United States black:white infant mortality disparities are not inevitable: identification of community resilience independent of socioeconomic status.

INTRODUCTION: U.S. disparities in Black:White infant mortality are persistent. National trends, however, may obscure local successes. METHODS: Zero-corrected, negative binomial multivariable modeling was used to predict Black infant mortality (1999-2003) in all U.S. counties with reliable rates. Independent variables included county population size, racial composition, educational attainment, poverty, income and geographic origin. Resilient counties were defined as those whose Black infant mortality rate residual score was < 2.0. Mortality data was accessed from the Compressed Mortality File compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics and found on the CDC WONDER website. Demographic information was obtained from the US Census. RESULTS: The final model included the percentage of Blacks, age 18 to 64 years, speaking little or no English (P < .008), a socioeconomic index comprising educational attainment, poverty, and per capita income (P < .001), and household income in 1990 (P < .001). After accounting for these factors, a stratum comprising Essex and Plymouth Counties, Mass.; Bronx, N.Y.; and Multnomah, Ore. was identified as unusually resilient. Percentage of Black poverty and educational attainment in Black women in the resilient stratum approximated the average for all 330 counties. In 1979, Black infant mortality in the resilient stratum (23.6 per 1000 live births) exceeded Black US infant mortality (22.6). By 2001, Black infant mortality in the resilient stratum (5.6) was below the corresponding value for Whites (5.7). Resilient county neonatal mortality declined both early and late in the observation period, while post-neonatal declines were most marked after 1996. CONCLUSIONS: Models for reduction/elimination of racial disparities in US infant mortality, independent from county-level contextual measures of socioeconomic status, may already exist.

The clinical content of preconception care: care of psychosocial stressors.

In the period before conceiving, many women are under considerable psychosocial stress, which may affect their ability to conceive and to carry a pregnancy successfully to term. Thus, health care providers who interact with women in the preconception and interconception period should ask their patients about possible psychosocial risks. It is no longer sufficient to wait until the woman mentions a problem or seeks advice; the provider must be proactive, because many women do not realize the potential impact of stressors on their pregnancy outcomes nor are they always aware that their provider is interested in their psychosocial as well as their physical health. An income that puts women below or near the federal poverty level is one such stress. If a woman's economic situation can be improved before the pregnancy, she is more likely to be healthy after conception, because increased income can reduce financial stress, improve food security, and improve well-being in other ways. Therefore, all women should be asked about their economic status and those who appear to be struggling financially should be referred to an agency that can check their eligibility for various types of financial assistance. Many women of childbearing age have difficulty accessing the primary care services needed for preconception care. Usually this is due to lack of insurance, but it may also be caused by living in an area with an insufficient number of providers. Certainly all women who are uninsured, and possible many who are on Medicaid and have difficulty finding providers who will accept Medicaid, have access problems. All women should be asked about their health insurance coverage and their usual source of care. If they do not have health insurance, they should be referred to an agency that can determine their eligibility. If they do not have a usual source of care, one should be established that will accept their insurance coverage or provide care free of charge or on a sliding fee basis. Intimate partner violence, sexual violence outside of an intimate relationship (usually rape), and maltreatment (abuse or neglect) as a child or adolescent place a woman at elevated risk during a pregnancy, as well as having possible adverse impacts on the fetus, the infant, and the child. Studies show that women believe it is appropriate for health care providers to ask about interpersonal violence, but that they will not report it spontaneously. Therefore, screening for ongoing and historical interpersonal violence, sexual violence, and child maltreatment should be incorporated into routine care by all health care providers.

Trends in mental health and substance abuse services at the nation's community health centers: 1998-2003.

OBJECTIVE: We examined trends in delivery of mental health and substance abuse services at the nation's community health centers. METHODS: Analyses used data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Bureau of Primary Care's (BPHC) 1998 and 2003 Uniform Data System, merged with county-level data. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2003, the number of patients diagnosed with a mental health/substance abuse disorder in community health centers increased from 210,000 to 800,000. There was an increase in the number of patients per specialty mental health/substance abuse treatment provider and a decline in the mean number of patient visits, from 7.3 visits per patient to 3.5 by 2003. Although most community health centers had some on-site mental health/substance abuse services, centers without on-site services were more likely to be located in counties with fewer mental health/substance abuse clinicians, psychiatric emergency rooms, and inpatient hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Community health centers are playing an increasingly central role in providing mental health/substance abuse treatment services in the United States. It is critical both to ensure that these centers have adequate resources for providing mental health/substance abuse care and that they develop effective linkages with mental health/substance abuse clinicians in the communities they serve.

Trends in Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services at the Nation's Community Health Centers: 1998-2003.

OBJECTIVE: We examined trends in delivery of mental health and substance abuse services at the nation's community health centers. METHODS: Analyses used data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Bureau of Primary Care's (BPHC) 1998 and 2003 Uniform Data System, merged with county-level data. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2003, the number of patients diagnosed with a mental health/substance abuse disorder in community health centers increased from 210,000 to 800,000. There was an increase in the number of patients per specialty mental health/substance abuse treatment provider and a decline in the mean number of patient visits, from 7.3 visits per patient to 3.5 by 2003. Although most community health centers had some on-site mental health/substance abuse services, centers without on-site services were more likely to be located in counties with fewer mental health/substance abuse clinicians, psychiatric emergency rooms, and inpatient hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Community health centers are playing an increasingly central role in providing mental health/substance abuse treatment services in the United States. It is critical both to ensure that these centers have adequate resources for providing mental health/substance abuse care and that they develop effective linkages with mental health/substance abuse clinicians in the communities they serve.

