Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 48
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Surg ; 108(4): 435-440, 2021 04 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33930119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement is the establishment of active partnerships between patients, families, and health professionals to improve healthcare delivery. The objective of this project was to conduct a series of patient engagement workshops to identify areas to improve the surgical experience and develop strategies to address areas identified as high priority. METHODS: Faculty surgeons and patients were invited to participate in three in-person meetings. Evaluation included identifying and developing strategies for three priority areas to improve the surgical experience and level of engagement achieved at each meeting. RESULTS: Sixteen faculty surgeons and 32 patients participated. Some 63 themes to improve the surgical experience were identified; the three highest-priority themes were physician communication, discharge process, and expectations at home after discharge. Individual improvement strategies for these three prioritized themes (12, 36 and 6 respectively) were used to develop a formal strategic plan, and included a physician communication survey, discharge process worksheet and video, and guideline regarding what to expect at home after discharge. Overall, the level of engagement achieved was considered high by over 85 per cent of the participants. CONCLUSION: A high level of patient engagement was achieved. Priorities were identified with patients and surgeons to improve surgical experience, and strategies were developed to address these areas.


Assuntos
Participação do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Assistência ao Convalescente , Comunicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Alta do Paciente , Participação do Paciente/métodos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/psicologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas
2.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 49(2): 156-62, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25458435

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and risk factors for proximal aneurysm neck related complications with a late generation device for endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Data were retrieved from a prospective registry (Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global Postmarket Registry) involving 79 institutions worldwide. The risk factors tested were age, gender, surgical risk profile, proximal neck length (<10 mm), diameter (>30 mm), supra- and infrarenal angulation (>60° and 75°), mural thrombus/calcification (>50%) and taper (>10%), and AAA diameter (>65 mm). Two neck related composite endpoints were used, for intra-operative (type-1a endoleak, conversion, deployment/retrieval complication or unintentional renal coverage) and post-operative (type-1a endoleak or migration) adverse events. Independent risk factors were identified using multivariable backwards modeling. RESULTS: The study included 1263 patients (mean age 73, 10.3% female) from March 2009 to May 2011. Twenty three (1.8%) intra-operative adverse events occurred. Neck length <10 mm (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.1-22.6) and neck thrombus/calcification >50% (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.7-13.5) were risk factors for intra-operative events. The planned 1 year follow up visit was reached for the entire cohort, and the 2 year visit for 431 patients. During this time, 99 (7.8%) events occurred. Female gender (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2), aneurysm diameter >65 mm (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9-4.2), and neck length <10 mm (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-6.9) were significant post-operative risk factors. Neck angulation, neck taper, large diameter neck, and presence of thrombus/calcification were not predictors of adverse outcome in this study. CONCLUSION: These results support the adequacy of this device in the face of adverse neck anatomy, and confirm neck length as the most relevant anatomical limitation for EVAR. Additionally, the study confirms the decline in early to mid-term intervention rates with a newer generation device in a large patient sample. Lastly, it suggests that neck related risk factors affect outcome and impact on prognosis in varying degrees.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Endoleak/etiologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Falha de Prótese , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Endoleak/diagnóstico , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 44(4): 369-75, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22835762

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The ENGAGE registry was undertaken to examine the real-world outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) with the Endurant Stent Graft in a large, contemporary, global series of patients. METHODS: From March 2009 to April 2011, 1262 AAA patients (89.6% men; mean age 73.1 years, range 43-93 years) were enrolled from 79 sites in 30 countries and treated with Endurant. Results are described following the reporting standards for EVAR. Follow-up data were tabulated for all 1262 patients at a 30-day follow-up and for the first 500 patients at a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Intra-operative technical success was achieved in 99.0% of cases. Within 30 days, adverse events were reported in 3.9% of patients, including a 1.3% mortality rate. Type-I or -III endoleaks were identified in 1.5% of cases. Estimated overall survival, aneurysm-related survival and freedom from secondary interventions at 1 year were 91.6%, 98.6% and 95.1%, respectively. At 1 year, aneurysm size increased ≥ 5 mm in 2.8% and decreased ≥ 5 mm in 41.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Early results from this real world, global experience are promising and indicate that endovascular AAA repair with the Endurant Stent Graft is safe and effective across different geographies and standards of practice. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to assess durability of these results.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Stents , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 39(5): 555-8, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20226694

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Treatment recommendations based on thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) diameter (D) ignore differences in proportional dilatation between patients of different body habitus and sex. This study's goal is to compare TAA diameters between sexes as a function of relative aortic size as determined by aortic size index (ASI). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all TAA's treated between 2003 and 2008. ASI was calculated for each patient, which considers aneurysm diameter, patient's height and weight. Values for males and females were plotted separately (TAA diameter vs ASI) and the resulting linear regression equations permitted comparison of proportional dilatation between sexes. RESULTS: In 40 patients (25 males, 15 females) mean TAA diameter did not differ between sexes (6.56 +/- 0.99 vs 7.03 +/- 1.14, P = 0.18), while ASI was larger in females than males (4.21 +/- 0.85 vs 3.24 +/- 0.63, P = 0.0003). Values for ruptured and intact aneurysms did not differ. Linear regression analysis permitted comparison of TAA diameter with ASI between sexes resulting in the following equation: D(Female) = 0.91D(Male) - 0.49. This correlates a 6 cm TAA in a male with a 4.97 cm TAA in a female. CONCLUSIONS: TAA of equal diameter represent a larger proportional dilatation in females compared to males. This could influence repair thresholds that are historically diameter based.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/patologia , Ruptura Aórtica/patologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/terapia , Ruptura Aórtica/terapia , Estatura , Peso Corporal , Dilatação Patológica , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA