RESUMO
AIMS: The aims of this study were to measure the prevalence of polypharmacy and describe the prescribing of selected medications known for overuse in older people with polypharmacy in primary care. METHODS: This was a multinational retrospective cohort study across six countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. We used anonymized longitudinal patient-level information from general practice databases hosted by IQVIA. Patients ≥65 years were included. Polypharmacy was defined as having 5-9 and ≥10 distinct drug classes (ATC Level 3) prescribed during a 6-month period. Selected medications were: opioids, antipsychotics, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), benzodiazepines (ATC Level 5). We included country experts on the healthcare context to interpret findings. RESULTS: Age and gender distribution was similar across the six countries (mean age 75-76 years; 54-56% female). The prevalence of polypharmacy of 5-9 drugs was 22.8% (UK) to 58.3% (Germany); ≥10 drugs from 11.3% (UK) to 28.5% (Germany). In the polypharmacy population prescribed ≥5 drugs, opioid prescribing ranged from 11.5% (France) to 27.5% (Spain). Prescribing of PPI was highest with almost half of patients receiving a PPI, 42.3% (Germany) to 65.5% (Spain). Benzodiazepine prescribing showed a marked variation between countries, 2.7% (UK) to 34.9% (Spain). The healthcare context information explained possible underreporting for selected medications. CONCLUSIONS: We have found a high prevalence of polypharmacy with more than half of the older population being prescribed ≥5 drugs in four of the six countries. Whilst polypharmacy may be appropriate in many patients, worryingly high usage of PPIs and benzodiazepines supports current efforts to improve polypharmacy management across Europe.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Polimedicação , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Europa (Continente) , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Clínicos Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , População EuropeiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Drug utilization research (DUR) contributes to inform policymaking and to strengthen health systems. The availability of data sources is the first step for conducting DUR. However, documents that systematize these data sources in Latin American (LatAm) countries are not known. We compiled the potential data sources for DUR in the LatAm region. METHODS: A network of DUR experts from nine LatAm countries was assembled and experts conducted: (i) a website search of the government, academic, and private health institutions; (ii) screening of eligible data sources, and (iii) liaising with national experts in pharmacoepidemiology (via an online survey). The data sources were characterized by accessibility, geographic granularity, setting, sector of the data, sources and type of the data. Descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified 125 data sources for DUR in nine LatAm countries. Thirty-eight (30%) of them were publicly and conveniently available; 89 (71%) were accessible with limitations, and 18 (14%) were not accessible or lacked clear rules for data access. From the 125 data sources, 76 (61%) were from the public sector only; 46 (37%) were from pharmacy records; 43 (34%) came from ambulatory settings and; 85 (68%) gave access to individual patient-level data. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple sources for DUR are available in LatAm countries, the accessibility is a major challenge. The procedures for accessing DUR data should be transparent, feasible, affordable, and protocol-driven. This inventory could permit a comparison of drug utilization between countries identifying potential medication-related problems that need further exploration.
Assuntos
Uso de Medicamentos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação , Humanos , América Latina , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the current status of regulatory reliance in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) by assessing the countries' regulatory frameworks to approve new medicines, and to ascertain, for each country, which foreign regulators are considered as trusted regulatory authorities to rely on. METHODS: Websites from LAC regulators were searched to identify the official regulations to approve new drugs. Data collection was carried out in December 2019 and completed in June 2020 for the Caribbean countries. Two independent teams collected information regarding direct recognition or abbreviated processes to approve new drugs and the reference (trusted) regulators defined as such by the corresponding national legislation. RESULTS: Regulatory documents regarding marketing authorization were found in 20 LAC regulators' websites, covering 34 countries. Seven countries do not accept reliance on foreign regulators. Thirteen regulatory authorities (Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and the unique Caribbean Regulatory System for 15 Caribbean States) explicitly accept relying on marketing authorizations issued by the European Medicines Agency, United States Food and Drug Administration, and Health Canada. Ten countries rely also on marketing authorizations from Australia, Japan, and Switzerland. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico are reference authorities for eight LAC regulators. CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory reliance has become a common practice in the LAC region. Thirteen out of 20 regulators directly recognize or abbreviate the marketing authorization process in case of earlier approval by a regulator from another jurisdiction. The regulators most relied upon are the European Medicines Agency, United States Food and Drug Administration, and Health Canada.
