Unsupervised delineation of stratum corneum using reflectance confocal microscopy and spectral clustering.

BACKGROUND: Measuring the thickness of the stratum corneum (SC) in vivo is often required in pharmacological, dermatological, and cosmetological studies. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) offers a non-invasive imaging-based approach. However, RCM-based measurements currently rely on purely visual analysis of images, which is time-consuming and suffers from inter-user subjectivity. METHODS: We developed an unsupervised segmentation algorithm that can automatically delineate the SC layer in stacks of RCM images of human skin. We represent the unique textural appearance of SC layer using complex wavelet transform and distinguish it from deeper granular layers of skin using spectral clustering. Moreover, through localized processing in a matrix of small areas (called 'tiles'), we obtain lateral variation of SC thickness over the entire field of view. RESULTS: On a set of 15 RCM stacks of normal human skin, our method estimated SC thickness with a mean error of 5.4 ± 5.1 µm compared to the 'ground truth' segmentation obtained from a clinical expert. CONCLUSION: Our algorithm provides a non-invasive RCM imaging-based solution which is automated, rapid, objective, and repeatable.

Assessing subsets of analytes in context of detecting laboratory errors.

Laboratory error detection is a hard task yet plays an important role in efficient care of the patients. Quality controls are inadequate in detecting pre-analytic errors and are not frequent enough. Hence population- and patient-based detectors are developed. However, it is not clear what set of analytes leads to the most efficient error detectors. Here, we use three different scoring functions that can be used in detecting errors, to rank a set of analytes in terms of their strength in distinguishing erroneous measurements. We also observe that using evaluations of larger subsets of analytes in our analysis does not necessarily lead to a more accurate error detector. In our data set obtained from renal kidney disease inpatients, calcium, potassium, and sodium, emerged as the top-3 indicators of an erroneous measurement. Using the joint likelihood of these three analytes, we obtain an estimated AUC of 0.73 in error detection.