IMRT dose fractionation for head and neck cancer: variation in current approaches will make standardisation difficult.

INTRODUCTION: Altered fractionation has demonstrated clinical benefits compared to the conventional 2 Gy/day standard of 70 Gy. When using synchronous chemotherapy, there is uncertainty about optimum fractionation. IMRT with its potential for Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) adds further to this uncertainty. This survey will examine international practice of IMRT fractionation and suggest possible reasons for diversity in approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen international cancer centres were surveyed for IMRT dose/fractionation practised in each centre. RESULTS: Twelve different types of dose fractionation were reported. Conventional 70-72 Gy (daily 2 Gy/fraction) was used in 3/14 centres with concurrent chemotherapy while 11/14 centres used altered fractionation. Two centres used >1 schedule. Reported schedules and number of centres included 6 fractions/week DAHANCA regime (3), modest hypofractionation (< or =2.2 Gy/fraction) (3), dose-escalated hypofractionation (> or =2.3 Gy/fraction) (4), hyperfractionation (1), continuous acceleration (1) and concomitant boost (1). Reasons for dose fractionation variability include (i) dose escalation; (ii) total irradiated volume; (iii) number of target volumes; (iv) synchronous systemic treatment; (v) shorter overall treatment time; (vi) resources availability; (vii) longer time on treatment couch; (viii) variable GTV margins; (ix) confidence in treatment setup; (x) late tissue toxicity and (xi) use of lower neck anterior fields. CONCLUSIONS: This variability in IMRT fractionation makes any meaningful comparison of treatment results difficult. Some standardization is needed particularly for design of multi-centre randomized clinical trials.

Correction to Kasibhatla et al. How much radiation is the chemotherapy worth in advanced head and neck cancer? (Int j radiat oncol biol phys 2007;68:1491-1495).

PURPOSE: To correct several elementary radiobiologic errors in the otherwise admirable article by Kasibhatla, Kirkpatrick, and Brizel (2007) on estimating the equivalent radiation effect of the concomitant chemotherapy in head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: (1) Their equation was wrong because it omitted the lag or onset time of repopulation in tumors, Tk. Instead of zero days this should be 18-35 days. (2) Instead of a doubling time of 5 days, at most 3 days should be used for head-and-neck tumors. (3) Their slope "S" (the gamma-50 slope) for head-and-neck tumors should be 1.7, not 1.1. The same percentages of increased locoregional control as quoted by Kasibhatla et al. are used. RESULTS: The average time-corrected biologically effective dose for the 16 schedules listed should be 72.4 instead of 63.1 Gy(10). The average gains in locoregional tumor control are the equivalent of 8.8 Gy(10), not 10.6 Gy(10) (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The equivalent number of 2-Gy fractions of concomitant chemotherapy as used in the 16 listed schedules is 3.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.7-4.1), not 5 as claimed by Kasibhatla et al. The difference is statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Stereotactic hypofractionated accurate radiotherapy of the prostate (SHARP), 33.5 Gy in five fractions for localized disease: first clinical trial results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of stereotactic hypofractionated accurate radiotherapy (SHARP) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Phase I/II trial of SHARP performed for localized prostate cancer using 33.5 Gy in 5 fractions, calculated to be biologically equivalent to 78 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (alpha/beta ratio of 1.5 Gy). Noncoplanar conformal fields and daily stereotactic localization of implanted fiducials were used for treatment. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were evaluated by American Urologic Association (AUA) score and Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and self-reported sexual function were recorded at specified follow-up intervals. RESULTS: The study includes 40 patients. The median follow-up is 41 months (range, 21-60 months). Acute toxicity Grade 1-2 was 48.5% (GU) and 39% (GI); 1 acute Grade 3 GU toxicity. Late Grade 1-2 toxicity was 45% (GU) and 37% (GI). No late Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported. Twenty-six patients reported potency before therapy; 6 (23%) have developed impotence. Median time to PSA nadir was 18 months with the majority of nadirs less than 1.0 ng/mL. The actuarial 48-month biochemical freedom from relapse is 70% for the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition and 90% by the alternative nadir + 2 ng/mL failure definition. CONCLUSIONS: SHARP for localized prostate cancer is feasible with minimal acute or late toxicity. Dose escalation should be possible.

