Early recovery patterns of olfactory disorders in COVID-19 patients; a clinical cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: A rapidly evolving evidence suggests that smell dysfunction is a common symptom in COVID-19 infection with paucity of data on its duration and recovery rate. OBJECTIVES: Delineate the different patterns of olfactory disorders recovery in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This cross-sectional cohort study included 96 patients with olfactory complaint confirmed to be COVID-19 positive with recent onset of anosmia. All patients were inquired for smell recovery patterns using self-assessment questionnaires. RESULTS: Ninety six patients completed the study with mean age 34.26 ±â€¯11.91 years. Most patients had sudden anosmia 83%. Loss of smell was accompanied by nonspecific inflammatory symptoms as low-grade fever (17%) and generalized body ache (25%). Nasal symptoms were reported by 33% of patients. Some patients reported comorbidities as D.M (16%), hypertension (8%) or associated allergic rhinitis (25%), different patterns of olfactory recovery showed 32 patients experiencing full recovery (33.3%) while, 40 patients showed partial recovery (41.7%) after a mean of 11 days while 24 patients (25%) showed no recovery within one month from onset of anosmia. CONCLUSION: The sudden olfactory dysfunction is a common symptom in patients with COVID-19. Hyposmia patients recover more rapidly than anosmic ones while the middle age group carried the best prognosis in olfactory recovery. Females possess better potentiality in regaining smell after recovery and the association of comorbidities worsen the recovery rate of olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b a cross-sectional cohort study.

Endoscopic Management of Chronic Frontal Sinusitis: Prospective Quality of Life Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery have been primarily retrospective and focused on symptom relief only. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the impact of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery on frontal sinus ostium patency and disease-specific quality of life as measured by the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI). STUDY DESIGN: A 60-patient cohort with chronic frontal sinusitis (100 diseased frontal sinuses) was prospectively evaluated using the RSDI, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and endoscopic examination. Image-guided endoscopic frontal sinusotomy (Draf 2a) was performed in each case. Patients were assessed with RSDI and endoscopic assessment at least 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 10 months, endoscopic assessment revealed patent frontal recesses in 90 of 100 frontal sinuses (90%), with significant improvement in the total RSDI score (41.98 ± 26.48 preoperatively to 17.15 ± 15.66 postoperatively) as well as each of its physical, emotional, and functional subscales from 16.3 ± 9.03, 12.23 ± 10.55, 13.45 ± 9.59 preoperatively to 5.95 ± 5.71, 5.55 ± 5.66, 5.65 ± 5.72 postoperatively, respectively. Similar improvement was seen in patients with asthma, polyps, and those undergoing revision sinus surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: With frontal recess mucosal preservation and meticulous postoperative endoscopic surveillance, endoscopic frontal sinusotomy results in high rates of frontal sinus ostium patency with significant improvement in quality of life.

Crooked Nose: Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes.

Purpose: To highlight a detailed analysis of aesthetic and functional rhinoplasty outcomes utilizing the most recent highly validated Standardized Cosmesis Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Middle Eastern crooked nose patients. Methods: A longitudinal cohort study scrutinizing preoperative rhinoplasty patients' satisfaction retrospectively and their postoperative outcomes prospectively. The patients fulfilled the Arabic SCHNOS during postoperative follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative responses were recorded and then reviewed and analyzed. Results: This study included 41 patients with a mean age of 27.8 years. Females represented 41.5% of patients. About 73% of patients had a history of trauma. 90% of patients underwent primary procedures for crooked nose correction. Twelve patients (29.3%) underwent surgery for functional reasons, and twenty-six (63.4%) had it for both aesthetic and functional issues. There was a statistically significant difference regarding changes in SCHNOS regarding nasal obstruction scores (SCHNOS-O) and nasal cosmesis scores (SCHNOS-C) (p < 0.001). These findings coincided with a substantial reduction of all SCHNOS items postoperatively (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between changes in (SCHNOS-O) or (SCHNOS-C) pre-and postoperatively and either age, sex, history of trauma, or type of surgery. However, a statistically significant difference was detected when assessing the relationship between changes in SCHNOS-O and the reason for surgery. Conclusion: A thorough knowledge of three-dimensional pathology and time-associated changes is required to achieve optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes for crooked nose patients. The use of highly validated questionnaires like SCHNOS in clinical practice is highly encouraged to modify and trace surgical techniques to the most appropriate and successful ones for the patients.

