Treatment of multidirectionally unstable supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A modified Gartland type-IV fracture.

BACKGROUND: There is an uncommon subset of supracondylar humeral fractures in children that are so unstable they can displace into both flexion and extension. The purposes of this study were to describe this subset of supracondylar fractures and to report a new technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for their treatment. METHODS: In a retrospective review of 297 consecutive displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children treated operatively at our institution, we identified nine that were completely unstable with documented displacement into both flexion and extension as seen on fluoroscopic examination with the patient under anesthesia. We used a new technique for closed reduction and fixation of these fractures, and then we assessed fracture-healing and complications from the injury and treatment. RESULTS: All nine fractures were treated satisfactorily with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. The complication rate associated with these unstable fractures was no higher than that associated with the 288 more stable fractures. Seven of the nine fractures were stabilized with lateral entry pin placement, and two fractures were stabilized with crossed medial and lateral pins. None of the patients had a nonunion, cubitus varus, malunion, additional surgery, or loss of motion. CONCLUSIONS: In rare supracondylar fractures in children, multidirectional instability results in displacement into flexion and/or extension. This fracture can be classified as type IV according to the Gartland system, as it is less stable than a Gartland type-III extension supracondylar fracture. These fractures can be treated successfully with a new technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, thus avoiding open reduction.

Access to orthopedic care for children with medicaid versus private insurance in California.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the availability of timely orthopedic care to a child with a fractured arm insured by Medi-Cal (California state Medicaid) and by private insurance. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty randomly chosen offices of orthopedic surgeons were telephoned with the following scenario: "My 10-year-old son broke his arm last week during a vacation" followed by a request for an appointment that week. Each office was called twice with an identical script except for insurance status: once with Medi-Cal and once with private insurance. RESULTS: All 50 offices offered an appointment to see the child with private insurance within 7 days. Only 1 of the same 50 offices offered an appointment to see the child with Medi-Cal within 7 days. Of the offices that would not see a child with Medi-Cal, 87% were unable to recommend an orthopedic office that accepted Medi-Cal. CONCLUSIONS: Timely access to orthopedic care was available in 100% of offices polled to a child with private insurance versus in 2% of offices to a child with Medi-Cal. This is a significant difference. Lack of timely orthopedic care may result in poor outcome, ie, if a fracture is not properly aligned in the first few weeks, a permanent deformity may result. Although causation cannot be established from this study, we suspect that Medi-Cal reimbursement rates below the cost of office overhead may be of significance. Although federal guidelines require that payments must be sufficient to enlist enough providers so that services to Medi-Cal recipients are available to the same extent as those available to the general population, this study finds that that children with Medi-Cal insurance have significantly less access to timely orthopedic care.