Development of radiobiology for oncology-a personal view.

When I came into radiotherapy in 1950, I was puzzled that some patients were treated to 3000 rads (cGy) in 3 weeks but others received 4000 in 5 or 6000 in 6 weeks. When I asked why, there were no convincing answers given, except 'this is what we usually do'. It wasn't until I went to a course on 'Radiobiology for Radiotherapy' in Cambridge that I learnt about the basic theories of Douglas Lea and the very considerable history of research into radiobiology and clinical radiotherapy. And there were still some questions outstanding, such as the relative importance of intracellular repair between 'daily' fractions, whether a 2 day gap each week was a good or a bad idea, and the role of proliferation, if any, during irradiation. I thought that a few simple animal experiments might help to give answers! That led me to a continuing interest in these questions and answers, which has taken me more than 50 years to pursue. This is the very personal story of what I saw happening in the subject, decade by decade. I was happy to experience all this together with scientists in many other countries, and our own, along the way.

The optimal fraction size in high-dose-rate brachytherapy: dependency on tissue repair kinetics and low-dose rate.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Indications of the existence of long repair half-times on the order of 2-4 h for late-responding human normal tissues have been obtained from continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART). Recently, these data were used to explain, on the basis of the biologically effective dose (BED), the potential superiority of fractionated high-dose rate (HDR) with large fraction sizes of 5-7 Gy over continuous low-dose rate (LDR) irradiation at 0.5 Gy/h in cervical carcinoma. We investigated the optimal fraction size in HDR brachytherapy and its dependency on treatment choices (overall treatment time, number of HDR fractions, and time interval between fractions) and treatment conditions (reference low-dose rate, tissue repair characteristics). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiobiologic model calculations were performed using the linear-quadratic model for incomplete mono-exponential repair. An irradiation dose of 20 Gy was assumed to be applied either with HDR in 2-12 fractions or continuously with LDR for a range of dose rates. HDR and LDR treatment regimens were compared on the basis of the BED and BED ratio of normal tissue and tumor, assuming repair half-times between 1 h and 4 h. RESULTS: With the assumption that the repair half-time of normal tissue was three times longer than that of the tumor, hypofractionation in HDR relative to LDR could result in relative normal tissue sparing if the optimum fraction size is selected. By dose reduction while keeping the tumor BED constant, absolute normal tissue sparing might therefore be achieved. This optimum HDR fraction size was found to be largely dependent on the LDR dose rate. On the basis of the BED(NT/TUM) ratio of HDR over LDR, 3 x 6.7 Gy would be the optimal HDR fractionation scheme for replacement of an LDR scheme of 20 Gy in 10-30 h (dose rate 2-0.67 Gy/h), while at a lower dose rate of 0.5 Gy/h, four fractions of 5 Gy would be preferential, still assuming large differences between tumor and normal tissue repair half-times and equal overall treatment time. For the same fraction size, an even larger normal tissue sparing can be obtained by prolongation of the HDR overall treatment time. CONCLUSION: Radiobiologic model calculations presented here aim to demonstrate that hypofractionation in HDR might have its opportunities for widening the therapeutic window, but definitely has its limits. For each specific combination of the parameters, a theoretical optimal HDR fraction size with regard to relative or absolute normal tissue sparing can be estimated, but because of uncertainty in the biologic parameters, these hypofractionation schemes cannot be generalized for all HDR brachytherapy indications.

Loss of biological effect in prolonged fraction delivery.

PURPOSE: The decrease of biologic effect if delivery of dose fractions takes more than a few minutes has been occasionally recognized in the literature but has been insufficiently studied. It has been recognized as a problem in the long exposures necessary for stereotactic radiotherapy and is also a potential problem in some applications of IMRT. Modeling repair rates is a complex function of dose per fraction, dose rate, half-times of repair, and nature of the tissue of interest (the alpha/beta ratio of intrinsic radiosensitivity to repair capacity). In this article, we model repair rates for a range of doses per fraction and draw conclusions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We review the data on half-times of repair in tissues in situ in animals and human patients and conclude that a single first-order (exponential) repair rate is no longer an appropriate assumption for most tissues. At least 2 half-times of repair, and perhaps a distribution of half-times, are required. The faster components have a median half-time of 0.3 h (range, 0.08-1.2 h), and the longer components have a median of 4 h (range, 2.4->6 h). Modeling repair rates by a two-component model is the simplest approach. We have used two models of repair to represent these ranges, one with equal proportions of 0.2 h + 4.0 h half-times, the other with 0.4 h + 4.0 h half-times of repair. Data are also reviewed on the few experiments that have been reported with cell culture that investigate this problem. RESULTS: Computations indicate that any fraction delivery that lasts more than half an hour might experience a clinically significant loss of cell-sterilizing effect. We suggest that a loss of more than 10% in biologically effective dose should be compensated for and show modeled doses and fraction durations for which this situation seems to be likely. It will be dose, tissue, and system dependent and will require more investigation at the clinical level. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that any radiotherapy schedule that requires more than half an hour for the delivery of 1 fraction should have careful records made and reported, to look for a possible decrease of biologic effect with fraction duration.

A challenge to traditional radiation oncology.

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the biologically effective doses, equivalent doses in 2-Gy fractions, log tumor cells killed, and late effects that can be estimated for the large fractions in short overall times that are now being delivered in various clinically used schedules in several countries for the treatment of cancer in human lungs, liver, and kidney. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Linear quadratic (LQ) modeling is employed with only the standard assumptions that tumor alpha/beta ratio is 10 Gy, pneumonitis and late complication alpha/beta ratios are 3 Gy, that intrinsic radiosensitivity of tumor cells is 0.35 ln/Gy, that no tumor repopulation occurs within 2 weeks, and that LQ modeling is valid up to 23 Gy per fraction. As well as the planning target volume (PTV), we propose a practical term called the prescription isodose volume (PIV) to be used in this discussion. In the ideal case of 100% conformity, PIV equals PTV, but usually PIV is larger than the PTV. Biologically effective doses (BED) in Gy(10) for tumors or Gy(3) for normal lung are calculated and converted to equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (= normalized total doses [NTD]), and to estimated log cell kill. How such large biologic doses might be delivered to tissues is discussed. RESULTS: Tumor cell kill varies between 16 and 27 logs to base 10 for schedules from 4F x 12 Gy to 3F x 23 Gy. The rationale for the high end of this scale is the possible presence of hypoxic or otherwise extraordinarily resistant cells, but how many tumors and which ones require such doses is not known. How can such large doses be tolerated? In "parallel type organs," it is shown to be theoretically possible, provided that suitably small volumes are irradiated, with rapid fall-off of dose outside the PTV, and a mean dose (excluding PTV and allowing for local fraction size) to both lungs of less than 19 Gy NTD. If suitably small PTVs were used, local late BEDs have been given which were as large as 600 Gy(3), equivalent to 2 Gy x 180F = 360 Gy in 2-Gy fractions, with remarkably few complications reported clinically. Questions of concurrent chemotherapy and microscopic extension of lung tumor cells are discussed briefly. CONCLUSIONS: Such large doses can apparently be given, with suitable precautions and experience. Ongoing clinical trials from an increasing number of centers will be reporting the results of tumor control and complications from this new modality of biologically higher doses.

What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: Recent analyses of clinical results have suggested that the fractionation sensitivity of prostate tumors is remarkably high; corresponding point estimates of the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer are around 1.5 Gy, much lower than the typical value of 10 Gy for many other tumors. This low alpha/beta value is comparable to, and possibly even lower than, that of the surrounding late-responding normal tissue in rectal mucosa (alpha/beta nominally 3 Gy, but also likely to be in the 4-5 Gy range). This lower alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer than for the surrounding late-responding normal tissue creates the potential for therapeutic gain. We analyze here possible high-gain/low-risk hypofractionated protocols for prostate cancer to test this suggestion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using standard linear-quadratic (LQ) modeling, a set of hypofractionated protocols can be designed in which a series of dose steps is given, each step of which keeps the late complications constant in rectal tissues. This is done by adjusting the dose per fraction and total dose to maintain a constant level of late effects. The effect on tumor control is then investigated. The resulting estimates are theoretical, although based on the best current modeling with alpha/beta parameters, which are discussed thoroughly. RESULTS: If the alpha/beta value for prostate is less than that for the surrounding late-responding normal tissue, the clinical gains can be rather large. Appropriately designed schedules using around ten large fractions can result in absolute increases of 15% to 20% in biochemical control with no evidence of disease (bNED), with no increase in late sequelae. Early sequelae are predicted to be decreased, provided that overall times are not shortened drastically because of a possible risk of acute or consequential late reactions in the rectum. An overall time not shorter than 5 weeks appears advisable for the hypofractionation schedules considered, pending further clinical trial results. Even if the prostate tumor alpha/beta ratio turns out to be the same (or even slightly larger than) the surrounding late-responding normal tissue, these hypofractionated regimens are estimated to be very unlikely to result in significantly increased late effects. CONCLUSIONS: The hypofractionated regimens that we suggest be tested for prostate-cancer radiotherapy show high potential therapeutic gain as well as economic and logistic advantages. They appear to have little potential risk as long as excessively short overall times (<5 weeks) and very small fraction numbers (<5) are avoided. The values of bNED and rectal complications presented are entirely theoretical, being related by LQ modeling to existing clinical data for approximately intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients as discussed in detail.

Acute radiation reactions in oral and pharyngeal mucosa: tolerable levels in altered fractionation schedules.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a predictive estimate can be obtained for a 'tolerance level' of acute oral and pharyngeal mucosal reactions in patients receiving head and neck radiotherapy, using an objective set of dose and time data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Several dozen radiotherapy schedules for treating head and neck cancer have been reviewed, together with published estimates of whether they were tolerated or (in a number of schedules) not. Those closest to the borderline were given detailed analysis. Total doses and biologically effective doses (BED or ERD) were calculated for a range of starting times of cellular repopulation and rates of daily proliferation. Starting times of proliferation from 5 to 10 days and daily cellular doubling rates of 1-3 days were considered. The standard published form of BED with its linear overall time factor was used: BED=nd(1 + d/(alpha/beta) - Ln2(T - T(k))/alpha T(p) (see text for parameters). RESULTS: A clear progression from acceptable to intolerable mucosal reactions was found, which correlated with total biologically effective dose (BED in our published modeling), for all the head and neck cancer radiotherapy schedules available for study, when ranked into categories of 'intolerable' or 'tolerable'. A review of published mechanisms for mucosal reactions suggested that practical schedules used for treatment caused stimulated compensatory proliferation to start at about 7 days. The starting time of compensatory proliferation had little predictive value in our listing, so we chose the starting time of 7 days. Very short and very long daily doubling rates also had little reliability, so we suggest choosing a doubling time of 2.5 days as a datum. With these parameters a 'tolerance zone of uncertainty' could be identified which predicted acute-reaction acceptability or not of a schedule within a range of about 2-10 Gy in total BED. If concurrent chemoradiotherapy is used, our provisional suggestion is that this zone should be reduced by up to roughly 3-5 Gy10 in BED, with a request for further evidence. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that total BED should be used, as specified above. Parameters of alpha=0.35 Gy-(1), alpha/beta=10 Gy, Tk=7 days and Tp=2.5 days are suggested. The 'acute/ tolerance zone' then turns out to be 59-61 Gy10 for radiation-only treatments. Further information about the decrement caused by concurrent head-and-neck cancer chemoradiotherapy, possibly 3-5 Gy10, is required.

