Abciximab in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel loading: a randomized double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor abciximab has improved the efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, it is not known whether abciximab remains beneficial after adequate clopidogrel loading in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 800 patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction within 24 hours from symptom onset, all treated with 600 mg clopidogrel, were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either abciximab (n=401) or placebo (n=399) in the intensive care unit before being sent to the catheterization laboratory. The primary end point, infarct size measured by single-photon emission computed tomography with technetium-99m sestamibi before hospital discharge, was 15.7+/-17.2% (mean+/-SD) of the left ventricle in the abciximab group and 16.6+/-18.6% of the left ventricle in the placebo group (P=0.47). At 30 days, the composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or urgent revascularization of the infarct-related artery was observed in 20 patients in the abciximab group (5.0%) and 15 patients in the placebo group (3.8%) (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.6; P=0.40). Major bleeding complications were observed in 7 patients in each group (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Upstream administration of abciximab is not associated with a reduction in infarct size in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours of symptom onset and receiving 600 mg clopidogrel.

Age-dependent effect of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: No studies have specifically performed an age-based analysis of the efficacy of abciximab in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of the study was to assess whether there are age-dependent differences in the clinical benefit of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed this retrospective analysis of 2022 patients with acute coronary syndrome enrolled in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT 2) study and randomized to receive abciximab or placebo during a PCI procedure. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the 30 days after PCI was the primary end point of the study. On the basis of the cutoff age value provided by logistic regression in connection with bootstrap resampling, patients were divided into those younger (n=1220) and older (n=802) than 70 years. Among younger patients, the incidence of MACE was 7.7% in the abciximab group versus 13.3% in the placebo group (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.80, P=0.001). In contrast, no difference was observed among older patients: The incidence of MACE was 10.9% in the abciximab group versus 9.9% in the placebo group (relative risk 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.69, P=0.65). After adjustment for other variables, including cardiac troponin, there was a significant interaction between age and abciximab (P=0.04) with respect to MACE reduction, with abciximab being more effective in younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI, the efficacy of abciximab appears to be age-dependent, with greater benefit among younger patients.

A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Whether the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is beneficial in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel is unknown. METHODS: We enrolled 2159 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention: 1079 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive abciximab and 1080 patients to receive placebo. All patients were pretreated with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel at least two hours before the procedure. The primary end point of the trial was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent target-vessel revascularization within 30 days after randomization. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary end point was 4 percent (45 patients) in the abciximab group, as compared with 4 percent (43 patients) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.59; P=0.82). Most adverse events were myocardial infarctions: the incidence was 4 percent (40 patients) in the abciximab group and 4 percent (41 patients) in the placebo group (P=0.91). Twelve patients (1 percent) in the abciximab group and eight patients (1 percent) in the placebo group had major bleeding complications (P=0.37). Profound thrombocytopenia occurred in 10 patients (1 percent) in the abciximab group but in none in the placebo group (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that in patients at low-to-intermediate risk who undergo elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel, abciximab is associated with no clinically measurable benefit within the first 30 days.

Sex and effect of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: results from Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether there exists a sex-dependent difference in the clinical benefit of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We performed this retrospective analysis of 2022 patients (498 women) with ACS enrolled in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 2 trial and randomized to receive abciximab or placebo during a PCI procedure. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the 30 days after PCI was the primary end point of the study. RESULTS: Among men, the 30-day incidence of MACE was 8.6% in the abciximab group compared with 12.6% in the placebo group, relative risk (RR) 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.94), P = .01. The 30-day incidence of MACE in women was 9.7% in the abciximab group compared with 9.9% in the placebo group, RR 0.98 (95% CI, 0.56-1.72), P = .97. After adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, there was no significant interaction between sex and abciximab (P = .71); adjusted RR was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.34-1.34) in women and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.40-0.90) in men. The incidence of major bleeding was significantly greater in women (3.6%) than in men (0.7%), RR 5.5 (95% CI, 2.54-11.9), P < .001, without any dependence on the form of therapy received. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-ST elevation ACS undergoing a PCI, the benefit with abciximab is greater in men than in women. This is apparently the result of sex-based differences in risk profile.

