Applying propensity methods to the United States transplant registry for external real-world evidence control arms for 5-year survival in the BENEFIT study.

To address the challenges of assessing the impact of a reasonably likely surrogate endpoint on long-term graft survival in prospective kidney transplant clinical trials, the Transplant Therapeutics Consortium established a real-world evidence workgroup evaluating the scientific value of using transplant registry data as an external control to supplement the internal control group. The United Network for Organ Sharing retrospectively simulated the use of several distinct contemporaneous external control groups, applied multiple cause inference methods, and compared treatment effects to those observed in the BENEFIT study. Applying BENEFIT study enrollment criteria produced a smaller historical cyclosporine control arm (n = 153) and a larger, alternative (tacrolimus) historical control arm (n = 1069). Following covariate-balanced propensity scoring, Kaplan-Meier 5-year all-cause graft survivals were 81.3% and 81.7% in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) tacrolimus and cyclosporine external control arms, similar to 80.3% observed in the BENEFIT cyclosporine treatment arm. Five-year graft survival in the belatacept-less intensive arm was significantly higher than the OPTN controls using propensity scoring for comparing cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Propensity weighting using OPTN controls closely mirrored the BENEFIT study's long-term control (cyclosporine) arm's survival rate and the less intensive arm's treatment effect (significantly higher survival vs control). This study supports the feasibility and validity of using supplemental external registry controls for long-term survival in kidney transplant clinical trials.

Comparing the prognostic performance of iBOX and biopsy-proven acute rejection for long-term kidney graft survival.

Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurs in approximately 10% of kidney transplant recipients in the first year, making superiority trials unfeasible. iBOX, a quantitative composite of estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, antihuman leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibody, and + full/- abbreviated kidney histopathology, is a new proposed surrogate endpoint. BPAR's prognostic ability was compared with iBOX in a pooled cohort of 1534 kidney transplant recipients from 4 data sets, including 2 prospective randomized controlled trials. Discrimination analyses showed mean c-statistic differences between both iBOX compared with BPAR of 0.25 (95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.32) for full iBOX and 0.24 (95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.32) for abbreviated iBOX, indicating statistically significantly higher c-statistic values for the iBOX prognosis of death-censored graft survival. Mean (± standard error) c-statistics were 0.81 ± 0.03 for full iBOX, 0.80 ± 0.03 for abbreviated iBOX, and 0.57 ± 0.03 for BPAR. In calibration analyses, predicted graft loss events from both iBOX models were not significantly different from those observed. However, for BPAR, the predicted events were significantly (P < .01) different (observed: 64; predicted: 70; full iBOX: 76; abbreviated iBOX: 173 BPAR). IBOX at 1-year posttransplant is superior to BPAR in the first year posttransplant in graft loss prognostic performance, providing valuable additional information and facilitating the demonstration of superiority of novel immunosuppressive regimens.

Qualifying a novel clinical trial endpoint (iBOX) predictive of long-term kidney transplant outcomes.

New immunosuppressive therapies that improve long-term graft survival are needed in kidney transplant. Critical Path Institute's Transplant Therapeutics Consortium received a qualification opinion for the iBOX Scoring System as a novel secondary efficacy endpoint for kidney transplant clinical trials through European Medicines Agency's qualification of novel methodologies for drug development. This is the first qualified endpoint for any transplant indication and is now available for use in kidney transplant clinical trials. Although the current efficacy failure endpoint has typically shown the noninferiority of therapeutic regimens, the iBOX Scoring System can be used to demonstrate the superiority of a new immunosuppressive therapy compared to the standard of care from 6 months to 24 months posttransplant in pivotal or exploratory drug therapeutic studies.

Qualifying a Novel Clinical Trial Endpoint (iBOX) Predictive of Long-Term Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

New immunosuppressive therapies that improve long-term graft survival are needed in kidney transplant. Critical Path Institute's Transplant Therapeutics Consortium received a qualification opinion for the iBOX Scoring System as a novel secondary efficacy endpoint for kidney transplant clinical trials through European Medicines Agency's qualification of novel methodologies for drug development. This is the first qualified endpoint for any transplant indication and is now available for use in kidney transplant clinical trials. Although the current efficacy failure endpoint has typically shown the noninferiority of therapeutic regimens, the iBOX Scoring System can be used to demonstrate the superiority of a new immunosuppressive therapy compared to the standard of care from 6 months to 24 months posttransplant in pivotal or exploratory drug therapeutic studies.

