Reducing aneurysm sac growth and secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair by preemptive coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries.

OBJECTIVE: Type II endoleak (EL-2) is the most common complication following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), leading to continued sac growth and potential rupture. In this study, we examined the association between patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar arteries (LAs) with respect to sac growth. The effect of preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LAs on the need for secondary interventions for sac growth post-EVAR was also evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive patients who underwent EVAR for non-ruptured, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) from January 2012 to December 2020. A select group of patients underwent preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LA. Patients with any types I, III, or IV endoleaks were excluded. Patency of the IMA and LA on preoperative computed tomography angiogram (CTA) was evaluated on TeraRecon workstation. All secondary interventions to treat EL-2 were recorded. Sac growth was defined as centerline axial diameter increase of ≥5 mm on follow-up CTA. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients (mean age, 74 ± 8.5 years; 83.7% male) underwent EVAR. Ninety-nine patients had preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LA. Mean follow-up of the cohort was 59.3 ± 30.5 months. Thirty-six patients (12%) demonstrated sac growth on follow-up; 12 of these (33.3%) had preemptive embolization. The median time until detection of sac growth was 28.8 months (interquartile range, 15.2-46.5 months), with a mean growth of 10.1 ± 6.4 mm. Sac growth was significantly associated with presence of EL-2: 27 of 36 (75%) with EL-2 vs 9 of 36 (25%) without EL-2 (P < .001). Patients with sac growth had a higher mean total number (2.6 ± 1.5) of patent lower LAs (L3, L4) compared with those without (2.0 ± 1.4; P = .03). Patency of L1, L2, and L3 LAs were not associated with sac growth. However, patency of at least one L4 LA was significantly associated with sac growth (14.8% vs 7.7%; P = .04). The highest incidence of sac growth (17.6%) was seen when both IMA and L4 LA were patent; significantly different from the lowest incidence (5.3%) when both were occluded preoperatively (P = .018). Preemptive coiling of the IMA and/or LA significantly reduced the need for post-EVAR secondary intervention for sac growth. Freedom from post-EVAR secondary intervention was achieved in 92 of 99 (92.9%) pre-EVAR coiled patients vs 163 of 201 (81.5%) patients who did not undergo pre-EVAR coiling (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive coil embolization of the IMA and LAs, especially L4 LA, reduces the need for secondary interventions for sac growth, potentially improving the long-term durability of EVAR.

The Future of Interventions for Stage IV Colorectal Cancers.

Future options for the management of stage IV colorectal cancer are primarily focused on personalized and directed therapies. Interventions include precision cancer medicine, utilizing nanocarrier platforms for directed chemotherapy, palliative pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), adjunctive oncolytic virotherapy, and radioembolization techniques. Comprehensive genetic profiling provides specific tumor-directed therapy based on individual genetics. Biomimetic magnetic nanoparticles as chemotherapy delivery systems may reduce systemic side effects of traditional chemotherapy by targeting tumor cells and sparing healthy cells. PIPAC is a newly emerging option for patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer and is now being used internationally, showing promising results as a palliative therapy for colorectal cancer. Oncolytic virotherapy is another emerging potential treatment option, especially when combined with standard chemotherapy and/or radiation, as well as immunotherapy. And finally, radioembolization with yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) microspheres has shown some success in treating patients with unresectable liver metastasis from colorectal cancer via selective arterial injection.

Robotic Resection of Type I Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma with Intrapancreatic Bile Duct Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Type I hilar cholangiocarcinoma is a malignancy of the extrahepatic bile duct for which margin-negative resection with sufficient lymphadenectomy may provide curative treatment. The aim of this video is to highlight the advantages of optical magnification, articulating instruments, and indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography to demonstrate extrahepatic bile duct resection from the biliary confluence to the intrapancreatic bile duct with comprehensive hilar lymphadenectomy for pathologic staging. METHODS: A 58-year-old male presented with obstructive jaundice and was found to have a biliary stricture arising from the cystic duct and bile duct junction. Endoscopic biopsy of the bile duct confirmed adenocarcinoma. His case was presented at a multidisciplinary tumor conference where consensus was to proceed with upfront robotic en bloc extrahepatic bile duct resection with hilar lymphadenectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. RESULTS: Final pathology demonstrated margin-negative resection of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 1 out of 12 lymph nodes involved with disease, and pathologic stage T2N1M0 (stage IIIC). The patient had no postoperative complications and was discharged home on postoperative day 5. At 6 weeks from his operative date, he was initiated on four cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine/capecitabine, followed by 50 Gray external beam radiation therapy with capecitabine, then four cycles of gemcitabine/capecitabine, completed after 6 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic extrahepatic bile duct resection, hilar lymphadenectomy, and biliary enteric reconstruction is feasible and should be considered for selected cases of bile duct resection.

Robotic Isolated Caudate Lobectomy for Solitary Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Safety of liver resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma continues to improve due to decreased morbidity of resection. Minimally invasive techniques contribute greatly to this morbidity reduction. Isolated caudate lobectomy presents a unique technical challenge because of proximity to major vasculature. The video aims to review nuances of robotic isolated caudate lobectomy for metastatic colon adenocarcinoma.

Effect of wound protectors on surgical site infection in patients undergoing whipple procedure.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data persists for use of wound protectors in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI). We aimed to examine, at a multi-institutional level, the effect of wound protectors on superficial or deep SSI following elective open PD. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pancreatectomy procedure targeted participant use file was queried from 2016 to 2018. Planned open PD procedures were extracted. Univariable, multivariable, and propensity score matched analyses were conducted. RESULTS: 11,562 patients undergoing PD were evaluated, 27% of which used wound protectors. Wound protectors decreased superficial or deep SSI risk in all patients (5.7% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001), patients who have (6.6% vs. 12.2%, P < 0.001) and who did not have (4.6% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.011) a biliary stent. Propensity score matched analysis confirms such results (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.69, P < 0.001 overall, OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.95, P = 0.03 without biliary stent, OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44-0.73, P < 0.001 with biliary stent). CONCLUSIONS: Wound protectors reduce risk of superficial or deep SSI in patients undergoing PD, yet only a quarter of PD were associated with their use. This protective effect is seen whether patients have or have not had preoperative biliary stenting.

Cellular Immunoprofile of Peritoneal Environment During a HIPEC Procedure.

BACKGROUND: We characterized the peritoneal immune cellular profile during cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in this pilot study. METHODS: We prospectively performed flow cytometric analysis of peritoneal fluid collected at laparotomy and during HIPEC at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min. Analysis consisted of standard flow cytometric leukocyte gating and the use of antibodies for stem cells, B lymphocytes, T-helper, T-suppressor, and natural killer (NK) cells. RESULTS: The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score was 19.8 ± 11.5 (median 19). Twelve patients had a completeness of cytoreduction (CCR) score of 0-1, and three patients had a CCR score of ≥ 2 (20%). The proportion of peritoneal NK cells remained stable (p = 0.655) throughout perfusion. The CD4/CD8 ratio (p = 0.019) and granulocyte/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.018) evolved during cytoreduction, with no further change during HIPEC. Two distinct temporal patterns of peritoneal T lymphocytes became evident (the 'high' and 'low' CD4/CD8 ratio groups) and patients maintained their high versus low peritoneal CD4/CD8 ratio status throughout the duration of HIPEC. High CD4/CD8 was associated with longer cytoreduction (p = 0.019) and borderline higher PCI score (p = 0.058). No association was identified with age (p = 0.131), sex (p = 1.000), CCR status (p = 0.580), occurrence of complication (p = 0.282), or ascites volume (p = 0.713). CONCLUSION: The cellular immunoprofile of peritoneal fluid during HIPEC is stable but changes during cytoreduction. Two distinct immune groups emerged, based on CD4/CD8 ratios in the peritoneal perfusate. Further studies are warranted to evaluate peritoneal immunity and the clinical significance of novel peritoneal immune phenotype.

