Effectiveness and acceptability of a computerized decision support system using modified Wells criteria for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Ready availability of computed tomography (CT) angiography for evaluation of pulmonary embolism in emergency departments (EDs) is associated with a dramatic increase in the number of CT angiography tests. The aims of this study are to determine whether a validated prediction algorithm embedded in a computerized decision support system improves the positive yield rate of CT angiography for pulmonary embolism and is acceptable to emergency physicians. METHODS: This study was conducted as a prospective interventional study with a retrospective preinterventional comparison group. RESULTS: The implementation of the computerized physician order entry-based computerized decision support system was associated with an overall increase in the positivity rate of from 8.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9% to 12.9%) preintervention to 12.7% (95% CI 8.6% to 17.7%) postintervention, with a difference of 4.4% (95% CI -1.4% to 10.1%). A total of 404 patients were eligible for inclusion. Physician nonadherence to the computerized decision support system occurred in 105 (26.7%) cases. Fifteen patients underwent CT angiography despite low Wells score and negative D-dimer result, all of whose results were negative for pulmonary embolism. Emergency physicians did not order CT angiography for 44 patients despite high pretest probability, with one receiving a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism on a subsequent visit and another, of DVT. When emergency physicians adhered to the computerized decision support system for the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism, a higher yield of CT angiography for pulmonary embolism occurred, with 28 positive results of 168 CT angiography tests (16.7%; 95% CI 11.4% to 23.2%) and a difference compared with preintervention of 8.4% (95% CI 1.7% to 15.4%). Physicians cited the time required to apply the computerized decision support system and a preference for intuitive judgment as reasons for not adhering to the computerized decision support system. CONCLUSION: Use of an evidence-based computerized physician order entry-based computerized decision support system for the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism was associated with a higher yield of CT angiography for pulmonary embolism. The computerized decision support system, however, was poorly accepted by emergency physicians (partly because of increased computer time), leading to possibly selective use, reducing the effect on overall yield, and leading to removal of the computerized decision support system from the computer order entry. These findings emphasize the importance of facilitation of rule-based decisionmaking in the ED and attentiveness to the complex demands placed on emergency physicians.

Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: 10 years follow-up data of 65 patients.

BACKGROUND: Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary is an uncommon neoplasm. The majority of patients are diagnosed in early stages of disease and overall prognosis is favorable. The stage at time of diagnosis is the only prognostic factor that is unequivocally related to survival. Other prognostic factors have not been well defined and are discussed in the literature controversially. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multi-institutional retrospective study we analyzed all relevant clinical data of patients with histologically proven granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. We applied the Kaplan-Meier method in order to estimate overall survival rates and evaluate prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 6-315 months). Overall survival was 87% and 76% after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Eighty percent of granulosa cell tumors were diagnosed stage I (FIGO). The survival rate after recurrence was 56.8% after 10 years. Mitotic rate (p=0.003), tumor stage (p<0.001) and residual tumor disease (p<0.001) were associated with a poor prognosis (p<0.001). Age and rupture of the tumor could not be confirmed to be of prognostic value. CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed that the mitotic index may be a valuable prognostic factor. Complete tumor resection should always be attempted, since residual tumor disease is associated with a poor prognosis. Prospective studies are needed in order to confirm our findings.

Aspirin versus anticoagulation for prevention of venous thromboembolism major lower extremity orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture surgery and lower extremity arthroplasty are associated with increased risk of both venous thromboembolism and bleeding. The best pharmacologic strategy for reducing these opposing risks is uncertain. PURPOSE: To compare venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding rates in adult patients receiving aspirin versus anticoagulants after major lower extremity orthopedic surgery. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library through June 2013; reference lists, ClinicalTrials.gov, and scientific meeting abstracts. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials comparing aspirin to anticoagulants for prevention of VTE following major lower extremity orthopedic surgery. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data on rates of VTE, bleeding, and mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 298 studies screened, 8 trials including 1408 participants met inclusion criteria; all trials screened participants for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Overall rates of DVT did not differ statistically between aspirin and anticoagulants (relative risk [RR]: 1.15 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.68-1.96]). Subgrouped by type of surgery, there was a nonsignificant trend favoring anticoagulation following hip fracture repair but not knee or hip arthroplasty (hip fracture RR: 1.60 [95% CI: 0.80-3.20], 2 trials; arthroplasty RR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.49-2.05], 5 trials). The risk of bleeding was lower with aspirin than anticoagulants following hip fracture repair (RR: 0.32 [95% CI: 0.13-0.77], 2 trials), with a nonsignificant trend favoring aspirin after arthroplasty (RR: 0.63 [95% CI: 0.33-1.21], 5 trials). Rates of pulmonary embolism were too low to provide reliable estimates. CONCLUSION: Compared with anticoagulation, aspirin may be associated with higher risk of DVT following hip fracture repair, although bleeding rates were substantially lower. Aspirin was similarly effective after lower extremity arthroplasty and may be associated with lower bleeding risk. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:579-585. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine.