Use of extended-release and immediate-release anti-seizure medications with a long half-life to improve adherence in epilepsy: A guide for clinicians.

Poor adherence to anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is associated with breakthrough seizures and potentially increased toxicity in patients with epilepsy. Extended-release (ER) drugs and immediate-release (IR) drugs with a long half-life (t1/2) that permit once-daily dosing (such as, perampanel, zonisamide, lamotrigine [IR, ER] and topiramate [ER]) have a number of advantages over short t1/2 ASMs that require multiple daily dosing. These advantages include simplification of dosing regimens, reduction in pill burden, and a decrease in the peak-to-trough fluctuations in serum drug concentration that may be associated with a decreased risk of adverse effects and seizures. Such properties have wider implications in improving patient adherence to treatment. This article is intended as a practical guide for clinicians that provides an overview of the features of ER ASMs and long t1/2 IR ASMs that are advantageous in the context of patient adherence and pharmacokinetic "forgiveness" (after missing a dose). In addition, we note that efforts to improve adherence should not depend solely on drug dosing regimens and drug pharmacokinetics, but should be part of a wider strategy that includes therapeutic drug monitoring, improved healthcare provider-patient dialogue, patient education, and the use of "reminder" technology.

Changes in perampanel levels during de-induction: Simulations following carbamazepine discontinuation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time course of changes in perampanel levels when co-administered with carbamazepine, and following carbamazepine discontinuation, using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. METHODS: The PBPK model was developed, verified using clinical PK data, and used to simulate the effect of abrupt discontinuation and down-titration (75 mg twice daily [bid]/wk) of co-administered carbamazepine 300 mg bid on the PK of perampanel once daily (qd). Perampanel dose tapering (8-4 mg) and up-titration (2-6 mg) were simulated during abrupt carbamazepine 300 mg bid discontinuation to identify a titration schedule that minimizes changes in perampanel plasma concentrations. RESULTS: The PBPK model accurately reproduced perampanel plasma concentration-time profiles from clinical studies in single- and multiple-dose regimen simulations, including multiple-dose carbamazepine co-administration. The time course of return to pre-induced perampanel levels occurred more slowly following carbamazepine down-titration (~48 days after first down-titration) vs abrupt discontinuation (~25 days). Perampanel dose tapering (8-4 mg) at abrupt carbamazepine discontinuation produced minimal changes in steady-state concentrations, which returned to the levels observed during carbamazepine co-administration in ~15 days from the time of carbamazepine discontinuation. When perampanel was up-titrated in the presence of carbamazepine, return to steady state occurred more slowly when carbamazepine was down-titrated weekly (~45 days) vs abrupt discontinuation (~24 days). CONCLUSION: This PBPK model simulated and predicted optimal perampanel dose tapering and up-titration schedules for maintaining perampanel levels during conversion to monotherapy. These results may guide physicians when managing conversion from perampanel polytherapy with concomitant enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications to monotherapy.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions of avatrombopag when coadministered with dual or selective CYP2C9 and CYP3A interacting drugs.

AIMS: Avatrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and CYP3A. We assessed three drug-drug interactions of avatrombopag as a victim with dual or selective CYP2C9/3A inhibitors and inducers. METHODS: This was a three-part, open-label study. Forty-eight healthy subjects received single 20 mg doses of avatrombopag alone or with one of 3 CYP2C9/3A inhibitors or inducers: fluconazole 400 mg once daily for 16 days, itraconazole 200 mg twice daily on Day 1 and 200 mg once daily on Days 2-16, or rifampicin 600 mg once daily for 16 days. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (platelet count) and safety of avatrombopag were evaluated. RESULTS: Coadministration of a single 20-mg dose of avatrombopag with fluconazole at steady-state resulted in 2.16-fold increase of AUC of avatrombopag, prolonged terminal elimination phase half-life (from 19.7 h to 39.9 h) and led to a clinically significant increase in maximum platelet count (1.66-fold). Itraconazole had a mild increase on both avatrombopag pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics compared to fluconazole. Coadministration of rifampicin caused a 0.5-fold decrease in AUC and shortened terminal elimination phase half-life (from 20.3 h to 9.84 h), but has no impact on maximum platelet count. Coadministration with interacting drugs was found to be generally safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The results from coadministration of fluconazole or itraconazole suggest that CYP2C9 plays a more predominant role in metabolic clearance of avatrombopag than CYP3A. To achieve comparable platelet count increases when avatrombopag is coadministered with CYP3A and CYP2C9 inhibitors, an adjustment in the dose or duration of treatment is recommended, while coadministration with strong inducers is not currently recommended.

Impact of perampanel on pharmacokinetics of concomitant antiepileptics in patients with partial-onset seizures: pooled analysis of clinical trials.

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of perampanel and demographics on clearance of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures. METHODS: Pooled data from three Phase III clinical studies with adjunctive perampanel were used. Blood samples for evaluation of 11 concomitant AEDs were taken during baseline (before perampanel initiation), and at weeks 10, 14, and 19 during the maintenance phase of perampanel treatment (2-12 mg/day, once daily at bedtime). Models estimating apparent clearance of each concomitant AED were fitted to the data, and the effects of perampanel and demographic variables on clearance were determined. Final models were assessed with goodness of fit plots including population predictions and individual predictions against observations. RESULTS: No significant impact of perampanel on clearance was found for clonazepam (n = 81), levetiracetam (n = 330), phenobarbital (n = 54), phenytoin (n = 90), topiramate (n = 226) or zonisamide (n = 93). Statistically significant, but small and not clinically relevant increases in model-predicted clearance were detected for carbamazepine (+4.3% with 12 mg perampanel; n = 379), clobazam (+3.4% males, +7.7% females, 12 mg; n = 114), lamotrigine (+9.3%, 12 mg; n = 356), and valproic acid (+5.0%, 12 mg; n = 349). Oxcarbazepine clearance was reduced (26%; n = 200), but the clinical relevance is unclear as levels of the active metabolite (the monohydroxy derivative of oxcarbazepine) were not measured. CONCLUSIONS: Population PK data show that perampanel (2-12 mg/day, once daily at bedtime) has no relevant impact on the clearance of the most commonly used concomitant AEDs.

The practical impact of altered dosing on perampanel plasma concentrations: pharmacokinetic modeling from clinical studies.

RATIONALE: Perampanel is a selective AMPA receptor antagonist approved for adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures. Perampanel is metabolized primarily via CYP3A4, yet it has a relatively long half-life of 105h; it is, therefore, recommended that perampanel be given once daily (preferably at bedtime). Many patients occasionally have less-than-perfect adherence to their drug regimen, and given the known pharmacokinetic interactions of perampanel with commonly used enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs), we explored the effects of a missed dose on steady-state perampanel plasma concentrations and the ramifications of "make up" doses in these patients. Although perampanel is approved for once-daily dosing, some clinicians may elect to give perampanel as a divided dose (i.e., twice daily), so we also sought to examine the pharmacokinetic impact of twice- versus once-daily dosing. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic simulations were performed using validated perampanel pharmacokinetic parameters, derived from 19 phase I studies in 606 subjects, to investigate the effect on perampanel plasma concentration of (1) missing a dose of perampanel followed by delayed replacement of the missed dose, (2) missing a dose followed by resumption of scheduled therapy, and (3) missing a dose in the presence/absence of carbamazepine. Simulations were done for a typical patient receiving an 8-mg once-daily or a 4-mg twice-daily dose using the nonlinear mixed effects program, NONMEM v7.2, in conjunction with PDx-pop v5. RESULTS: Our results corroborate that given the pharmacokinetic characteristics of perampanel, a missed dose is unlikely to cause as much fluctuation in plasma concentration as would be expected for a drug with a short half-life. Importantly, simulations suggest that supplementing a missed dose 6-12h later, followed by continuation of the regular schedule, may not result in any significant "spikes" in perampanel plasma concentrations. Simulations demonstrated that twice-daily dosing offered little advantage in further flattening the concentration-time profile of perampanel in the adherent patient. However, fluctuations in plasma concentrations are minimized by twice-daily dosing in patients receiving concomitant EIAEDs. CONCLUSIONS: These pharmacokinetic simulations suggest that the long half-life of perampanel may be advantageous in conferring a relatively smooth concentration-time profile with a once-daily or twice-daily dosing, even in the presence of concomitant EIAEDs. However, the results of the present study suggest that perampanel replacement is recommended for patients taking an EIAED to mitigate the potential risks associated with reduced exposure. Confirmation of the ultimate clinical impact of these findings will require further study.

Concentration-effect relationships with perampanel in patients with pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures.