Meeting report: FDA public meeting on patient-focused drug development and medication adherence in solid organ transplant patients.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held a public meeting and scientific workshop in September 2016 to obtain perspectives from solid organ transplant recipients, family caregivers, and other patient representatives. The morning sessions focused on the impact of organ transplantation on patients' daily lives and the spectrum of activities undertaken to maintain grafts. Participants described the physical, emotional, and social impacts of their transplant on daily life. They also discussed their posttransplant treatment regimens, including the most burdensome side effects and their hopes for future treatment. The afternoon scientific session consisted of presentations on prevalence and risk factors for medication nonadherence after transplantation in adults and children, and interventions to manage it. As new modalities of Immunosuppressive Drug Therapy are being developed, the patient perceptions and input must play larger roles if organ transplantation is to be truly successful.

Pharmacokinetics of prolonged-release tacrolimus and implications for use in solid organ transplant recipients.

Prolonged-release tacrolimus was developed as a once-daily formulation with ethylcellulose as the excipient, resulting in slower release and reduction in peak concentration (Cmax ) for a given dose compared with immediate-release tacrolimus, which is administered twice daily. This manuscript reviews pharmacokinetic information on prolonged-release tacrolimus in healthy subjects, in transplant recipients converted from immediate-release tacrolimus, and in de novo kidney and liver transplant recipients. As with the immediate-release formulation, prolonged-release tacrolimus shows a strong correlation between trough concentration (Cmin ) and area under the 24-hour time-concentration curve (AUC24 ), indicating that trough whole blood concentrations provide an accurate measure of drug exposure. We present the pharmacokinetic similarities and differences between the two formulations, so that prescribing physicians will have a better understanding of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus.

Quantifying Clinical Trial Diversity in Pivotal Registration Trials of FDA Novel Drug Approvals.

BACKGROUND: Health care inequity includes the lack of adequate representation of various populations in clinical trials. Government, academic and industry organizations have highlighted these issues and committed to actions to improve. In order to assess the current status and future success of these initiatives a quantitative objective measure to assess the state of clinical trial diversity is needed. METHODS: FDA review documents for all novel drug approvals from January 2022 through March 2023 were assessed using a scorecard that considers diversity across different demographic subgroups including age (≥ 65 years old), sex (female), race (Black and Asian) and ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino). The scorecard assigns each drug a letter grade, between A and F, for each subgroup (and overall) based on (1) the percent of each sub-population included in the trials and grades relative to the percent of the US population per the 2020 Census, (2) the number of participants from each subpopulation that received the novel new drug in the trials, (3) the incidence or prevalence of the disease/condition in each of the sub-populations. RESULTS: The FDA approved 49 novel new drugs for 50 indications (one drug was simultaneously approved for two indications). There was good representation of elderly and females with only two drugs receiving a D grade in either of these sub-populations. In contrast, Black (5 F grades) and Hispanic (4 F grades) representation was often inadequate. There were 10 drugs (20.0%) where there were no Black participants receiving the novel new drug and 16 (32.0%) approvals where there were 1-9 Black participants receiving the novel drug. In the Hispanic/Latino population there were 4 (8.0%) approvals with no Hispanic participants receiving the novel drug and 15 (30.0%) approvals where there were 1-9 Hispanic participants receiving the drug. CONCLUSIONS: This scorecard provides an objective quantitative approach to assess the current state of diversity in clinical trials supporting new drug approvals. Substantial improvement in racial and ethnic representation is needed. Meaningful change will require actions and cooperation among all stakeholders to address this multifaceted issue and will take commitment, perseverance, and appropriate incentives.

Pediatric Lung Transplant Outcomes Based on Immunosuppressive Regimen at Discharge: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-World Evidence From the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective analysis of the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was undertaken to obtain real-world evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients to support a supplemental New Drug Application. METHODS: Overall, 725 pediatric recipients of a primary deceased-donor lung transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2017, were followed for up to 3 years post-transplant based on an immunosuppressive regimen at hospital discharge: immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC)+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC+azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA)+MMF, or CsA+AZA. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of graft failure or death (all-cause) at 1 year post-transplant, calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The use of TAC+MMF increased over time. During 2010 to 2017, 91.7% of pediatric lung transplant recipients were receiving TAC+MMF at the time of discharge. The proportion of recipients continuing their discharge regimen at 1 year post-transplant was 83.7% with TAC+MMF and 40.4% to 59.7% with the other regimens. Cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant was 7.7% with TAC+MMF, 13.9% with TAC+AZA, 8.9% with CsA+MMF, and 9.1% with CsA+AZA. There was no significant difference in the risk of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant between groups from 1999 to 2005 (the only era when adequate numbers on each regimen allowed statistical comparison). No increase in hospitalization for infection or malignancy was seen with TAC+MMF. CONCLUSION: The real-world evidence from the US database of transplant recipients supported the Food and Drug Administration's approval of tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients.

Longitudinal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) modeling in long-term renal function to inform clinical trial design in kidney transplantation.

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for individuals with end-stage kidney disease. From a modeling perspective, our understanding of kidney function trajectories after transplantation remains limited. Current modeling of kidney function post-transplantation is focused on linear slopes or percent decline and often excludes the highly variable early timepoints post-transplantation, where kidney function recovers and then stabilizes. Using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a well-known biomarker of kidney function, from an aggregated dataset of 4904 kidney transplant patients including both observational studies and clinical trials, we developed a longitudinal model of kidney function trajectories from time of transplant to 6 years post-transplant. Our model is a nonlinear, mixed-effects model built in NONMEM that captured both the recovery phase after kidney transplantation, where the graft recovers function, and the long-term phase of stabilization and slow decline. Model fit was assessed using diagnostic plots and individual fits. Model performance, assessed via visual predictive checks, suggests accurate model predictions of eGFR at the median and lower 95% quantiles of eGFR, ranges which are of critical clinical importance for assessing loss of kidney function. Various clinically relevant covariates were also explored and found to improve the model. For example, transplant recipients of deceased donors recover function more slowly after transplantation and calcineurin inhibitor use promotes faster long-term decay. Our work provides a generalizable, nonlinear model of kidney allograft function that will be useful for estimating eGFR up to 6 years post-transplant in various clinically relevant populations.

COVID-19 vaccine associated transverse myelitis-Evusheld as an option when vaccination is not recommended due to severe adverse events.

Individuals who experience severe COVID-19-vaccine-related adverse reactions such as transverse myelitis may be precluded from receiving further vaccination to protect from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although the mechanism of autoimmune spinal cord inflammation resulting in transverse myelitis is unclear, it may be safe to administer antibody therapy for preventing COVID-19. Recently, Evusheld, tixagevimab with cilgavimab, two spike-protein directed monoclonal antibodies were authorized by the U.S. FDA and U.K. MHRA for administration to individuals when vaccination is not recommended. We report the safe administration of Evusheld to a patient who experienced transverse myelitis 11 months previously as a result of receiving the Moderna mRNA vaccine. This patient has experienced no adverse events to Evusheld. Additional experience and data collection are warranted to determine the safety of this prophylactic therapy.

In vitro effect of a non-immunosuppressive FKBP ligand, FK1706, on SARS-CoV-2 replication in combination with antivirals.

FKBP, a naturally occurring ubiquitous intracellular protein, has been proposed as a potential target for coronavirus replication. A non-immunosuppressive FKBP ligand, FK1706, was studied in vitro in a Vero cell model to assess potential activity alone and in combination with antivirals against SARS-CoV-2 replication. When combined with remdesivir, synergistic activity was seen (summary synergy score 24.7±9.56). FK1706 warrants in vivo testing as a potential new combination therapeutic for the treatment of COVID-19 infections.

Lung Transplant Outcomes in Adults in the United States: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-world Evidence from the SRTR.

BACKGROUND: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was retrospectively analyzed to provide real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens in adult lung transplant recipients in the United States. METHODS: Adult recipients (N = 25 355; ≥18 y) of a primary deceased-donor lung transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2017, were followed for 3 y posttransplant based on immunosuppressive regimen at discharge: immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC + azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA) + MMF, or CsA + AZA. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of graft failure or death (all-cause) at 1 y posttransplant (calculated via a modified Kaplan-Meier method). RESULTS: Discharge immunosuppressive regimens in lung transplant recipients changed over time, with a substantial increase in the use of TAC + MMF. TAC + MMF was the most common immunosuppressive regimen (received by 61.0% of individuals at discharge). The cumulative incidence of graft failure or death at 1 y posttransplant in adult lung transplant patients receiving TAC + MMF was 8.6% (95% confidence interval 8.1-9.1). Risk of graft failure or death was significantly higher in adults receiving CsA + MMF or CsA + AZA compared with TAC + MMF, with no significant difference seen between TAC + MMF and TAC + AZA. TAC + MMF had the highest continued use at 1 y posttransplant (72.0% versus 35.4%-51.5% for the other regimens). There was no increase in the rate of infection or malignancy in the TAC + MMF group. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world evidence from the most comprehensive database of transplant recipients in the United States supports the use of TAC in combination with MMF or AZA as maintenance immunosuppression in adult lung transplant recipients.

