Adductor Canal Blocks Reduce Inpatient Opioid Consumption While Maintaining Noninferior Pain Control and Functional Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The use of perioperative adductor canal blocks (PABs) continues to be a highly debated topic for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Here, we evaluate the effect of PABs on immediate postoperative subjective pain scores, opioid consumption, and objective functional outcomes. METHODS: On December 1, 2019, an institution-wide policy change was begun to use PABs in primary elective TKAs. Patient demographics, immediate postoperative nursing documented pain scores, opioid administration events, and validated physical therapy functional scores were prospectively collected as part of the standard of care and retrospectively queried through our electronic data warehouse. A historical comparison cohort was derived from consecutive patients undergoing TKA between July 1, 2019 and November 30, 2019. RESULTS: 405 primary TKAs received PABs, while 789 patients were in the control cohort. Compared with controls, average verbal rating scale pain scores were lower among PAB recipients from 0-12 hours (2.42 ± 1.60 vs 2.05 ± 1.60; <.001) and 24-36 hours (4.92 ± 2.00 vs 4.47 ± 2.27; <.01). PAB recipients demonstrated significantly lower opioid consumption within the first 24 hours (44.34 ± 40.98 vs 36.83 ± 48.13; P < .01) and during their total inpatient stay (92.27 ± 109.81 vs 77.52 ± 123.11; <.05). AM-PAC scores within the first 24 hours were also higher for PABs (total scores: 20.28 ± 3.06 vs 20.71 ± 3.12; <.05). CONCLUSION: While the minimal clinically important differences in pain scores and functional status were comparable between both cohorts, patients demonstrated a significant reduction in overall inpatient opiate consumption after the introduction of PABs. Surgeons should consider these findings when evaluating for perioperative pain management, opioid-sparing, and rapid discharge protocols.

Preoperative Workup of Operative Hip Fracture Patients: A Survey.

Background: There may be disagreement among stakeholders on the need for preoperative cardiac screening for elderly hip fracture patients. Purpose: We sought to assess preoperative workup perceptions among physicians for hip fracture patients across specialties, specifically considering a patient's cardiovascular risk. Methods: A case-based survey was distributed to 50 physicians in each of the 4 departments involved in preoperative patient care: orthopedic surgery (OS), anesthesiology (A), cardiology (C), and hospital medicine (HM). The survey asked about which clinical presentations required a cardiology consult, as well as about further preoperative imaging and laboratory work. Single score intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare agreement. Results: Of the 200 surveys sent out, 33 responses (16.5% response rate) were received. Between all specialties, there was 72% agreement about preoperative cardiology consult need (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.063 or poor) and 71% agreement about preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) need (ICC = 0.188 or poor). Within each specialty (A, C, HM, OS) ICCs measuring agreement for the need for cardiology consult were 0.812 (good), 0.561 (moderate), 0.457 (poor), and 0.414 (poor), respectively, and for the need for preoperative TTE were 0.852 (good), 0.441 (poor), 0.848 (good), and 0.188 (poor), respectively. Common preoperative testing requested included complete blood count, basic metabolic panel in all cases, and electrocardiogram with troponins if perioperative acute coronary syndrome symptoms were present. Conclusion: This survey suggests that there may be varying levels of agreement within specialties and poor agreement between specialties on the need for cardiology consultation and preoperative imaging for hip fracture patients. This suggests the need for established, reliable preoperative workup protocols with input from different specialties to streamline preoperative care for patients before hip fracture surgery.

Peripheral Nerve Catheter Reduces Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) have historically received high doses of opioids during the perioperative period. As awareness of opioid use has heightened, opioid administration has continuously decreased. This study aimed to evaluate if peripheral nerve catheter (PNC) use in rTKA reduces opiate consumption while maintaining similar pain control and postoperative function levels. Methods: A retrospective review of 354 patients who underwent rTKA between July 2019 and January 2022 was conducted. Fifty total patients who received an adductor canal PNC were propensity-matched 1:1 to a control group of 50 patients that did not receive a PNC. To assess the primary outcome of opiate consumption, nursing documented opiate administration events were converted into morphine milligram equivalents per 24-hour interval. Postoperative pain and functional status were assessed using the verbal rating scale for pain and the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care scores, respectively. Results: Compared to the control group, the PNC group demonstrated significantly lower overall inpatient opiate consumption (98.68 ± 117.03 vs 176.69 ± 203.47 morphine milligram equivalents; 44.15% decrease, P = .021) and lower verbal rating scale pain scores at 60 to 72 hours postoperatively (4.85 ± 1.24 vs 5.83 ± 1.35; 16.81% decrease, P = .038). There was no significant difference in Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care scores postoperatively (raw score: 19.41 ± 3.61 vs 19.46 ± 3.18; 0.26% decrease, P = .952). Finally, the PNC cohort was significantly less likely to be readmitted within 90 days after surgery (0.0% vs 12.0%; P = .012). Conclusions: In rTKA patients, PNC can significantly reduce inpatient opioid consumption while maintaining a comparable functional recovery and superior pain control. Level III Evidence: Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Influence of Tourniquet and Adductor Canal Block Use on Pain and Opioid Consumption after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Reducing pain and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an important perioperative consideration. Though commonly used, the combined influence of tourniquets and adductor canal blocks (ACBs) on pain and opioid consumption is unknown. This study evaluated inpatient opioid consumption and pain between patients with TKA based on tourniquet and/or ACB use. Pain and opioid consumption were highest when a tourniquet, but no ACB was used, and lowest when an ACB, but no tourniquet was used - though absolute differences in pain scores were not clinically significant. Tourniquet and ACB use should be considered as part of TKA opioid-sparing protocols.