PURPOSE: Although there is a general paucity of published pharmacokinetic (PK) data for new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), PK analyses of pooled data from clinical studies of perampanel have recently been presented. We present PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses of pooled data from phase III studies of perampanel describing efficacy and safety as a function of exposure, in order to determine whether a predictable concentration-effect relationship exists for perampanel efficacy and/or adverse events (AEs). The effects of concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs (EIAEDs) and non-enzyme-inducing AEDs on the exposure, efficacy, and safety of perampanel are also considered. METHODS: Three multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III studies investigated the efficacy and safety of perampanel 2-12 mg in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures despite prior therapy with two or more AEDs. From baseline onward, patients also received ongoing treatment with stable doses of one to three approved concomitant AEDs. AEs were monitored throughout the studies. Changes from baseline in seizure frequency and 50% responder rates were evaluated. Exposure to perampanel was predicted based on the actual (last) dose using a previously established PK model. A population PK/PD model for the relationship between perampanel exposure and seizure frequency was estimated using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling with first-order conditional estimation, whereas logistic analyses for responder rate and AEs were performed using SAS analysis software. KEY FINDINGS: The PK/PD population included 1,109 patients. Seizure frequency decreased linearly as predicted perampanel average steady-state plasma concentrations increased. Concomitant EIAEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and phenytoin) reduced exposure to perampanel but had no effect on the slope of the PD model-predicted relationship between exposure and reduction in seizure frequency. The probability of patients achieving a response was predicted to increase as perampanel average plasma concentration at steady state increased. No demographic, AED, region, or study covariate had any effect on the probability of achieving a positive treatment response to perampanel or on the slope of the exposure-response curve. Across the phase III studies, there were reports of dizziness (32.9%), somnolence (21.7%), fatigue (13.9%), irritability (12.3%), gait disturbance (9.1%), weight increase (6.1%), dysarthria (4.5%), and euphoric mood (0.5%); the model-predicted probability of these AEs increased significantly at higher exposure to perampanel (all p < 0.001). There was no effect of demographic variables or region on the probability of experiencing any of the AEs analyzed. SIGNIFICANCE: PK and PD analyses have played a pivotal role in the clinical development of perampanel as an adjunctive treatment for pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures. Phase III data suggest that a significant relationship exists between increases in perampanel plasma concentration (i.e., systemic exposure) and reductions in seizure frequency. In addition, increases in perampanel plasma concentration may potentially be associated with increases in AE rates. The model-predicted concentration-safety profile of perampanel does not appear to be affected by patient age, gender, or ethnicity. Although concomitant EIAEDs may influence perampanel PK, they do not appear to alter the relationship between perampanel plasma concentration and seizure frequency. Understanding these relationships between perampanel plasma concentration and clinical response will be valuable in utilizing this novel AED.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of the Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist Lemborexant: Findings From Single-Dose and Multiple-Ascending-Dose Phase 1 Studies in Healthy Adults.

Lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, is approved for the treatment of insomnia and is under investigation for treating other sleep disorders. Here we summarize pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety data from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 studies: single ascending doses in healthy adults (Study 001; 1-200 mg; N = 64), multiple ascending doses in healthy and elderly adults (Study 002; 2.5-75 mg; N = 55), and multiple doses in healthy white and Japanese adults (Study 003; 2.5-25 mg; N = 32). Lemborexant exposure increased with increasing dose. The time to maximum concentration ranged from approximately 1 to 3 hours for the 5- and 10-mg doses. The mean effective half-life was 17 hours for lemborexant 5 mg and 19 hours for lemborexant 10 mg. The plasma concentration at 9 hours postdose was 27% of the maximum concentration following multiple dosing with lemborexant 10 mg. There were no clinically relevant effects on next-morning residual sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, Digital Symbol Substitution Test, Psychomotor Vigilance Test) for doses through 10 mg/day, indicating no effect of residual plasma concentrations on next-day residual effects. Lemborexant was well tolerated across the doses tested. There were no clinically relevant effects of age, sex, or race on lemborexant pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, or safety. These results suggest that lemborexant at doses through 25 mg provides an overall pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profile suitable for obtaining the target pharmacologic effect supporting treatment of insomnia while minimizing residual effects during wake time.

Evaluation of the Effect of 5 QT-Positive Drugs on the JTpeak Interval - An Analysis of ECGs From the IQ-CSRC Study.