RESUMO
AIMS: To develop the Workload Assessment of Nurses on Emergency (WANE) tool and to test its validity and reliability to measure nursing workload in the emergency departments. BACKGROUND: Ensuring safe nursing staffing in emergency departments is a worldwide concern. There is no valid tool to measure emergency nursing workload in order to determine the needed nurse staffing in the emergency departments. DESIGN: A two-year, cross-sectional, multicenter study. METHODS: Workload was operationalised as the time nurses spent with nursing activities, classified into direct and indirect care. A board of experts provided content validity. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the WANE's correlations and group-discriminations patterns within the network of variables known to determine nursing workload. Reliability was assessed by the tool's ability to yield consistent results across repeated measurements. Reporting of this research adheres to STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: Seven emergency departments, including 3,024 patients, were involved in the first year and 18 emergency departments and 7,442 patients in the second year. Direct care time correlated positively and significantly with patient dependency on nursing care, age and length of emergency department stay and discriminated between the categories of dependency on nursing care, age and hospitalisation. Both direct and indirect care time discriminated between the emergency departments according to different patient care profiles and unit characteristics. WANE showed consistent results across measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the WANE's reliability and validity to measure emergency nursing workload. This tool could be used to determine, on patient and unit, a baseline nurse staffing and the nursing skill mix in the emergency departments. WANE is also an evidence-based management tool for benchmarking purposes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The use of an evidence-based workload tool in making staffing decisions in emergency departments is crucial to ensure safe patient care and prevent work overload in nursing staff.
Assuntos
Enfermagem em Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/provisão & distribuição , Carga de Trabalho , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine the use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in relation to time before death, to explore whether PIMs are discontinued at the end of life, and the factors associated with this discontinuation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective register-based mortality cohort study of all deceased in 2012 in Belgium, aged at least 75 years at time of death (n = 74 368), using linked administrative databases. We used STOPPFrail to identify PIMs received during the period from 12 to 6 months before death (P1) and the last 4 months (P2) of life. RESULTS: Median age was 86 (IQR 81-90) at time of death, 57% were female, 38% were living in a nursing home, and 16% were admitted to hospital between 2 years and 4 months before death. Overall, PIM use was high, and increased towards death for all PIMs. At least one PIM was discontinued during P2 for one in five (20%) of the population, and 49% had no discontinuation. Being hospitalized in the period before the last 4 months of life, living in a nursing home, female gender and a higher number of medications used during P1 were associated with discontinuation of PIMs (respective aOR [95% CI]: 2.89 [2.73-3.06], 1.29 [1.23-1.36], 1.26 [1.20-1.32], 1.17 [1.16-1.17]). CONCLUSION: Initial PIM use was high and increased towards death. Discontinuation was observed in only one in five PIM users. More guidance for discontinuation of PIMs is needed: practical, evidence-based deprescribing guidelines and implementation plans, training for prescribers and a better consensus on what inappropriate medication is.
Assuntos
Desprescrições , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Terminal/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Polimedicação , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Assistência Terminal/normas , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Balancing medications that are needed and beneficial and avoiding medications that may be harmful is important to prevent drug-related problems, and improve quality of life. The aim of this study is to describe medication use, the prevalence of deprescribing of medications suitable for deprescribing, and the prevalence of new initiation of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in nursing home (NH) residents with life-limiting disease in Flanders. METHODS: NH residents aged ≥ 65, suffering from end stage organ failure, advanced cancer, and/or dementia (n = 296), were included in this cross-sectional study with retrospective analyses of medication use at the time of data collection (t2) and 3 to 6 months before (t1). The appraisal of appropriateness of medications was done using a list of medications documented as suitable for deprescribing, and STOPPFrail criteria. RESULTS: Residents' (mean age 86 years, 74% female) mean number of chronic medications increased from 7.4 (t1) to 7.9 (t2). In 31% of those using medications suitable for deprescribing, at least one medication was actually deprescribed. In 30% at least one PIM from the group of selected PIMs was newly initiated. In the subgroup (n = 76) for whom deprescribing was observed, deprescribing was associated with less new initiations of PIMs (r = - 0.234, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Medication use remained high at the end of life for NH residents with life-limiting disease, and deprescribing was limited. However, in the subgroup of 76 residents for whom deprescribing was observed, less new PIMs were initiated.