Theoretical simulation of oxygen tension measurement in the tissue using a microelectrode: II. Simulated measurements in tissues.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to make a computer simulation of tissues with different vascular structures and to simulate measurements of oxygen tension using an Eppendorf-like electrode in these tissues and to compare the response to radiation of the tissues with the real oxygen distributions (called input distribution) with the response to radiation of the tissues in which the oxygen distribution is given by the results of the simulated measurements (called output distribution). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The structure of various tissues and the measurements of oxygen tension using a microelectrode were simulated using a computer program. The mathematical model used combines the description of a gradient of tissue oxygenation and the electrode absorption process. RESULTS: We have compared the oxygen distributions resulting from diffusion (input) with those obtained from a simulation of measurements (output) for various tissues in the same points. Because the electrode measurement is an averaging process, the calculated oxygen distributions are different from the expected ones and the extreme high and low values are not detected. We have then calculated the survival curves describing the response to radiation if there is a small fraction of truly hypoxic cells (expected values) or a large fraction of cells at intermediate values (observed results) in order to determine the differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that oxygen electrode measurements do not give the true distribution of pO(2) values in the tissue. However, our results do not contradict the numerous empirical correlations between the Eppendorf measurements of tumour oxygenation and the outcome of treatments. Measurement results will be misleading for modelling purposes since they do not reflect the actual distributions of oxygen tensions in the measured tissue. Decisions based on such modelling could be very dangerous, especially with respect to the clinical response of tumours to new treatments.

Repair between dose fractions: a simpler method of analyzing and reporting apparently biexponential repair.

Increasing numbers of animal experiments in situ are reporting that repair of sublethal radiation damage in vivo slows down with time, usually described as two components of (monoexponential) repair. For repair of DNA strand breaks, plotting the reciprocal of proportion unrepaired as a function of time yielded straight lines. Two processes have been suggested as causing this: (1) a second-order process (bimolecular) instead of first-order (exponential) and (2) a skewed distribution of monoexponential rates. The present paper investigates whether such plots of hyperbolic or reciprocal repair are relevant for laboratory animal tissue results. Published repair data were reanalyzed from laboratory animal experiments that employed split doses or two fractions per day. Graphs are presented of the reciprocal proportion of damage remaining as a function of the interval between the two doses. If the reciprocal model applies, the graphs would be straight lines. Different animal data showed no inconsistency with straight reciprocal plots. These reciprocal plots describe well with one parameter tau, the first half-time, repair curves previously thought to be "biexponential", and to require three parameters. Straight reciprocal plots mean that in a constant time interval tau the unrepaired damage falls from 1 to (1/2), then from (1/2) to (1/3), then (1/3) to (1/4), etc. A much larger proportion of damage would therefore remain unrepaired at several half-times than is estimated by current mono- or biexponential models. The practical implications for clinical radiotherapy are important.

On cold spots in tumor subvolumes.

Losses in tumor control are estimated for cold spots of various "sizes" and degrees of "cold dose." This question is important in the context of intensity modulated radiotherapy where differential dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for targets that abut a critical structure often exhibit a cold dose tail. This can be detrimental to tumor control probability (TCP) for fractions of cold volumes even as small as 1%, if the cold dose is lower than the prescribed dose by substantially more than 10%. The Niemierko-Goitein linear-quadratic algorithm with gamma50 slope 1-3 was used to study the effect of cold spots of various degrees (dose deficit below the prescription dose) and size (fractional volume of the cold dose). A two-bin model DVH has been constructed in which the cold dose bin is allowed to vary from a dose deficit of 1%-50% below prescription dose and to have volumes varying from 1% to 90%. In order to study and quantify the effect of a small volume of cold dose on TCP and effective uniform dose (EUD), a four-bin DVH model has been constructed in which the lowest dose bin, which has a fractional volume of 1%, is allowed to vary from 10% to 45% dose deficit below prescription dose. The highest dose bin represents a simultaneous boost. For fixed size of the cold spot the calculated values of TCP decreased rapidly with increasing degrees of cold dose for any size of the cold spot, even as small as 1% fractional volume. For the four-subvolume model, in which the highest dose bin has a fractional volume of 80% and is set at a boost dose of 10% above prescription dose, it is found that the loss in TCP and EUD is moderate as long as the cold 1% subvolume has a deficit less than approximately 20%. However, as the dose deficit in the 1% subvolume bin increases further it drives TCP and EUD rapidly down and can lead to a serious loss in TCP and EUD. Since a dose deficit to a 1% volume of the target that is larger than 20% of the prescription dose may lead to serious loss of TCP, even if 80% of the target receives a 10% boost, particular attention has to be paid to small-volume cold regions in the target. The effect of cold regions on TCP can be minimized if the EUD associated with the target DVH is constrained to be equal to or larger than the prescription dose.

Helical tomotherapy as a means of delivering accelerated partial breast irradiation.

A novel treatment approach utilizing helical tomotherapy for partial breast irradiation for patients with early-stage breast cancer is described. This technique may serve as an alternative to high dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy and standard linac-based approaches. Through helical tomotherapy, highly conformal irradiation of target volumes and avoidance of normal sensitive structures can be achieved. Unlike HDR brachytherapy, it is noninvasive. Unlike other linac-based techniques, it provides image-guided adaptive radiotherapy along with intensity modulation. A treatment planning CT scan was obtained as usual on a post-lumpectomy patient undergoing HDR interstitial breast brachytherapy. The patient underwent catheter placement for HDR treatment and was positioned prone on a specially designed position-supporting mattress during CT. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the lumpectomy bed plus a 20 mm margin. The prescription dose was 34 Gy (10 fx of 3.4 Gy) in both the CT based HDR and on the tomotherapy plan. Cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated and analyzed for the target, lung, heart, skin, pectoralis muscle, and chest wall for both HDR brachytherapy and helical tomotherapy. Dosimetric coverage of the target with helical tomotherapy was conformal and homogeneous. "Hot spots" (> or =150% isodose line) were present around implanted dwell positions in brachytherapy plan whereas no isodose lines higher than 109% were present in the helical tomotherapy plan. Similar dose coverage was achieved for lung, pectoralis muscle, heart, chest wall and breast skin with the two methods. We also compared our results to that obtained using conventional linac-based three dimensional (3D) conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation. Dose homogeneity is excellent with 3D conformal irradiation, and lung, heart and chest wall dose is less than for either HDR brachytherapy or helical tomotherapy but skin and pectoral muscle doses were higher than with the other techniques. Our results suggest that helical tomotherapy can serve as an effective means of delivering accelerated partial breast irradiation and may offer superior dose homogeneity compared to HDR brachytherapy.

On the inclusion of proliferation in tumour control probability calculations for inhomogeneously irradiated tumours.

In previous modelling of tumour control probability (TCP) for inhomogeneously irradiated tumours we used an expression that did not include a proliferation correction term, which should be lambda(T - Tk). We did not use that term in the specific examples in our previous work to model slowly growing tumours in order to avoid unnecessary mathematical complexity. We have now considered how to do so in more detail, and there are some variations, such as schedules that depart from a number of equal fractions over the entire course of treatment, if one wishes to compensate for proliferation in the remaining fractions by increasing the dose per fraction after the kick-off time has passed in order to achieve the same TCP when proliferation is neglected.

Should single or distributed parameters be used to explain the steepness of tumour control probability curves?

Linear quadratic (LQ) modelling allows easy comparison of different fractionation schedules in radiotherapy. However, estimating the radiation effect of a single fractionated treatment introduces many questions with respect to the parameters to be used in the modelling process. Several studies have used tumour control probability (TCP) curves in order to derive the values for the LQ parameters that may be used further for the analysis and ranking of treatment plans. Unfortunately, little attention has been paid to the biological relevance of these derived parameters, either for the initial number of cells or their intrinsic radiosensitivity, or both. This paper investigates the relationship between single values for the TCP parameters and the resulting dose-response curve. The results of this modelling study show how clinical observations for the position and steepness of the TCP curve can be explained only by the choice of extreme values for the parameters, if they are single values. These extreme values are in contradiction with experimental observations. This contradiction suggests that single values for the parameters are not likely to explain reasonably the clinical observations and that some distributions of input parameters should be taken into consideration.

