Number of lymph node metastases is better predictor of prognosis than level of lymph node metastasis in patients with node-positive colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor for colon cancer patients. Survival is also related to the number and level of positive lymph nodes (PLNs). Definitions of degree of PLNs for colon cancer differ greatly between the number and level of PLNs. STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study is to compare number and level of PLNs to see which is a better predictor of prognosis for node-positive colon cancer. One hundred eighteen patients underwent histologically curative resection for node-positive colon cancer. We calculated the cumulative 5-year survival rates and examined prognostic factors for multivariate analysis based on the number and level of PLNs and additional factors. The number of PLNs was classified as either one to three PLNs or more than four PLNs, and level of PLNs was classified as either Level I (pericolic lymph node metastasis) or Level II (lymph node metastasis along the major named vessel supplying the tumor, and that around the origin of a main artery). RESULTS: Cumulative 5-year survival rates were statistically different between the 1 to 3 PLNs group and the more than 4 PLNs group, but not significantly different between Level I group and Level II group. Multivariate analysis showed that number, not level, of PLNs was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: In node-positive colon cancer, number of PLNs predicted prognosis better than level of PLNs.

Laparoscopic two-stage surgery for goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix: report of a case and review of the Japanese literature.

Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix is a rare clinical entity exhibiting features of both carcinoid and adenocarcinoma. Here, we present the first report of laparoscopic 2-stage surgery for goblet cell carcinoid with a review of the Japanese literature. A 49-year-old man underwent laparoscopic appendectomy under the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A pathologic diagnosis of goblet cell carcinoid, accompanied by the aggressive proliferation, with acute appendicitis was made. Subsequent laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed, and it was verified that there were neither residual tumor nor lymph node metastases. The postoperative course was uneventful. Because goblet cell carcinoid may be difficult to clinically distinguish from acute appendicitis, pathologic examination is essential. Depending upon the grade of tumor proliferation, additional resection should be considered, and our experience with this case suggests that laparoscopic 2-stage surgery is feasible for the adequate treatment of goblet cell carcinoid without complications.