Assuntos
Desprescrições , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados , Assistência Terminal/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND:: Knowing the barriers/enablers to deprescribing in people with a life-limiting disease is crucial for the development of successful deprescribing interventions. These barriers/enablers have been studied, but the available evidence has not been summarized in a systematic review. AIM:: To identify the barriers/enablers to deprescribing of medications in people with a life-limiting disease. DESIGN:: Systematic review, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017073693). DATA SOURCES:: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL was conducted and extended with a hand search. Peer-reviewed, primary studies reporting on barriers/enablers to deprescribing in the context of explicit life-limiting disease were included in this review. RESULTS:: A total of 1026 references were checked. Five studies met the criteria and were included in this review. Three types of barriers/enablers were found: organizational, professional and patient (family)-related barriers/enablers. The most prominent enablers were organizational support (e.g. for standardized medication review), involvement of multidisciplinary teams in medication review and the perception of the importance of coming to a joint decision regarding deprescribing, which highlighted the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and involving the patient and his family in the decision-making process. The most important barriers were shortages in staff and the perceived difficulty or resistance of the nursing home resident's family - or the resident himself. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS:: The scarcity of findings in the literature highlights the importance of filling this gap. Further research should focus on deepening the knowledge on these barriers/enablers in order to develop sustainable multifaceted deprescribing interventions in palliative care.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Desprescrições , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Information on medication use in the last months of life is limited. AIM: To describe which medications are prescribed and deprescribed in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care in relation to time before death and to explore associations with demographic variables. DESIGN: Prospective study, using case report forms for monthly data collection. Medication included cancer treatment and 19 therapeutic groups, grouped into four categories for: (1) cancer therapy, (2) specific cancer-related symptom relief, (3) other symptom relief and (4) long-term prevention. Data were analysed retrospectively using death as the index date. We compared medication use at 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 month(s) before death by constructing five cross-sectional subsamples with medication use during that month. Paired analyses were done on a subsample of patients with at least two assessments before death. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We studied the medication use of 720 patients (mean age 67, 56% male) in 30 cancer centres representing 12 countries. RESULTS: From 5 to 1 month(s) before death, cancer therapy decreased (55%-24%), most medications for symptom relief increased, for example, opioids (62%-81%) and sedatives (35%-46%), but medication for long-term prevention decreased (38%-27%). The prevalence of chemotherapy was 15.5% in the last month of life, with 9% of new courses started in the last 2 months. With higher age, chemotherapy and opioid use decreased. CONCLUSION: Medications for symptom relief increased in almost all medication groups. Deprescribing was found in heart medication/anti-hypertensives and cancer therapy, although use of the latter remained relatively high.
Assuntos
Substituição de Medicamentos , Internacionalidade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patologia , Cuidados Paliativos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
There is no doubt that the introduction of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines 14 years ago, and their subsequent updates, have substantially contributed to the early detection of different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several recent studies from different parts of the world mention a CKD prevalence of 8-13%. However, some editorials and reviews have begun to describe the weaknesses of a substantial number of studies. Maremar (maladies rénales chroniques au Maroc) is a recently published prevalence study of CKD, hypertension, diabetes and obesity in a randomized, representative and high response rate (85%) sample of the adult population of Morocco that strictly applied the KDIGO guidelines. When adjusted to the actual adult population of Morocco (2015), a rather low prevalence of CKD (2.9%) was found. Several reasons for this low prevalence were identified; the tagine-like population pyramid of the Maremar population was a factor, but even more important were the confirmation of proteinuria found at first screening and the proof of chronicity of decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), eliminating false positive results. In addition, it was found that when an arbitrary single threshold of eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2) was used to classify CKD stages 3, 4 and 5, it lead to substantial 'overdiagnosis' (false positives) in the elderly (>55 years of age), particularly in those without proteinuria, haematuria or hypertension. It also resulted in a significant 'underdiagnosis' (false negatives) in younger individuals with an eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and below the third percentile of their age-/gender-category. The use of the third percentile eGFR level as a cut-off, based on age-gender-specific reference values of eGFR, allows the detection of these false positives and negatives. There is an urgent need for additional quality studies of the prevalence of CKD using the recent KDIGO guidelines in the correct way, to avoid overestimation of the true disease state of CKD by ≥50% with potentially dramatic consequences.
Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/classificação , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Terminologia como Assunto , Adulto , Idoso , Bélgica/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Prevalência , Proteinúria/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This paper examines recently admitted nursing home residents' practical autonomy, their remaining social environment and their social functioning. METHOD: In a cross-sectional design, 391 newly admitted residents of 67 nursing homes participated. All respondents were ≥65 years old, had mini-mental state examination ≥18 and were living in the nursing home for at least 1 month. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and validated measuring tools. RESULTS: The mean age was 84, 64% were female, 23% had a partner, 80% children, 75% grandchildren and 59% siblings. The mean social functioning score was 3/9 (or 33%) and the autonomy and importance of autonomy score 6/9 (or 67%). More autonomy was observed when residents could perform activities of daily living more independently, and cognitive functioning, quality of life and social functioning were high. Residents with depressive feelings scored lower on autonomy and social functioning compared to those without depressive feelings. Having siblings and the frequency of visits positively correlated with social functioning. In turn, social functioning correlated positively with quality of life. Moreover, a higher score on social functioning lowered the probability of depression. CONCLUSION: Autonomy or self-determination and maintaining remaining social relationships were considered to be important by the new residents. The remaining social environment, social functioning, quality of life, autonomy and depressive feelings influenced each other, but the cause--effect relation was not clear.
Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas/psicologia , Casas de Saúde , Autonomia Pessoal , Qualidade de Vida , Apoio Social , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/psicologia , MasculinoRESUMO
The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in an adult Arabic-Berber population was investigated according to 2012 KDIGO guidelines. A stratified, randomized, representative sample of 10,524 participants was obtained. Weight, height, blood pressure, proteinuria (dipstick), plasma creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and fasting glycemia were measured. Abnormal results were controlled within 2 weeks; eGFR was retested at 3, 6, and 12 months. The population adjusted prevalences were 16.7% hypertension, 23.2% obesity, 13.8% glycemia, 1.6% for eGFR under 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and confirmed proteinuria 1.9% and hematuria 3.4%. Adjusted prevalence of CKD was 5.1%; distribution over KDIGO stages: CKD1: 17.8%; CKD2: 17.2%; CKD3: 52.5% (3A: 40.2%; 3B: 12.3%); CKD4: 4.4%; CKD5: 7.2%. An eGFR distribution within the sex and age categories was constructed using the third percentile as threshold for decreased eGFR. A single threshold (under 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) eGFR classifying CKD3-5 leads to "overdiagnosis" of CKD3A in the elderly, overt "underdiagnosis" in younger individuals with eGFR over 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), below the third percentile, and no proteinuria. By using the KDIGO guidelines in a correct way, "kidney damage" (confirmed proteinuria, hematuria) and the demonstration of chronicity of decreased eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), combined with the third percentile as a cutoff for the normality of eGFR for age and sex, overcome false positives and negatives, substantially decrease CKD3A prevalence, and greatly increase the accuracy of identifying CKD.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Árabes , Glicemia/análise , Creatinina/sangue , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/urina , Feminino , Hematúria/diagnóstico , Hematúria/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/sangue , Hipertensão/urina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Marrocos/epidemiologia , Obesidade/sangue , Obesidade/urina , Prevalência , Proteinúria/diagnóstico , Proteinúria/epidemiologia , Distribuição Aleatória , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/sangue , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/urina , Fatores de Risco , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
AIMS: Little is known about the impact of inappropriate prescribing (IP) in community-dwelling adults, aged 80 years and older. The prevalence at baseline (November 2008September 2009) and impact of IP (misuse and underuse) after 18 months on mortality and hospitalization in a cohort of community-dwelling adults, aged 80 years and older (n = 503) was studied. METHODS: Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions (STOPP-2, misuse) and Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START-2, underuse) criteria were cross-referenced and linked to the medication use (in Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical coding) and clinical problems. Survival analysis until death or first hospitalization was performed at 18 months after inclusion using Kaplan-Meier, with Cox regression to control for covariates. RESULTS: Mean age was 84.4 (range 80-102) years. Mean number of medications prescribed was 5 (range 0-16). Polypharmacy (≥5 medications, 58%), underuse (67%) and misuse (56%) were high. Underuse and misuse coexisted in 40% and were absent in 17% of the population. A higher number of prescribed medications was correlated with more misused medications (rs = .51, P < 0.001) and underused medications (rs = .26, P < 0.001). Mortality and hospitalization rate were 8.9%, and 31.0%, respectively. After adjustment for number of medications and misused medications, there was an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.10, 1.76) and hospitalization (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10, 1.45) for every additional underused medication. Associations with misuse were less clear. CONCLUSION: IP (polypharmacy, underuse and misuse) was highly prevalent in adults, aged 80 years and older. Surprisingly, underuse and not misuse had strong associations with mortality and hospitalization.
Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Inadequada/efeitos adversos , Vida Independente , Análise de Sobrevida , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Polimedicação , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob PrescriçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is a common adverse effect of antibiotic (AB) treatment. This study aimed to measure the overall prevalence of AAD (including mild to moderate diarrhea) in hospitalized AB treated patients, to investigate associated risk factors and to document AAD associated diagnostic investigations, contamination control and treatment. METHODS: During 8 observation days (with time delay of 10-14 days between each observation day), all adult patients hospitalized at an internal medicine ward of 4 Belgian participating hospitals were screened for AB use. Patients receiving AB on the observation day were included in the study and screened for signs and symptoms of AAD using a period prevalence methodology. Clinical data were collected for all AB users and AAD related investigations and treatment were collected for the entire duration of AAD. Additionally, nurses noted daily the frequency of all extra care associated to the treatment of the diarrhea. RESULTS: A total of 2543 hospitalized patients were screened of which 743 were treated with AB (29.2%). Included AB users had a mean age of 68 yr (range 16-99) and 52% were male. Penicillins were mostly used (63%) and 19% received more than one AB. AAD was observed in 9.6% of AB users including 4 with confirmed Clostridium difficile infection. AAD started between 1 and 16 days after AB start (median 5) and had a duration of 2 to 41 days (median 4). AAD was significantly associated with higher age and the use of double AB and proton pump inhibitors. AAD patients had extra laboratory investigations (79%), received extra pharmacological treatment (42%) and 10 of them were isolated (14%). AAD related extra nursing time amounted to 51 minutes per day for the treatment of diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, with one third of hospitalized patients receiving AB, an AAD period prevalence of 9.6% in AB users was found. AAD caused extra investigations and treatment and an estimated extra nursing care of almost one hour per day. Preventive action are highly recommended to reduce the prevalence of AAD and associated health care costs.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Diarreia/diagnóstico , Diarreia/etiologia , Feminino , Hospitais Gerais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Nursing home residents are at high risk for adverse drug reactions (ADR). To improve pharmacotherapeutic care for individual residents, healthcare professionals need to be aware of ADRs. In nursing homes, nurses have a central role in monitoring residents' health and informing physicians on the presence of ADRs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of nursing home residents' ADR reports. METHODS: Residents of a convenient sample of two nursing homes were included if their mental status and understanding of Dutch enabled them to report ADRs. In a cross-sectional design, residents and nurses were questioned about 17 potential ADRs. Reports of residents and nurses were consequently compared. Medication use was studied to describe the risk for ADRs per resident. RESULTS: Residents had a mean of eight different chronic medication prescriptions. Over 90% of the residents used medications which increase the risk of feeling somnolent/tired/sedated, arrhythmias and abdominal pain. The median number of potential ADRs reported by nurses was significantly lower compared to the number of resident reports (median [range], respectively, 1 [1-10] and 4 [1-10]). In general, residents reported the presence of more ADRs than nurses, except for confusion. The correspondence between nurse and resident reports ranged from 43% (dry mouth) till 88% (arrhythmia). CONCLUSIONS: Nurses and patients reported a lot of potential ADRs. The type of ADRs they reported was different and complementary. Questioning residents about specific potential ADRs may increase the awareness of ADRs.
Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Casas de Saúde , Assistência ao Paciente , MédicosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Chronic use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (BZD/Zs) has been linked to cognitive decline. In this one-year prospective cohort study, we explored the impact of chronic BZD/Z use on cognitive decline compared to nonusers. METHODS: In cognitively capable BZD/Z users and nonusers in 10 Belgian nursing homes, we investigated cognition with the MiniMentalStateExamination(MMSE) at baseline and one year. A decrease of ≥ 4 points on the MMSE (clinically relevant decrease) was used in multiple logistic regression. We collected baseline demographics, functional, psychometric and social characteristics potentially influencing cognition. RESULTS: In both the 131 BZD/Z users and 95 nonusers, the cognition decreased significantly over time, but without significant difference between the groups. Clinically relevant decrease was present in 34% BZD/Z users and 27% nonusers (NS). Controlled for age, gender, education and BZD/Z use, the significant risk factors for clinically relevant cognitive decline were depression, hearing and functional impairment. Frequent reading was associated with less MMSE decrease. Our findings could not demonstrate with statistical significance that BZD/Z use was associated with fast cognitive decline. The risk factors for fast decline were depression, hearing and functional impairment, and the absence of a reading attitude. In addition, BZD/Z use and depression were associated, indicating a complex relationship.
Assuntos
Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Cognitivos/induzido quimicamente , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Casas de Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Psicometria , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/tratamento farmacológico , Estatísticas não ParamétricasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Depression after stroke or poststroke depression (PSD) has a negative impact on the rehabilitation process and the associated rehabilitation outcome. Consequently, defining risk factors for development of PSD is important. The relationship between stroke and depression is described extensively in the available literature, but the results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review is to outline conflicting evidence on risk factors for PSD. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, and Web of Knowledge were searched using the keywords "stroke," "depression," and "risk factor" for articles published between January 01, 1995, and September 30, 2012. Additional articles were identified and obtained from a hand search in related articles and reference lists. RESULTS: A total of 66 article abstracts were identified by the search strategy and 24 articles were eligible for inclusion based on predefined quality criteria. The methodology varies greatly between the various studies, which is probably responsible for major differences in risk factors for PSD reported in the literature. The most frequently cited risk factors for PSD in the literature are sex (female), history of depression, stroke severity, functional impairments or level of handicap, level of independence, and family and social support. CONCLUSIONS: Many risk factors are investigated over the last 2 decades and large controversy exists concerning risk factors for development of PSD. These contradictions may largely be reduced to major differences in clinical data, study population, and methodology, which underline the need for more synchronized studies.
Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/psicologia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular CerebralRESUMO
PURPOSE: Guidelines discourage chronic benzodiazepines and related Z drugs (BZD/Zs) for sleep problems. However, prevalence among nursing home residents remains high. Discontinuing these drugs is widely recommended but seems difficult to implement. The aim of our study was to evaluate the overall feasibility in the nursing home, in terms of willingness towards discontinuation and success rate at 8 months, together with the impact on withdrawal symptoms, change in sleep quality, quality of life and medication use. METHODS: In a convenience sample of five nursing homes (823 residents), we included cognitively competent residents with chronic BZD/Z use for insomnia. We investigated sleep quality [with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)], quality of life (EQ-5D) and withdrawal symptoms [Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Symptom Questionnaire (BWSQ)]. Success rate was analysed with survival analysis. RESULTS: Of the 135 eligible residents, both general physician (GP) and resident were willing to initiate discontinuation in 38 residents. Reasons for refusing to initiate discontinuation among GPs was the unmotivated patient and among residents the reluctance towards change. At 8 months, 66.0% were successful discontinuers, with the subjective PSQI component evolving favourably (p = 0.013) and a decreasing number of midnight awakenings (p = 0.041). In the relapse group (n = 13), the quality of life decreased (p = 0.012), with mainly an increase of problems with activities and pain/discomfort. In both groups, the withdrawal symptoms, functionality and medication use did not change. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of chronic BZD/Z use is feasible in the nursing home setting without noticeable withdrawal symptoms, without a switch in medication use, without detrimental effect on quality of life and with a positive effect on the self-perceived sleep quality.