The Lateral Femoral Cutaneous and Over the Hip (LOH) Block for the Surgical Management of Hip Fractures: A Safe and Effective Anesthetic Strategy.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of regional anesthesia with sedation only for a variety of hip fractures using the newly described lateral femoral cutaneous with over the hip (LOH) block. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Orthopedic specialty hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 40 patients who presented between November 2021 and February 2022 for fixation of OTA/AO 31.A1-3 and 31.B1-3 fractures. Matched cohorts of 40 patients who received general anesthesia and 40 patients who received spinal anesthesia for hip fracture fixation were also used. INTERVENTION: Operative fixation under LOH block and sedation only. The LOH block is a regional hip analgesic that targets the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, articular branches of femoral nerve, and accessory obturator nerve. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, intraoperative characteristics, anesthesia-related complications, hospital quality metrics, and short-term mortality and reoperation rates. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (40 each: general, spinal, and LOH block) were compared. The cohorts were similar in age, race, body mass index, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, trauma risk score, ambulatory status at baseline, fracture type, and surgical fixation technique performed. Physiologic parameters during surgery were more stable in the LOH block cohort ( P < 0.05). Total OR time and anesthesia time were the shortest for the LOH block cohort ( P < 0.05). Patients in the LOH block cohort also had lower postoperative pain scores ( P < 0.05). Length of hospital stay was the shortest for patients in the LOH block cohort ( P < 0.05), and during discharge, patients in the LOH block cohort ambulated the furthest ( P < 0.05). No differences were found for anesthesia-related complications, palliative care consults, major and minor hospital complications, discharge disposition, reoperation and readmission rates, and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: The LOH block is safe and effective anesthesia for the treatment of all types of hip fractures in the elderly patients requiring surgery. In addition, this block may decrease postoperative pain and length of hospital stay, and allow for greater ambulation in the early postoperative period for patients with hip fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Resolution of Psoriatic Plaques of the Leg After Nailing of an Ipsilateral Tibial Shaft Fracture: A Case Report.

CASE: This case describes a 45-year-old man with documented history of untreated bilateral lower extremity psoriasis of equal severity who sustained a closed left tibial-fibular shaft fracture. After operative fixation with an intramedullary nail under a regional nerve block, the left lower extremity circumferential psoriatic plaque resolved throughout 1 year of follow-up with persistence of the contralateral limb disease. CONCLUSION: This case describes a rare outcome for a patient with bilateral leg psoriasis who experienced resolution of psoriatic plaques on the operated leg only after surgery. It is unknown which process: injury, anesthetic, surgery, or fracture healing mediated this unique finding.

Posterior Shoulder Instability After Infraclavicular Block for Outpatient Hand Surgery.

Regional blocks are being increasingly utilized for anesthesia for various orthopedic procedures. Several studies have shown that regional anesthesia has fewer side effects and improved postoperative pain relief compared to general anesthesia, but regional blocks are not without risks. We present case reports of 2 patients who experienced posterior shoulder instability, one of whom had a posterior shoulder dislocation, immediately in the postanesthesia care unit after undergoing hand surgery with regional anesthesia. This paper highlights the importance of being aware that patients might be at increased risk of shoulder instability after upper extremity regional anesthesia, and appropriate perioperative precautions should be taken.

