Constraining 3-PG with a new δ13C submodel: a test using the δ13C of tree rings.

A semi-mechanistic forest growth model, 3-PG (Physiological Principles Predicting Growth), was extended to calculate δ(13)C in tree rings. The δ(13)C estimates were based on the model's existing description of carbon assimilation and canopy conductance. The model was tested in two ~80-year-old natural stands of Abies grandis (grand fir) in northern Idaho. We used as many independent measurements as possible to parameterize the model. Measured parameters included quantum yield, specific leaf area, soil water content and litterfall rate. Predictions were compared with measurements of transpiration by sap flux, stem biomass, tree diameter growth, leaf area index and δ(13)C. Sensitivity analysis showed that the model's predictions of δ(13)C were sensitive to key parameters controlling carbon assimilation and canopy conductance, which would have allowed it to fail had the model been parameterized or programmed incorrectly. Instead, the simulated δ(13)C of tree rings was no different from measurements (P > 0.05). The δ(13)C submodel provides a convenient means of constraining parameter space and avoiding model artefacts. This δ(13)C test may be applied to any forest growth model that includes realistic simulations of carbon assimilation and transpiration.

Storage and transpiration have negligible effects on delta13C of stem CO2 efflux in large conifer trees.

Stem respiration rates are often quantified by measuring the CO(2) efflux from stems into chambers. It has been suggested that these measurements underestimate respiration because some of the respired CO(2) can be either retained or transported upwards in the transpiration stream. If the stem CO(2) efflux does not represent all respired CO(2), then the interpretation of its isotopic signal may be compromised as well. The C-isotope composition of the respired CO(2) and the measured efflux could differ due to (i) the release of CO(2) produced elsewhere into the stem and transported upwards in xylem water (soil CO(2) or root respired CO(2)); (ii) the retention or release of CO(2) storage pools within the tree stem and (iii) the removal of CO(2) by the transpiration stream. We investigated the effects of these processes in large conifer trees using two manipulative experiments: a labelling experiment and a crown removal experiment. The labelling experiment used an extreme enrichment of dissolved CO(2) in soil water to assess the C uptake by the roots. In this experiment, we found no contamination of the stem CO(2) pool despite clear evidence that the water itself had been taken up. The crown removal experiment tested for vertical CO(2) flux in xylem water by eliminating transpiration. Here, we found no change in the delta(13)C of stem CO(2) efflux (delta(EA); P > 0.05). We concluded that for these large conifers, sap-flow influenced neither delta(13)C of stem efflux nor that of the stem CO(2) pool. By parameterizing Henry's Law for conditions inside the stem, we estimated the transport flux to represent 1-3% of the stem CO(2) efflux to the atmosphere. Finally, assuming a 2 per thousand difference between delta(13)C of root and stem respiration, we estimated that potential contamination of delta(EA) by root respired CO(2) would be < 0.1 per thousand. Thus, neither the release of soil or root CO(2), nor storage in the stem, nor vertical transport of CO(2) in the xylem sap had any detectable influence on delta(13)C of the CO(2) measured in stem efflux.