Minimally invasive hepatectomy is associated with decreased morbidity and resource utilization in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether elderly patients undergoing elective hepatectomy experience increased morbidity/mortality and whether these outcomes could be mitigated by minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH). METHODS: 15,612 patients from 2014 to 2017 were identified in the Hepatectomy Targeted Procedure Participant Use File of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine the effect of elderly status (age ≥ 75 years, N = 1769) on outcomes with a subgroup analysis of elderly only patients by open (OH) versus MIH (robotic, laparoscopic, and hybrid, N = 4044). Propensity score matching was conducted comparing the effect of MIH to OH in elderly patients to ensure that results are not the artifact of imbalance in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, elderly patients had increased risk for 30-day mortality, major morbidity, prolonged length of hospital stay, and discharge to destination other than home. In the elderly subgroup, MIH was associated with decreased major morbidity (OR 0.71, P = 0.031), invasive intervention (OR 0.61, P = 0.032), liver failure (OR 0.15, P = 0.011), bleeding (OR 0.46, P < 0.001), and prolonged length of stay (OR 0.46, P < 0.001). Propensity score-matched analyses successfully matched 4021 pairs of patients treated by MIH vs. OH, and logistic regression analyses on this matched sample found that MIH was associated with decreased major complications (OR 0.69, P = 0.023), liver failure (OR 0.14, P = 0.010), bile leak (OR 0.46, P = 0.009), bleeding requiring transfusion (OR 0.46, P < 0.001), prolonged length of stay (OR 0.46, P < 0.001), and discharge to destination other than home (OR 0.691, P = 0.035) compared to OH. CONCLUSION: MIH is associated with decreased risk of major morbidity, liver failure, bile leak, bleeding, prolonged length of stay, and discharge to destination other than home among elderly patients in this retrospective study. However, MIH in elderly patients does not protect against postoperative mortality.

The role of the inferior mesenteric artery in predicting secondary intervention for type II endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with a greater risk of graft-related complications and need for secondary interventions compared with open repair. Type II endoleak (EL-2) is the most common complication. We examined the hypothesis that a functionally occluded inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) before EVAR was associated with fewer secondary interventions for EL-2. METHODS: All nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated by EVAR using U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved endografts from January 2005 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed, including computed tomography angiograms. Preoperative patency of the IMA and any secondary interventions performed after the index EVAR procedure were recorded. A functionally occluded IMA was defined as one that was (1) chronically occluded or severely stenosed on preoperative imaging or (2) coil embolized before EVAR. Secondary interventions for persistent EL-2 were indicated when AAA sac diameter increased by more than 5 mm. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 490 patients (84 women) with a mean age of 74.8 ± 8.2 years. The mean preoperative AAA diameter was 5.6 ± 0.9 cm. One hundred twenty-nine patients (26.3%) died during follow-up. The mean follow-up of survivors was 38 months. Types (prevalence) of endoleak were I (2.4%), II (18.9%), III (0.7%), IV (0.5%), and V (0.2%). Patients with a functionally occluded IMA underwent significantly fewer secondary interventions for EL-2 compared with patients with a patent IMA (2.6% vs 7.1%; P = .020). All secondary interventions in the functionally occluded IMA group involved the lumbar arteries (LA). When the IMA was patent, secondary interventions were equally distributed between the LA and IMA. Logistic regression confirmed that a functionally patent IMA was associated with a greater number of secondary interventions for EL-2 (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-7.5; P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a functionally occluded IMA required significantly fewer secondary interventions for EL-2 after EVAR. In addition, the type of vessels intervened on were primarily LA. Among patients with a patent IMA, preoperative coil embolization may decrease secondary interventions and improve the long-term durability of EVAR.

Antimicrobial Properties of Perfusate Fluid After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CS-HIPEC) with Mitomycin C.

BACKGROUND: Infectious postoperative complications often delay systemic chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS-HIPEC). Because the authors have empirically observed fewer incisional infectious complications than expected after CS-HIPEC with mitomycin C (MMC), they investigated the antimicrobial properties of HIPEC perfusate fluid. METHODS: This study prospectively measured in vitro bacterial growth inhibition by HIPEC perfusate (n = 18). After 10 µL of perfusate had been plated on agar plate inoculated by standard strains of either Escherichia coli (strain 25922) or Staphylococcus aureus (strain 25923), it was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Antimicrobial activity evidenced by a zone of complete growth inhibition was measured in millimeters. These were compared against growth inhibition produced by control groups represented by MMC solution in normal saline (MMC concentrations of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 8.75 µg/mL), 7 per group. RESULTS: Bacterial inhibition by HIPEC perfusate was stronger against E. coli than against S. aureus (13.1 ± 6.8 vs 8.3 ± 7.7 mm; p = 0.005). No E. coli inhibition was observed for MMC saline in concentrations of 2 through 8 µg/mL (p < 0.001 each), and inhibition of 4.5 ± 5.7 mm was observed for an MMC saline concentration of 8.75 µg/mL (p = 0.007). The S. aureus inhibition zones by MMC saline solutions were 2.2 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002), 5.1 ± 2.3 (p = 0.135), 7.5 ± 1.0 (p = 0.654), 9.6 ± 0.9 (p = 0.058), and 10.2 ± 0.4 mm (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The antimicrobial properties of HIPEC perfusate are considerable but variable between patients and stronger against E. coli than against S. aureus. Further studies of HIPEC carrier solutions and chemotherapy agents may result in reduction of surgical-site infection and thus enhanced patient recovery.

Prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer given systemic therapy: an analysis of individual patient data from prospective randomised trials from the Analysis and Research in Cancers of the Digestive System (ARCAD) database.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer have reduced overall survival compared with patients with metastatic colorectal cancer without peritoneal involvement. Here we further investigated the effect of the number and location of metastases in patients receiving first-line systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: We analysed individual patient data for previously untreated patients enrolled in 14 phase 3 randomised trials done between 1997 and 2008. Trials were included if protocols explicitly pre-specified and solicited for patients with peritoneal involvement in the trial data collection process or had done a formal peritoneum-focused review of individual pre-treatment scans. We used stratified multivariable Cox models to assess the prognostic associations of peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer with overall survival and progression-free survival, adjusting for other key clinical-pathological factors (age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, primary tumour location [colon vs rectum], previous treatment, and baseline BMI). The primary endpoint was difference in overall survival between populations with and without peritoneal metastases. FINDINGS: Individual patient data were available for 10 553 patients. 9178 (87%) of 10 553 patients had non-peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer (4385 with one site of metastasis, 4793 with two or more sites of metastasis), 194 (2%) patients had isolated peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer, and 1181 (11%) had peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer and other organ involvement. These groups were similar in age, ethnic origin, and use of targeted treatment. Patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer were more likely than those with non-peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer to be women (565 [41%] of 1371 vs 3312 [36%] of 9169 patients; p=0·0003), have colon primary tumours (1116 [84%] of 1334 patients vs 5603 [66%]; p<0·0001), and have performance status of 2 (136 [10%] vs 521 [6%]; p<0·0001). We recorded a higher proportion of patients with mutated BRAF in patients with peritoneal-only (eight [18%] of 44 patients with available data) and peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer with other sites of metastasis (34 [12%] of 289), compared with patients with non-peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer (194 [9%] of 2230; p=0·028 comparing the three groups). Overall survival (adjusted HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·63-0·91; p=0·003) was better in patients with isolated non-peritoneal sites than in those with isolated peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival of patients with two of more non-peritoneal sites of metastasis (adjusted HR 1·04, 95% CI 0·86-1·25, p=0.69) and those with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer plus one other site of metastasis (adjusted HR 1·10, 95% CI 0·89-1·37, p=0·37) was similar to those with isolated peritoneal metastases. Compared with patients with isolated peritoneal metastases, those with peritoneal metastases and two or more additional sites of metastasis had the shortest survival (adjusted HR 1·40; CI 1·14-1·71; p=0·0011). INTERPRETATION: Patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer have significantly shorter overall survival than those with other isolated sites of metastases. In patients with several sites of metastasis, poor survival is a function of both increased number of metastatic sites and peritoneal involvement. The pattern of metastasis and in particular, peritoneal involvement, results in prognostic heterogeneity of metastatic colorectal cancer. FUNDING: None.

Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Colorectal Surgery: A Pragmatic Nonsponsored Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Trial in a Community Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Prior industry conducted studies have shown that long acting liposomal bupivacaine injection improves pain control postoperatively. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether liposomal bupivacaine reduced the use of postoperative opioid (http://links.lww.com/DCR/A253) pain medication as compared to standard bupivacaine following colorectal surgery. DESIGN: A double blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing liposomal bupivacaine versus standard bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective colon resection. SETTINGS: Community hospital with general surgery residency program with all cases performed by colorectal surgeons. PATIENTS: Fifty-seven patients were randomized and reported as intention-to-treat analysis with 6 protocol violations. Sensitivity analysis excluding these 6 patients demonstrated no change in study results or conclusion. Mean age was 67 ± 2 years and 56% were male. There were 36 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery, and 21 patients had an open colon resection. INTERVENTIONS: Experimental arm received liposomal bupivacaine while control arm received standard bupivacaine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was intravenous hydromorphone equivalent used via PCA during first 48 hours after operation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the amount of opioid used orally or intravenously in the postoperative period. The primary outcome measure was PCA hydromorphone consumption during first two postoperative days after operation (hydromorphone equivalent use in standard bupivacaine group 11.3 ± 8.9 mg versus 13.3 ± 11.9 mg in liposomal bupivacaine group, p = 0.58 Mann-Whitney test). LIMITATIONS: Small pragmatic trials typically remain underpowered for secondary analyses. A larger study could help to further delineate other outcomes that are impacted by postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal bupivacaine did not change the amount of opioid used postoperatively. Based on our study, liposomal bupivacaine does not provide any added benefit over conventional bupivacaine after colon resection. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02052557).

Rare breast cancer: 246 invasive secretory carcinomas from the National Cancer Data Base.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Invasive secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) is a rare subtype of breast malignancy. METHODS: Cases of SBC and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) from the National Cancer Database (1998-2011) were queried. RESULTS: Patients with SBC (n = 246) and IDC were identified (n = 1,564,068). The group with SBC was younger (age 56.4 ± 16.0 vs. 60.4 ± 13.9 years, P < 0.001), had similar tumor size (19.9 ± 17.8 vs. 21.6 ± 25.5 mm, P = 0.297), more frequently African-Americans (24.1 vs. 14.8 vs. 13.7; P = 0.004), more well-differentiated (32 vs. 18%, P < 0.001) and less likely to be hormone receptor positive (ER: 64 vs. 76%, P = 0.001; PR: 43 vs. 65%, P < 0.001). No differences were found for incidence of node-positivity (32 vs. 34%, P = 0.520) and stage IV presentation (2.4 vs. 3.6%, P = 0.372). Breast conserving surgery (60 vs. 58%, P = 0.405) and hormonal therapy (67 vs. 71%, P = 0.489) rates were similar. Systemic chemotherapy was used less often for SBC (38 vs. 45%, P = 0.035). The overall survival of all patients with SBC was better than all patients with IDC (median not reached vs. 14.8 years, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: SBC is an uncommon tumor that is often well-differentiated and seen in younger women. Contrary to prior reports, they are frequently hormone receptor-positive. Compared to IDC, overall survival is improved. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:721-725. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Role of type II endoleak in sac regression after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair (EVAR) of infrarenal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is increasingly used in patients with suitable aortic morphology conforming to device-specific instructions for use. Despite improvements in graft design, type II endoleak (EL-2) from the inferior mesenteric artery (EL-IMA) or the lumbar artery (EL-LA) remains the Achilles' heel of EVAR. The objective of this study was to evaluate the natural history of the AAA sac after EVAR. We hypothesized that persistent EL-2 would be associated with inferior AAA sac volume regression. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all nonruptured AAA treated by elective EVAR using Food and Drug Administration-approved endografts from January 2005 to December 2008 in our facility. Review of medical records and preoperative and follow-up computed tomography angiograms at 1, 6, and 12 months was performed. Patients with type I, III, and IV endoleaks were excluded, as were those lost to all follow-up. AAA size and volume were analyzed using TeraRecon software (Aquarius Intuition, Foster City, Calif). Change in AAA sac volume was compared in patients with and without EL-2, and with an occluded vs patent IMA. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 191 patients (161 men, 30 women) with a mean age of 74 years. The mean preoperative AAA diameter was 5.5 cm (range, 4-11 cm), and mean volume was 137.45 cm(3). EL-2 was present in 24% at completion of EVAR and in 9% at a mean follow-up of 6 months (range 4-8 months). Completion angiography at 1 month showed 63% of EL-2 had resolved. Those with EL-2 present at 1 month had statistically inferior sac regression compared with those who did not (23% reduction vs 2% increase at 1 year; P = .002). Preoperatively, the IMA was occluded by coils or was chronically occluded in 82 patients vs 109 patients who had a patent IMA. At the 6-month follow-up, patients with an occluded IMA had an EL-2 rate of 2.4% vs 14.7% in those with a patent IMA (P = .005 by t-test). Sac volume regression was 21.8% in those with an occluded IMA vs 13.2% in those with a patent IMA (P = .004 by t-test). Regression in AAA sac volume was highly significant in patients with occluded IMA, at 30% vs 16% at 1 year (P = .0018 by two-sided t-test). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of persistent EL-2 after EVAR results in inferior AAA sac regression. A preoperatively patent IMA is associated with increased rates of EL-2 and inferior AAA sac regression. Consideration should be given to preoperative occlusion of a patent IMA before EVAR.