Arabic translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the BDDQ-AS for rhinoplasty patients.

BACKGROUND: Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is a significant aspect that compromises patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty. BDDQ-AS (Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire-Aesthetic Surgery) is a validated, simple, reliable patient-reported outcome measure. It is a screening tool to detect body dysmorphic disorder in rhinoplasty patients. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate BDDQ-AS to Arabic as a novel tool for screening and detecting BDD in Arabic rhinoplasty individuals. METHODS: BDDQ-AS was translated from English to Arabic following the international consensus guidelines. We tested the translation on ten Arabic-speaking rhinoplasty patients to ensure that the final version was understandable and acceptable. The proposed Arabic version was then completed by 112 patients whose average age was 28.79 ± 9.32 years. The screening is assumed positive if the patients expressed bother and preoccupation about their appearance (questions 1 and 2 "yes"), as well as a moderately disrupted everyday life (question 7 "yes" or questions 3, 4, 5, or 6 are equal to or greater than "3''). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and item-response theory (IRT) were used to evaluate psychometric validations. RESULTS: The Arabic BDDQ had a high level of internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha 0.995. The A-BDDQ-AS was deemed reliable with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.989. A-BDDQ had good discrimination scores (above 2.0) with adequate difficulty parameters. The overall scale content validity average was 0.83, affirming that all items were relevant, clear, and straightforward. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the BDDQ-AS is reliable, culturally adapted, and psychometrically validated to be readily used and incorporated into clinical practice. It is a beneficial tool that can guide the screening of Arabic rhinoplasty patients suffering from body dysmorphic disorder and be utilized in further studies to optimize patient outcomes.

Invasive fungal rhinosinusitis associated with COVID-19: Course changes and prognosis predictors.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the behavior of acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS) associated with COVID-19 infection as there has been an increase in the rate of AIFRS cases in the last two years, and many reports connected this rising with the COVID-19 infection. We studied most factors that may impact the prognosis as a trial to find the most affecting factors to improve the outcomes. METHODS: It was a retrospective observational study that included cases from four tertiary referral institutions between November 2020 to February 2022. We included sixty-six patients who suffered from AIFRS associated with confirmed COVID-19. We observed the prognosis of all included patients with a six-month follow-up. We correlated the prognosis with many factors, such as demographic data, medical conditions, blood investigations, the features of fungal infections, and management. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (64%) survived after the AIFRS associated with COVID-19, and twenty-two patients (36%) died. High doses of corticosteroids with prolonged use were the main factors that affected the behavior of the AIFRS associated with COVID-19. HbA1c was a good predictor of the prognosis; a level less than 9.35% may indicate survival with 87.5% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: According to this multi-center study, the mortality of the AIFRS associated with COVID-19 was high. The behavior was affected by glycemic control, the type of fungal species, and the type of antifungal therapy. Early surgical debridement, a combination of Amphotericin B with Voriconazole, and anticoagulants helped improve the prognosis.

Mitomycin C-enhanced revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To conduct an adequately powered randomized controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of mitomycin C-enhanced revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and (2) to analyze causes of failure after primary endoscopic DCR. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled study. SETTING: General hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six revision endoscopic DCRs were randomized into 2 groups: endoscopic DCR with mitomycin (group I), where 0.5 mg/mL mitomycin C was applied for 10 minutes, and endoscopic DCR without mitomycin (group II). Follow-up settings were done to document the patient's subjective improvement, to judge ostium patency on irrigation, and to record any complications. RESULTS: Causes of failure in the original 92 patients included canalicular obstruction (14%), small misplaced bony window (43%), very small nasolacrimal stoma due to development of synechia (23%), and complete closure of nasolacrimal stoma with tough fibrous tissue (63%). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in subjective and objective success rates and adverse events. Group I demonstrated a significantly longer operative time and a significantly lower number of debridement sessions (mean of 1.2 vs 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent nasolacrimal duct obstruction after primary endoscopic DCR is mainly due to reclosure of the nasolacrimal stoma with synechia and fashioning of the small misplaced bony window. Mitomycin C does not increase the success rate of revision endoscopic DCR. It is a safe procedure and may be of value only in patients inaccessible to strict follow-up because it induces a better healing profile in terms of mucosal recovery, wound healing, and less need for debridement sessions.