Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anticancer Res ; 44(4): 1675-1681, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537962

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: The association between clinical outcomes and posttreatment changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in patients receiving avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from advanced UC patients who received avelumab and had not progressed with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The association between the changes in NLR and NER from pretreatment to week 6 of avelumab treatment and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this study (male, n=25; female, n=7; median age, 71 years). At six weeks, 19 patients (59.4%) had a decreased NLR and 18 patients (56.3%) had a decreased NER. When the change in NER from pretreatment to six weeks was compared, there was a significant decrease in responders (without progressive disease) (p=0.008); however, there was no significant decrease in non-responders (progressive disease) (p=0.855). The NLR showed no significant change in either group (p=0.099, 0.358). When patients were compared according to the change in the NLR at six weeks, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between the decreased NLR and increased NLR groups (p=0.116, 0.256). When patients were compared according to the change in the NER, the decreased and increased groups showed significant differences in PFS and OS (p<0.001, 0.030). CONCLUSION: In the present real-world study, the responders showed a significantly decreased NER at six weeks. This was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with advanced UC.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Neutrófilos , Eosinófilos , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Linfócitos
2.
Transl Androl Urol ; 13(7): 1118-1126, 2024 Jul 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39100842

RESUMO

Background: The subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC) has been known to possess morphological diversity for histologic subtype or divergent differentiation. However, the efficacy of avelumab against SUC remains unclear. Therefore, the effect of the treatment as well as the survival results of avelumab monotherapy were evaluated as a first-line therapeutic maintenance in patients with advanced SUC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in Kyushu study population with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who underwent avelumab maintenance therapy without progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and SUC were comparatively analyzed based on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Out of 49 recorded patients, 38 and 11 had PUC and SUC, respectively. The most common subtype element was glandular differentiation (n=5), followed by squamous differentiation (n=3), micropapillary (n=1), and plasmacytoid subtypes (n=1). The SUC and PUC groups had comparable ORR (0% vs. 2.6%, P>0.99) and disease control rates (54.5% vs. 44.7%, P=0.73). These patient groups also showed no significant difference in PFS (median 3.9 vs. 3.1 months, P=0.33) or OS (median 16.7 vs. 22.1 months, P=0.47). Conclusions: The response of SUC and PUC to avelumab was comparable in patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer, indicating that avelumab maintenance therapy is also effective for SUC.

3.
Curr Oncol ; 31(2): 862-871, 2024 02 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38392058

RESUMO

Subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC), defined here as urothelial carcinoma with any histologic subtype or divergent differentiation, is a clinically aggressive disease. However, the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) against SUC remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of patients with SUC treated with EV for metastatic disease. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who received EV after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy at six institutions. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and those with SUC. We identified 44 and 18 patients with PUC and SUC, respectively. Squamous differentiation was the most common subtype element, followed by glandular differentiation and sarcomatoid subtype. Although patients with SUC had a comparable ORR to those with PUC, the duration of response for SUC was short. Patients with SUC had poorer PFS than those with PUC; however, no significant difference was observed in OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUC was significantly associated with shorter PFS. Although the response of metastatic SUC to EV was similar to that of PUC, SUC showed faster progression than PUC.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Anticancer Res ; 44(7): 3025-3032, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925809

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical outcomes associated with cutaneous toxicity and changes in the renal function of patients receiving enfortumab vedotin (EV) for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between clinical outcomes and EV-related cutaneous toxicity, and the influence on the renal function in 58 patients with advanced UC who received EV after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors from December 2021 to July 2023. RESULTS: There were no differences in the overall response and disease control rates between patients with any grade of EV-related cutaneous toxicity and without (p=0.605 and p>0.99, respectively) nor of grade ≥3 (p>0.99 and p=0.173, respectively). Progression-free survival was not significantly associated with EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade (5.4 vs. 5.6 months, p=0.557) nor of grade ≥3 (2.7 vs. 5.6 months, p=0.053). Overall survival was not significantly associated with EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade (11.8 vs. 8.9 months, p=0.389), nor of grade ≥3 (4.6 vs. 11.4 months, p=0.168). The incidence of EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade was significantly higher in patients with any grade of ICI-related cutaneous toxicity (88.9% vs. 36.7%, p=0.008). There was no significant difference in the serum creatinine levels after EV treatment (p=0.211). Divided into two groups according to their renal function, using a serum creatinine cut-off of 2 mg/dl, there were no significant changes after EV treatment in either group (p=0.187 and p=0.938). CONCLUSION: EV-related cutaneous toxicity did not affect clinical outcomes, although it occurred in patients who experienced immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cutaneous toxicity. EV did not affect renal function.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/patologia , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Rim/patologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia
5.
Anticancer Res ; 44(8): 3409-3417, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39060060