The JTpeak interval has been proposed as a new biomarker to demonstrate mixed ion channel effects, potentially leading to reduced late-stage electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring for mildly QT-prolonging drugs. ECG waveforms from the IQ-CSRC study were used. Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled with 6 subjects on placebo and 9 subjects on each of 5 mildly QT-prolonging drugs - moxifloxacin, dofetilide, ondansetron, dolasetron, and quinine - and 1 negative drug, levocetirizine. A vector magnitude lead was derived from 12-lead ECGs, and measurements were made on a median beat from three 10-second replicates. Data were analyzed using a linear concentration-response model with QTcF and heart rate corrected JTpeak (JTpeak_c) as dependent variables. For moxifloxacin, dofetilide, and ondansetron, all pure hERG blockers, slopes of the concentration (C)-QTcF and C-JTpeak_c relationships were positive and statistically significant. With the prespecified linear model, the predicted effects on ΔΔQTcF and ΔΔJTpeak_c were 11.4 and 9.4 milliseconds for moxifloxacin at the geometric mean Cmax on day 1, 9.0 and 11.7 milliseconds for dofetilide and 11.5, and 7.9 milliseconds for ondansetron, respectively. In contrast, dolasetron and quinine, both with additional ion channel effects, prolonged QTcF with a positive C-ΔQTcF slope and predicted ΔΔQTcF effect on day 1 of 6.2 and 11.4 milliseconds, whereas the C-ΔJTpeak_c slope and the predicted ΔΔJTpeak on day 1 were negative (-0.3 and -7.5 milliseconds per ng/mL). Pure hERG-blocking drugs prolonged both the QTc and the JTpeak_c intervals, whereas drugs with mixed ion channel effects, including peak sodium inhibition, prolonged QTcF but not the JTpeak_c interval.

Potential protein-binding displacement interactions with perampanel: An in vitro analysis.

Plasma protein binding and effects on volume of distribution and pharmacologically active, circulating-drug concentrations are complex issues. Protein-binding displacement often underlies drug-drug interactions. Perampanel is a once-daily oral anti-seizure drug for focal seizures and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Perampanel is also indicated for monotherapy use for focal seizures in the United States. Perampanel is extensively but slowly metabolized via CYP3A4. Its elimination t½ is about 100 h, and it displays substantial plasma protein binding (>95%). Here, we examine perampanel's potential to displace highly bound anti-seizure drugs and the ability of warfarin, a standard highly protein-bound drug, to displace perampanel. Protein binding of perampanel, phenytoin, valproate, and warfarin was assessed using equilibrium dialysis. Plasma samples containing each compound were dialyzed against phosphate buffered saline. For phenytoin, valproate, and warfarin, plasma samples were also dialyzed in the presence of perampanel. After 24 h equilibrium dialysis, amounts of test compounds were analyzed to calculate plasma protein binding. At clinically relevant concentrations, perampanel did not displace other highly bound drugs or vice versa. Protein-binding displacement may confound therapeutic drug monitoring of extensively protein-bound medications. Without empirical data, clinicians might be concerned that addition of perampanel could alter unbound concentrations of other medications, resulting in adverse effects. Our data indicate perampanel has low potential for drug interactions resulting from protein-binding displacement.

Adjunctive Perampanel Oral Suspension in Pediatric Patients From ≥2 to <12 Years of Age With Epilepsy: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy.

Study 232, an open-label pilot study with an extension phase, evaluated the pharmacokinetics and preliminary safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel oral suspension (≤0.18 mg/kg/d) in epilepsy patients aged ≥2 to <12 years. Patients were grouped into cohorts 1 (aged ≥7 to <12 years) and 2 (aged ≥2 to <7 years). The Core Study included pretreatment (≤2 weeks) and treatment phases (7-week titration; 4-week maintenance; 4-week follow-up [for those not entering the extension]). The extension phase consisted of 41-week maintenance and 4-week follow-up periods. Pharmacokinetic data were pooled with adolescent pharmacokinetic data from phase II/III studies. Population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that perampanel pharmacokinetics was independent of age, weight, or liver function, suggesting age- or weight-based dosing is not required and that the same dose can be given to adults and children to achieve exposures shown to be efficacious. Perampanel was well tolerated and efficacious for ≤52 weeks.

Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analyses of Avatrombopag in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Optimal Dose Adjustment Guide With Concomitantly Administered CYP3A and CYP2C9 Inhibitors.