Abciximab and angiographic restenosis after coronary stent placement. Analysis of the angiographic substudy of ISAR-REACT--a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial evaluating abciximab in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: ISAR-REACT was a trial designed to evaluate whether the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is beneficial in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement after pretreatment with a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel. Objective for the angiographic substudy was to determine the impact of abciximab on angiographic restenosis after coronary stent placement. Previous analyses have suggested a reduction in the incidence of restenosis after the administration of abciximab. METHODS: The angiographic substudy comprises 1885 of 2159 patients enrolled in ISAR-REACT: 994 patients were randomly assigned to abciximab and 941 patients to placebo. All patients were scheduled for a routine angiographic follow-up after 6 months (performed in 80% of eligible patients). End points for the angiographic substudy were the rates of angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: The incidence of angiographic restenosis was 27% in the abciximab group and 29% in the placebo group (relative risk 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.06, P = .27). Late angiographic lumen loss was 0.95 +/- 0.68 and 0.99 +/- 0.70 mm, respectively (P = .25). Similar results were obtained in a subgroup analysis focusing on high-risk subsets. The rate of target lesion revascularization procedures was 22% in the abciximab group and 23% in the placebo group (relative risk 0.94, 95% CI 0.79-1.12, P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: In low- to intermediate-risk patients who undergo elective PCI after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel >2 hours before PCI, the additional administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is not associated with a significant reduction in angiographic restenosis.

Abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial.

CONTEXT: No specifically designed studies have addressed the role of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether abciximab is associated with clinical benefit in high-risk patients with ACS undergoing PCI after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: International, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted from March 2003 through December 2005, enrolling 2022 patients (mean age, 66 years) with non-ST-segment elevation ACS undergoing PCI. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to receive either abciximab (0.25 mg/kg of body weight bolus, followed by a 0.125-microg/kg per minute [maximum, 10 microg/min] infusion for 12 hours, plus heparin, 70 U/kg of body weight) or placebo (placebo bolus and infusion of 12 hours, plus heparin bolus, 140 U/kg). All patients received clopidogrel, 600 mg, at least 2 hours prior to the procedure, as well as 500 mg of oral or intravenous aspirin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization occurring within 30 days after randomization; secondary end points were rates of in-hospital major and minor bleeding. RESULTS: Of 2022 patients enrolled, 1012 were assigned to abciximab and 1010 to placebo. The primary end point was reached in 90 patients (8.9%) assigned to abciximab vs 120 patients (11.9%) assigned to placebo, a 25% reduction in risk with abciximab (relative risk [RR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.97; P = .03). Among patients without an elevated troponin level, there was no difference in the incidence of primary end point events between the abciximab group (23/499 patients [4.6%]) and the placebo group (22/474 patients [4.6%]) (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.56-1.76; P = .98), whereas among patients with an elevated troponin level, the incidence of events was significantly lower in the abciximab group (67/513 patients [13.1%]) compared with the placebo group (98/536 patients [18.3%]), which corresponds to an RR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54-0.95; P = .02) (P = .07 for interaction). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the risk of major and minor bleeding as well as need for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab reduces the risk of adverse events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS undergoing PCI after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. The benefits provided by abciximab appear to be confined to patients presenting with an elevated troponin level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00133003.

Randomized clinical trial of abciximab in diabetic patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions after treatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients are at increased risk of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions. Although subset analyses suggest particular benefit from the administration of abciximab in diabetic patients, no dedicated large randomized trials have been performed in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and certainly not after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Is Abciximab a Superior Way to Eliminate Elevated Thrombotic Risk in Diabetics [ISAR-SWEET] Study) enrolled 701 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease who underwent an elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel >2 hours before the procedure: 351 patients were randomly assigned to abciximab and 350 patients to placebo. The primary end point of the trial was the composite incidence of death and myocardial infarction at 1 year. The frequency of angiographic restenosis (diameter stenosis > or =50%) was the secondary end point. The incidence of death or myocardial infarction was 8.3% in the abciximab group and 8.6% in the placebo group (P=0.91), with a relative risk of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.58 to 1.62). The incidence of angiographic restenosis was 28.9% in the abciximab group and 37.8% in the placebo group (P=0.01), with a relative risk of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.94). The incidence of target lesion revascularization was 23.2% in the abciximab group and 30.4% in the placebo group (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study do not support a significant impact of abciximab on the risk of death and myocardial infarction in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions after pretreatment with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure. The present findings suggest, however, that abciximab reduces the risk of restenosis in diabetic patients receiving coronary bare metal stents.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral sirolimus for restenosis prevention in patients with in-stent restenosis: the Oral Sirolimus to Inhibit Recurrent In-stent Stenosis (OSIRIS) trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in interventional cardiology, including the introduction of drug-eluting stents for de novo coronary lesions, the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging clinical issue. Given the efficacy of systemic sirolimus administration to prevent neointimal hyperplasia in animal models and to halt and even reverse the progression of allograft vasculopathy, the aim of the present double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy of a 10-day oral sirolimus treatment with 2 different loading regimens for the prevention of recurrent restenosis in patients with ISR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred symptomatic patients with ISR were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment arms: placebo or usual-dose or high-dose sirolimus. Patients received a cumulative loading dose of 0, 8, or 24 mg of sirolimus 2 days before and the day of repeat intervention followed by maintenance therapy of 2 mg/d for 7 days. Angiographic restenosis at 6-month angiography was the primary end point of the study. Restenosis was significantly reduced from 42.2% to 38.6% and to 22.1% in the placebo, usual-dose, and high-dose sirolimus groups, respectively (P=0.005). Similarly, the need for target vessel revascularization was reduced from 25.5% to 24.2% and to 15.2% in the placebo, usual-dose, and high-dose groups, respectively (P=0.08). The sirolimus blood concentration on the day of the procedure correlated significantly with the late lumen loss at follow-up (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, an oral adjunctive sirolimus treatment with an intensified loading regimen before coronary intervention resulted in a significant improvement in the angiographic parameters of restenosis.

Predictive factors for early cardiac events and angiographic restenosis after coronary stent placement in small coronary arteries.

OBJECTIVES: The rationale of this study was to identify risk factors that predict early thrombotic events and angiographic restenosis after stenting in small coronary arteries. BACKGROUND: Rates of cardiac complications and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention are higher in patients with small versus large coronary arteries. Because of discordant results, randomized studies comparing stent placement with balloon angioplasty could not establish the best interventional approach to use in this high-risk subset of patients. This study of predictive factors, with special focus on stent design, may provide particular help in this regard. METHODS: Clinical, lesion-related, and procedural data of a large and unselected population of 3,156 consecutive patients were analyzed in a logistic regression model for both early and late complications. Repeat angiography at six months was performed in 80.8% of eligible patients. RESULTS: The strongest risk factors for early thrombotic events (cumulative incidence of 4.2%) were the presence of an acute coronary syndrome and reduced left ventricular function. The stent design had no influence on early thrombotic complications. Restenosis (overall rate of 38.4%) was predominantly influenced by procedure-related variables, including the stent design and stented segment length. The incidence of restenosis varied from 29.6% to 55.8%, depending on the stent design used. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical factors known before the procedure are predominant risk factors for early thrombotic complications, underscoring the need for potent antiplatelet regimens in these patients. In contrast, our findings suggest a major impact of procedural factors, including the choice of stent type, on restenosis.

Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO-2) trial.

OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that thinner-strut stents are associated with a reduced rate of restenosis when comparing two stents with different design. BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that, for two stents with similar design, the risk for restenosis is dependent on the strut thickness. It is unknown whether strut thickness preserves its relevance as a determinant of restenosis even in the presence of different stent designs. METHODS: A total of 611 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to receive either the thin-strut ACS RX Multilink stent (Guidant, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Santa Clara, California) (strut thickness 50 microm, interconnected ring design; n = 309) or the thick-strut BX Velocity stent (Cordis Corp., Miami, Florida) (strut thickness 140 microm, closed cell design; n = 302). The primary end point was angiographic restenosis (> or =50% diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography). Secondary end points were the incidence of target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and the combined rate of death and myocardial infarction (MI) at one year. RESULTS: The incidence of angiographic restenosis was 17.9% in the thin-strut group and 31.4% in the thick-strut group, relative risk, 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.84), p < 0.001. A TVR due to restenosis was required in 12.3% of the thin-strut group and 21.9% of the thick-strut group, relative risk, 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.84), p = 0.002. No significant difference was observed in the combined incidence of death and MI at one year. CONCLUSIONS: When two stents with different design are compared, the stent with thinner struts elicits less angiographic and clinical restenosis than the thicker-strut stent.

Influence of treatment duration with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: We examined clinical outcomes in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) trial based on the duration of pretreatment with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel. BACKGROUND: The influence of the treatment duration with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary revascularization on early outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: Among 2,159 patients with coronary disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the ISAR-REACT trial, we examined clinical outcomes relative to the duration of pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel: (2 to 3 h, 3 to 6 h, 6 to 12 h, or >12 h). Patients were randomly assigned to adjunctive therapy with abciximab or placebo at the beginning of the study. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization within 30 days after randomization. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between patient groups regarding the duration of pretreatment, irrespective of assignment to abciximab or placebo (p = 0.27 for interaction among abciximab/clopidogrel and placebo/clopidogrel treatment at each time interval). Occurrence of major bleeding also did not differ according to time of initial clopidogrel dosing. CONCLUSIONS: For low-to-intermediate risk patients treated with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel before PCI, incremental clinical benefit within the first 30 days from durations of pretreatment >2 to 3 h was not evident.

Comparison of stenting with balloon angioplasty for lesions of small coronary vessels in patients with diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: We sought to assess whether stenting is a better treatment strategy than percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for lesions in small coronary vessels of diabetic patients. METHODS: We studied the 100 diabetic patients who were enrolled in the Intracoronary Stenting or Angioplasty for Restenosis Reduction in Small Arteries trial; 51 patients were randomly assigned to receive a stent and 49 to PTCA alone. Small vessels were considered those with a reference diameter of 2.0 to 2.8 mm. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of restenosis, defined as 50% or greater diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography (performed in 83 of the 100 patients). The secondary endpoint was clinical restenosis, defined as the need for target vessel revascularization within 1 year. RESULTS: Angiographic restenosis occurred in 18 (44%) of the patients who received a stent and in 19 (45%) of the PTCA patients (P = 0.90). Target vessel revascularization was needed in 13 (25%) of the stent patients and 10 (20%) of the PTCA patients (P = 0.55). During the 1-year follow-up, 5 (10%) of the stent patients died or incurred myocardial infarction, compared with 3 (6%) of the PTCA patients (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes who undergo percutaneous coronary interventions for lesions in small vessels have an especially high risk of restenosis that does not appear to be attenuated by stenting.

Impact of lesion complexity on the capacity of a trial to detect differences in stent performance: results from the ISAR-STEREO trial.

BACKGROUND: A number of stent-versus-stent trials have not been able to disclose differences in stent performance. It has been hypothesized that the selection of patient subsets with simple lesion morphologies may have masked differences among the stent designs under testing. The randomized Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results Strut Thickness Effect on Restenosis Outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial has shown that a reduced stent strut thickness is associated with a reduced risk for restenosis. The rationale of this study was to investigate the role of lesion complexity on the capacity of a stent-versus-stent trial to distinguish between superior and inferior stents. METHODS: In the ISAR-STEREO trial, 651 patients were randomly assigned to receive either a thin-strut (n = 326) or a thick-strut stent (n = 325) with a comparable stent design. Restenosis, defined as a > or =50% diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography, was analyzed according to the lesion complexity, which was assessed with the use of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification system. RESULTS: The restenosis rate did not differ between stent designs in patients with noncomplex lesions (type A or B(1); restenosis rate: 16.7% vs 16.7%, P = 1.0 for thin-strut vs thick-strut stents). In patients with complex lesions (type B2 or C), there was a significant reduction in restenosis in the thin-strut stent group (restenosis rate: 14.5% vs 29.0%; P <.01 for thin-strut vs thick-strut stents). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the potential to detect differences in the risk for restenosis in stent-versus-stent trials is strongly dependent on the inclusion of patients with complex lesions. These findings may be relevant when planning new stent-versus-stent trials.

Early administration of reteplase plus abciximab vs abciximab alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction referred for percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The optimal pharmacological strategy for bridging the delay between admission and performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) is not known. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether early administration of reteplase plus abciximab produces better results compared with abciximab alone in patients with acute MI referred for PCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Open-label, randomized controlled study conducted from May 3, 2001, through June 2, 2003, of 253 patients who were admitted to 13 community hospitals without catheterization facilities (n = 186) and to 5 hospitals with catheterization facilities (n = 67), with the diagnosis of an ST-segment elevation acute MI within 12 hours from onset of symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received intravenously either the combination of a half-dose reteplase (two 5-U boluses, 30 minutes apart) with a standard dose of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg bolus, 0.125 microg/kg per minute infusion [maximum 10 microg/min for 12 hours]) or the standard dose of abciximab alone; all patients were then transferred for PCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Final infarct size according to a single-photon emission computed tomography study with technetium Tc 99m sestamibi performed between 5 and 10 days after randomization in 228 patients (90.1% of entire sample). RESULTS: Of the 253 patients enrolled, 125 were assigned to reteplase plus abciximab and 128 to abciximab alone. The median (interquartile range) of the final infarct size of the left ventricle was 13.0% (3.0%-28.0%) in the reteplase plus abciximab group and 11.5% (3.0%-26.3%) in the abciximab-alone group (P =.81). The mean difference in final infarct size of left ventricle between the reteplase plus abciximab group and the abciximab group was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1% to 5.7%). Within 6 months after randomization, the composite secondary end point of death, recurrent MI, or stroke occurred in 8 patients (6.4%) in the reteplase plus abciximab group and 6 patients (4.7%) in the abciximab group (relative risk, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.5-3.9; log-rank P =.56). Major bleeding complications were observed in 7 patients (5.6%) in the reteplase plus abciximab group and 2 patients (1.6%) in the abciximab group (P =.16). CONCLUSION: Early administration of reteplase plus abciximab does not lead to a reduction of infarct size compared with abciximab alone in patients with acute MI referred for PCI.

[Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results Strut Thickness Effect on Restenosis Outcome (ISAR-STEREO) Trial].

BACKGROUND: Increased thrombogenicity and smooth muscle cell proliferative response induced by the metal struts compromise the advantages of coronary stenting. The objective of this randomized, multicenter study was to ascertain whether a reduced strut thickness of a stent is associated with improved follow-up angiographic and clinical results. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study covered 651 patients with stenosis in the native coronary arteries > 2.8 mm in diameter. They were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 2 commercially available stents of comparable design but different thickness: 326 patients to the thin-strut stent (strut thickness of 50 microm) and 325 patients to the thicker-strut stent (strut thickness of 140 microm). The primary end point was the angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter luminal stenosis at follow-up angiography). The secondary end points were the incidence of reinterventions due to restenosis-induced ischemia and the total rate of death and myocardial infarctions at 1 year (a combined end point). The incidence of angiographic restenosis was 15.0% in the thin-strut group and 25.8% in the thick-strut group (relative risk, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87; p = 0.003). Clinical restenosis was also significantly reduced. Reinterventions were made in 8.6% of the thin-strut patients and in 13.8% of the thick-strut patients (relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.99; p = 0.03). No difference was observed in the combined 1-year rate of death and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a thin-strut device is associated with a significant reduction of angiographic and clinical restenosis after coronary artery stenting. These findings may have relevant implications for the currently most widely used percutaneous coronary intervention.