Use of low-dose tacrolimus and associated hypomagnesemia in the prevention of erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hypomagnesemia with urinary magnesium wasting is a well described adverse event with calcineurin inhibitor therapy. Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer in men in the United States. Injury to the cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy frequently results in erectile dysfunction. Tacrolimus has been shown to be neuroprotective in the rat cavernous nerve injury model, an animal model representative of the neural injury that occurs in humans at the time of radical prostatectomy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the utility of tacrolimus was assessed for prevention of erectile dysfunction following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Low dose tacrolimus, associated with low trough levels, resulted in mild hypomagnesemia, which was an early and persistent finding. As early as one week after institution of therapy, mean and median serum magnesium levels were significantly lower in the tacrolimus arm as compared to the placebo arm (p<0.001 for both). While the mean and median levels were within the normal range at Week 1, 10.9% of tacrolimus-treated patients had levels <1.8mg/dL, compared to none in the placebo arm (p=0.017). Median and mean levels remained significantly different at Week 5, Month 3 and Month 6. No clinical manifestations of hypomagnesemia were noted and no subject required treatment with magnesium. Changes in serum magnesium occurred earlier than other potential metabolic adverse events described with tacrolimus (changes in serum glucose, creatinine or potassium). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that mild hypomagnesemia is an early and sensitive biomarker for the effect of tacrolimus on the kidney.

New drugs to improve transplant outcomes.

Fujisawa is committed to improving the outcomes of transplant patients worldwide. Research and development programs are underway for a new modified release dosage form of tacrolimus (MR-4), a new analog of leflunomide (FK 778), and several novel compounds (PG 490-88, AGI 1096) in collaboration with other companies. These programs are targeted to address many of the unmet medical needs in transplantation including (1) improving compliance, (2) reducing chronic rejection, and (3) improving long-term safety by reducing infectious and cardiovascular risk.

Combination therapy of malononitrilamide FK778 with tacrolimus on cell proliferation assays and in rats receiving renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Malononitrilamide FK778, an analogue of leflunomide's active metabolite, is a promising novel small molecule with immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory properties. In this study, we evaluated the ability of combination therapy of FK778 with tacrolimus to inhibit lymphocyte proliferation and to prevent acute allograft rejection. METHODS: Proliferation assay was used to evaluate the effect of FK778 plus tacrolimus on murine splenocytes, monkey lymphocytes, and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, after activation with T or B cell-specific mitogens. A rat kidney transplantation model was used to evaluate the ability of FK778 combined with tacrolimus to prolong allograft survival. Median-effect principle and combination index (CI) were used to determine synergism, summation, or antagonism. RESULTS: A total of 58 combinations of FK778 plus tacrolimus were evaluated. Of the combinations tested, 82.8% (24/29) produced additive to synergistic effects in B cells, whereas 79.3% (23/29) produced moderate antagonistic effects in T cells. A concomitant 14-day therapy of FK778 (10 mg/kg/day) and tacrolimus (1 mg/kg/day) synergistically prolonged renal allograft survival to 25.5+/-5.9 days (CI=0.458). However, when addition of FK778 to tacrolimus therapy was delayed to day 7 after transplantation, a strong synergism was obtained (mean survival time=74.9+/-14.8 days, CI<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the combination of FK778 with tacrolimus in vitro produces synergistic inhibition on B-cell proliferation but not on T cell proliferation in mice, nonhuman primates, and humans. When the addition of FK778 treatment was delayed to day 7 after transplantation, a strong synergism was produced in prolongation of renal allograft survival in the rat.

Synergistic effects of malononitrilamides (FK778, FK779) with tacrolimus (FK506) in prevention of acute heart and kidney allograft rejection and reversal of ongoing heart allograft rejection in the rat.