Avatrombopag, a c-Mpl agonist, has been developed to provide an alternative therapy to standard platelet transfusion care for the treatment of thrombocytopenia. The main objectives of this article were to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of avatrombopag, to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship between plasma avatrombopag concentrations and platelet count, and to identify potential intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting PK or PK/PD in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Platelet count following avatrombopag administration with and without concomitant medication was further simulated using the final population PK/PD model to explore potential dose adjustments. Avatrombopag PK was described by a 1-compartment model with combined first- and zero-order absorption and linear elimination. The relationship between the plasma avatrombopag concentrations and platelet count was well described by a 6-compartment life-span model with a linear drug effect. The final PK and PK/PD models included statistically significant but not clinically relevant effects of body weight and CLD on apparent volume distribution and East Asian ethnicity, albumin, and thrombopoietin level on the slope parameter in the PK/PD relationship. PK/PD simulations showed comparable elevation in platelet count with and without concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and CYP2C9 inhibitors for the dosing regimens of 40 and 60 mg for 5 days, with predictions of <10% of CLD patients exceeding platelet count >200 × 109 /L. Dose adjustment is therefore not necessary with concomitant use of CYP3A and CYP2C9 interacting drugs considering the limited treatment duration (ie, 5 days) and lack of significant safety concerns in CLD patients.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacogenomics, Safety, and Tolerability of Avatrombopag in Healthy Japanese and White Subjects.

Avatrombopag, an orally administered, small-molecule thrombopoietin receptor (c-Mpl) agonist, is currently in clinical development for the potential treatment of severe thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing an elective procedure. The objectives of this study were to characterize and compare the pharmacokinetics (including the food effect) and pharmacodynamics (platelet count) of avatrombopag following single doses in Japanese and white subjects. Following single dosing under fasted and fed conditions, mean peak concentrations occurred at 5 to 8 hours and subsequently declined with a half-life of 16 to 18 hours in Japanese and white subjects. Administration with food did not alter the rate or extent of avatrombopag absorption but substantially reduced pharmacokinetic variability relative to the fasted state. CYP2C9 polymorphism (*2, *3) was associated with higher pharmacokinetic variability but not with any clinically important effect on variability in platelet response. Plasma exposures of avatrombopag increased in a dose-proportional manner over the dose range tested. After a single dose, platelet count increased in a dose-related manner, reaching a maximum by day 11 and returning to baseline levels by day 27. No clinically important differences were found when avatrombopag pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were compared between Japanese and white subjects. Administration of avatrombopag was generally well tolerated.

Exposure-response analysis and simulation of lenvatinib safety and efficacy in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: Once-daily lenvatinib 24 mg is the approved dose for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. In a phase 3 trial with lenvatinib, the starting dose of 24 mg was associated with a relatively high incidence of adverse events that required dose reductions. We used an exposure-response model to investigate the risk-benefit of different dosing regimens for lenvatinib. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics modeling analysis was used to simulate the potential benefit of lower starting doses to retain efficacy with improved safety. The seven lenvatinib regimens tested were: 24 mg; and 20 mg, 18 mg, and 14 mg, all with or without up-titration to 24 mg. Exposure-response models for efficacy and safety were created using a 24-week time course. RESULTS: The approved dose of lenvatinib at 24 mg, predicted the best efficacy. However, the lenvatinib dosing regimens of 14 mg with up-titration or 18 mg without up-titration potentially provides comparable efficacy (objective response rate at 24 weeks) and a better safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with lenvatinib at starting doses lower than the approved once-daily 24 mg dose could provide comparable antitumor efficacy and a similar or better safety profile. Based on the results from this modeling and simulation study, a comparator dose of lenvatinib 18 mg without up-titration was selected for evaluation in a clinical trial.

Effect of enzyme inhibition on perampanel pharmacokinetics: Why study design matters.

OBJECTIVES: Perampanel, a selective, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist, is indicated as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in patients with epilepsy aged 12years and older. In vitro studies and Phase I trials indicate that perampanel is metabolized almost exclusively by CYP3A, with an elimination half-life (t1/2) averaging approximately 105h. Understanding of pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions-enzyme inhibition or induction-and anticipating their occurrence are important for management of patients with epilepsy. Here we report PK results from a Phase I drug-drug interaction (DDI) study (Study 005) combining perampanel with the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole, as well as supplementary in silico predictions further exploring this interaction. METHODS: A Phase I, randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, two-way crossover study was conducted in 26 healthy adult male volunteers. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences. In one period, subjects received a single 1-mg fasting dose of perampanel (Day1); in the other period, subjects received ketoconazole 400mg once daily for 10days with a single 1-mg perampanel dose while fasting (Day3). Blood samples were drawn at multiple time points up to 288h after the perampanel dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters of perampanel were calculated by noncompartmental analysis, and safety was recorded. An integrated, physiologically based PK model built in Simcyp® provided additional insight into this interaction. Drug-drug interaction intensity was measured by the ratio of systemic exposure (area under plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of perampanel in the presence or absence of concomitant ketoconazole. RESULTS: Single oral doses of 1mg perampanel and once-daily oral doses of ketoconazole 400mg were safe and well tolerated. Maximum perampanel plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax showed no apparent differences when perampanel was administered alone versus with ketoconazole. Ketoconazole co-administration resulted in an approximate 20% increase in perampanel AUC (P<0.001). This increase, although statistically significant, was a<2.0-fold AUC change and alone would suggest a modest effect of ketoconazole. To further explore these results, DDI simulations were performed to query the findings and test additional study conditions. Using the actual trial conditions of Study 005, the simulations also predicted an AUC ratio increase <2-fold, providing verification of the simulation assumptions and the modest effect of ketoconazole for 10days. Simulations further suggested that an interaction effect of ketoconazole on perampanel exposure (>2-fold) of potential clinical significance could be predicted when using larger doses of ketoconazole (e.g., 200mg every 6h) coadministered for a greater time period (e.g., 30days), with AUC ratio as high as 3.36. Additionally, simulations suggested that a significant interaction with co-administration of perampanel and an inhibitor more potent than ketoconazole (such as itraconazole) could not be ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: Selecting an appropriate study design is critical to fully characterize the PK interaction for drugs such as perampanel that have a long t1/2. Although a negligible effect on perampanel PK was observed following co-administration of ketoconazole 400mg/day for 10days, this is likely due in part to the relatively brief co-administration period of ketoconazole and perampanel (<3 times the t1/2 of perampanel). While short-term administration of a CYP3A inhibitor may not significantly increase perampanel exposure, such increases may be expected following chronic and larger dosing or with a more potent inhibitor.

Reducing placebo exposure in trials: Considerations from the Research Roundtable in Epilepsy.

The randomized controlled trial is the unequivocal gold standard for demonstrating clinical efficacy and safety of investigational therapies. Recently there have been concerns raised about prolonged exposure to placebo and ineffective therapy during the course of an add-on regulatory trial for new antiepileptic drug approval (typically ∼6 months in duration), due to the potential risks of continued uncontrolled epilepsy for that period. The first meeting of the Research Roundtable in Epilepsy on May 19-20, 2016, focused on "Reducing placebo exposure in epilepsy clinical trials," with a goal of considering new designs for epilepsy regulatory trials that may be added to the overall development plan to make it, as a whole, safer for participants while still providing rigorous evidence of effect. This topic was motivated in part by data from a meta-analysis showing a 3- to 5-fold increased rate of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in participants randomized to placebo or ineffective doses of new antiepileptic drugs. The meeting agenda included rationale and discussion of different trial designs, including active-control add-on trials, placebo add-on to background therapy with adjustment, time to event designs, adaptive designs, platform trials with pooled placebo control, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach to reducing placebo exposure, and shorter trials when drug tolerance has been ruled out. The merits and limitations of each design were discussed and are reviewed here.

Concentration-Response Modeling of ECG Data From Early-Phase Clinical Studies as an Alternative Clinical and Regulatory Approach to Assessing QT Risk - Experience From the Development Program of Lemborexant.

Lemborexant is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist being developed to treat insomnia. Its potential to cause QT prolongation was evaluated using plasma concentration-response (CR) modeling applied to data from 2 multiple ascending-dose (MAD) studies. In the primary MAD study, placebo or lemborexant (2.5 to 75 mg) was administered for 14 consecutive nights. In another MAD study designed to "bridge" pharmacokinetic and safety data between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects (J-MAD), placebo or lemborexant (2.5, 10, or 25 mg) was administered for 14 consecutive nights. QT intervals were estimated using a high-precision measurement technique and evaluated using a linear mixed-effects CR model, for each study separately and for the pooled data set. When each study was analyzed separately, the slopes of the CR relationship were shallow and not statistically significant. In the pooled analysis, the slope of the CR relationship was -0.00002 milliseconds per ng/mL (90%CI, -0.01019 to 0.01014 milliseconds). The highest observed Cmax was 400 ng/mL, representing a margin 8-fold above exposures expected for the highest planned clinical dose. The model-predicted QTc effect at 400 ng/mL was 1.1 milliseconds (90%CI, -3.49 to 5.78 milliseconds). In neither the J-MAD study nor the pooled analysis was an effect of race identified. CR modeling of data from early-phase clinical studies, including plasma levels far exceeding those anticipated clinically, indicated that a QT effect >10 milliseconds could be excluded. Regulatory agreement with this methodology demonstrates the effectiveness of a CR modeling approach as an alternative to thorough QT studies.

Single- and Multiple-dose Pharmacokinetics of a Lorcaserin Extended-release Tablet.

PURPOSE: Lorcaserin is a serotonin 2C receptor agonist indicated for chronic weight management as an adjunct to diet and exercise. The initial approved formulation is a 10-mg, immediate-release (IR) tablet for administration BID. These studies investigated the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic properties of a new, recently US Food and Drug Administration-approved, extended-release, 20-mg once-daily formulation. METHODS: We performed 2 separate 2-period, 2-sequence crossover studies in 36 healthy adults: a study comparing the IR formulation to the extended-release formulation under fasting conditions and a study comparing the extended-release formulation under fed and fasted conditions. FINDINGS: Compared with lorcaserin IR, the Tmax after a single dose of lorcaserin extended-release was greater (median, 12 vs 3 hours), and the Cmax was 26% lower (38.8 vs 52.3 ng/mL). AUC data were bioequivalent for the 2 formulations in both single- and multiple-dose regimens, confirming no formulation effect on lorcaserin bioavailability. In fasted and fed conditions, Tmax after a single dose was identical (median, 12 hours), but Cmax was approximately 45% higher in the fed state (mean, 38.5 ng/mL fasted vs 56.1 ng/mL fed). However, at steady state, Cmax and AUC were determined to be bioequivalent between the fasted and fed states, indicating no clinically relevant food effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of lorcaserin extended-release. The safety profile was consistent between the 2 formulations. IMPLICATIONS: Overall, the results indicate that lorcaserin extended-release is a suitable once-daily alternative to the approved IR BID formulation.

Pharmacokinetics, exposure-cognition, and exposure-efficacy relationships of perampanel in adolescents with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize, in adolescents aged 12-17, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of perampanel, the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on PK, and the relationships between perampanel exposure and cognitive function, seizure frequency, and responder status. METHODS: Population PK analysis used plasma concentration data from Phase II study 235 (NCT01161524), in which adolescents with inadequately controlled POS despite treatment with 1-3 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were randomized to receive once daily oral placebo or perampanel (8-12mg/day) for 19 weeks, pooled with data from adolescent patients in perampanel Phase III studies 304, 305, 306. Exposure-cognition and exposure-efficacy relationships were modelled using data from study 235. RESULTS: Population PK results from 152 adolescent patients revealed a perampanel apparent clearance of 0.729L/h, consistent with previous analyses in adolescents and adults. Clearance was increased with coadministration of inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin), and was slightly higher in females. The PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis for cognition (n=110) showed that increasing perampanel exposure had no significant effect on overall cognition, measured by the Cognitive Drug Research global cognition score. The PK/PD analysis for efficacy (n=123) showed a significant decrease in seizure frequency and significant increased probability of being a responder, as perampanel concentration increased - both in the presence and absence of inducing AEDs. Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin reduced perampanel exposure in adolescents, but reduced the magnitude of seizure frequency reduction and responder probability to a lesser extent. SIGNIFICANCE: Pharmacokinetics of perampanel are similar in adolescents to adults. Increasing perampanel exposure reduces seizure frequency and increases probability of being a responder regardless of concomitant inducers. The lack of relationship between perampanel exposure and cognitive function suggests a benign cognitive profile for this AED in adolescents. We await results from long-term exposure.