Gemcitabine transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to increase survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however toxicity from commonly used agents limits its use in unresectable disease. Gemcitabine is a well tolerated chemotherapeutic agent with a high first pass clearance. In this study we evaluated a cohort of patients with unresectable HCC treated with gemcitabine-TACE alone. METHODOLOGY: A review of all patients that underwent gemcitabine-TACE for unresectable HCC from 2002 to 2006 was performed. No patients were eligible for resection, liver transplantation or ablation. All patients received gemcitabine-TACE alone. The primary outcome measure was survival from first treatment. Secondary outcome measures included radiological response and toxicity. RESULTS: 55 patients underwent a total of 172 gemcitabine-TACE treatments for unresectable HCC. Median age was 64.7 years. All patients had Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B (44%) or C (56%) disease. Median survival following gemcitabine-TACE was 8.8 months. 22% demonstrated a partial response and 61% had stable disease. 6% experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. There was 1 treatment related death. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine-TACE is well tolerated and appears to provide an alternative agent for patients with unresectable HCC undergoing chemoembolization.

Survival and cancer recurrence after short-course perioperative probiotics in a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The long-term impact of perioperative probiotics remains understudied while mounting evidence links microbiome and oncogenesis. Therefore, we analyzed overall survival and cancer recurrence among patients enrolled in a randomized trial of perioperative probiotics. METHODS: 6-year follow-up of surgical patients participating in a randomized trial evaluating short-course perioperative oral probiotic VSL#3 (n = 57) or placebo (n = 63). RESULTS: Study groups did not differ in age, preoperative hemoglobin, ASA status, and Charlson comorbidity index. There was a significant difference in preoperative serum albumin (placebo group 4.0 ± 0.1 vs. 3.7 ± 0.1 g/dL in the probiotic group, p = 0.030). Thirty-seven deaths (30.8 %) have occurred during a median follow-up of 6.2 years. Overall survival stratified on preoperative serum albumin and surgical specialty was similar between groups (p = 0.691). Age (aHR = 1.081, p = 0.001), serum albumin (aHR = 0.162, p = 0.001), and surgical specialty (aHR = 0.304, p < 0.001) were the only predictors of overall survival in the multivariate model, while the placebo/probiotic group (aHR = 0.808, p = 0.726) was not predictive. The progression rate among cancer patients was similar in the probiotic group (30.3 %, 10/33) compared to the placebo group (21.2 %, 7/33; p = 0.398). The progression-free survival was not significantly different (unstratified p = 0.270, stratified p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative short-course use of VSL#3 probiotics does not influence overall or progression-free survival after complex surgery for visceral malignancy.

Survival among pancreaticoduodenectomy patients treated for pancreatic head cancer <1 or 2 cm.

BACKGROUND: Size of primary tumor has implications for staging, imaging, and treatment of pancreatic head carcinomas. Limited data suggest that small tumor size is associated with better survival. The objective of this population study is to analyze characteristics and survival of patients with resected pancreatic head ductal carcinomas sized <1 and 2 cm. METHODS: Analysis of resected invasive pancreatic head ductal carcinomas captured within SEER Program from 1998 to 2008. RESULTS: A total of 7,135 cases were analyzed with nodal metastases in 31, 55, and 67 % for subcentimeter, 1.1-2 cm, and >2 cm tumors, respectively. Median survival was longest for node-negative tumors (38, 26, 19 months for tumors measuring ≤ 1, 1.1-2, and >2 cm, respectively; p < 0.001) versus node-positive tumors (18, 19, 14 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, large tumor size was associated with higher risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.179 for tumors 1.1-2 cm, p = 0.152; HR = 1.665 for tumors >2 cm, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Small pancreatic cancers have a poor prognosis and surprisingly high rate of nodal involvement; therefore, they cannot be considered early cancers. Size-based screening is unlikely to save lives with current treatment options.