Influence of abciximab on evolution of left ventricular function in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI after clopidogrel pretreatment: lessons from the ISAR-REACT 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Abciximab reduced the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of abciximab on the evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in these patients. METHODS: The current study included 1,158 patients enrolled in the randomized, double-blind ISAR-REACT 2 (the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) trial who had paired angiograms obtained at baseline and 6-8 months after randomization. Of them, 586 patients received abciximab and 572 patients received placebo. The primary outcome analysis was LVEF at 6-8-month follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline LVEF was comparable in patients assigned to abciximab or placebo (53.2 ± 12.6 vs. 53.7 ± 12.1%; P = 0.393). At 6-8-month follow-up angiography, there was no difference in LVEF between the abciximab and placebo groups (55.4 ± 11.5 vs. 55.8 ± 11.2%; P = 0.743). Subgroup analysis of patients with elevated baseline troponin (>0.03 µg/L) also revealed comparable LVEF at follow-up in both treatment groups (P = 0.527). The multivariate analysis identified age, arterial hypertension, prior MI, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, baseline LVEF, MI at 30 days and repeat PCI as independent correlates of follow-up LVEF. CONCLUSION: Although abciximab reduced the 30-day and 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing primary PCI after pre-treatment with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel, the agent did not improve or impact on the evolution of LVEF over 6-8 months of follow-up.

One-year clinical outcomes with abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the BRAVE-3 randomized trial.

PURPOSE: In the Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation (BRAVE)-3 study upstream administration of abciximab additional to 600 mg clopidogrel loading did not reduce the infarct size in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate 1-year clinical outcomes in the BRAVE-3 study patients. METHODS: A total of 800 patients with acute STEMI within 24 h from symptom onset, all treated with 600 mg of clopidogrel were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either abciximab (n = 401) or placebo (n = 399) in the intensive care unit before being sent to the catheterization laboratory. RESULTS: The main outcome of interest of the present study, the composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or revascularization of the infarct-related artery (IRA) at 1 year, was 23.0% (92 patients) in the abciximab versus 25.7% (102 patients) in the placebo group [relative risk (RR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.20; P = 0.46]. The combined incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction or stroke was 9.3% in the abciximab group versus 6.0% in the placebo group (RR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.93-2.58; P = 0.09). There was a significant reduction of the IRA revascularization with abciximab compared to placebo (16.3 vs. 22.3%, RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.98; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In patients with STEMI, all receiving 600 mg clopidogrel, abciximab did not improve overall clinical outcomes at 1 year after primary coronary stenting.

One-year clinical outcomes with abciximab vs. placebo in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after pre-treatment with clopidogrel: results of the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the benefit of abciximab in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACSs) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel is sustained at 1 year. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed 1-year follow-up of 2022 high-risk patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing urgent PCI, who were randomized to abciximab or placebo after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 2 trial. The combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at 1 year was the primary outcome analysis. At 1 year, the primary outcome was reached in 23.3% of patients allocated to abciximab vs. 28.0% of patients allocated to placebo [relative risk (RR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95, P = 0.012]. The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction was 11.6% in patients allocated to abciximab vs. 15.3% in patients allocated to placebo (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.94, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing a PCI after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel, adverse events occurred less frequently with abciximab and the early benefit was maintained at 1 year after administration.

Troponin level and efficacy of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how does troponin level (TnT) affect the benefit achieved by abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel. METHODS: The Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT 2) trial included 2,022 patients with non-ST elevation ACS undergoing PCI who were randomized to abciximab or placebo after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. The patients were divided into groups with elevated TnT level (n = 1,049) and no elevated TnT level (n = 973). The primary end point of the trial was the composite of death, myocardial infarction and urgent reintervention at 30 days. RESULTS: In patients with elevated TnT level the incidence of the primary end point was 13.1% in the abciximab group Vs. 18.3% in the placebo group [relative risk (RR): 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.95, P = 0.02]. The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction was 12.9% in the abciximab group vs. 17.9% in the placebo group (RR: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96, P = 0.03). In contrast, the incidence of the primary end point in patients with no elevated TnT level was identical in both treatment groups (4.6%). The risk of bleeding was not related to TnT level. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline troponin level affects the benefit of abciximab in patients with ACS undergoing PCI after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel. Abciximab reduces the risk of ischemic events only in patients with ACS and elevated troponin level.