Absence of Liver Toxicity in Perampanel-Treated Subjects: Pooled results from partial seizure phase III perampanel clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE: The liver plays a major role in the metabolism and elimination of many antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including perampanel. Some of the metabolites identified for perampanel are likely formed via reactive intermediates, which have the potential to covalently bind to protein and cause idiosyncratic toxicities, including hepatotoxicity. The approved AED perampanel is a selective, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist. The safety and tolerability of perampanel have been well documented in 3 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III studies. Here we report the effects of perampanel on liver function in patients from the phase III studies to assess the potential for liver toxicity. METHODS: Following 6-week baseline, patients (≥12 years old) with drug-resistant partial seizures were randomized to once-daily double-blind treatment (6-week titration, 13-week maintenance) with 2, 4, 8, or 12mg perampanel (n=1038) or with placebo (n=442). Clinical laboratory tests for hepatobiliary laboratory parameters were evaluated at baseline and at end of treatment. These included alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and total bilirubin. Treatment-emergent markedly abnormal values (an increase in NCI-CTC grade relative to baseline and a grade ≥2) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to hepatobiliary parameters were also recorded. RESULTS: Mean hepatobiliary values were within normal ranges at baseline and end of treatment for all perampanel groups and placebo. Mean changes from baseline to end of treatment were small. The incidence of markedly abnormal results was very low for perampanel and placebo. TEAEs related to hepatobiliary parameters occurred in 0.4% of perampanel patients and 0% of placebo patients. Hepatobiliary disorders included cholelithiasis (n=3 in perampanel) and abnormal hepatic function (n=1 in perampanel). None of the events were serious or led to perampanel discontinuation. No subject had values that met the criteria for Hy's Law. CONCLUSION: Hepatobiliary laboratory data and related TEAEs were not notably different between perampanel and placebo treatment groups, and no dose-related trends were observed. Based on the laboratory results from the 3 Phase III studies, perampanel (2, 4, 8, and 12mg) demonstrated no clinically important effects on liver function tests, indicating perampanel is an AED with a low potential for drug-induced liver toxicity.

Lack of effect of perampanel on QT interval duration: Results from a thorough QT analysis and pooled partial seizure Phase III clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Perampanel is a selective, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist approved as adjunctive treatment for partial seizures. To assess potential for delayed cardiac repolarization, a Phase I thorough QT study was performed, supplemented by plasma concentration-QT data modeled from 3 pooled Phase III studies. METHODS: The Phase I thorough QT study (double-blind, combined fixed-sequence, parallel-group) quantified the effect of perampanel (6 mg once daily for 7 days, followed by dose escalation to a single 8-mg dose, a single 10-mg dose, then 12 mg once daily for 7 days), moxifloxacin positive control (single 400-mg dose on Day 16), and placebo on QT interval duration in healthy subjects (N = 261). Electrocardiograms were recorded at baseline, Day 7 (post 6 mg dose), and Day 16 (post 12 mg dose). Statistical comparisons were between the highest approved perampanel dose (12 mg) versus placebo, a "mid-therapeutic" dose (6 mg) versus placebo, and moxifloxacin versus placebo. Acknowledging that the Phase I thorough QT study could not incorporate a true "supratherapeutic" dose due to length of titration and tolerability concerns in healthy subjects, Phase III studies of perampanel included expanded electrocardiogram safety evaluations specifically intended to support concentration-QT response modeling. The lack of effect of perampanel on the QT interval is shown from pooled analysis of 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 19-week, Phase III studies with perampanel doses ≤ 12 mg (N = 1038, total perampanel; and N=442, placebo) in patients with partial seizures. QT measures were corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's (QTcF; the primary endpoint) and Bazett's (QTcB) formulas. RESULTS: In the Phase I thorough QT study, the positive control moxifloxacin caused peak time-matched, baseline-adjusted, placebo-corrected (ΔΔ) QTcF of 12.15 ms at 4h postdose, confirming a drug effect on QTc interval and study assessment sensitivity. Mean baseline-adjusted (Δ) QTcF versus nominal time curves were comparable between perampanel 12 mg and placebo, with most ΔQTcF values being slightly negative. Healthy subjects receiving perampanel 6 and 12 mg doses for 7 days showed no evidence of effects on cardiac repolarization. Peak ΔΔQTcF was 2.34 ms at 1.5h postdose for perampanel 6 mg and 3.92 ms at 0.5h postdose for perampanel 12 mg. At every time point, the upper 95% confidence limit of ΔΔQTcF for perampanel 6 and 12 mg was <10 ms. Phase III studies revealed no clinically significant difference between patients with partial seizures treated with perampanel or placebo in QTcF and QTcB values >450 ms, with no dose-dependent increases or large incremental changes from baseline of >60 ms. Regression analysis of individual plasma perampanel concentrations versus corresponding QTc interval values in Phase I thorough QT and Phase III studies demonstrated no relationship between perampanel concentrations and QT interval duration. CONCLUSION: Treatment with perampanel 6 mg and 12 mg for 7 days did not delay cardiac repolarization in healthy volunteers. In a population analysis of 1480 patients with partial seizures treated with perampanel doses ≤ 12 mg or placebo, no clinically significant trends in QT interval data were noted. Based on the thorough QT study and evaluations from pooled Phase III studies, there is no evidence of prolonged QT interval duration with perampanel treatment.