients were allocated in group 1 (intervention and control) or group 2 (control and intervention) with a wash-out period of 4 to 6 hours. Metabolic variables were evaluated by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were analysed in the acute septic shock study and 21 in the late sepsis/septic shock study. There were no significant differences between Oxygen Consumption (VO2) values in the acute phase of septic shock when the baseline period, intervention, and control protocols were compared (186.59 ± 46.10; 183.64 ± 41.39; 188.97 ± 44.88, p>0.05- expressed in mL/Kg/min). The same was observed when the VO2 values in the late phase were compared (224.22 ± 53.09; 226.20 ± 49.64; 226.79 ± 58.25, p>0.05). The other metabolic variables followed the same pattern, with no significant differences between the protocols. When metabolic variables were compared between acute to late phase, significant differences were observed (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As metabolic rates in septic shock patients had no increase during NMES, either in the first 72 hours of diagnosis or later, NMES can be considered safe from a metabolic viewpoint, even despite the higher metabolic demand in the acute phase of shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03193164; NCT03815994. Registered on June 5, 2017; November 13, 2018 (clinicaltrials.gov/).

Correlation among clinical, functional and morphological indexes of the respiratory system in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) is a heterogeneous disease, which assessment and severity can't be defined by one particular instrument but using a multidimensional score. Thus, in additional to traditional methods, alternative tools have been developed to assist these patients' evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To correlate functional and morphological indexes with severity and dyspnea in NCFB patients, focusing on the correlation between the impulse oscillometry system (IOS) and the quantitative analysis of computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Clinically stable NCFB patients, between 18 and 80 years old were submitted to clinical, functional and morphological evaluations assessed by Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale; spirometry and IOS; and subjective and quantitative Chest CT scans analysis, respectively. RESULTS: This study included 38 patients. The best correlations obtained between functional and morphological airway indexes were: resistance at 5 Hz-R5 and the normalized thickness of bronchial walls-Pi10 (r = 0.57), and the mean forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%) and CT score (r = -0.39). BSI as well as MRC showed higher correlations with the quantitative automated analysis of CT (BSI and Pi10: r = 0.41; MRC and Pi10: r = 0.35) than with subjective CT score (BSI and CT score: r = 0.41; MRC and CT score: r = 0.15); and moderate and weak correlations were obtained on both functional airway indexes (BSI and peripheral airways resistance - R5-R20: r = 0.53; BSI and forced expiratory volume at the first second-FEV1: R = -0,64; MRC and R5-R20: r = 0.42; and MRC and VEF1: r = -0.45). CONCLUSION: In NCFB patients, compartmentalized methods for assessing the respiratory system (IOS and the automated quantitative CT analysis) have a good correlation with severity and dyspnea.

Comparative evaluation of expiratory airflow limitation between patients with COPD and BE using IOS.

Impulse oscillometry (IOS) allows evaluation of the compartmentalized resistance and reactance of the respiratory system, distinguishing central and peripheral obstruction. The IOS measurements are getting attention in the diagnosis and differentiation of chronic respiratory diseases. However, no data are available in the literature to differentiate between COPD and BE using IOS parameters. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of IOS in the diagnosis of bronchiectasis non-cystic fibrosis (BE) in comparison to COPD. Whole breath, inspiration, expiration, and inspiratory-expiratory difference (Δ) were evaluated based on the IOS parameters: total resistance (R5), central airway resistance (R20), peripheral airway resistance (R5-R20), reactance (X5), reactance area (AX), and resonance frequency (Fres). Fifty-nine subjects (21 Healthy, 19 BE, and 19 COPD) participated in this study. It was observed a significant difference in the comparison of healthy and pulmonary disease groups (BE and COPD) for total breathing (R5-R20, X5, AX, and Fres), inspiratory phase (R5 and R5-R5), and expiratory phase (R5-R20 and X5). The comparison between BE and COPD groups showed significant difference in the expiratory phase for resistance at 5 and 20 Hz and, ΔR5 and ΔR20. The IOS evidenced an increase of R5, R20 and R5-R20 in patients with BE and COPD when compared to healthy subjects. Expiratory measures of IOS revealed increased airway resistance in COPD compared to BE patients who had similar FEV1 measured by spirometry, however, further studies are needed to confirm these differences.