Reduction in radiation dose to lung and other normal tissues using helical tomotherapy to treat lung cancer, in comparison to conventional field arrangements.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of tomotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has the potential to reduce radiation dose to normal tissues, in particular, the lungs, esophagus, and spinal cord, as compared with standard radiotherapy. Five patients with anatomically or physiologically inoperable stage III NSCLC were studied, representing a variety of tumor sizes and locations. For each patient, two treatment plans were generated. One was developed using conventional field arrangements (CFA), and the other for tomotherapy. Using dose-volume histogram reduction techniques, including mean normalized dose (NTDmean), V20, and effective uniform dose (EUD), the normal tissue doses for CFA and tomotherapy plans for a given fixed tumor dose were compared. In addition, the maximum tumor doses possible for a given level of mean normalized lung dose were computed and compared for the CFA and tomotherapy plans. The gross tumor volumes in the five patients studied ranged from 13.5 to 87.1 cm. The tumor dose distributions, determined by EUD and minimum dose, were similar for both CFA and tomotherapy plans, as intended. In all cases, the NTDmean of both lungs was significantly reduced using tomotherapy planning (range: 10-53% reduction, mean: 31%). The volume of lung receiving more than 20 Gy was also reduced in all cases using tomotherapy (range: 17-37% reduction, mean: 22%). For a constant lung NTDmean, it is shown that it should be possible to increase tumor dose to up to 160 Gy in certain patients with tomotherapy. The dose to the spinal cord and esophagus was also reduced in all cases with tomotherapy planning, compared with plans generated using conventional field arrangements. Both tomotherapy, and to a lesser extent conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, have the potential to significantly decrease radiation dose to lung and other normal structures in the treatment of NSCLC. This has important implications for dose escalation strategies in the future.

A modelled comparison of prostate cancer control rates after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (3145 multicentre patients) combined with, or in contrast to, external-beam radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyse biochemical relapse-free-survival results for prostate cancer patients receiving combined external beam and high-dose-rate brachytherapy, in comparison with expected results using projections based on dose/fractionation/response parameter values deduced from a previous external-beam-alone 5969-patient multicentre dataset. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Results on a total of 3145 prostate cancer patients receiving brachytherapy (BT) as part or all of their treatment were collected from 10 institutions, and subjected to linear-quadratic (LQ) modelling of dose response and fractionation parameters. RESULTS: Treatments with BT components of less than 25Gy, 3-4 BT fractions, doses per BT fraction up to 6Gy, and treatment times of 3-7weeks, all gave outcomes expected from LQ projections of the external-beam-alone data (α/ß=1.42Gy). However, BT doses higher than 30Gy, 1-2 fractions, 9 fractions (BT alone), doses per fraction of 9-15Gy, and treatment in only 1week (one example), gave local control levels lower than the expected levels by up to ∼35%. CONCLUSIONS: There are various potential causes of the lower-than-projected control levels for some schedules of brachytherapy: it seems plausible that cold spots in the brachytherapy dose distribution may be contributory, and the applicability of the LQ model at high doses per fraction remains somewhat uncertain. The results of further trials may help elucidate the true benefit of hypofractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Is the α/ß ratio for prostate tumours really low and does it vary with the level of risk at diagnosis?

AIM: To answer the questions: Is the α/ß ratio (radiosensitivity to size of dose-per-fraction) really low enough to justify using a few large dose fractions instead of the traditional many small doses? Does this parameter vary with prognostic risk factors? METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three large statistical overviews are critiqued, with results for 5,000, 6,000 and 14,000 patients with prostate carcinoma, respectively. RESULTS: These major analyses agree in finding the average α/ß ratio to be less than 2 Gy: 1.55, (95% confidence interval=0.46-4.52), 1.4 (0.9-2.2), and the third analysis 1.7 (1.4-2.2) by the ASTRO and 1.6 (1.2-2.2) by Phoenix criteria. All agree that α/ß values do not vary significantly with the low, intermediate, high and "all-included" risk factors. CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity to dose-per-fraction is an intrinsic property of prostate carcinomas and this supports the use of hypo-fractionation to increase the therapeutic gain for these tumours with dose-volume modelling to reduce the risk of late complications in rectum and bladder.

A Comment on Qi et al.: An Estimation of Radiobiological Parameters for Head-and-Neck and the Clinical Implications. Cancers, 2012, 4, 566-580.

Important results were shown as cell survival points in the two panels of the figure which is reproduced in this Comment letter. A curve was fitted assuming the mono-exponential recovery half-time of 17 ± 21 minutes. The wide error limits indicate that this fit is not very good, but the notable feature of both panels is that the last four points are clearly continuing to rise, above the "fitted" curve. This indicates that there is a second, slower, component of repair or recovery and this Comment explores constructively the implications of that additional discovery.