Abortion for fetal indications: Timing of prenatal diagnosis and abortion for structural and genetic abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: To compare diagnoses in patients undergoing abortion for fetal indications at 15-0/7 to 21-6/7 vs. ≥22-0/7 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included women undergoing abortion at ≥15-0/7 weeks' gestation for fetal indications from 2012 to 2018 at our institution. We compared indications (genetic vs. structural only) between groups by gestational age (15-0/7 to 21-6/7 vs. ≥22-0/7 weeks). We performed statistical analysis using Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The 158 women identified included 97 (61.4%) at 15-0/7 to 21-6/7 and 61 (38.6%) at ≥22-0/7 weeks' gestation. Women at an earlier gestational age more commonly had an initial diagnosis of a genetic disorder (41 [42.3%)] vs.10 [16.4%], respectively, p < .001). In 69 cases with initial or subsequent diagnosis of a genetic disorder, there were differences in the types of genetic abnormalities, with common chromosomal abnormalities (including Trisomies 13, 18, and 21) the most frequent diagnosis in those who underwent abortion at 15-0/7 to 21-6/7 weeks and microarray abnormalities more common at ≥22-0/7 weeks (22 [44.9%] vs. 4 [18.2%]) and 7 [14.9%] vs. 11 [50.0%], respectively, p = .01). Routine ultrasonography for fetal anomaly surveillance occurred one week earlier in women undergoing abortion for structural anomalies at 15-0/7 to 21-6/7weeks (median 19-2/7 weeks [interquartile range (IQR) 19 0/7 to 19-5/7 weeks]) compared to ≥22-0/7 weeks (median 20-2/7 weeks [IQR 19 6/7 to 20 4/7 weeks]), p < .001. CONCLUSION: Abortions for genetic indications are performed earlier in gestation compared to those performed for structural abnormalities. Timing of fetal anatomy ultrasound examination correlated with gestational age at abortion for structural abnormalities. IMPLICATIONS: Many states impose gestational-age based abortion bans, with 20-weeks post-fertilization the most common. However, we may not identify fetal abnormalities until close to 22 weeks gestation (20-weeks post-fertilization). Optimizing timing of prenatal diagnosis might mitigate the impact of gestational-age based abortion bans.

Prevalence of baby bottle versus breastfeeding graphics on products in national chain stores.

OBJECTIVE: This study surveyed the prevalence of bottle versus breastfeeding graphic images on products marketed for pregnant mothers and young children available for purchase in national chain stores. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a product survey/content analysis. Eighteen national chain stores located in a 10-mile radius of Charlottesville, VA were visited. In total, 2,670 individual items in 11 categories of baby shower and baby gift merchandise (shower invitations, greeting cards, gift wrap, shower decorations, baby dolls, baby books, infant clothing, bibs, nursery decorations, baby blankets, and disposable diapers) were assessed. The main outcome measures were prevalences of baby bottle and breastfeeding graphic images. RESULTS: Baby bottle images were found on products in eight of the 11 categories of items surveyed. Thirty-five percent of baby dolls were marketed with a baby bottle. The prevalence of bottle images on items in all other categories, however, was low. Of the 2,670 items surveyed, none contained a breastfeeding image. CONCLUSIONS: The low prevalence of baby bottle images on commonly purchased baby gift and baby shower items is encouraging. However, the absence of breastfeeding images and the relatively high prevalence of baby dolls marketed with a baby bottle demonstrate that breastfeeding is not portrayed as the physiologic norm on these products. Product designers should explore ways to promote breastfeeding, consumers should make informed choices in product selection, and advocacy groups should promote guidelines for these products.