Acute Effects of Oscillatory PEP and Thoracic Compression on Secretion Removal and Impedance of the Respiratory System in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiectasis is characterized by abnormal and permanent dilatation of the bronchi, caused mainly by the progression of inflammatory processes and loss of the ability to remove mucus. Techniques to clear the airways are essential for the treatment of these patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the acute effects of oscillatory PEP and thoracic compression on both the clearance of secretions and impedance of airways in subjects with bronchiectasis. METHODS: This was a randomized crossover single-blinded study that involved both subjects with bronchiectasis and healthy subjects evaluated by using an impulse oscillometry system, which assessed resistance at 5 Hz and resistance 20 Hz, reactance at 5 Hz, reactance area, and resonant frequency, before, after, and 30 min after oscillatory PEP, chest compression, or control sessions. Dry and total weights, adhesiveness, purulence of the expectorated secretions, the dyspnea scale score, the acceptability and tolerance scale score, pulse oximetry, and difficulty in expectoration were also assessed. RESULTS: The dry and total weights of secretions were higher after the use of the oscillatory PEP technique than those in a control session (P = .005 and P = .039, respectively). In the bronchiectasis group, there was a decrease after oscillatory PEP in total airway resistance (P = .04), peripheral resistance (P = .005), and reactance area (P = .001). After compression, there was a decrease in peripheral resistance Hz (P = .001) and reactance area (P = .001). In the healthy group, there was an increase in resistance at 5 Hz (P = .02) after oscillatory PEP. There were no differences in acceptability and tolerance, dyspnea, and oxygen saturation. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillatory PEP technique was effective for the removal of secretions and in decreasing total and peripheral respiratory system resistance; thoracic compression had comparable positive effects on the peripheral resistance. Both techniques were safe and well tolerated by the subjects with bronchiectasis. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02509637.).

Effects of exercise on secretion transport, inflammation, and quality of life in patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiectasis is characterized by pathological and irreversible bronchial dilatation caused by the inefficient mucus and microorganism clearance and progression of inflammatory processes. The most frequent characteristic is the increase in bronchial mucus production resulting in slower transport and damage to the mucociliary transport. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of exercise on mucus transport, inflammation, and resistance of the respiratory and autonomic nervous systems and subsequent effects on quality of life in patients with bronchiectasis who are enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program. METHODS: Sixty subjects of both sexes between 18 and 60 years (30 volunteers with clinically stable bronchiectasis and 30 healthy volunteers) will be included. Participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, decompensated cardiovascular or metabolic diseases, neuromuscular and musculoskeletal diseases, and active smokers will be excluded. Volunteers will be randomly allocated to the pulmonary rehabilitation or control groups. The primary outcomes will be nasal transport time as evaluated by nasal saccharin transport time, analysis of nasal lavage, enzyme immunoassay of exhaled expiration, and analysis of the mucus properties. The secondary outcomes will include pulmonary function tests, impulse oscillometry, heart rate variability analysis, and quality of life questionnaires. DISCUSSION: In addition to the benefits for patients already described in the literature, the additional benefit of mucus removal may contribute to optimizing treatments and better control of the disease. CONCLUSION: This protocol could provide new information about the unclear mechanisms regarding exercise to aid in the removal of secretions.

The Influence of Different Mouthpieces on Impulse Oscillometry Results.

BACKGROUND: Impulse oscillometry is a method of airway assessment and diagnosis that provides data on lung mechanics. In the literature, studies have used different types of mouthpieces or did not describe the model used for the tests. We sought to compare the 3 most commonly described mouthpieces in terms of test results, comfort, and subject preference. METHODS: Thirty-nine healthy volunteers were evaluated with spirometry and impulse oscillometry, assessing the resistance at 5 Hz and 20 Hz (R5 and R20, respectively), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), reactance area, and resonant frequency. A filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1), a filter heat exchanger with an oval mouthpiece (B2), and a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) were compared using an acceptability and tolerance scale, and subjects noted their preference. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed differences between all the mouthpieces and the predicted values for R5, R20, and X5. The mouthpiece comparison showed differences in R5 between a filter heat exchanger with an oval mouthpiece (B2) and a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) (P = .007); resonant frequency between a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1) and a filter heat exchanger with an oval mouthpiece (B2) (P = .004) and between a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1) and a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) (P = .003); and reactance area between a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1) and a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) (P = .01). In the subjective evaluation, acceptability and tolerance differences were found in the ease of carrying out the evaluation, and no difference was found with regard to the degree of discomfort. Ten subjects preferred a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1), 15 preferred a filter heat exchanger with an oval mouthpiece (B2), and 14 preferred a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3). CONCLUSIONS: A circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) appeared to be the most suitable mouthpiece for the impulse oscillometry tests. It assured smaller impedance values for the respiratory system, and subjects expressed the most confidence in using this mouthpiece.