Assuntos
Benzodiazepinas/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Casas de Saúde , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop a computerized assessment tool for monitoring the quality of prescribing in Belgian nursing homes. DESIGN: In a observational cross-sectional study of the medication charts of nursing home residents, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) was investigated using three scoring systems for the elderly (Beers, ACOVE, BEDNURS) complemented with a list of drug-drug interactions. SETTING: A representative stratified sample of Belgian nursing homes (n = 76). PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of nursing home residents with a complete data set (n = 1730) excluding palliative care patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A combination of PIM scores to assess inappropriate, under- and overprescribing. RESULTS: Included residents had a mean age of 85, 78% were female. They used a mean of 7.1 chronic medications. Most PIMs were detected by the application of the ACOVE criteria for underprescribing with 58% of patients having at least one PIM. Using the BEDNURS and the Beers criteria, at least one PIM was noticed in 56 and 27% of patients, respectively. Patients' characteristics showing a positive relationship with the PIM score were age, female gender, amount of clinical and nursing care problems, number of prescriptions and the use of psychotropic drugs (multiple regression analysis R(2) = 0.332). CONCLUSIONS: In Belgian nursing homes, the observed high level of drug utilization was associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing. The development of a combined assessment tool and the implementation of a computerized monitoring system of PIMs is highly recommended to improve the quality of prescribing.
Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/normas , Casas de Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Despite safety warnings on serious adverse effects and guidance advising discontinuation, antipsychotic use in nursing homes remains high. Studies documenting the barriers experienced to antipsychotic discontinuation are rare. This exploratory study investigates the willingness of nurses and general practitioners (GPs) as well as the barriers to undertake antipsychotic discontinuation. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed-method study involving an expert meeting, followed by a survey using structured questionnaires distributed to responsible nurses (primary caregivers) and treating GPs on selected nursing home residents in Belgian nursing homes to generate case-specific information. RESULTS: Antipsychotic users (n = 113) had a mean age of 81 years (range 57-97); 62% were female and 81% had moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Nurses and GPs indicated a willingness for antipsychotic discontinuation in a small proportion of residents, 13.8% and 12.2%, respectively, with a shared willingness in only 4.2%. Residents for whom there was a higher willingness to try antipsychotic discontinuation were generally older (mean age 84.6 vs. 80.3, p = 0.07), had high physical dependency (ADL > 14, 93.3% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.01) and resided on a ward with controlled access (80.0% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.02). In contrast, residents for whom there was a significant lower willingness for discontinuation already had a previously failed discontinuation effort, and may present risk of harm to themselves or to others. Nurses working longer on the ward, with lower education, presented higher barriers to discontinuation of antipsychotics. CONCLUSION: Nurses and GPs share a very low willingness and high barriers to antipsychotic discontinuation. To implement discontinuation programs, complex multidisciplinary interventions should be offered taking existing barriers into account.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Casas de Saúde , Suspensão de Tratamento , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem , Padrões de Prática MédicaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Non-adherence to chronic medication remains an important problem with vast consequences and without solutions to date. Nurses are well positioned to provide adherence care, yet currently represent an underutilised force in improving adherence and outcomes. This review aims to synthesise the effect of nurse-led interventions on adherence to chronic medication. METHODS: Using Review Manager software, a meta-analysis was conducted. The search term medication adherence was combined with random* and nurse in PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge. Retrieved articles' reference lists were hand searched. Included were randomised controlled trials on nurse-led interventions, aiming to improve chronic medication adherence. Articles were to be in English and published from 2006 to 2011. Quality was assessed using an adapted version of the CONSORT tool. RESULTS: Ten studies met the selection criteria, seven of which were on HIV-positive patients. Their quality was acceptable to high. Counselling was the intervention most frequently assessed, mostly given face-to-face, but also in groups and via electronic messages. All interventions enhanced adherence. Of the five studies reporting adherence as mean percentage of adherence, pooled mean differences were +5.39 (1.70-9.07) (short term) and +9.49 (4.68-14.30) (long term), favouring the intervention groups. Of the studies reporting adherence dichotomously, odd's ratios were 1.55 (1.04-2.29) (short term) and 1.87 (1.35-2.61) (long term). The longer counselling was effectuated, the better the results. CONCLUSIONS: Counselling appears to be an effective approach that nurses can use to supplement other methods, building a multifaceted strategy to enhance adherence. Tackling non-adherence seems to demand continuous efforts and follow-up.