BACKGROUND: The effects of tacrolimus (FK506) and malononitrilamides (MNA) (FK778 and FK779) monotherapy and combination therapy were examined in prevention of acute heart and kidney allograft rejection and reversal of ongoing acute heart allograft rejection in the rat. METHODS: Brown Norway (RT1n)-to-Lewis (RT11) and ACI (RT1a)-to-Lewis (RT11) combinations were used, respectively, for heart and kidney transplantation models. Immunosuppressants were administered orally from day 1 to day 14 for preventing acute rejection and from day 4 to day 34 after transplantation for the reversal of ongoing acute rejection. RESULTS: In the prevention of acute heart rejection model, recipient rats treated with monotherapy of tacrolimus or MNA (FK778, FK779) showed a dose-related prolongation of mean survival time (MST) compared with naive control rats (P<0.01). The mean survival time in combination therapy of tacrolimus (FK506) and FK778 indicated that an additive to synergistic interaction was produced when compared with the respective monotherapies (combination index [CI]=0.631-1.022). These results were reproducible with tacrolimus and FK779 combination therapy (CI=0.572-0.846). Furthermore, similar results were also found in the prevention of acute kidney allograft rejection in the rat (CI=0.137-0.516). In the reversal of ongoing acute heart allograft rejection, combination therapy of tacrolimus and FK778 demonstrated a strong synergistic interaction (CI=0.166-0.970) compared with monotherapy of tacrolimus or FK778. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy of tacrolimus and MNA (FK778, FK779) produces synergistic effects in prevention of acute heart and kidney rejection and reversal of ongoing heart allograft rejection in the rat.

Significant prolongation of renal allograft survival by delayed combination therapy of FK778 with tacrolimus in nonhuman primates.

BACKGROUND: Malononitrilamide 715 (FK778) is a new class of low-molecular-weight immunosuppressant that is a derivative of the active metabolite of leflunomide, A77 1726. In this study, the authors evaluated the combined effect of FK778 with tacrolimus in prevention of renal allograft rejection in Vervet monkeys. METHODS: Male Vervet monkeys were obtained from Caribbean Primates Ltd. Donor and recipient monkeys were from different breeding colonies. Eleven groups (n>or=4 per group) were involved in this study. FK778 and tacrolimus were administered orally for 60 days according to protocol. RESULTS: Naive controls rejected renal grafts, with a median survival time (MST) of 8.0 days in group 1. When recipient monkeys were treated with tacrolimus 1.0 mg/kg/day in group 2 or FK778 2.5 mg/kg/day in group 3, the MST was 16.0 days (P=0.001) and 11.0 days (P=0.266), respectively. Combination therapy of these two agents at the same doses immediately after transplantation resulted in an MST of 25.0 days (P=0.016) in group 4. When tacrolimus was initiated immediately after transplantation and FK778 treatment was delayed until day 7 after surgery in group 5, recipient survivals were significantly prolonged to 38.0 days (P=0.02). These results were repeatable when FK778 5.0 mg/kg/day (9.0 days, P=0.544 in group 6) was combined with tacrolimus 1.0 mg/kg/day immediately after transplantation (8.0 days, P=0.339) in group 7, or when FK778 was delayed 7 days (60.0 days, P=0.002) in group 8. Furthermore, it was also repeatable when FK778 10 mg/kg/day was combined with tacrolimus 1.0 mg/kg/day with a 7-day delay. CONCLUSIONS: A significant prolongation of renal allograft survival was produced when FK778 administration was delayed by 7 days combined with tacrolimus in Vervet monkeys.

Randomized trial of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at three years.

METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus (TAC) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC + azathioprine (AZA), or cyclosporine (Neoral; CsA) + MMF. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function (DGF). Patients were followed-up for 3 years. RESULTS: The results at 3 years corroborate and extend the findings of the 2-year results. Patients with DGF treated with TAC+MMF experienced an increase in 3-year allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (84.1% vs. 49.9%, P=0.02). Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing TAC exhibited numerically superior kidney function when compared with CsA. During the 3 years, new-onset insulin dependence occurred in 6, 3, and 11 patients in the TAC+MMF, CsA+MMF, and TAC+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients randomized to TAC+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF as compared with those who received CsA+MMF. CONCLUSION: All three immunosuppressive regimens provided excellent safety and efficacy. However, the best results overall were achieved with TAC+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients with DGF. In patients who experienced DGF, graft survival was better at 3 years in those patients receiving TAC in combination with either MMF or AZA as compared with the patients receiving CsA with MMF.