Diversity in academic medicine no. 1 case for minority faculty development today.

For the past 20 years, the percentage of the American population consisting of nonwhite minorities has been steadily increasing. By 2050, these nonwhite minorities, taken together, are expected to become the majority. Meanwhile, despite almost 50 years of efforts to increase the representation of minorities in the healthcare professions, such representation remains grossly deficient. Among the underrepresented minorities are African and Hispanic Americans; Native Americans, Alaskans, and Pacific Islanders (including Hawaiians); and certain Asians (including Hmong, Vietnamese, and Cambodians). The underrepresentation of underrepresented minorities in the healthcare professions has a profoundly negative effect on public health, including serious racial and ethnic health disparities. These can be reduced only by increased recruitment and development of both underrepresented minority medical students and underrepresented minority medical school administrators and faculty. Underrepresented minority faculty development is deterred by barriers resulting from years of systematic segregation, discrimination, tradition, culture, and elitism in academic medicine. If these barriers can be overcome, the rewards will be great: improvements in public health, an expansion of the contemporary medical research agenda, and improvements in the teaching of both underrepresented minority and non-underrepresented minority students.

Diversity in academic medicine no. 3 struggle for survival among leading diversity programs.

Since efforts to increase the diversity of academic medicine began shortly after the Civil War, the efforts have been characterized by a ceaseless struggle of old and new programs to survive. In the 40 years after the Civil War, the number of minority-serving institutions grew from 2 to 9, and then the number fell again to 2 in response to an adverse evaluation by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. For 50 years, the programs grew slowly, picking up speed only after the passage of landmark civil rights legislation in the 1960s. From 1987 through 2005, they expanded rapidly, fueled by such new federal programs as the Centers of Excellence and Health Careers Opportunity Programs. Encompassing majority-white institutions as well as minority-serving institutions, the number of Centers of Excellence grew to 34, and the number of Health Careers Opportunity Programs grew to 74. Then, in 2006, the federal government cut its funding abruptly and drastically, reducing the number of Centers of Excellence and Health Careers Opportunity Programs to 4 each. Several advocacy groups, supported by think tanks, have striven to restore federal funding to previous levels, so far to no avail. Meanwhile, the struggle to increase the representation of underrepresented minorities in the health professions is carried on by the surviving programs, including the remaining Centers of Excellence and Health Careers Opportunity Programs and new programs that, funded by state, local, and private agencies, have arisen from the ashes.

Diversity in academic medicine no. 5 successful programs in minority faculty development: overview.

Despite recent drastic cutbacks in federal funding for programs to diversify academic medicine, many such programs survive and continue to set examples for others of how to successfully increase the participation of minorities underrepresented in the healthcare professions and, in particular, how to increase physician and nonphysician minority medical faculty. This article provides an overview of such programs, including those in historically black colleges and universities, minority-serving institutions, research-intensive private and public medical schools, and more primary care-oriented public medical schools. Although the models for faculty development developed by these successful schools overlap, each has unique features worthy of consideration by other schools seeking to develop programs of their own. The ingredients of success are discussed in detail in another article in this theme issue of the Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, "Successful Programs in Minority Faculty Development: Ingredients of Success."

Diversity in academic medicine no. 6 successful programs in minority faculty development: ingredients of success.

This article describes the ingredients of successful programs for the development of minority faculty in academic medicine. Although stung by recent cuts in federal funding, minority faculty development programs now stand as models for medical schools that are eager to join the 140-year-old quest for diversity in academic medicine. In this article, the ingredients of these successful faculty development programs are discussed by experts in minority faculty development and illustrated by institutional examples. Included are descriptions of program goals and content, mentoring and coaching, selecting participants, providing a conducive environment, managing the program, and sustaining support. This article is a companion to another article, "Successful Programs in Minority Faculty Development: Overview," in this issue of the Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine.

Being uninsured: impact on children's healthcare and health.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are 8.4 million uninsured children in the United States. Many are eligible for coverage. Current literature on how lack of health insurance affects the quality and outcome of children's healthcare in the United States is reviewed, and effective solutions are identified. Recent policy changes have produced restrictions on basic preventive and curative services, despite concurrent major efforts to increase insurance coverage rates for children. RECENT FINDINGS: With more than 70% of currently uninsured children eligible for either Medicaid or the State Children's Health Insurance Program, these public programs have not yet produced expected levels of coverage. Health systems and provider accountability for the primary care of uninsured children is not optimal. Families of uninsured children face non-financial access barriers to care such as lack of continuity with a primary care provider and inadequate visit time. These barriers are compounded for uninsured children with special healthcare needs. SUMMARY: Pediatric primary care effectiveness is significantly reduced by insurance shortfalls. Lack of coverage inhibits appropriate care seeking; diminishes provider availability; compromises care content, quality, and satisfaction; and ultimately harms the entire family unit. However, provision of insurance alone is not a panacea.