Indications for Conversion of Spinal into General Anesthesia During Total Joint Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the preferred method of anesthesia at many centers for total joint arthro- plasty (TJA). However, a small subset of patients fails SA, necessitating a conversion to general anesthesia (GA). This report assesses the patient characteristics associated with failed SA. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent SA during their primary TJA between Janu- ary 2015 and December 2016 at our institution. A subset of this group required a conversion from SA to GA. Anesthesia reports were reviewed for the number of attempts at SA and the documented reason for failure. The SA failure cohort was then subdivided into failure categories based on the reasons that had been provided. RESULTS: A total of 5,706 patients were included in this study, 78 of which experienced SA failure. The number of attempts was most strongly associated with SA failure, with three attempts resulting in a five times increased failure rate (OR = 4.73, p = 0.010) and four attempts resulting in 12 times increased failure rate compared to the no failure cohort (OR = 12.3, p < 0.001). Greater than two attempts occurred in 87.5% of the "technical failure" sub-group of the SA failure cohort (p < 0.001). No difference was demon- strated among the other patient characteristics, such as age, sex, body mass index, race, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score, and surgical time. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the major predic- tor influencing spinal to general anesthesia conversion was the number of attempts at SA, especially among technical failure cases. Based on the results, it may be appropriate for anesthesiologists to convert to GA after two failed spi- nal attempts. Further studies are warranted to assess this relationship for firm clinical recommendations.

Modification of a Validated Risk Stratification Tool to Characterize Geriatric Hip Fracture Outcomes and Optimize Care in a Post-COVID-19 World.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To demonstrate how a risk assessment tool modified to account for the COVID-19 virus during the current global pandemic is able to provide risk assessment for low-energy geriatric hip fracture patients. (2) To provide a treatment algorithm for care of COVID-19 positive/suspected hip fractures patients that accounts for their increased risk of morbidity and mortality. SETTING: One academic medical center including 4 Level 1 trauma centers, 1 university-based tertiary care referral hospital, and 1 orthopaedic specialty hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One thousand two hundred seventy-eight patients treated for hip fractures between October 2014 and April 2020, including 136 patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic between February 1, 2020 and April 15, 2020. INTERVENTION: The Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged ORIGINAL (STTGMAORIGINAL) score was modified by adding COVID-19 virus as a risk factor for mortality to create the STTGMACOVID score. Patients were stratified into quartiles to demonstrate differences in risk distribution between the scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Inpatient and 30-day mortality, major, and minor complications. RESULTS: Both STTGMA score and COVID-19 positive/suspected status are independent predictors of inpatient mortality, confirming their use in risk assessment models for geriatric hip fracture patients. Compared with STTGMAORIGINAL, where COVID-19 patients are haphazardly distributed among the risk groups and COVID-19 inpatient and 30 days mortalities comprise 50% deaths in the minimal-risk and low-risk cohorts, the STTGMACOVID tool is able to triage 100% of COVID-19 patients and 100% of COVID-19 inpatient and 30 days mortalities into the highest risk quartile, where it was demonstrated that these patients have a 55% rate of pneumonia, a 35% rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome, a 22% rate of inpatient mortality, and a 35% rate of 30 days mortality. COVID-19 patients who are symptomatic on presentation to the emergency department and undergo surgical fixation have a 30% inpatient mortality rate compared with 12.5% for patients who are initially asymptomatic but later develop symptoms. CONCLUSION: The STTGMA tool can be modified for specific disease processes, in this case to account for the COVID-19 virus and provide a robust risk stratification tool that accounts for a heretofore unknown risk factor. COVID-19 positive/suspected status portends a poor outcome in this susceptible trauma population and should be included in risk assessment models. These patients should be considered a high risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. Patients with COVID-19 symptoms on presentation should have surgery deferred until symptoms improve or resolve and should be reassessed for surgical treatment versus definitive nonoperative treatment with palliative care and/or hospice care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.

Increased Mortality and Major Complications in Hip Fracture Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A New York City Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: To examine one health system's response to the essential care of its hip fracture population during the COVID-19 pandemic and report on its effect on patient outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Seven musculoskeletal care centers within New York City and Long Island. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-eight recent and 115 historical hip fracture patients. INTERVENTION: Patients with hip fractures occurring between February 1, 2020, and April 15, 2020, or between February 1, 2019, and April 15, 2019, were prospectively enrolled in an orthopaedic trauma registry and chart reviewed for demographic and hospital quality measures. Patients with recent hip fractures were identified as COVID positive (C+), COVID suspected (Cs), or COVID negative (C-). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Hospital quality measures, inpatient complications, and mortality rates. RESULTS: Seventeen (12.2%) patients were confirmed C+ by testing, and another 14 (10.1%) were suspected (Cs) of having had the virus but were never tested. The C+ cohort, when compared with Cs and C- cohorts, had an increased mortality rate (35.3% vs. 7.1% vs. 0.9%), increased length of hospital stay, a greater major complication rate, and a greater incidence of ventilator need postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 had a devastating effect on the care of patients with hip fracture during the pandemic. Although practice patterns generally remained unchanged, treating physicians need to understand the increased morbidity and mortality in patients with hip fracture complicated by COVID-19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.