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: The efficacy, safety, and liver toxicity of enfortumab vedotin (EV) for elderly advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients and patients with a poor performance status (PS) are unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy, safety, and liver toxicity of EV in elderly patients and patients with a poor PS between December 2021 and August 2023. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (≥75 years old, n=22; PS≥2, n=10) were enrolled. Patients with PS≥2 had significantly lower albumin levels than those with PS<2 (p=0.023). The objective response and disease control rates did not differ significantly between patients <75 and ≥75 years old (p=0.598 and p=0.769, respectively) or between those with PS<2 and PS≥2 (p>0.99 and p=0.178, respectively). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different in patients <75 years and ≥75 years (p=0984, 0.368). A significant difference in PFS (p=0.047) but not OS (p=0.086) was observed between the PS<2 and PS≥2 groups. The rates of any-grade and severe (grade ≥3) adverse events did not differ significantly between patients <75 and ≥75 years (p=0.471, p=0.136) or between PS<2 and PS≥2 groups (p>0.99, 0.99). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels significantly increased, but alanine aminotransferase levels did not, following EV treatment (p<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the albumin level was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=0.159; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: EV demonstrated similar efficacy and safety in elderly and younger patients with advanced UC. In patients with a poor PS, although the safety was similar, survival was significantly worse in terms of PFS, while the AST levels were significantly elevated.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/patologia , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Anticancer Res ; 44(8): 3419-3426, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39060065

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study retrospectively evaluated whether enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy is effective as a late-line treatment according to prior treatment type in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in the Kyushu study population with lower and upper urinary tract cancer treated with EV monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy failure between December 2021 and March 2024. In particular, patients receiving avelumab maintenance or pembrolizumab therapy before EV for advanced UC were analyzed and compared according to the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 80 enrolled patients, 31 and 49 received avelumab and pembrolizumab before EV therapy, respectively. The avelumab and pembrolizumab groups had comparable objective response rates (48.4% vs. 44.9%, p=0.820) and disease control rates (77.4% vs. 67.3%, p=0.448). These two groups showed no significant difference in PFS from the initiation of EV (median: 6.4 months vs. 4.2 months, p=0.184); meanwhile, the avelumab group had better OS from the initiation of EV than the pembrolizumab group (median: 16.0 months vs. 10.2 months, p=0.019). Moreover, the median OS after first-line chemotherapy initiation was longer in the avelumab group than in the pembrolizumab group (40.3 months vs. 24.7 months, p=0.054). On multivariate analysis, avelumab maintenance therapy before EV reduced the mortality risk by 47% (95% confidence interval=0.27-1.03; p=0.059). CONCLUSION: EV monotherapy after avelumab maintenance therapy provides favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced UC.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/patologia , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico
7.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(5): 102148, 2024 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033710

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the organ-specific therapeutic effect of enfortumab vedotin (EV) after chemotherapy and immunotherapy failed for advanced urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS METHODS: At 6 institutions between December 2021 and July 2023, we retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic upper and lower urinary tract cancer who received EV monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Objective response rate (ORR) and organ-specific response rate (OSRR) were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. RESULTS: This study analyzed 58 patients with 210 tumor lesions, of which 24% were females and 48% had upper urinary tract cancer. The ORR and disease control rate were 53.5% and 74.1%. Moreover, we found 15 target lesions in the primary site, 7 in local recurrence, 93 in the lymph nodes, 46 in the lung, 29 in the liver, and 20 in the bone, with OSRRs of 40%, 71.4%, 61.1%, 70.6%, 90.9%, and 18.2%, respectively. Over time from baseline, the reduction rate (median) in tumor burden was 50% or more in the lymph node, lung, and liver metastases. CONCLUSION: The organ-specific tumor response to EV in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma was almost favorable. The antitumor activity of EV monotherapy may be less in bone metastasis than in other organ sites. Conversely, EV showed remarkably high efficacy against liver metastasis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA